• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:29
CEST 23:29
KST 06:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence5Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups3WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues
Tourneys
WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 General Discussion Playing StarCraft as 2 people on the same network
Tourneys
Is there English video for group selection for ASL [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [ASL20] Ro16 Group B [IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Borderlands 3
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1452 users

Program to resume games from replays - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 37 38 39 Next All
DigitalDevil
Profile Joined October 2011
219 Posts
April 13 2012 06:11 GMT
#61
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.
latan
Profile Joined July 2010
740 Posts
April 13 2012 06:14 GMT
#62
the most efficient solution would be to allow parties to load maps from a hard drives, then a replay could be converted into a map.
Ruscour
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
5233 Posts
April 13 2012 06:15 GMT
#63
On April 13 2012 14:41 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 14:40 Canas wrote:
On April 13 2012 14:11 VashTS wrote:
On April 13 2012 14:10 Soft`Soap wrote:
On a side note, this is a cool concept and if it sounds so easy to implement, it makes me wonder, why hasn't Blizzard done something like this?

What's simple for somebody may not be so simple for others. Maybe Blizz simply never thought of this method.


Warcraft 3 has this function so I don't really think that's the case


Sorry but I don't remember WC3 having that...? What do you mean?

I didn't follow WC3 but in DotA there are like, periodic pauses for saves that can be loaded later.
theBOOCH
Profile Joined November 2010
United States832 Posts
April 13 2012 06:17 GMT
#64
And AFAIK this tech isn't something new. I remember clicking around like an idiot in AOE2 while watching "recorded games" and I end up controlling the units + production facilities. Might be a bug or it could be intentional, but I never bothered to find out.

I remember that from AOE 2. For me at least it was super buggy, though. and would crash the program a lot... so maybe not the best example.
If all you're offering is Dos Equis, I will stay thirsty thank you very much.
Dalguno
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States2446 Posts
April 13 2012 06:20 GMT
#65
This could be used in some pretty neat ways. Say you felt like a game was going really well, but you made a decision that you think lost it. Get the other guy to go back, make the alternate decision, and see how it plays out. Could be cool.
"I'm gonna keep making drones cause I'm a baller, and ballers make drones." -Snute
TheAmazombie
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States3714 Posts
April 13 2012 06:21 GMT
#66
Well, I am not going to try it, but it sounds like a simple thing to actually do. I hope that Blizzard finally implements something along these lines to prevent what happened this weekend.
We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery, we need humanity. More than cleverness, we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will be lost. -Charlie Chaplin
hegeo
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany194 Posts
April 13 2012 06:22 GMT
#67
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.



One should care for what they said (or didn't) if one wants to understand. Do you _really_ think they wouldn't already have implemented it before if they wanted to?
They are neither lazy nor incompetent. They just have other plans.
Hairy
Profile Joined February 2011
United Kingdom1169 Posts
April 13 2012 06:29 GMT
#68
Of course it's a simple thing to actually do, blizz already has a fricking replay engine that allows you to go to any point in a game and see the exact game state. THAT would be the hard bit to program; allowing players to 'load' at an arbitrary point during a replay instead of the beginning of a game is, in comparison, "hello world".

Personally, I don't have use for this. It's obviously not useful on ladder until blizz does it themselves, and if I want to practice with a friend I will use 'SALT' instead (which isn't quite the same thing, I know). However, as "a demonstration of how easy it is to implement technically" it is superb work, well done.
Sometimes I sits and thinks, and sometimes I just sits
Humposaurus
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands86 Posts
April 13 2012 06:30 GMT
#69
On April 13 2012 14:38 mrRoflpwn wrote:
guy with 1 post posts download links, expects people to actually believe him.



Like a guy with 10.000 posts can't post virusses?
LazinCajun
Profile Joined July 2011
United States294 Posts
April 13 2012 06:32 GMT
#70
On April 13 2012 14:14 Severian wrote:
Pfft. In the time it took you to write that program, Blizzard could have easily made chat windows resizable in both the x and y dimensions.


I almost spit my drink all over my monitor when I read this.
IronMonocle
Profile Joined September 2009
Canada142 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-13 06:39:06
April 13 2012 06:37 GMT
#71
I posted this idea 2 years ago in the battle net forums SC2 Suggestions board. Pretty cool.

Can't find the post since blizzard made changes to their forums so maybe it's gone.
My armor is contempt. My shield is disgust. My sword is hatred.
DigitalDevil
Profile Joined October 2011
219 Posts
April 13 2012 06:41 GMT
#72
On April 13 2012 15:22 hegeo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.



One should care for what they said (or didn't) if one wants to understand. Do you _really_ think they wouldn't already have implemented it before if they wanted to?
They are neither lazy nor incompetent. They just have other plans.

Blizzard can make mistakes. This is one of them. I'm a programmer myself so it's not like I don't understand it can take time to implement features. But you're seriously defending Blizzard when one programmer can implement a feature that is highly requested within a few days? If Blizzard feels this is not high on their priority, then that can only reflect incompetence albeit in a different sense. Seriously, someone was able to write a hack that hooks onto the game while Blizzard has the actual source code to the game itself which should be WAY simpler to modify.
memcpy
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States459 Posts
April 13 2012 06:45 GMT
#73
Wow, awesome job. This could easily be adapted to save tournament games, given Blizzard's consent of course...
To all the skeptics: He posted the source code... if you don't trust it then look at the source and build it yourself or wait for someone else to do it for you. Just took a look myself and it seems fine. Building it now.
Bibbit
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Canada5377 Posts
April 13 2012 06:48 GMT
#74
On April 13 2012 15:20 Dalguno wrote:
This could be used in some pretty neat ways. Say you felt like a game was going really well, but you made a decision that you think lost it. Get the other guy to go back, make the alternate decision, and see how it plays out. Could be cool.

I think it would be funnier if done on the ladder. PM some random guy after a game and be like "Nono wait a second let me try that again"
BoxingKangaroo
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Japan955 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-13 06:52:08
April 13 2012 06:49 GMT
#75
On April 13 2012 15:41 DigitalDevil wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 15:22 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.



One should care for what they said (or didn't) if one wants to understand. Do you _really_ think they wouldn't already have implemented it before if they wanted to?
They are neither lazy nor incompetent. They just have other plans.

Blizzard can make mistakes. This is one of them. I'm a programmer myself so it's not like I don't understand it can take time to implement features. But you're seriously defending Blizzard when one programmer can implement a feature that is highly requested within a few days? If Blizzard feels this is not high on their priority, then that can only reflect incompetence albeit in a different sense. Seriously, someone was able to write a hack that hooks onto the game while Blizzard has the actual source code to the game itself which should be WAY simpler to modify.


Nowhere in the OP did he say it only took a few days. I'm still skeptical that this allows players to continue playing against each other and not just one resuming a replay. I'll wait for confirmation on that.

edit: For example, what does the game client do when someone wins a resumed replay? Records of wins/losses (even customs) are recorded server-side - so some reporting must take place. If the server has no record of the game being created then.... what?
DigitalDevil
Profile Joined October 2011
219 Posts
April 13 2012 06:55 GMT
#76
On April 13 2012 15:49 BoxingKangaroo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 15:41 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:22 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.



One should care for what they said (or didn't) if one wants to understand. Do you _really_ think they wouldn't already have implemented it before if they wanted to?
They are neither lazy nor incompetent. They just have other plans.

Blizzard can make mistakes. This is one of them. I'm a programmer myself so it's not like I don't understand it can take time to implement features. But you're seriously defending Blizzard when one programmer can implement a feature that is highly requested within a few days? If Blizzard feels this is not high on their priority, then that can only reflect incompetence albeit in a different sense. Seriously, someone was able to write a hack that hooks onto the game while Blizzard has the actual source code to the game itself which should be WAY simpler to modify.


Nowhere in the OP did he say it only took a few days. I'm still skeptical that this allows players to continue playing against each other and not just one resuming a replay. I'll wait for confirmation on that.

edit: For example, what does the game client do when someone wins a resumed replay? Records of wins/losses (even customs) are recorded server-side - so some reporting must take place. If the server has no record of the game being created then.... what?

You're right, he didn't. But it certainly seems like so given the timing.
DeltruS
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada2214 Posts
April 13 2012 06:56 GMT
#77
I've tried it out. I really can't believe it works. Basically it just plays out the replay really fast while you have control. So you can move 1 drone and it breaks the rest of the playback.

I'm not sure how it works with multiplayer. Do 2 people use the program at once or what?


On April 13 2012 14:31 jeeneeus wrote:
Well hasn't SALT been out for a while? Blizzard hasn't done anything regarding using this function.


SALT doesn't save things like spells or larva count. This doesn't need a special map and can be used retroactively. We could even play back MKP VS Parting in a $500 showmatch to see who would really have won the game.
http://grooveshark.com/#/deltrus/music
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
April 13 2012 07:01 GMT
#78
If this program works as intended, it will mean to me that Blizzard are just lazy. No LAN, no online replays with friends, limited chat channel functions, etc.
Ruscour
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
5233 Posts
April 13 2012 07:02 GMT
#79
On April 13 2012 15:56 DeltruS wrote:
I've tried it out. I really can't believe it works. Basically it just plays out the replay really fast while you have control. So you can move 1 drone and it breaks the rest of the playback.

I'm not sure how it works with multiplayer. Do 2 people use the program at once or what?


Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 14:31 jeeneeus wrote:
Well hasn't SALT been out for a while? Blizzard hasn't done anything regarding using this function.


SALT doesn't save things like spells or larva count. This doesn't need a special map and can be used retroactively. We could even play back MKP VS Parting in a $500 showmatch to see who would really have won the game.

But MKP vs Parting was already replayed
BoxingKangaroo
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Japan955 Posts
April 13 2012 07:05 GMT
#80
On April 13 2012 15:55 DigitalDevil wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 15:49 BoxingKangaroo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:41 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:22 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.



One should care for what they said (or didn't) if one wants to understand. Do you _really_ think they wouldn't already have implemented it before if they wanted to?
They are neither lazy nor incompetent. They just have other plans.

Blizzard can make mistakes. This is one of them. I'm a programmer myself so it's not like I don't understand it can take time to implement features. But you're seriously defending Blizzard when one programmer can implement a feature that is highly requested within a few days? If Blizzard feels this is not high on their priority, then that can only reflect incompetence albeit in a different sense. Seriously, someone was able to write a hack that hooks onto the game while Blizzard has the actual source code to the game itself which should be WAY simpler to modify.


Nowhere in the OP did he say it only took a few days. I'm still skeptical that this allows players to continue playing against each other and not just one resuming a replay. I'll wait for confirmation on that.

edit: For example, what does the game client do when someone wins a resumed replay? Records of wins/losses (even customs) are recorded server-side - so some reporting must take place. If the server has no record of the game being created then.... what?

You're right, he didn't. But it certainly seems like so given the timing.


People have been talking about this for months...
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 37 38 39 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 31m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ZombieGrub237
UpATreeSC 177
NeuroSwarm 164
JuggernautJason69
Lillekanin 17
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 710
ajuk12(nOOB) 17
sSak 16
Dota 2
Fuzer 176
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps560
Foxcn385
Stewie2K310
Super Smash Bros
PPMD73
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu553
Other Games
Grubby4052
FrodaN3455
summit1g1941
shahzam321
mouzStarbuck272
C9.Mang0117
ToD116
SortOf79
Trikslyr61
rGuardiaN39
Nathanias16
fpsfer 2
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta26
• RyuSc2 22
• sitaska16
• Psz 11
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 27
• FirePhoenix10
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2955
• masondota22275
• Ler95
League of Legends
• TFBlade546
Other Games
• Scarra1332
• imaqtpie1036
Upcoming Events
OSC
2h 31m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
12h 31m
Afreeca Starleague
12h 31m
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
2v2
13h 31m
PiGosaur Monday
1d 2h
LiuLi Cup
1d 13h
RSL Revival
2 days
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
4 days
BSL Team Wars
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Online Event
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Team Wars
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.