EPT[Resolved] Kespa, GOM, ESF dispute - Page 97
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Gosi
Sweden9072 Posts
| ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
| ||
|
INTENZ-_-
Sweden137 Posts
| ||
|
Brett
Australia3823 Posts
The obvious choice wins through! | ||
|
Meldon
Greece128 Posts
| ||
|
Kreggar
United States83 Posts
Less rivalry, more competition! | ||
|
Yorbon
Netherlands4272 Posts
| ||
|
Laneir
United States1160 Posts
| ||
|
-niL
Canada1131 Posts
| ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
On August 27 2012 18:48 MCXD wrote: Because KeSPA isn't their coach or team manager. It would be as if the (inter?)national soccer association told Messi to play, regardless of what he, his team OR his coach wanted. They simply don't have control over that sort of thing. Plus the original issue was the opposite, perfectly good players being forced not to play, despite wanting to, which is even more unusual. EDIT: To clarify, I know nothing about soccer so if I just used a really stupid analogy I'm sorry *shot* its more like tennis no soccer, and tennisplayer can choose where to play no matter what team they play in or for what organisation | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On August 27 2012 21:35 Kreggar wrote: Well I'm glad to see all of that get resolved. Rather surprised by 2 Code S seeds for KeSPA players, and 4 Code A seeds, but I suppose the KeSPA players did show some good games at WCS Kr. Less rivalry, more competition! Seeing how generous they have been with seeds to foreigners, I am not the least surprised. Worst case they will drop down, no biggie. For sure flash and jaedong in code S will generate more viewers than any other current up/down player.  | ||
|
Headnoob
Australia2108 Posts
| ||
|
LimitSEA
Australia9580 Posts
| ||
|
X3GoldDot
Malaysia3840 Posts
On August 27 2012 21:39 Headnoob wrote: I do hope they don't keep up that level of seeding for every GSL season and that it's just for this, because that is a lot of slots to just give away for free, Kespa players should have to earn their spot no matter their history. there is always 2 code S spots, regardless of what, while code A spots are usually non existant and 2 up&down spots ( for the losers of code A ro2 and ro3 to advance straight to code S) | ||
|
RHoudini
Belgium3632 Posts
Not sure why it required a couple of rounds of blackmail and bluff. | ||
|
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
| ||
|
dabom88
United States3483 Posts
On August 27 2012 21:42 RHoudini wrote: Common sense has prevailed. Not sure why it required a couple of rounds of blackmail and bluff. Exercising your bargaining power is not blackmailing. ESF had to do this to teach Kespa that it can't keep doing this kind of crap. | ||
|
Pheint
United States73 Posts
| ||
|
dabom88
United States3483 Posts
On August 27 2012 20:50 Irave wrote: Yes but their leverage this time was ruining a tournament that is still taking place. Next time it would be simple for Kespa to not invite ESF players and have no worry of participating in the GSL. Then that would probably lead to fewer viewers since you're closing off the tournament to a lot of the best players in the game who have been playing the game the longest. It's probably not in their best interests to exclude ESF players. But if worst comes to worst, then this would be the one time I would be thankful for Blizzard's b.net system in place, since Blizzard probably wont let Kespa get away with blatantly unethical crap. | ||
|
MistSC2
Sweden583 Posts
| ||
| ||
