EPTCarmac responds to IEM Criticism: "Bring on the pitchforks…
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
benDover!
Romania19 Posts
| ||
|
suddendeathTV
Sweden388 Posts
On January 20 2012 08:54 zaii wrote: You see if there was LAN mode, Shitty computers transform into supercomputers that can handle anything. hahaha trololol | ||
|
ReadySetFire
Kuwait545 Posts
On January 20 2012 07:02 Tumor wrote: Give us lan... or tournament server for the big ones... no problem for blizzard... and we can set up streams with mobile internet shit -.- I heard that the computers were at fault here. Not the servers | ||
|
sixfour
England11062 Posts
| ||
|
suddendeathTV
Sweden388 Posts
On January 20 2012 08:58 sixfour wrote: idk, i'm just irritated that what was an instant ban in brood war continues to be condoned in sc2, namely people making LR threads and not updating them properly, i have no idea who went through in group 1 even after clicking on the spoilers http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/IEM_Season_VI_-_Global_Challenge_Kiev#Group_Stage EDIT: and to clarify about White-Ra/Strelok/NaNiwa: nani has more mapwins, and White-Ra won his game vs Strelok. I believe they value; points>maps won/lost>internal meetings>more games | ||
|
phanto
Sweden708 Posts
I enjoyed a game or two but overall was left with a bitter taste after today. Here's hoping for a better tomorrow and better preparation for Brazil and WC. | ||
|
pe6ousa
United States5 Posts
| ||
|
figq
12519 Posts
On January 20 2012 08:58 sixfour wrote: Not sure if serious, but:idk, i'm just irritated that what was an instant ban in brood war continues to be condoned in sc2, namely people making LR threads and not updating them properly, i have no idea who went through in group 1 even after clicking on the spoilers http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/IEM_Season_VI_-_Global_Challenge_Kiev Attention: spoilers!  (oops, ninja'd) | ||
|
sixfour
England11062 Posts
| ||
|
ellirc
Sweden3286 Posts
It doesn't cut it. Naniwa already got a lot of bad talk because of this, a lot of players are probably in their hotel room swearing right now. If there actually is a routing issue from the arena ISP to the Telia bnet servers, why didn't it show before at earlier competitions? Sure, there may have been changes but it isn't very likely that it would change for the worse considering how the Internet is evolving and how well built the EU network is built. From what people are saying it is pretty damn obvious that the actual PC's being used for playing are sub par. 1.6 is not relevant for this discussion at all since it has LAN support and runs at literally 500 fps on my four year old laptop in a public server with 24 players. I don't know about LoL but I doubt it eats computing power(both cpu and gpu) like SC2 does. A 150+ food fight at a minimum 60fps is actually really demanding. We even saw the lag popup several times today which clearly indicates that the computer(s) were struggling. Sometimes it only showed as spikes, which could be a network issue but again - from what "we heard" there were issues with low fps from time to time. Let's cross our fingers for the rest of the event  I am sharpening my pitchforks though, might come in handy on sunday. | ||
|
InternalSync
176 Posts
| ||
|
dnld12
United States324 Posts
| ||
|
NeoSlicerZ
Ireland470 Posts
| ||
nimdil
Poland3772 Posts
On January 20 2012 08:20 sd_andeh wrote: Wow, basically half the posts on here talk about blizzard and bnet. THIS WASN'T A BATTLE.NET ISSUE. The issue was the computers. They simply weren't good enough, and some worse than others due to a so far unexplained reason (as Carmac stated they all have the same specs, yet no reason why some computers lagged worse than others). Get it to your heads that this was indeed IEM's fault, and not even remotely close to Blizzard's fault. Battle.net was fine. The internetconnection was fine. We should all appreciate the post by Carmac though and sincerely hope that the problems are fixed tomorrow. Until then, we can just pray. Routing problem is quite different from "they weren't good enough". Stop trolling. | ||
|
tapk69
Portugal264 Posts
Why not give players a Lan mode ? most people play online anyway , and the game would have much more players.. but no... not like the first starcraft because that way the games would not be on blizzards servers.. =( GSL had players lagging out and much more tourneys had lag problems , so its not IEM fault.. breaks players concentration and spectator interest.. thanks blizzard for SC2 , FU for not giving LAN mode | ||
|
suddendeathTV
Sweden388 Posts
On January 20 2012 09:06 InternalSync wrote: I'm happy NightEnd got his rematch, but what about Grubby? Two exact same situations, one players gets a rematch, but the other one doesn't. Or are you gonna put this on Blizzard too? Good call. IEM has to make some statement about this. What qualifies a game to be replayed? Which players "deserve" re-games? Will you allow NaNiwa to play Strelok again, as well? Or is NightEnd vs Zenio being replayed only because it decided whether or not NightEnd advances? About what HuK said as well: it seems Zenio didn't even agree to this. Official statements are needed! | ||
|
nimdil
Poland3772 Posts
On January 20 2012 08:04 amazingxkcd wrote: Blizzard has to report to activision, thus we'll never get LAN I remember someone from Blizzard mentioning on BlizzCon 2011 developing local server to set-up inside LAN so I don't see your point. The best scenario would be if a bunch of really hard-core hackers would develop such a LAN server. It would probably be illegal but it could potenatially force Blizzard to develop legal one. I really hope the LAN server would be developed by Heart of the Swarm. | ||
|
carloselcoco
United States2302 Posts
On January 20 2012 06:34 Tommylew wrote: how about nigthend losing a battle where he may of won in the game three??? whata joke... On January 20 2012 06:33 Skillver wrote: Please apologize to Nightend, he lost the game due to lag! On January 20 2012 06:41 Vadrigar wrote: Add Nightend to the list. In his last game vs. Zenio it was OBVIOUS PC lag that caused him no to control his stalkers right! He was basically robbed. I am with you guys in that! I was watching one of the most amazing games simply because of how he was behind all the time, countering mutas at his main all the time while trying to attack a bit Zenio. Then he sniped all of Zenio's infestors and then began owning Zenio's brood lords only to begin lagging like crazy and not be able to control his army! :/ I even think he deserves a rematch! | ||
|
TheTurk
United States732 Posts
Historically, he has had some emotional outburst issues, but he was a total baller and won his group like a champ, no excuses or whining or anything. NaNi, you have won my heart. <3 | ||
|
renlynn
United States276 Posts
whole day leaves a shitty taste in my mouth but carmac's post makes it a little better | ||
| ||
