• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:26
CEST 09:26
KST 16:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202562RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension5
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Server Blocker Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Simple editing of Brood War save files? (.mlx) BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 680 users

[D] The raven buff does not address TvZ issues - Page 35

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 33 34 35 36 37 48 Next All
If this thread can't remain civil then we'll have to close it. Thread will be moderated harshly from pg.3 onwards.
jliu
Profile Joined March 2011
282 Posts
August 20 2012 15:43 GMT
#681
random idea that's probably been mentioned, but what about decreasing the cost of the Raven by 50gas? Then you increase the cost of the HSM upgrade?

It makes it more viable in mid game for clearing creep and auto-turret harrassing, but keeps the HSM function as a late-game deathball tool. allows you to have them for longer to build up energy. if it entered mid-game zvt meta, it might even force zerg to shift to a muta transition to stop harrass or snipe ravens. just tossing it out there, don't throw me to the wolves.
Chaggi
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)1936 Posts
August 20 2012 15:43 GMT
#682
On August 21 2012 00:41 zmansman17 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 00:37 Chaggi wrote:
On August 21 2012 00:34 zmansman17 wrote:
On August 20 2012 11:56 KawaiiRice wrote:
I wish we could just get irradiate back to replace HSM.
Terran's only aoe spell is HSM which is a projectile costs a lot and takes time blah blah etc.
Protoss has storm which is instant and DOT
zerg's spell is also instant DOT and root.

replacing hsm with irradiate would make it more in line with the other races/useful overall/easier to balance and also more interesting to watch in general (mass hsm is like KABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMM, well, game over).


Words of Wisdom from Kawaii Rice.

So good.


and just think about it, irradiate on tanks, kills any lings that comes running by

welp


Why would lings run right into tanks, which are irradiated? It's not like energy is free or can be repeatedly cast. Give Zergs more respect than just running their lings into irradiated units.


My picture of a zerg player is someone who is missing many brain cells and attacks me only when the drool from their mouth gets too heavy and their head hits the keyboard's a button.

Yup
Chaggi
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)1936 Posts
August 20 2012 15:45 GMT
#683
On August 21 2012 00:43 jliu wrote:
random idea that's probably been mentioned, but what about decreasing the cost of the Raven by 50gas? Then you increase the cost of the HSM upgrade?

It makes it more viable in mid game for clearing creep and auto-turret harrassing, but keeps the HSM function as a late-game deathball tool. allows you to have them for longer to build up energy. if it entered mid-game zvt meta, it might even force zerg to shift to a muta transition to stop harrass or snipe ravens. just tossing it out there, don't throw me to the wolves.


I'm not a very good player but my biggest problem with Ravens isn't the fact that they are expensive or slow or whatever (which I do have a problem with but...) it's more the fact that I can get them out, and they're still kinda paperweights until I get energy for HSM, which takes a really long time.
skadumdums
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
United States20 Posts
August 20 2012 15:54 GMT
#684
Hello TL,
I don't post much especially in balance matters, but I would like to ask a question to the terran players. This is not a snipe and it does not contain a snarky tone. If infestor fungal were to be nerfed, how does zerg deal with endgame marine production? I'm sure everyone sees at a minimum of 10 rax with reactors during that endgame period, that's 20 reactorsrines at a time with more queued with no more effort than holding down a button for the entirety of the endgame all which can be financed by quickly muling up a newly gotten base. Add in 7-10 medivacs which will almost completely negate the fungal spell. With a production rate of that caliber zerg injects and baneling usage cant keep up enough to protect.the broodlords in the sky. Add in 3 properly times starports with reactors Vikings can't really be negated.
The one thing my uncle taught me is fist can also be a verb.
Chaggi
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)1936 Posts
August 20 2012 16:23 GMT
#685
On August 21 2012 00:54 skadumdums wrote:
Hello TL,
I don't post much especially in balance matters, but I would like to ask a question to the terran players. This is not a snipe and it does not contain a snarky tone. If infestor fungal were to be nerfed, how does zerg deal with endgame marine production? I'm sure everyone sees at a minimum of 10 rax with reactors during that endgame period, that's 20 reactorsrines at a time with more queued with no more effort than holding down a button for the entirety of the endgame all which can be financed by quickly muling up a newly gotten base. Add in 7-10 medivacs which will almost completely negate the fungal spell. With a production rate of that caliber zerg injects and baneling usage cant keep up enough to protect.the broodlords in the sky. Add in 3 properly times starports with reactors Vikings can't really be negated.


Believe it or not, you can nerf something without completely neutering it.

I think getting rid of the root, and throwing a slow on there would be not too bad.
zeross
Profile Joined September 2010
France310 Posts
August 20 2012 16:26 GMT
#686
On August 21 2012 00:54 skadumdums wrote:
Hello TL,
I don't post much especially in balance matters, but I would like to ask a question to the terran players. This is not a snipe and it does not contain a snarky tone. If infestor fungal were to be nerfed, how does zerg deal with endgame marine production? I'm sure everyone sees at a minimum of 10 rax with reactors during that endgame period, that's 20 reactorsrines at a time with more queued with no more effort than holding down a button for the entirety of the endgame all which can be financed by quickly muling up a newly gotten base. Add in 7-10 medivacs which will almost completely negate the fungal spell. With a production rate of that caliber zerg injects and baneling usage cant keep up enough to protect.the broodlords in the sky. Add in 3 properly times starports with reactors Vikings can't really be negated.



well marines need to be microed (correctly splited/stimmed at the right time..) to be effective against the zergs, so the bolded sentence is a bit of an underestimation from your part.

my answer would be that a nerf don't always mean to go from OP to useless in a single patch. the real problem is that fungal does well against the majority of terran army (marines and viking particularly) and feel to the terran like the pre-nerf ghost must had feeled for the zerg.

i think fungal should deal less effectively against viking, forcing the zerg to have more corruptors and less broods, without changing the effects on the bio side.
kaokentake
Profile Joined July 2012
383 Posts
August 20 2012 18:12 GMT
#687
I think a big problem in TvZ is that infestors design allows them to kill a ton of unspread marines/vikings really quickly

marines being raped by fungal are ok i guess because storm is the same deal. but vikings are the real killer. vikings only have 120 health (wtf?) but they need such low health in order to be balanced with their high dps

My idea is to give vikings double health, but reduce their attackrate in air and ground modes by 50%. This means a viking takes twice as long to die, but takes twice as long to kill things. Actually double health is a stretch but my point is you can increase viking health and still keep it combat balanced by reducing attackspeed.

corrupters and vikings are balanced to kill eachother in a 1v1 fight with one having like 1health remianing, vikings and corrupters are evenly balanced combat stats wise, however corrupters have much more health and less dps, while vikings were balanced with more dps and less health. Dunno why blizzard felt this to be requires but I do not believe the reason for vikings low health is due to their range. Instead I believe the RANGE of vikings is balanced out in the fact that they cant transform into broodlords.

Lets compare vikings, corrupters, and pheonix. Ive faced some tosses that go collossi pheonix and its very strong because pheonix and vikings deal equal dps to eachother, but pheonix have 50% more health than vikings and cost the same. But this is blizzards balance logic because pheonix cannot transform into ground mode and fight ground units and I agree with them there

Pheonix beat vikings easily, but lose to corrupters because of corrupters high armor. While vikings are even with corrupters. The balance in all of this is that pheonix are massively FASTER than corrupters and in the ZvP matchup pheonix can pickoff queens and infestors with good micro and pheonix heavily counter mutalisks so they needed to be balanced to lose to corrupters.

Now back to vikings. My point in all of this was comparing combat stats between pheonix/viking/corrupter and trying to show that I believe blizzard simply gave vikings low health because they felt it would be cool to give them highdamage/lowhealth and they never suspected the metagame to get to this world where you got vikings trying to kill mass broodlords but they all get stunlock killed by 3 fungal growths.

So I suggest you increase viking health but lower attackspeed, thus keeping the same dps per health ratio thus same combat stats ratio but they are stronger against AoE like fungal so now it takes 5fungals to kill vikings instead of 3
fds
Profile Joined February 2011
Slovenia258 Posts
August 20 2012 18:38 GMT
#688
So I suggest you increase viking health but lower attackspeed, thus keeping the same dps per health ratio thus same combat stats ratio but they are stronger against AoE like fungal so now it takes 5fungals to kill vikings instead of 3


I think that would create a problem in TvP as colossus would be alive too long.
In my opinion it would be better idea to toy with armor type. At the moment vikings are armored + mechanical so they take bonus damage from fungal (double damage).
Maybe swap armor type on vikings to light. To adjust phoenix vs vikings they would also have to swap phoenix bonus damage on biological instead of light (for mutas...).
OR
just remove fungal's bonus damage on armored

On the end I would be much happier if Blizzard would only remove snare from fungal and replace it with slow.
Maxd11
Profile Joined July 2011
United States680 Posts
August 20 2012 18:51 GMT
#689
Apparently this change and the creep one aren't being considered anymore.
I looked in the mirror and saw biupilm69t
Godwrath
Profile Joined August 2012
Spain10126 Posts
August 20 2012 18:54 GMT
#690
On August 21 2012 03:38 fds wrote:
Show nested quote +
So I suggest you increase viking health but lower attackspeed, thus keeping the same dps per health ratio thus same combat stats ratio but they are stronger against AoE like fungal so now it takes 5fungals to kill vikings instead of 3


I think that would create a problem in TvP as colossus would be alive too long.
In my opinion it would be better idea to toy with armor type. At the moment vikings are armored + mechanical so they take bonus damage from fungal (double damage).
Maybe swap armor type on vikings to light. To adjust phoenix vs vikings they would also have to swap phoenix bonus damage on biological instead of light (for mutas...).
OR
just remove fungal's bonus damage on armored

On the end I would be much happier if Blizzard would only remove snare from fungal and replace it with slow.


I think the root is ok, so zerg can connect their melee units easier. Theproblem is they hitting air or raping vikings imho, of course that would have a lot of repercussions aside TvZ so i don't really how to change it. The change to no double damage to armored seems spot on.
blade55555
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States17423 Posts
August 20 2012 18:56 GMT
#691
On August 21 2012 03:51 Maxd11 wrote:
Apparently this change and the creep one aren't being considered anymore.


No they said they are putting it on hold and it may still be in but they aren't sure now.
When I think of something else, something will go here
vthree
Profile Joined November 2011
Hong Kong8039 Posts
August 20 2012 18:57 GMT
#692
On August 21 2012 03:51 Maxd11 wrote:
Apparently this change and the creep one aren't being considered anymore.


Thanks Taeja and MVP!!!
kaokentake
Profile Joined July 2012
383 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-20 18:59:13
August 20 2012 18:57 GMT
#693
Holy crap i just thought of something amazing that could fix the matchup.

How about new snipe, 100 energy for 100 damage, refunds 25 energy when used against a psionic unit.

now its 75 energy to snipe casters instead of 50 energy due to 1shotting instead of 2shotting them.

This snipe would probably be overpowered honestly, because even in the past it wasnt snipes energy/damage ratio that made it overpowered, it was its dps. In mass ghost battles all the ghosts never used their energy anyway, with this change their dps would INCREASE from its old stats (making it even stronger and more overpowered) but it just means the ghosts deplete all their energy instead of 50% of their energy.

3ghosts (6food) vs 1ultralisk (6food). Ghosts simply cast 5snipes and kill the ultralisk in a second. Same for broodlords.

In many ways, this snipe would be as powerful as the current lame ass stankin fungal that kills 30 vikings in 3 seconds stunlocking them

What do you guys think


EDIT: vikings do not take "double damage" from fungal... lol.. they take 40 like any armored unit
superstartran
Profile Joined March 2010
United States4013 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-20 19:02:47
August 20 2012 18:57 GMT
#694
On August 21 2012 00:41 NightOfTheDead wrote:
According to this logic. BW never was a decent game, cause if there is something difficult to overcome, it needs to be patched. Guess what, BW havent been patched for a long long time, and still it is amazingly competetive. Although WoL is a different beast, glaring imbalances should be patched, but not several months after patch. There will be no patch before Hots anyway, why bother.



What?


Mech was difficult to use as Terran, and you were always playing behind on economy, vision, map control, etc. but a 3 base Terran could easily smash a 5 base Z if he controlled his Tank/Sci Vessel/Mech army properly. Late game T with a fully maxed out Mech army in proper position kills 3+ 200 supply BW Z armies no problem.

The issue is that Z players think that it is somehow balanced that not only do they have a superior late game, that they also need to have the ability to have completely uncontested vision, map control, and exponential economical growth on top of that late game. Any Z player who is saying get better is simply riding the train, because every single Z if you look through their post history that has said "get better" says that to Terran players, but always go into ZvP threads about how +2 Blink Stalkers is impossible to hold without perfect injects, or how 2 base 1/1 sentry/immortal/prism pushes are impossible to stop even if scouted. Both TvP and ZvP are both better match-ups to watch and play right now because all races have some sort of chance of winning. Even in TvP, if the Terran gets solid EMPs off late game with a good flank/spread on units, while also keeping his Medivacs alive, he will crush a Protoss 200 deathball army late game (I've seen it too often from beta till now to say that it doesn't). Sure, the Protoss is at a significant advantage, but it is nothing like TvZ late game where the Terran is literally helpless unless the Zerg player just makes massive mistakes.

If Z players want to have their superior map control and vision early game than they need to give up something later in the game to balance it out. They already have arguably the strongest macro mechanic in the game in terms of countering (the ability to tech switch on the fly is extremely deadly late game) units, there's no reason that they need to also have super cost efficient Infestors or have that much superior map control, vision, etc. in the early game. They have to give up one of them, or Blizzard is going to have to do something dramatically different in HotS like make Battle Helions/Warhounds overpowered as shit.


TL;DR

TvZ will never be balanced if you maintain Terran's shitty late game or continue to allow Z's to take 3rds virtually uncontested while having complete map control and superior vision on the field + having a better late game. Either Blizzard is going to have to do massive overhauls to Z themselves, or they are simply going to have to buff the living snot out of Terran deathball in general. The easier route is going to be buffing Terran late game, allowing a Terran to match a Z with 5 bases with just 3 bases like BW Terran can.
pmp10
Profile Joined April 2012
3318 Posts
August 20 2012 19:21 GMT
#695
On August 21 2012 03:57 vthree wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 03:51 Maxd11 wrote:
Apparently this change and the creep one aren't being considered anymore.


Thanks Taeja and MVP!!!

Thank avilo.
Taeja and MVP were not killing that many good zergs.
Surely it's the crushing rejection of the raven buff that caused this
Now you'll need to wait 6 months for the next baby-step 10% buff - just make sure no to criticize it then.
fds
Profile Joined February 2011
Slovenia258 Posts
August 20 2012 22:26 GMT
#696
EDIT: vikings do not take "double damage" from fungal... lol.. they take 40 like any armored unit


Sorry I wrote it in a wrong way. They take extra damage from fungal (not double). With armor change they could take only 30.
maartendq
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Belgium3115 Posts
August 20 2012 22:38 GMT
#697
On August 21 2012 03:57 superstartran wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 00:41 NightOfTheDead wrote:
According to this logic. BW never was a decent game, cause if there is something difficult to overcome, it needs to be patched. Guess what, BW havent been patched for a long long time, and still it is amazingly competetive. Although WoL is a different beast, glaring imbalances should be patched, but not several months after patch. There will be no patch before Hots anyway, why bother.



What?


Mech was difficult to use as Terran, and you were always playing behind on economy, vision, map control, etc. but a 3 base Terran could easily smash a 5 base Z if he controlled his Tank/Sci Vessel/Mech army properly. Late game T with a fully maxed out Mech army in proper position kills 3+ 200 supply BW Z armies no problem.

The issue is that Z players think that it is somehow balanced that not only do they have a superior late game, that they also need to have the ability to have completely uncontested vision, map control, and exponential economical growth on top of that late game. Any Z player who is saying get better is simply riding the train, because every single Z if you look through their post history that has said "get better" says that to Terran players, but always go into ZvP threads about how +2 Blink Stalkers is impossible to hold without perfect injects, or how 2 base 1/1 sentry/immortal/prism pushes are impossible to stop even if scouted. Both TvP and ZvP are both better match-ups to watch and play right now because all races have some sort of chance of winning. Even in TvP, if the Terran gets solid EMPs off late game with a good flank/spread on units, while also keeping his Medivacs alive, he will crush a Protoss 200 deathball army late game (I've seen it too often from beta till now to say that it doesn't). Sure, the Protoss is at a significant advantage, but it is nothing like TvZ late game where the Terran is literally helpless unless the Zerg player just makes massive mistakes.

If Z players want to have their superior map control and vision early game than they need to give up something later in the game to balance it out. They already have arguably the strongest macro mechanic in the game in terms of countering (the ability to tech switch on the fly is extremely deadly late game) units, there's no reason that they need to also have super cost efficient Infestors or have that much superior map control, vision, etc. in the early game. They have to give up one of them, or Blizzard is going to have to do something dramatically different in HotS like make Battle Helions/Warhounds overpowered as shit.


TL;DR

TvZ will never be balanced if you maintain Terran's shitty late game or continue to allow Z's to take 3rds virtually uncontested while having complete map control and superior vision on the field + having a better late game. Either Blizzard is going to have to do massive overhauls to Z themselves, or they are simply going to have to buff the living snot out of Terran deathball in general. The easier route is going to be buffing Terran late game, allowing a Terran to match a Z with 5 bases with just 3 bases like BW Terran can.

This post sums it up rather nicely. Can anyone give this man a medal?
ScienceGroen
Profile Joined July 2012
United States43 Posts
August 20 2012 23:09 GMT
#698
As a Terran, I don't find fungal OP at all. It's a super powerful tool, but only if you directly engage with them in the open field. If they've got Infestors out, that's your cue to start dropping everywhere and multi-attacking hatches.

I get the complaints about Terran's weak late game units. The problem that people overlook is that surprise attacks are the terran's late-game tool. Not some spell or unit. You simply can't buff the raven by more than a tiny amount and not have the game spiral out of control. You can't give Terrans a great skyAoE spell (HSM) AND the mobility to drop anywhere on a whim.

IMO Fungal doesn't need a nerf, but Terran's need more viable tech paths as MMM is by far the most common right now at all levels. Make mech and skyterran more viable, and fungal gets naturally nerfed.
chadissilent
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Canada1187 Posts
August 20 2012 23:10 GMT
#699
On August 21 2012 04:21 pmp10 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2012 03:57 vthree wrote:
On August 21 2012 03:51 Maxd11 wrote:
Apparently this change and the creep one aren't being considered anymore.


Thanks Taeja and MVP!!!

Thank avilo.
Taeja and MVP were not killing that many good zergs.
Surely it's the crushing rejection of the raven buff that caused this
Now you'll need to wait 6 months for the next baby-step 10% buff - just make sure no to criticize it then.

avilo: "yo blizz, i think im progamer and raven buff wont fix TvZ. I dont even make ravens rofl"
Blizzard: "hmm, this guy says he's a progamer. Well boys, time to scrap the patch."
FlukyS
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Ireland485 Posts
August 20 2012 23:14 GMT
#700
On August 20 2012 01:05 blug wrote:
Late game scans aren't really as much of an issue because you aren't technically losing 1750 minerals. You just won't get the minerals as fast.

If you are talking about early game. Just getting to raven tech can be pretty awkward especially when you are trying to pump out medivacs/vikings.


Late game yes I suppose so it doesn't mean much but if you are going banshee how is it a problem to make 1 raven?
Prev 1 33 34 35 36 37 48 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 34m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft744
Nina 206
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 3913
firebathero 352
Larva 279
ToSsGirL 172
Zeus 83
Dewaltoss 79
Free 50
Mind 12
ivOry 4
Dota 2
XcaliburYe300
League of Legends
JimRising 658
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor149
Other Games
summit1g5035
Fuzer 229
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick930
BasetradeTV45
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH237
• LUISG 14
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2151
League of Legends
• Lourlo1031
Other Games
• Scarra1439
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
2h 34m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6h 34m
CSO Cup
8h 34m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
10h 34m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 1h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 6h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 10h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL Team Wars
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.