• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:32
CEST 00:32
KST 07:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy16ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion Gypsy to Korea How Can I Add Timer & APM Count? A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group F [ASL21] Ro24 Group E Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1305 users

Difference between korean and non-korean terrans - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 12 13 14 Next All
tztztz
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany314 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-21 09:42:56
February 21 2012 09:41 GMT
#21
koreans drop WAAAAAAAAAAAAY more than non-koreans. it almost seems like they are dropping constantly. and they have the micro to make those drops more efficent than non-koreans.
LRObot
Profile Joined April 2011
United States153 Posts
February 21 2012 09:42 GMT
#22
Let's just say what everyone is thinking and what I feel is the OP is hinting at. Terran is harder to play. It's the race where your skill doesn't match your success, whereas with Z or P, where that relationship is linear.

Blizzard doesn't account for this, and more likely, they really don't care. What they do care about is the literal X vs Y win percentage, and at only the highest tier of skill, ie not you.
Never say die
Aela
Profile Joined January 2012
97 Posts
February 21 2012 09:43 GMT
#23
Terran relies very much on good micro and multitasking, thats hard for us europeans and even more harder for americans. Thats why foreign-zergs and tosses have more success outside of korea and terrans in korea.
Fission
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Canada1184 Posts
February 21 2012 09:44 GMT
#24
I think korean terrans spend more time mapping out ultra-specific details about their timing attacks and possible outcomes. Maybe they emphasize decision-making and specific knowledge over raw "mechanics"? I feel like an obsession with the mechanical aspect of the game over the strategic aspect plagues many foreigners.
MafiaCheese
Profile Joined April 2010
United States87 Posts
February 21 2012 09:46 GMT
#25
I feel that The True strength of the terran race is in its ability to apply pressure and harass with a multitude of openings and eventually divide and conqueor with so many different types of harassment going on at once, with the main force always on the outskirts waiting for the right moment to either to damage or destroy the protoss. The foreign scene plays terran too passively as if it was too was protoss minus the late game superiority, and then question why the protoss deathball is so strong. You are taking protoss head on when that is one of its greatest strengths. Pushing out with the first 2 medivacs and dropping 8 supply once or twice isnt enough if you are sitting on a 3 base economy all game vs an even level protoss opponent who is also 3 based. Koreans take full advantage of the versitily (unpredictable strategies), early game harassment potential, and then turn the advantage they gain no matter how big or small into a powerfull timing or a very specific army composition for the macro game. They put the protoss players in very micro intensive and difficult situations where sending too little or too many units to handle any one threat results in damage being taken somewhere else. This is what is necesary in order to build up the kind of lead that would allow a bioball to beat a deathball.

In Conclusion, Koreans play terran like a well oiled machine, dictating the pace of the game and using skillfull multipronged harassment/aggresion leading into powerfull timings and build orders, the way it was meant to be.
Foreign terrans fall into a comfortable build or two, play too predictably/passively and attempt to win the game by fighting armies head on in the later stages of the game.
VPFaith
Profile Joined April 2011
United States261 Posts
February 21 2012 09:48 GMT
#26
On February 21 2012 18:46 MafiaCheese wrote:
I feel that The True strength of the terran race is in its ability to apply pressure and harass with a multitude of openings and eventually divide and conqueor with so many different types of harassment going on at once, with the main force always on the outskirts waiting for the right moment to either to damage or destroy the protoss. The foreign scene plays terran too passively as if it was too was protoss minus the late game superiority, and then question why the protoss deathball is so strong. You are taking protoss head on when that is one of its greatest strengths. Pushing out with the first 2 medivacs and dropping 8 supply once or twice isnt enough if you are sitting on a 3 base economy all game vs an even level protoss opponent who is also 3 based. Koreans take full advantage of the versitily (unpredictable strategies), early game harassment potential, and then turn the advantage they gain no matter how big or small into a powerfull timing or a very specific army composition for the macro game. They put the protoss players in very micro intensive and difficult situations where sending too little or too many units to handle any one threat results in damage being taken somewhere else. This is what is necesary in order to build up the kind of lead that would allow a bioball to beat a deathball.

In Conclusion, Koreans play terran like a well oiled machine, dictating the pace of the game and using skillfull multipronged harassment/aggresion leading into powerfull timings and build orders, the way it was meant to be.
Foreign terrans fall into a comfortable build or two, play too predictably/passively and attempt to win the game by fighting armies head on in the later stages of the game.


Mafia, you are totally correct.
Never Give Up
zul
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Germany5427 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-21 09:51:05
February 21 2012 09:49 GMT
#27
from what I see the difference lies in details. When comparing korean harassment with foreigner harassment, the korean harassment always does damage, whereas the foreigner drops/helions/banshees regularly get killed before doing anything. at the same time they dont mess up their macro and that`s the hard part. By doing so they pick apart their opponents slowly, but steady.
keep it deep! @zulison
Ucs
Profile Joined October 2010
264 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-21 09:53:32
February 21 2012 09:49 GMT
#28
Korean terrans win alot more in GSL because they can analize their opponent and pick him apart. If terran knows what you do they can be VERY strong, exploiting 100 diffrent timings.

In non-korea terran case we get rolled over because we can't prepare against so many cheese and diffrent styles, on ladder and in tournaments. The timings are too sharp edge to be pulled off on a fly in a torunament where you play 5-10 games/day. MMA just picks his opponents apart with his builds. 75% of his wins are build order wins and he is the best terran in the world. He dosen't REALLY need thost build order wins to be really good but imo thats what makes a champion in GSL.

Im struggling near GM vs zerg and protoss and I basicly win because I follow the metagame and understand faster than others what I need to do to win not because I copy the builds/styles of PRO players in GSL( only thing i realize is that cheese is still the most effective way to play on ladder as terran). The builds/styles in GSL have been figured out and they can be easely coutered even by ladder players, thats why you need to drasticily change your strat and make it look like lets say: vs Z reactor hellion opening, or vs P trick him you are doing a 1-1-1.

P.S. the nerfs are getting way too much to deal with for terran. We still win because timings work not because T is op in late game. They nerf ghost? Really? T losees the most in late game if we don't get a definitive advantage in early-mid game.
Dgotto
Profile Joined February 2012
Russian Federation210 Posts
February 21 2012 09:50 GMT
#29
I think Koreans all time is playing,other players find time for making threads on TL ;D
aebriol
Profile Joined April 2010
Norway2066 Posts
February 21 2012 09:52 GMT
#30
On February 21 2012 18:33 Mr. Nefarious wrote:
Terran is very strong at the highest level for two main reasons. 1. Terran benefits the most from extreme multitasking. If you have a spare 400apm, you can always marine split, always drop and get away, always stutter step well, you can get 15 kills with a banshee and get away with 5hp, you always can repair hurt units and always salvage buildings just in time. Almost every unit in the Terran army becomes exponentially stronger the better you can control it. Therefor, players that have very high APM and multitasking achieve a level of cost efficiency that is very difficult to match by lower level players. The other prong of my theory is actually very simple. Terran is typically the safest from cheese, and are very hard to attack directly if they are turtling. A higher average cost efficiency produced by excellent control combined with the ability to play very safe if turtling could lead to the highest level Terrans having the most stability as well as becoming exponentially stronger as multitasking and unit control skill increases.

This is just my theory based on watching GSL, playing games on the NA ladder and casually training.

Solution: Examine ways to make the other races more "micro-able". While some micro is needed for Z/P at the moment, it is not nearly as beneficial as extreme micro is for T. Instead of playing with damage numbers, analyze the unit design. Make units attack twice as fast but do the same overall DPS. Allow more units to cancel their attack to move away while still doing damage similar to the marine. These types of changes are obviously targeted solely at the highest level. A-moved roaches will do the same overall DPS in bronze as they will Korea GM, however if they shot twice as quickly they would be a hell of a lot more microable, despite doing the same overall DPS. This would allow additional functionality from players that have the APM to micro their army while maintaining production while not effecting the lowest leagues in the slightest as overall damage output stays the same.

I would agree with this completely.

To me, Terran is the race that - by far - benefits from better mechanics.
- Positioning, stutter step, spreading
- Multiple drops and controlling them, stimming, target firing, getting away, aborting at the right times.
- Target firing in general (tanks on banelings, marines on mutas, hellions on banelings, or where to get the best worker shots etc).
- Stimming the right amount of units (just a few, everything, etc).
- Making the right decisions (get into the medivac, or lose the units in exchange for that building that is upgrading... fail if I don't get the building, win if I do).

In comparison, protoss in most situations harass by throwing away units (I can spare 1 dt, or 4 or 8 zealots now, I'll warp them in here, and hope they do something here), while zerg is constantly moving around a clump of units, and not microing on the individual level too much.

But the point is, microing on the individual level, isn't really beneficial for the other races too much. I mean, yes, controlling your banelings, target firing with mutas, but it's not a lot compared to what Terran can do with stuff that actually gives them an advantage).

Protoss have blink stalkers, which allows them to greatly benefit from better mechanics, but other than that ... not so much.

So the reason seems to me to be that Terrans aren't doing so good, probably because they are a lot more passive. Korean terrans seem very dedicated to map control, aggressively expanding, and leaving little to no units at home - going with the assumption that building placement, depots + 1 bunker and 2 turrets make the orbital safe from 'anything' that isn't a base race, etc.

I note that playing 'standard' ZvT in the GSL, the Terran will most often have the supply lead on Zergs. And that's the best zergs in the world. I think that studying how they consistently do that in macro games would be a real indication of why they are doing so much better than foreigners.
bgx
Profile Joined August 2010
Poland6595 Posts
February 21 2012 09:53 GMT
#31
I believe Terran is actually even stronger than terran in BW on paper if played perfectly, the "organic" style of play from terran should be able to demolish both zerg and toss, you limit your scans, so you get already an edge in economy, all your informations are provided by your aggresive moves (that are still safe given the knowledge of timings). You should calculate how many units zerg can have given how many minerals he mined (click on mineral), how many larvae he has (queen, hatcheries, energy on queens/number of creep tumors). You have to know how your opponent works, so you dont need to double check your knowledge with scans, scans cost you, if terran dont scan and play macro heavy, with perfect macro he will be ahead in economy, you only should scan if you know the opponent is severely limiting the information you can get, but most of information can be aquired by simple mathematic and knowledge of timings. Yes thats the future, but thats what everyone should strive for.
Stork[gm]
aebriol
Profile Joined April 2010
Norway2066 Posts
February 21 2012 09:54 GMT
#32
On February 21 2012 18:49 Ucs wrote:
Korean terrans win alot more in GSL because they can analize their opponent and pick him apart. If terran knows what you do they can be VERY strong, exploiting 100 diffrent timings.

MMA just picks his opponents apart with his builds. 75% of his wins are build order wins and he is the best terran in the world.

Don't you see the contradiction here? The best terran in the world just 'does his builds' but all korean terrans just win because they analyze their opponents and pick them apart? As if the other races aren't trying the same ...
nface
Profile Joined June 2011
106 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-21 09:58:45
February 21 2012 09:56 GMT
#33
Terran is just way harder to master than the other races, but when you got all the multitasking and apm it requieres you can be a beast with it. Unfortunately against protoss it doesn't matter so much how good you play, because in the end Protoss will just roll you anyways, which also can be seen in GSL alot recently.

And yeah I think MMA actually wins because of his skill and sick multitasking and multi prongued attacks and not because of special Builds. IMMVP would be more of the player who has very good build orders to either set up a solid game or to get ready for a deadly timing push.
Ucs
Profile Joined October 2010
264 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-21 09:59:36
February 21 2012 09:59 GMT
#34
On February 21 2012 18:54 aebriol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2012 18:49 Ucs wrote:
Korean terrans win alot more in GSL because they can analize their opponent and pick him apart. If terran knows what you do they can be VERY strong, exploiting 100 diffrent timings.

MMA just picks his opponents apart with his builds. 75% of his wins are build order wins and he is the best terran in the world.

Don't you see the contradiction here? The best terran in the world just 'does his builds' but all korean terrans just win because they analyze their opponents and pick them apart? As if the other races aren't trying the same ...


How is that a contradiction? korean terrans analyze their opponents and pick them appart. MMA does that and wins 75% of his games with build order wins aka timing attacks that just kill his opponents outright.

Zerg dosent care about replays beacuse they just have to defend and know the GENERAL style of their opponent. I can't say the same for protoss but they usually just have to pick either a aggresive stance(6 gate timing/whatever timing) or a defensive strategy(don't atatck untill you have a advantage like upgrades/tech/economy) for a opponent. After they decide that they just roll with it. (im talking about TvZ and TvP now)
aebriol
Profile Joined April 2010
Norway2066 Posts
February 21 2012 09:59 GMT
#35
On February 21 2012 18:56 nface wrote:
Terran is just way harder to master than the other races, but when you got all the multitasking and apm it requieres you can be a beast with it. Unfortunately against protoss it doesn't matter so much how good you play, because in the end Protoss will just roll you anyways, which also can be seen in GSL alot recently.

And yeah I think MMA actually wins because of his skill and sick multitasking and multi prongued attacks and not because of special Builds. IMMVP would be more of the player who has very good build orders to either set up a solid game or to get ready for a deadly timing push.

I think complaining - specifically - about Protoss being overpowered, should be called 'pulling an Idra'

Btw, I agree with you - in both matchups, about Protoss
massivez
Profile Joined May 2010
Belgium653 Posts
February 21 2012 10:01 GMT
#36
Seems like Starcraft 2 isnt as easy as most Pro's seem to think (foreign pro's mostly). I think i saw Morrow say something about this in an other topic.
I also agree that terran is a bit harder then the other 2 races, but on the other hand its a much MUCH more rewarding race for players who can multitask like a BOSS. Hence why the korean terrans are putting on better results then there foreing counterparts.
Rockztar
Profile Joined June 2011
Denmark210 Posts
February 21 2012 10:02 GMT
#37
On February 21 2012 18:07 Verator wrote:
Things I tend to notice, is that the koreans use a lot more micro, I see much less impressive marine splitting from foreigners than I do from the koreans. Besides that, the koreans also seem to be more threatening with their units than foreigners. Koreans will keep poking units around the opponents bases, not necessarily going in to risk losing units, but enough to keep the opponent scared, and on the occasional moment they notice a weakness, go for some damage. Foreigners like to be less active and more defensive with their units.


I agree very much this. Well said.

Another thing is that it seems like Koreans know a lot more what exactly they can or can't do with their builds. Along with this they seem to have really good game sense. For example I feel like I often see foreign Terrans fall to pressure builds and such, because they aren't aware of an incoming attack despite scouting indicators of an attack, and thus don't prepare properly.

Another thing is their creativity, when it comes to passing by enemy defenses, which relates to what Verator said. If some foreign terrans scout a lot of sentries for example on Shakura's Plateau at the natural they'll just back off and do something else, while I often see Korean terrans do some impressive micro in order to get all their army lifted up into the main only using two medivacs, and they can seemingly pull it off due to their high game knowledge/skill(is it too risky, and executing it).

When it comes to build orders it seems like a guy like Polt has a few builds he sticks too. MVP has a ton of different of builds, but I've seen him using them all several times over the last year or so. MMA seems to develop new strategies with his teammates for each final he's in, but still has a few staple builds and so on. So I guess build orders aren't that important, as long as you have a few that work. ^.^

Hope this helps you anything.
decaf
Profile Joined October 2010
Austria1797 Posts
February 21 2012 10:03 GMT
#38
I think artosis put it extremely well:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=78677
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
February 21 2012 10:08 GMT
#39
The game is being balanced around the actual play (and the players) we see.
Ladder statistics show that there are more Terrans in the high leagues (Master, GM), from which proplayers and tournament competitors come. So in a region with high Terran population like Korea, Terran should have more competitors and tournament winners than in other regions. Even if the TerranKorea vs TerranInternationally is only by 2-5%, this also means that the other races are being played more by 2-5%, which should statistically lead to a 4-10% disparity. (assuming somewhat compareable winrates in Korea and International for Terran)


http://sc2ranks.com/stats/region/master/1/all
http://sc2ranks.com/stats/region/grandmaster/1/all
http://imgur.com/a/hQHYS
(note that all of those statistics are flawed and we should only take trends from them; f.e the Korean RaceDistribution Statistics are mixed with Taiwan; the winrate statistics have rather small samplesizes and often feature games of pros vs nonpros - which the pro usually wins independent of balance - so the winrates tend to be closer to 50-50 than they should be...)

This is probably not the only reason, but at least a big one in my opinion!
masterbreti
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Korea (South)2711 Posts
February 21 2012 10:10 GMT
#40
Strelok. I think you really need to see how these Koreans play.

The biggest difference I've seen is how they act in the matchups. Each Terran had a sort of unique style that is small and subtle, but varies to each player, its much like a trademark. Sort of a sign of who is playing.

plus each teamhouse is almost like a mini conference. for example: mkp sits beside byun in the prime teamhouse. They are able to talk about each game and bounce ideas off each other. this leads to better builds and better gameplay overall.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 12 13 14 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
21:00
Best Games of SC
Reynor vs Zoun
SHIN vs ByuN
herO vs sOs
Maru vs SHIN
Clem vs Bunny
PiGStarcraft532
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft532
SpeCial 91
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 156
Backho 51
910 30
Dota 2
monkeys_forever339
capcasts108
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0212
Other Games
summit1g7058
tarik_tv3393
Grubby3246
FrodaN1591
shahzam478
Fuzer 163
ZombieGrub149
ProTech124
KnowMe85
Mew2King67
Dewaltoss42
minikerr8
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 27
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 33
• RyuSc2 33
• Hupsaiya 30
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 14
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie1153
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 28m
RSL Revival
11h 28m
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
20h 28m
RSL Revival
1d 8h
Cure vs Rogue
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 15h
BSL
1d 20h
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.