EPTBlizzard announces HoTS Feature List - Page 42
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Pipeline
Sweden1673 Posts
| ||
|
Noro
Canada991 Posts
| ||
|
ZackAttack
United States884 Posts
| ||
|
scsnow
Slovenia515 Posts
Very nice by Blizzard!!! | ||
|
Serpico
4285 Posts
On May 08 2012 07:40 Mzimzim wrote: Coming from console gaming and having to pay for Xbox Live and a new COD every 6 months, you won't see me complaining. As long as this will remain a good game for years to come, I don't mind paying $60 for the expansions. Just the attitude pc gaming doesn't need. I don't see the rationale of paying that much for an expansion. | ||
|
AnachronisticAnarchy
United States2957 Posts
One of the more ironic things I've seen in life, if you ask me. | ||
|
SeraKuDA
Canada343 Posts
On May 08 2012 08:13 scsnow wrote: Resume from replay... from any point in the game I hope. Very nice by Blizzard!!! I think now you're asking for too much. | ||
|
yawnoC
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
Catchafire2000
United States227 Posts
| ||
|
AnachronisticAnarchy
United States2957 Posts
On May 08 2012 08:13 Serpico wrote: Just the attitude pc gaming doesn't need. I don't see the rationale of paying that much for an expansion. Depends on the expansion size. An update like this is HUGE. It brings a new campaign, new units, TONS of balance work and now all these new features we were asking for. It seems comparable in scale to the original game, or at least comparable enough to warrant paying 60 dollars for it. If it was just the new campaign, or even the new campaign and the tons of work going into creating and balancing the new units during and after development, I wouldn't pay full price. Fortunately for them, this laundry list of awesome features that they just dumped on us warrants the payment I feel. | ||
|
Aetherial
Australia917 Posts
| ||
|
Kryt0s
Germany209 Posts
| ||
|
Pocky52
United States463 Posts
| ||
Kiett
United States7639 Posts
[16:17] <SirJolt> Man, this news about all the heart of the swarm changes bums me out [16:18] <SirJolt> Blizzard spends two years saying, "IT CAN'T BE DONE!" "THE TECHNOLOGY ISN'T THERE!" and now it turns around and says, "For the low, low cost of $60, the technology can be there." | ||
|
halfies
United Kingdom327 Posts
| ||
|
forsooth
United States3648 Posts
On May 08 2012 07:34 Smackzilla wrote: Meh, I'd rather have Wings of Liberty in July 2010, rather than November 2012. I wish the features were in the original, but seriously, I'm glad they didnt delay SC2 any more than they did. Problems and all, the last two years of SC2 have been a blast. You're missing the point. Several of the things they're adding have already existed for well over a decade in the original version of b.net. There's no excuse for them to not have been in WOL at release in the first place. And to suggest that an additional 2 1/2 years would be needed to add them is pretty silly. | ||
|
whatthefat
United States918 Posts
| ||
|
say1988
9 Posts
Don't get me wrong, StarCraft II is a great game. But some of teh back end and things like Bnet have been sorely lacking. | ||
|
.Carnage
United States99 Posts
| ||
|
Chronos.
United States805 Posts
| ||
| ||
