• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 07:29
CET 13:29
KST 21:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge1[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation13Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle What happened to TvZ on Retro? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine About SC2SEA.COM Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2125 users

Call to Action: Balance Testing (live custom map) - Page 26

Forum Index > SC2 General
2110 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 24 25 26 27 28 106 Next
Bippzy
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States1466 Posts
May 03 2012 05:57 GMT
#501
On May 03 2012 14:47 Chill Penguin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 14:19 Zaphid wrote:
I don't like the queen energy change, I feel like it makes stargate opening in PvZ almost useless.


This post right here is why the queen change can't happen. An extra 3-4 transfusions will end stargate aggression.

Yep. They would have to redo protoss air again. I can see how terrans don't like nerfing of hellion openers. 30 energy on spawn?
LEENOCK LEENOCK LEENOCK LEENOCK LEENOCK LEENOCK LEENOCK LEENOCK LEENOCK LEENOCK LEENOCK LEENOCK
Toastie
Profile Joined April 2012
Netherlands104 Posts
May 03 2012 05:58 GMT
#502
On May 03 2012 14:53 CloudMage wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 14:45 Jumbled wrote:
On May 03 2012 14:40 ][Primarch][ wrote:
well LOL !!! The anti-troll appearead! claiming TvP is favored for terran, if T is stonger in early-mid game why don't they just win then?

They do "just win". The numbers still show higher win percentages for Terran in short games, and overall winrates have only evened out recently as players became more experienced at identifying and defending against early all-ins.

Agree.

YOu said it well - ALL INS!!!!

TERRAN ALL INS BECAUSE LATEGAME IS A SHITFEST.

There's no early game balance in that other than Protoss not being good enough at scouting the all in, or, more often, BEING TO GREEDY. Protoss can kill terran EASILLY after warpgates.

Stop being so ignorant, play the other race for once and see.
Never give up, never surrender!
c0sm0naut
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1229 Posts
May 03 2012 05:58 GMT
#503
On May 03 2012 14:48 Raid wrote:
Hey guys, look on the brightside at least there are no terran nerfs amirite?

inb4 next patch

User was warned for this post
Tsubbi
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany7996 Posts
May 03 2012 06:01 GMT
#504
It's about time for a more drastic change, i like they buff one of the core mechanics of the race, let's see how this plays out...

I had a similiar idea actually some time ago, but mine was that a new hatchery can spawn a single creep tumor, this way it will be mostly an early game creep spreading help, while openers like gasless 4 queen don't get buffed so much.
Penecks
Profile Joined August 2010
United States600 Posts
May 03 2012 06:02 GMT
#505
Oh man as T every patch just brings more and more pain... zergs with good creep spread are already scary as hell, now they can start it so much earlier, and in multiple directions which is very important. Queen + ovie change would pretty much kill off the remainder of any terran 1 base play, which I'm sure some people would be glad to see, but remember it does limit the options of players, and makes the game much more predictable to play and watch.

At the same time it does little to deter the proxy rax/bunker rush/scv-marine allin type of play you occasionally see, as the overlord scout won't really come into effect, and queens will likely not have excess transfuse energy anyway due to crucial early game injects and tumors. So the "later" allins which are pretty much non-existant anyway are killed off, while the cheesy super-early game rushes remain.
straight poppin
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15725 Posts
May 03 2012 06:03 GMT
#506
Zerg changes are totally out of control. I don't see either of those changes sticking. Too dramatic of an impact on PvZ.
DannyJ
Profile Joined March 2010
United States5110 Posts
May 03 2012 06:03 GMT
#507
The Queen change is definitely over the top.
Nasreth
Profile Joined October 2011
United States48 Posts
May 03 2012 06:03 GMT
#508
On May 03 2012 09:08 SolidMoose wrote:
Faster overlord speed might work, but I feel like because zerg has the easiest time tech switching, easier scouting means they can more easily shift their whole build to counter what T and P do. I always thought that's one reason why overlords had to be so slow.

50 energy I just can't agree with. The creep spread will just be insane.

The observer buff seems out of the blue (has anyone ever complained about the build time?). I don't think protoss needs better scouting, or really anything at all at this point in the game.

I'm always bothered when they introduce buffs/nerfs completely unrelated to the things people talk about.



How is a slightly faster overlord going to significantly change my ability to shift my entire game to counter what my opponent is doing? You either overlord scout or you don't, in both ZvT and in ZvP. The problem has been that, for people who DO choose to overlord scout, we often lose our overlord to a single marine or 2, or a sentry, before we see anything important due to how slow the overlord is. Overlord scouting is a tactical decision, and we deserve to glean at least some information from it since we are sacrificing 100 minerals, a larvae, and 8 supply.
Why do I play Zerg? Because Kerrigan.
forsooth
Profile Joined February 2011
United States3648 Posts
May 03 2012 06:05 GMT
#509
Observers already build fast enough, especially with chrono. There's no need to make them faster. 50 queen energy is way too big a change. Definitely a bad move. A minor buff to overlord speed might be reasonable. It is pretty hard for them to gather early information right now, especially in ZvT.
Enhancer_
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada320 Posts
May 03 2012 06:05 GMT
#510
On May 03 2012 14:56 SolidMoose wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 13:05 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On May 03 2012 13:01 teamhozac wrote:
Please god, no... as if it wasnt already hard enough to push out/suprise attack in tvz, now THIS... jesus christ

I dont understand this mentality. Why do terrans feel it is right for them to surprise any race? Why is it that your all-ins are the only ones that should remain unscoutable?

EDIT:
Creep spreads faster if there are more tumors. If you put down two tumors intially, the creep spreads out faster than if it was just one. So it's not just a cycle ahead, because the creep actually gets OUT faster each time if you're doing two at a time.

You are limited by the creep tumor cooldown. Look at the two screenshots and realize the TRUTH, and not your imagination.


How about you realize the "TRUTH" that it's not just the cooldown, and that creep literally SPREADS faster. Like, the actual, physical creep, moves more in less time. It's too good.

It spreads to the tumor's radius faster than the cooldown period. The propogation of tumors is still limited by the cooldown. You might get an extra centimeter of creep or something if you spread exactly when the cooldown period expires every cycle. Yay.

Learn the actual game mechanic that's involved here before randomly capitalizing words and trying to sound really important.
Goliath0nline
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada165 Posts
May 03 2012 06:06 GMT
#511
i think both buffs are great for zerg.
Zelniq
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States7166 Posts
May 03 2012 06:06 GMT
#512
On May 03 2012 13:55 Resistentialism wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 13:28 Zelniq wrote:
On May 03 2012 11:32 mTwTT1 wrote:
zerg is already the best defencive race because of the larva inject mechanic, if u wanna make it easier for them to hold allins off just tweak the spine crawler build time.. why do they always try to overcomplicate everything?

believe me, they have considered reducing the build time as they realize that it would fix a lot of issues for zerg, except for one silly, super-specific reason against it. they claim zvz fast pool, spine crawler rushes would be broken. i am actually a little skeptical now, as i mean cannons (which have the same life as a spine), build 10 seconds faster than spine crawlers and yet 3 drones attacking it soon after it starts building can kill it before it's halfway done. so yeah actually i dont agree that a 40 second spine crawler down from 50 seconds would screw up zvz at all actually. someone should talk to him about it.


Spines have two armour on their entire hp pool compared to 1 armour on half hp for a cannon. This is a big deal against worker attacks, but also very important for the kind of defense zergs already use versus marines, hellions and zerglings, And they don't need a pylon. It's probably not that silly of an issue.


buildings dont have armor while they are constructing afaik. also yes i talked to david kim and that is the only issue he mentioned at the time, so it is that silly of an issue.

On May 03 2012 13:39 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 13:28 Zelniq wrote:
On May 03 2012 11:32 mTwTT1 wrote:
zerg is already the best defencive race because of the larva inject mechanic, if u wanna make it easier for them to hold allins off just tweak the spine crawler build time.. why do they always try to overcomplicate everything?

believe me, they have considered reducing the build time as they realize that it would fix a lot of issues for zerg, except for one silly, super-specific reason against it. they claim zvz fast pool, spine crawler rushes would be broken. i am actually a little skeptical now, as i mean cannons (which have the same life as a spine), build 10 seconds faster than spine crawlers and yet 3 drones attacking it soon after it starts building can kill it before it's halfway done. so yeah actually i dont agree that a 40 second spine crawler down from 50 seconds would screw up zvz at all actually. someone should talk to him about it.

Cannons don't have Zealots defending them. No one Spine Crawler rushes. They 6/7 pool and build a Crawler for additional offence.

obviously im very aware of this, and have plenty of experience with every early pool scenario. My point was just that if spines built 10 seconds faster, as long as you can still easily kill it with the same number of workers attacking it, it shouldn't really change the outcome. if you lose with the 10 second shorter build time you were probably going to lose anyway even if it was 10 seconds longer, or you made a mistake in your control or decision making. basically my point is that i dont think the 10 second build time will actually change the outcome of zvz early pool games.

ModeratorBlame yourself or God
Toastie
Profile Joined April 2012
Netherlands104 Posts
May 03 2012 06:06 GMT
#513
On May 03 2012 15:03 Nasreth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 09:08 SolidMoose wrote:
Faster overlord speed might work, but I feel like because zerg has the easiest time tech switching, easier scouting means they can more easily shift their whole build to counter what T and P do. I always thought that's one reason why overlords had to be so slow.

50 energy I just can't agree with. The creep spread will just be insane.

The observer buff seems out of the blue (has anyone ever complained about the build time?). I don't think protoss needs better scouting, or really anything at all at this point in the game.

I'm always bothered when they introduce buffs/nerfs completely unrelated to the things people talk about.



How is a slightly faster overlord going to significantly change my ability to shift my entire game to counter what my opponent is doing? You either overlord scout or you don't, in both ZvT and in ZvP. The problem has been that, for people who DO choose to overlord scout, we often lose our overlord to a single marine or 2, or a sentry, before we see anything important due to how slow the overlord is. Overlord scouting is a tactical decision, and we deserve to glean at least some information from it since we are sacrificing 100 minerals, a larvae, and 8 supply.

You mean, kinda like, how my Scan might not reveal everything?

I want my scan to be movable, because if I spend 300 potential minerals, I deserve to at least glean at some information, even if my opponent spreads his shit out.

See the flawed logic?
Never give up, never surrender!
Ketch
Profile Joined October 2010
Netherlands7285 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-03 06:08:26
May 03 2012 06:06 GMT
#514
On May 03 2012 14:50 Braric wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 14:47 Chill Penguin wrote:
On May 03 2012 14:19 Zaphid wrote:
I don't like the queen energy change, I feel like it makes stargate opening in PvZ almost useless.


This post right here is why the queen change can't happen. An extra 3-4 transfusions will end stargate aggression.


To be fair any good Zerg player right now can handle Stargate aggression insanely easily as is, this change will just make bad players able to deflect it much easier.


And people will like try to get away with less queens... so less queens to worry about and you can pick up all that remain...
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
May 03 2012 06:09 GMT
#515
On May 03 2012 12:45 latan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 12:43 avilo wrote:
On May 03 2012 12:41 latan wrote:
at first the queen change seems too much, but if you think about it it's only one extra tumor per queen. it'll help with creep connecting bases obviously and initial creep spread, but it won't affect that much overall creep spread, since if you can clear 1 tumor you can surely clear an additional one.

that is, I don't think it will be much harder to deny/clear creep, but it will certainly reduce a lot of stress for zerg players in the very early game.


It's a vast change. Lower level players won't see the difference, but for every high level player it's a world of difference. Spreading creep is essentially "free." All it takes is multi-task, and progamers are going to be able to cover half the map in creep by the 10 minute mark. A lot of people just do not understand how such a "tiny" change is a huge, huge, HUGE, buff.


well then i guess then opponents will have to work a little harder to deny creep spread, which isn't even difficult anyway, or a big deal, i think. the observer change will help a bit as well.

........
Denying creep spread is fucking hard as fuck wtf

Unless you make >6 hellions, hellions can not deny creep spread vs a zerg that is commited to spreading it -- Having the creep already be further out is gonna make it insanely hard.
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
TheRabidDeer
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
United States3806 Posts
May 03 2012 06:09 GMT
#516
Dear people saying the queen change is over the top:
Please demonstrate. Show me a game where the zerg having 25 extra energy on their queen has turned the tide of the battle so much that the zerg wins because of it.

It has already been proven that creep spread is not increased
It has already been shown that given the zerg is making extra queens that he is spending that extra energy on creep spreading therefore has no energy for transfuse.

The ONLY scenario this effects is heavy stargate play in which the zerg scouts it (in which case the zerg will already be putting down spores and making queens anyway, negating it 99% of the time, even on the current live version). Even if it is double stargate play, you are lifting the queens with energy negating any transfuses that might have come into play anyway.

The balance that this effects is MINIMAL.

If you think I am wrong, DEMONSTRATE THAT I AM WRONG.
Corrosive
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada3741 Posts
May 03 2012 06:10 GMT
#517
On May 03 2012 15:06 Toastie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 15:03 Nasreth wrote:
On May 03 2012 09:08 SolidMoose wrote:
Faster overlord speed might work, but I feel like because zerg has the easiest time tech switching, easier scouting means they can more easily shift their whole build to counter what T and P do. I always thought that's one reason why overlords had to be so slow.

50 energy I just can't agree with. The creep spread will just be insane.

The observer buff seems out of the blue (has anyone ever complained about the build time?). I don't think protoss needs better scouting, or really anything at all at this point in the game.

I'm always bothered when they introduce buffs/nerfs completely unrelated to the things people talk about.



How is a slightly faster overlord going to significantly change my ability to shift my entire game to counter what my opponent is doing? You either overlord scout or you don't, in both ZvT and in ZvP. The problem has been that, for people who DO choose to overlord scout, we often lose our overlord to a single marine or 2, or a sentry, before we see anything important due to how slow the overlord is. Overlord scouting is a tactical decision, and we deserve to glean at least some information from it since we are sacrificing 100 minerals, a larvae, and 8 supply.

You mean, kinda like, how my Scan might not reveal everything?

I want my scan to be movable, because if I spend 300 potential minerals, I deserve to at least glean at some information, even if my opponent spreads his shit out.

See the flawed logic?


You don't lose minerals by using a scan. You just get them slower.
Maruprime.
_Darwin_
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2374 Posts
May 03 2012 06:11 GMT
#518
i dont get why they said protoss is struggling at top pro level? they are 5/8 in gsl ro8 lol
I cant stop lactating
Dingobloo
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Australia1903 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-03 06:14:23
May 03 2012 06:12 GMT
#519
On May 03 2012 14:54 USvBleakill wrote:The Observer change makes me very angry. Srsly it´s like the Upgrade changes Blizzard is saying "well some koreans build more than one observer and have great success with it (i think Parting was it who have 6 - 8 Observers at the same time). But the average Protoss is just too stupid to build more than one so we have to buff them". I don´t see any reason for this and it´s a hidden terran nurf (again!) because cloak banshee will get weaker (and dt´s too).


It's more likely in response to games like Maru vs MC Game 1 in the latest GSL, Maru does a 1 rax expand build and makes it look like cloaked banshee at the front, MC is basically forced to make a robo and 2 observers just to play safe and still doesn't actually get to scout the base until nearly 8:30. That seems like a pretty specific example, but it's just a general blind spot protoss seems to have between their first zealot/stalker poke and the observer hitting the base that needs to account for 2 wildly different builds.

Part of the reason this is now becoming a problem is because Terrans are just taking the economic hit by beginning their 2nd depot before the scout can get in, even off a pylon scout on a 2 player map, and forcing the robo + observers ends up costing the protoss a lot more than it cost the terran to put the depot down, as it lets the terran player also cut a few corners in the mid game (things like 6-7 gates are weaker, gateway + immortal pushes arent as effective on long maps)

Chaggi
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)1936 Posts
May 03 2012 06:12 GMT
#520
On May 03 2012 15:09 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Dear people saying the queen change is over the top:
Please demonstrate. Show me a game where the zerg having 25 extra energy on their queen has turned the tide of the battle so much that the zerg wins because of it.

It has already been proven that creep spread is not increased
It has already been shown that given the zerg is making extra queens that he is spending that extra energy on creep spreading therefore has no energy for transfuse.

The ONLY scenario this effects is heavy stargate play in which the zerg scouts it (in which case the zerg will already be putting down spores and making queens anyway, negating it 99% of the time, even on the current live version). Even if it is double stargate play, you are lifting the queens with energy negating any transfuses that might have come into play anyway.

The balance that this effects is MINIMAL.

If you think I am wrong, DEMONSTRATE THAT I AM WRONG.


No one can demonstrate it until you play a stupid amount of games and that's the point. People can't just play a few games cause whatever the result, someone's gonna yell "Holy shit! you didn't play well at all! so biased!" No one wants to go play 5-6 months worth of games and be like well this was kind of op, let's nerf it. Some people play this for fun. Some people play this for a living. TvZ is fine right now, and OL speed will help a lot. Why even try to mess that up.

ibnozergsinGSL
Prev 1 24 25 26 27 28 106 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
12:00
#61
WardiTV405
Rex80
TKL 18
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Reynor 294
ProTech119
Harstem 97
Rex 80
TKL 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 41257
Sea 9311
Calm 8148
Horang2 1675
Jaedong 819
Soma 442
EffOrt 424
Stork 361
Light 263
Larva 231
[ Show more ]
Pusan 176
Zeus 153
ZerO 122
Killer 112
Rush 100
Mind 81
ToSsGirL 67
scan(afreeca) 56
Sea.KH 50
yabsab 39
Liquid`Ret 34
Icarus 25
Hm[arnc] 15
Noble 15
ivOry 9
NaDa 5
Dota 2
Dendi396
XcaliburYe138
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1788
shoxiejesuss841
x6flipin662
zeus560
allub168
oskar95
Other Games
B2W.Neo680
Pyrionflax410
crisheroes307
Fuzer 296
ZerO(Twitch)15
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream13022
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream2137
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 90
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1517
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
4h 31m
Replay Cast
10h 31m
ChoboTeamLeague
12h 31m
WardiTV Korean Royale
23h 31m
BSL: GosuLeague
1d 8h
The PondCast
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Reynor
Maru vs SHIN
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
BSL: GosuLeague
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
IPSL
5 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
RSL Revival
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
IPSL
6 days
StRyKeR vs OldBoy
Sziky vs Tarson
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-14
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.