EPTOn November 13 2012 21:07 tomwizz wrote:
also the new set of amazing campaigns too.
also the new set of amazing campaigns too.
just like what they did with every xpacs for their games.
HotS release date: March 12th - Page 7
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Remember you can pre-order your copy through the TL store and help support Team Liquid! It's also an easy way to get a beta key! | ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
just like what they did with every xpacs for their games. | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On November 13 2012 20:50 musai wrote: don't think anyone would buy the single player if you didn't have to lol That statement is so ignorant it boggles my mind anyone can even type that into the message box and not go "wait, does this even make sense" Guess what, people play games for other things then the multiplayer experience. And sc2's singleplayer experience was pretty damn good, even though the story was kinda lacklustre. In terms of gameplay it probably was one of the best RTS campaigns we had in a long time, i personally played it like 3-4 times or something, and enjoyed every playthrough. | ||
|
Uracil
Germany422 Posts
On November 13 2012 21:04 Hubble wrote: 40 € as usual. As we all know: 1 $ = 1 € = 1 £ ;-) It will mostly be cheaper if you buy at a retailer. I got WOL for 39 € at release day. | ||
|
malaan
365 Posts
The new call of duty game came out yesterday and costs like $80 with a 4 hour campeign and a terrible multi. We should be happy that HotS is a better ga.... oh wait. | ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9031 Posts
| ||
|
Targe
United Kingdom14103 Posts
At least it's only 40$ and not 60$. | ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
On November 13 2012 21:09 Fragile51 wrote: That statement is so ignorant it boggles my mind anyone can even type that into the message box and not go "wait, does this even make sense" Guess what, people play games for other things then the multiplayer experience. And sc2's singleplayer experience was pretty damn good, even though the story was kinda lacklustre. In terms of gameplay it probably was one of the best RTS campaigns we had in a long time, i personally played it like 3-4 times or something, and enjoyed every playthrough. I kinda agree. Eventhough the story could be improved(let's be honest, all of Blizzard's games story are pretty bad and cheesy but it's their iconic characters that made it interesting) but I think WoL's gameplay in campaigne is the best I have played for RTS. | ||
|
Anta
Germany434 Posts
Because Europe is so rich we have to pay 39 € = 49.46 $. ಠ_ಠ | ||
|
Hubble
Germany248 Posts
On November 13 2012 21:09 Uracil wrote: It will mostly be cheaper if you buy at a retailer. I got WOL for 39 € at release day. Yeah, Blizz sales their games for the recommended retail price. Retailers are cheaper in most cases. I'm going for the collector's edition so I'm gonna pay more anyway. It's still funny, that 1 $ is 1 € for Blizz. ^.^ | ||
|
Ryder.
1117 Posts
On November 13 2012 21:00 nihlon wrote: It's not "too" expensive, it's just expensive relative to what you are getting. If you are just playing for ladder, $40 is an overpayment compared to what other (new multiplayer) games you can get for the same cost. You are actually allowed to say something is overpriced even if you can afford it. Shocking right? Overpriced by what metric? I'm guessing a large majority of TL users have spent hundreds of hours of entertainment playing 'just ladder'. At least by my standards $40 for hundreds of hours of content isn't unreasonable... And apart from micro centric transaction games (which a lot of people here tend to dislike) how many games operate on the basis of you only pay for what you want to pay? I can't think of any games that let you only pay a fraction of the price if you choose to only access single or multiplayer, or only certain characters to use. And compared to other 'new multiplayer' games, compared to games like CoD having a new version released every year with minimal changes, or Battlefield having a whole bunch of expansions within a few months, to WoW requiring a monthly subscription I still can't see how $40 is considered overpriced... But anyone is more than welcome to enlighten me ^^ | ||
|
Bahamuth
134 Posts
| ||
|
MVega
763 Posts
On November 13 2012 21:05 Plansix wrote: And what did BW add, really. A bunch of upgrades that made units go faster or have longer range and two new units per faction. Lets face it, some people expect it to be $10. People can't remember that far back. BW was pretty bad at release, it wasn't until much much later that it became awesome. This whole thing about people complaining about cost is really nothing new. Pretty much every time any company announces a PC game's release date now, check the comments section and it's full of people saying things like "I'd pay $20 for it at most!" and such. PC gamers are cheap these days, except when it comes to DLC/micro-transactions where they seem to have no self control. Haha. Myself included sometimes. Edit: If a person plays the multiplayer of SC2 I'd say it's hard for HotS to NOT be worth it. Shit .. I've paid at least $150~ on Street Fighter 4 + DLC, plus I specifically bought an arcade stick for that game, and it's worth it because I've gotten so much time out of that game. Thousands of hours. For SC2 it's similar, so for me it's definitely worth it. $40 is nothing for hundreds if not thousands of hours of playtime. | ||
|
oberhofer
Germany98 Posts
Yeah, let's relativize everything. Hell, I don't see why everybody hates murder. It's nothing compared to war. | ||
|
MHT
Sweden1026 Posts
On November 13 2012 21:12 Ryder. wrote: Overpriced by what metric? I'm guessing a large majority of TL users have spent hundreds of hours of entertainment playing 'just ladder'. At least by my standards $40 for hundreds of hours of content isn't unreasonable... And apart from micro centric transaction games (which a lot of people here tend to dislike) how many games operate on the basis of you only pay for what you want to pay? I can't think of any games that let you only pay a fraction of the price if you choose to only access single or multiplayer, or only certain characters to use. And compared to other 'new multiplayer' games, compared to games like CoD having a new version released every year with minimal changes, or Battlefield having a whole bunch of expansions within a few months, to WoW requiring a monthly subscription I still can't see how $40 is considered overpriced... But anyone is more than welcome to enlighten me ^^ Couldn't agree more, its fucking starcraft almost any other game is trash in comparison. Just the sheer amount of hours we get out of it is just stupid with all the other $40 games out there. | ||
|
Grovbolle
Denmark3811 Posts
 Overprice is relative to income and willingness to pay really. | ||
|
Ryder.
1117 Posts
On November 13 2012 21:18 oberhofer wrote: I don't see how comparing the price to the current CoD release counts as an argument. Do we really want to compare prices and expansion content with CoD, cause don't get me started on what they are doing wrong. Yeah, let's relativize everything. Hell, I don't see why everybody hates murder. It's nothing compared to war. Because the guy I quoted specifically said $40 is overpayment compared to other new multiplayer games. I was giving examples of how I thought this was untrue. However good job comparing game prices to murder... | ||
|
Apolo
Portugal1259 Posts
| ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On November 13 2012 21:12 Hubble wrote: Yeah, Blizz sales their games for the recommended retail price. Retailers are cheaper in most cases. I'm going for the collector's edition so I'm gonna pay more anyway. It's still funny, that 1 $ is 1 € for Blizz. ^.^ It's an international standard, not just something blizzard came up with. It's retarded, yes. But it's a standard just about every single games company adheres to. Only exception i can think of is Gog.com, but those guys are basically the shining beacon of customer service in that regard. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On November 13 2012 21:30 Fragile51 wrote: It's an international standard, not just something blizzard came up with. It's retarded, yes. But it's a standard just about every single games company adheres to. Only exception i can think of is Gog.com, but those guys are basically the shining beacon of customer service in that regard. And Valve. Where everything is in Dollar. I don't know why no other company does it like that. Well, I don't know too much about other companies tbh, but I know that for steam and blizzard it is 1 $ is 1 € . If we have to pay by credit card it doesn't matter shit if it is $ or €. | ||
|
osmanic
Germany200 Posts
and some of you guys say paying 40 dollars for sc2 is too much? a game that you play for months/years ? i dont understand | ||
| ||
