• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:41
CEST 16:41
KST 23:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202538RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 726 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 609

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 607 608 609 610 611 1266 Next
Rabiator
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany3948 Posts
July 28 2013 03:46 GMT
#12161
Can we stop this useless "GSL & major tournament arguments" please? They have NOTHING to do with the real balance of the game - which this thread is about -, because a gifted individual can make a bad race work OR a gifted and skilled individual can be screwed over by random chance or having a bad day. In general the "big tournaments" do not provide enough games to give statistical samples because you would need at least ten different players, matchups per map and so on ... and there is only a limited amount of spots "at the last rounds of a tournament". Preparation also plays too much of a role in korean tournaments and if you make a mistake there you are screwed while a weekend tournament doesnt rely as much on preparing for the opposing player but the pure skill and general preparation.

Just stop it!
If you cant say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying.
Terrasmith
Profile Joined February 2013
47 Posts
July 28 2013 03:51 GMT
#12162
On July 28 2013 12:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 11:49 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:28 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:24 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:15 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 28 2013 10:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
For those quoting only the most recent season of WCS:
Dont forget that Life, Roro, Kangho, DRG, True, and Effort were all in the RO48 of challenger league (9 of the zergs from code S dropped, while only 1 terran did...). They were going against Terrans like Skyhigh, Kop, Bang and other terrans which are "lesser".

So the fact that Zergs are doing well in nearly every foreign tournament, online cups, and on ladder should be ignored because this is the first GSL season in the past 5 that a Zerg hasn't won?

If we went by your basis of needs to buff/nerf, terrans wouldve been buffed to hell in WoL. Foreign terrans sucked for a majority of WoL, even when terrans were doing extremely well in korea.


that's exactly what he would have wanted, over a balanced game.


Not sure if nested quote was removed, but where the hell do you see any notion of buffing Terran based on foreign Terrans? I think we can safely assume that everyone here wants a balanced game - just differing biases and points of view.

That post of yours is pure vitriol.

The nested quote says that since foreign zergs are doing great, while korean zergs are faring less than great, then zergs need a nerf because of the foreign success.

This means the opposite must be true: If foreign terrans are doing poorly, then terrans must need a buff even though korean terrans are doing fine.


Korean Zergs are faring "less than great"? Just speak straight man. You think Zergs need help?

I think it's a little soon to come to the conclusion that Zerg is in need of buffs, or that Terran is in need of nerfs. I haven't seen -all- the TvZs so far. But from what I've seen in major tournaments, the games have been won by the better player.

I think it is a possibility. I stated earlier that my preferable change would be to give widow mines a multiple stage AoE like siege tanks. So it deals less damage the farther away from the middle, that way z doesnt lose 10 banes and some lings to 1 hit. I mean, just looking at premier league, things look grim.

5 zergs advanced from the RO32, 3 of which were in triple zerg groups (so 1 was guaranteed out). Soo is the only one that got out by beating the other races instead of the zergs, and Kangho got out by beating Jangbi.
2 zergs advanced from the RO16, and it was another triple zerg group.
None advanced from the RO8 with Symbol being the only zerg to take a game, and it was only 1 game.


The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.
TheRabidDeer
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
United States3806 Posts
July 28 2013 04:26 GMT
#12163
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 12:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:49 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:28 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:24 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:15 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 28 2013 10:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
For those quoting only the most recent season of WCS:
Dont forget that Life, Roro, Kangho, DRG, True, and Effort were all in the RO48 of challenger league (9 of the zergs from code S dropped, while only 1 terran did...). They were going against Terrans like Skyhigh, Kop, Bang and other terrans which are "lesser".

So the fact that Zergs are doing well in nearly every foreign tournament, online cups, and on ladder should be ignored because this is the first GSL season in the past 5 that a Zerg hasn't won?

If we went by your basis of needs to buff/nerf, terrans wouldve been buffed to hell in WoL. Foreign terrans sucked for a majority of WoL, even when terrans were doing extremely well in korea.


that's exactly what he would have wanted, over a balanced game.


Not sure if nested quote was removed, but where the hell do you see any notion of buffing Terran based on foreign Terrans? I think we can safely assume that everyone here wants a balanced game - just differing biases and points of view.

That post of yours is pure vitriol.

The nested quote says that since foreign zergs are doing great, while korean zergs are faring less than great, then zergs need a nerf because of the foreign success.

This means the opposite must be true: If foreign terrans are doing poorly, then terrans must need a buff even though korean terrans are doing fine.


Korean Zergs are faring "less than great"? Just speak straight man. You think Zergs need help?

I think it's a little soon to come to the conclusion that Zerg is in need of buffs, or that Terran is in need of nerfs. I haven't seen -all- the TvZs so far. But from what I've seen in major tournaments, the games have been won by the better player.

I think it is a possibility. I stated earlier that my preferable change would be to give widow mines a multiple stage AoE like siege tanks. So it deals less damage the farther away from the middle, that way z doesnt lose 10 banes and some lings to 1 hit. I mean, just looking at premier league, things look grim.

5 zergs advanced from the RO32, 3 of which were in triple zerg groups (so 1 was guaranteed out). Soo is the only one that got out by beating the other races instead of the zergs, and Kangho got out by beating Jangbi.
2 zergs advanced from the RO16, and it was another triple zerg group.
None advanced from the RO8 with Symbol being the only zerg to take a game, and it was only 1 game.


The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).
Mattumsfox
Profile Joined April 2012
United States233 Posts
July 28 2013 04:35 GMT
#12164
If terran is strong why did they have their lowest Code S representation ever since GSL started?
Terrasmith
Profile Joined February 2013
47 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-28 04:42:47
July 28 2013 04:41 GMT
#12165
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:49 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:28 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:24 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:15 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 28 2013 10:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
For those quoting only the most recent season of WCS:
Dont forget that Life, Roro, Kangho, DRG, True, and Effort were all in the RO48 of challenger league (9 of the zergs from code S dropped, while only 1 terran did...). They were going against Terrans like Skyhigh, Kop, Bang and other terrans which are "lesser".

So the fact that Zergs are doing well in nearly every foreign tournament, online cups, and on ladder should be ignored because this is the first GSL season in the past 5 that a Zerg hasn't won?

If we went by your basis of needs to buff/nerf, terrans wouldve been buffed to hell in WoL. Foreign terrans sucked for a majority of WoL, even when terrans were doing extremely well in korea.


that's exactly what he would have wanted, over a balanced game.


Not sure if nested quote was removed, but where the hell do you see any notion of buffing Terran based on foreign Terrans? I think we can safely assume that everyone here wants a balanced game - just differing biases and points of view.

That post of yours is pure vitriol.

The nested quote says that since foreign zergs are doing great, while korean zergs are faring less than great, then zergs need a nerf because of the foreign success.

This means the opposite must be true: If foreign terrans are doing poorly, then terrans must need a buff even though korean terrans are doing fine.


Korean Zergs are faring "less than great"? Just speak straight man. You think Zergs need help?

I think it's a little soon to come to the conclusion that Zerg is in need of buffs, or that Terran is in need of nerfs. I haven't seen -all- the TvZs so far. But from what I've seen in major tournaments, the games have been won by the better player.

I think it is a possibility. I stated earlier that my preferable change would be to give widow mines a multiple stage AoE like siege tanks. So it deals less damage the farther away from the middle, that way z doesnt lose 10 banes and some lings to 1 hit. I mean, just looking at premier league, things look grim.

5 zergs advanced from the RO32, 3 of which were in triple zerg groups (so 1 was guaranteed out). Soo is the only one that got out by beating the other races instead of the zergs, and Kangho got out by beating Jangbi.
2 zergs advanced from the RO16, and it was another triple zerg group.
None advanced from the RO8 with Symbol being the only zerg to take a game, and it was only 1 game.


The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.
TheRabidDeer
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
United States3806 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-28 04:56:01
July 28 2013 04:53 GMT
#12166
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:49 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:28 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:24 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:15 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 28 2013 10:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
For those quoting only the most recent season of WCS:
Dont forget that Life, Roro, Kangho, DRG, True, and Effort were all in the RO48 of challenger league (9 of the zergs from code S dropped, while only 1 terran did...). They were going against Terrans like Skyhigh, Kop, Bang and other terrans which are "lesser".

So the fact that Zergs are doing well in nearly every foreign tournament, online cups, and on ladder should be ignored because this is the first GSL season in the past 5 that a Zerg hasn't won?

If we went by your basis of needs to buff/nerf, terrans wouldve been buffed to hell in WoL. Foreign terrans sucked for a majority of WoL, even when terrans were doing extremely well in korea.


that's exactly what he would have wanted, over a balanced game.


Not sure if nested quote was removed, but where the hell do you see any notion of buffing Terran based on foreign Terrans? I think we can safely assume that everyone here wants a balanced game - just differing biases and points of view.

That post of yours is pure vitriol.

The nested quote says that since foreign zergs are doing great, while korean zergs are faring less than great, then zergs need a nerf because of the foreign success.

This means the opposite must be true: If foreign terrans are doing poorly, then terrans must need a buff even though korean terrans are doing fine.


Korean Zergs are faring "less than great"? Just speak straight man. You think Zergs need help?

I think it's a little soon to come to the conclusion that Zerg is in need of buffs, or that Terran is in need of nerfs. I haven't seen -all- the TvZs so far. But from what I've seen in major tournaments, the games have been won by the better player.

I think it is a possibility. I stated earlier that my preferable change would be to give widow mines a multiple stage AoE like siege tanks. So it deals less damage the farther away from the middle, that way z doesnt lose 10 banes and some lings to 1 hit. I mean, just looking at premier league, things look grim.

5 zergs advanced from the RO32, 3 of which were in triple zerg groups (so 1 was guaranteed out). Soo is the only one that got out by beating the other races instead of the zergs, and Kangho got out by beating Jangbi.
2 zergs advanced from the RO16, and it was another triple zerg group.
None advanced from the RO8 with Symbol being the only zerg to take a game, and it was only 1 game.


The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
Terrasmith
Profile Joined February 2013
47 Posts
July 28 2013 05:02 GMT
#12167
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:49 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:28 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:24 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:15 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 28 2013 10:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
For those quoting only the most recent season of WCS:
Dont forget that Life, Roro, Kangho, DRG, True, and Effort were all in the RO48 of challenger league (9 of the zergs from code S dropped, while only 1 terran did...). They were going against Terrans like Skyhigh, Kop, Bang and other terrans which are "lesser".

[quote]
If we went by your basis of needs to buff/nerf, terrans wouldve been buffed to hell in WoL. Foreign terrans sucked for a majority of WoL, even when terrans were doing extremely well in korea.


that's exactly what he would have wanted, over a balanced game.


Not sure if nested quote was removed, but where the hell do you see any notion of buffing Terran based on foreign Terrans? I think we can safely assume that everyone here wants a balanced game - just differing biases and points of view.

That post of yours is pure vitriol.

The nested quote says that since foreign zergs are doing great, while korean zergs are faring less than great, then zergs need a nerf because of the foreign success.

This means the opposite must be true: If foreign terrans are doing poorly, then terrans must need a buff even though korean terrans are doing fine.


Korean Zergs are faring "less than great"? Just speak straight man. You think Zergs need help?

I think it's a little soon to come to the conclusion that Zerg is in need of buffs, or that Terran is in need of nerfs. I haven't seen -all- the TvZs so far. But from what I've seen in major tournaments, the games have been won by the better player.

I think it is a possibility. I stated earlier that my preferable change would be to give widow mines a multiple stage AoE like siege tanks. So it deals less damage the farther away from the middle, that way z doesnt lose 10 banes and some lings to 1 hit. I mean, just looking at premier league, things look grim.

5 zergs advanced from the RO32, 3 of which were in triple zerg groups (so 1 was guaranteed out). Soo is the only one that got out by beating the other races instead of the zergs, and Kangho got out by beating Jangbi.
2 zergs advanced from the RO16, and it was another triple zerg group.
None advanced from the RO8 with Symbol being the only zerg to take a game, and it was only 1 game.


The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?
Wingblade
Profile Joined April 2012
United States1806 Posts
July 28 2013 05:26 GMT
#12168
On July 28 2013 06:12 Viserion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 04:11 keglu wrote:
On July 28 2013 00:47 Orek wrote:
On July 28 2013 00:21 Sissors wrote:
And now I can also post a screenshot of my win ratio being worst vs zerg and best vs toss. It isn't THE evidence, and it also isn't evidence at all. It only proofs your best matchup is TvZ (after ZvT). It doesnt proof anything regarding balance, let alone it being 'utterly broken'. If you think N=1 statistics have any relevance then it is better if you just stay aways from stats.

Quite frankly what else I noticed from that page: That is yet again indicates that SC2 players are really loyal. I have played MMO, RTS and FPS games. In every one of those games, a large group of players ran towards whatever was strongest at that moment. Could be gear in MMOs, weapons in FPS, or races in an RTS. Yet of all those games, apparantly only SC2 is different. The most games you played were vs zerg. The least vs terran. SC2 ranks shows a similar image. So that surprises me a bit, considering in every other game people run to whatever is OP, yet in SC2 all those zerg players so incredibly loyal to their race they keep playing it despite it being utterly broken. And not only that, also no one runs to terran race, despite that terran apparantly has easy time considering how OP they are.

It was different during WoL.
Early WoL: Terran was considered OP, Most played race = Terran
End of WoL: Zerg was considered OP, Most played race = Zerg

I guess Zerg underperformance in HotS started only recently. So, it might take a few more months until some of them switch to another race.


Actually Zerg was least played race whole WoL but was much closer to other races at the end of it. Protoss was most played race for most of the time (outside of beginnig where Terran was more played)


http://www.sc2ranks.com/stats/race

Yes that is true, however, terran is the least represented race from Platinum to Grandmaster globally at this moment, and it´s been like that for a long time.


Less players overall = less players in each league. Working as intended.
PartinG fanboy to the max, Rain/Squirtle/Dear/Scarlett/Bbyong are cool too. I don't always watch Dota2 but when I do I have no clue what's going on. GOGO POWER RANGERS
TheRabidDeer
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
United States3806 Posts
July 28 2013 05:29 GMT
#12169
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:49 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:28 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:24 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:15 GhostOwl wrote:
[quote]

that's exactly what he would have wanted, over a balanced game.


Not sure if nested quote was removed, but where the hell do you see any notion of buffing Terran based on foreign Terrans? I think we can safely assume that everyone here wants a balanced game - just differing biases and points of view.

That post of yours is pure vitriol.

The nested quote says that since foreign zergs are doing great, while korean zergs are faring less than great, then zergs need a nerf because of the foreign success.

This means the opposite must be true: If foreign terrans are doing poorly, then terrans must need a buff even though korean terrans are doing fine.


Korean Zergs are faring "less than great"? Just speak straight man. You think Zergs need help?

I think it's a little soon to come to the conclusion that Zerg is in need of buffs, or that Terran is in need of nerfs. I haven't seen -all- the TvZs so far. But from what I've seen in major tournaments, the games have been won by the better player.

I think it is a possibility. I stated earlier that my preferable change would be to give widow mines a multiple stage AoE like siege tanks. So it deals less damage the farther away from the middle, that way z doesnt lose 10 banes and some lings to 1 hit. I mean, just looking at premier league, things look grim.

5 zergs advanced from the RO32, 3 of which were in triple zerg groups (so 1 was guaranteed out). Soo is the only one that got out by beating the other races instead of the zergs, and Kangho got out by beating Jangbi.
2 zergs advanced from the RO16, and it was another triple zerg group.
None advanced from the RO8 with Symbol being the only zerg to take a game, and it was only 1 game.


The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.
Rhaegal
Profile Blog Joined July 2013
United States678 Posts
July 28 2013 05:34 GMT
#12170
On July 28 2013 14:29 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:49 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:28 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:24 plogamer wrote:
[quote]

Not sure if nested quote was removed, but where the hell do you see any notion of buffing Terran based on foreign Terrans? I think we can safely assume that everyone here wants a balanced game - just differing biases and points of view.

That post of yours is pure vitriol.

The nested quote says that since foreign zergs are doing great, while korean zergs are faring less than great, then zergs need a nerf because of the foreign success.

This means the opposite must be true: If foreign terrans are doing poorly, then terrans must need a buff even though korean terrans are doing fine.


Korean Zergs are faring "less than great"? Just speak straight man. You think Zergs need help?

I think it's a little soon to come to the conclusion that Zerg is in need of buffs, or that Terran is in need of nerfs. I haven't seen -all- the TvZs so far. But from what I've seen in major tournaments, the games have been won by the better player.

I think it is a possibility. I stated earlier that my preferable change would be to give widow mines a multiple stage AoE like siege tanks. So it deals less damage the farther away from the middle, that way z doesnt lose 10 banes and some lings to 1 hit. I mean, just looking at premier league, things look grim.

5 zergs advanced from the RO32, 3 of which were in triple zerg groups (so 1 was guaranteed out). Soo is the only one that got out by beating the other races instead of the zergs, and Kangho got out by beating Jangbi.
2 zergs advanced from the RO16, and it was another triple zerg group.
None advanced from the RO8 with Symbol being the only zerg to take a game, and it was only 1 game.


The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.



Absurdly small sample size, and you're using words like "overwhelmingly" and "absurd". I just don't understand..

TvZ was 50% in June ffs.
http://www.twitch.tv/agonysc
TheRabidDeer
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
United States3806 Posts
July 28 2013 05:55 GMT
#12171
On July 28 2013 14:34 Rhaegal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 14:29 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:49 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:28 TheRabidDeer wrote:
[quote]
The nested quote says that since foreign zergs are doing great, while korean zergs are faring less than great, then zergs need a nerf because of the foreign success.

This means the opposite must be true: If foreign terrans are doing poorly, then terrans must need a buff even though korean terrans are doing fine.


Korean Zergs are faring "less than great"? Just speak straight man. You think Zergs need help?

I think it's a little soon to come to the conclusion that Zerg is in need of buffs, or that Terran is in need of nerfs. I haven't seen -all- the TvZs so far. But from what I've seen in major tournaments, the games have been won by the better player.

I think it is a possibility. I stated earlier that my preferable change would be to give widow mines a multiple stage AoE like siege tanks. So it deals less damage the farther away from the middle, that way z doesnt lose 10 banes and some lings to 1 hit. I mean, just looking at premier league, things look grim.

5 zergs advanced from the RO32, 3 of which were in triple zerg groups (so 1 was guaranteed out). Soo is the only one that got out by beating the other races instead of the zergs, and Kangho got out by beating Jangbi.
2 zergs advanced from the RO16, and it was another triple zerg group.
None advanced from the RO8 with Symbol being the only zerg to take a game, and it was only 1 game.


The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.



Absurdly small sample size, and you're using words like "overwhelmingly" and "absurd". I just don't understand..

TvZ was 50% in June ffs.

80% chance of winning, is an overwhelming chance
87.5% advancing is an absurd amount
I am not referencing statistics, so sample size isnt what I am discussing (I wouldnt mention only WCS kr if I wanted statistical sample sizes). At the VERY top level, terrans beat zergs. And I mean TOP level. For some reason there is a huge difference amongst those in the top 20 (or even the top 10) when compared to the next 20 below them (in a tournament setting).
plogamer
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
Canada3132 Posts
July 28 2013 06:17 GMT
#12172
On July 28 2013 14:55 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 14:34 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:29 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:49 plogamer wrote:
[quote]

Korean Zergs are faring "less than great"? Just speak straight man. You think Zergs need help?

I think it's a little soon to come to the conclusion that Zerg is in need of buffs, or that Terran is in need of nerfs. I haven't seen -all- the TvZs so far. But from what I've seen in major tournaments, the games have been won by the better player.

I think it is a possibility. I stated earlier that my preferable change would be to give widow mines a multiple stage AoE like siege tanks. So it deals less damage the farther away from the middle, that way z doesnt lose 10 banes and some lings to 1 hit. I mean, just looking at premier league, things look grim.

5 zergs advanced from the RO32, 3 of which were in triple zerg groups (so 1 was guaranteed out). Soo is the only one that got out by beating the other races instead of the zergs, and Kangho got out by beating Jangbi.
2 zergs advanced from the RO16, and it was another triple zerg group.
None advanced from the RO8 with Symbol being the only zerg to take a game, and it was only 1 game.


The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.



Absurdly small sample size, and you're using words like "overwhelmingly" and "absurd". I just don't understand..

TvZ was 50% in June ffs.

80% chance of winning, is an overwhelming chance
87.5% advancing is an absurd amount
I am not referencing statistics, so sample size isnt what I am discussing (I wouldnt mention only WCS kr if I wanted statistical sample sizes). At the VERY top level, terrans beat zergs. And I mean TOP level. For some reason there is a huge difference amongst those in the top 20 (or even the top 10) when compared to the next 20 below them (in a tournament setting).


Basic common-sense dictates that we don't use percentages when discussing small numbers. If a Zerg won at the very top level, win-rate shifts by a HUGE margin.
Mehukannu
Profile Joined October 2010
Finland421 Posts
July 28 2013 06:22 GMT
#12173
On July 28 2013 14:55 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 14:34 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:29 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 11:49 plogamer wrote:
[quote]

Korean Zergs are faring "less than great"? Just speak straight man. You think Zergs need help?

I think it's a little soon to come to the conclusion that Zerg is in need of buffs, or that Terran is in need of nerfs. I haven't seen -all- the TvZs so far. But from what I've seen in major tournaments, the games have been won by the better player.

I think it is a possibility. I stated earlier that my preferable change would be to give widow mines a multiple stage AoE like siege tanks. So it deals less damage the farther away from the middle, that way z doesnt lose 10 banes and some lings to 1 hit. I mean, just looking at premier league, things look grim.

5 zergs advanced from the RO32, 3 of which were in triple zerg groups (so 1 was guaranteed out). Soo is the only one that got out by beating the other races instead of the zergs, and Kangho got out by beating Jangbi.
2 zergs advanced from the RO16, and it was another triple zerg group.
None advanced from the RO8 with Symbol being the only zerg to take a game, and it was only 1 game.


The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.



Absurdly small sample size, and you're using words like "overwhelmingly" and "absurd". I just don't understand..

TvZ was 50% in June ffs.

80% chance of winning, is an overwhelming chance
87.5% advancing is an absurd amount
I am not referencing statistics, so sample size isnt what I am discussing (I wouldnt mention only WCS kr if I wanted statistical sample sizes). At the VERY top level, terrans beat zergs. And I mean TOP level. For some reason there is a huge difference amongst those in the top 20 (or even the top 10) when compared to the next 20 below them (in a tournament setting).

You get your conclusion from a small sample size which pretty much makes it relevant. The only thing ''absurd'' here is that you draw your conclusions from a ''overwhelmingly'' small amount of data.
All that can be said is that better players wins. Win rates sure as hell isn't going to stay at 50% in a tournament, probably never will.
C=('. ' Q)
TheRabidDeer
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
United States3806 Posts
July 28 2013 06:24 GMT
#12174
On July 28 2013 15:22 Mehukannu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 14:55 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:34 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:29 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
[quote]
I think it is a possibility. I stated earlier that my preferable change would be to give widow mines a multiple stage AoE like siege tanks. So it deals less damage the farther away from the middle, that way z doesnt lose 10 banes and some lings to 1 hit. I mean, just looking at premier league, things look grim.

5 zergs advanced from the RO32, 3 of which were in triple zerg groups (so 1 was guaranteed out). Soo is the only one that got out by beating the other races instead of the zergs, and Kangho got out by beating Jangbi.
2 zergs advanced from the RO16, and it was another triple zerg group.
None advanced from the RO8 with Symbol being the only zerg to take a game, and it was only 1 game.


The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.



Absurdly small sample size, and you're using words like "overwhelmingly" and "absurd". I just don't understand..

TvZ was 50% in June ffs.

80% chance of winning, is an overwhelming chance
87.5% advancing is an absurd amount
I am not referencing statistics, so sample size isnt what I am discussing (I wouldnt mention only WCS kr if I wanted statistical sample sizes). At the VERY top level, terrans beat zergs. And I mean TOP level. For some reason there is a huge difference amongst those in the top 20 (or even the top 10) when compared to the next 20 below them (in a tournament setting).

You get your conclusion from a small sample size which pretty much makes it relevant. The only thing ''absurd'' here is that you draw your conclusions from a ''overwhelmingly'' small amount of data.
All that can be said is that better players wins. Win rates sure as hell isn't going to stay at 50% in a tournament, probably never will.

What is my conclusion?
Frex
Profile Joined March 2012
Finland888 Posts
July 28 2013 06:25 GMT
#12175
On July 28 2013 14:26 Wingblade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 06:12 Viserion wrote:
On July 28 2013 04:11 keglu wrote:
On July 28 2013 00:47 Orek wrote:
On July 28 2013 00:21 Sissors wrote:
And now I can also post a screenshot of my win ratio being worst vs zerg and best vs toss. It isn't THE evidence, and it also isn't evidence at all. It only proofs your best matchup is TvZ (after ZvT). It doesnt proof anything regarding balance, let alone it being 'utterly broken'. If you think N=1 statistics have any relevance then it is better if you just stay aways from stats.

Quite frankly what else I noticed from that page: That is yet again indicates that SC2 players are really loyal. I have played MMO, RTS and FPS games. In every one of those games, a large group of players ran towards whatever was strongest at that moment. Could be gear in MMOs, weapons in FPS, or races in an RTS. Yet of all those games, apparantly only SC2 is different. The most games you played were vs zerg. The least vs terran. SC2 ranks shows a similar image. So that surprises me a bit, considering in every other game people run to whatever is OP, yet in SC2 all those zerg players so incredibly loyal to their race they keep playing it despite it being utterly broken. And not only that, also no one runs to terran race, despite that terran apparantly has easy time considering how OP they are.

It was different during WoL.
Early WoL: Terran was considered OP, Most played race = Terran
End of WoL: Zerg was considered OP, Most played race = Zerg

I guess Zerg underperformance in HotS started only recently. So, it might take a few more months until some of them switch to another race.


Actually Zerg was least played race whole WoL but was much closer to other races at the end of it. Protoss was most played race for most of the time (outside of beginnig where Terran was more played)


http://www.sc2ranks.com/stats/race

Yes that is true, however, terran is the least represented race from Platinum to Grandmaster globally at this moment, and it´s been like that for a long time.


Less players overall = less players in each league. Working as intended.


According to those statistics terran is the 2nd most played race right after protoss.
plogamer
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
Canada3132 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-28 06:30:48
July 28 2013 06:26 GMT
#12176
On July 28 2013 15:24 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 15:22 Mehukannu wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:55 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:34 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:29 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
[quote]

The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.



Absurdly small sample size, and you're using words like "overwhelmingly" and "absurd". I just don't understand..

TvZ was 50% in June ffs.

80% chance of winning, is an overwhelming chance
87.5% advancing is an absurd amount
I am not referencing statistics, so sample size isnt what I am discussing (I wouldnt mention only WCS kr if I wanted statistical sample sizes). At the VERY top level, terrans beat zergs. And I mean TOP level. For some reason there is a huge difference amongst those in the top 20 (or even the top 10) when compared to the next 20 below them (in a tournament setting).

You get your conclusion from a small sample size which pretty much makes it relevant. The only thing ''absurd'' here is that you draw your conclusions from a ''overwhelmingly'' small amount of data.
All that can be said is that better players wins. Win rates sure as hell isn't going to stay at 50% in a tournament, probably never will.

What is my conclusion?

Really. Don't play games. This is online, just be straight. I don't know why you've been bemoaning these stats with terms like overwhelming and absurd.

/edit

On July 28 2013 15:25 Viserion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 14:26 Wingblade wrote:
On July 28 2013 06:12 Viserion wrote:
On July 28 2013 04:11 keglu wrote:
On July 28 2013 00:47 Orek wrote:
On July 28 2013 00:21 Sissors wrote:
And now I can also post a screenshot of my win ratio being worst vs zerg and best vs toss. It isn't THE evidence, and it also isn't evidence at all. It only proofs your best matchup is TvZ (after ZvT). It doesnt proof anything regarding balance, let alone it being 'utterly broken'. If you think N=1 statistics have any relevance then it is better if you just stay aways from stats.

Quite frankly what else I noticed from that page: That is yet again indicates that SC2 players are really loyal. I have played MMO, RTS and FPS games. In every one of those games, a large group of players ran towards whatever was strongest at that moment. Could be gear in MMOs, weapons in FPS, or races in an RTS. Yet of all those games, apparantly only SC2 is different. The most games you played were vs zerg. The least vs terran. SC2 ranks shows a similar image. So that surprises me a bit, considering in every other game people run to whatever is OP, yet in SC2 all those zerg players so incredibly loyal to their race they keep playing it despite it being utterly broken. And not only that, also no one runs to terran race, despite that terran apparantly has easy time considering how OP they are.

It was different during WoL.
Early WoL: Terran was considered OP, Most played race = Terran
End of WoL: Zerg was considered OP, Most played race = Zerg

I guess Zerg underperformance in HotS started only recently. So, it might take a few more months until some of them switch to another race.


Actually Zerg was least played race whole WoL but was much closer to other races at the end of it. Protoss was most played race for most of the time (outside of beginnig where Terran was more played)


http://www.sc2ranks.com/stats/race

Yes that is true, however, terran is the least represented race from Platinum to Grandmaster globally at this moment, and it´s been like that for a long time.


Less players overall = less players in each league. Working as intended.


According to those statistics terran is the 2nd most played race right after protoss.


Not in gold league and above.
Mehukannu
Profile Joined October 2010
Finland421 Posts
July 28 2013 06:31 GMT
#12177
On July 28 2013 15:24 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 15:22 Mehukannu wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:55 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:34 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:29 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 12:51 Terrasmith wrote:
[quote]

The Ro32 was Bo1s, and therefore irrelevant for balance. Flash knocked out two Zergs there, as did First and Trap. In the Ro16 Kangho was the only Zerg to lose to a Terran, and he beat one as well. Maru outplayed Symbol, and Innovation is Innovation. That's this entire S2 Korea Premier league, and I don't see any TvZ imbalance in those results.

What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.



Absurdly small sample size, and you're using words like "overwhelmingly" and "absurd". I just don't understand..

TvZ was 50% in June ffs.

80% chance of winning, is an overwhelming chance
87.5% advancing is an absurd amount
I am not referencing statistics, so sample size isnt what I am discussing (I wouldnt mention only WCS kr if I wanted statistical sample sizes). At the VERY top level, terrans beat zergs. And I mean TOP level. For some reason there is a huge difference amongst those in the top 20 (or even the top 10) when compared to the next 20 below them (in a tournament setting).

You get your conclusion from a small sample size which pretty much makes it relevant. The only thing ''absurd'' here is that you draw your conclusions from a ''overwhelmingly'' small amount of data.
All that can be said is that better players wins. Win rates sure as hell isn't going to stay at 50% in a tournament, probably never will.

What is my conclusion?

Oh, now you are saying that you don't conclusion? Then why the heck are you even trying to argue anything here? How about you stop posting if you aren't going to say anything anyway?
C=('. ' Q)
TheRabidDeer
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
United States3806 Posts
July 28 2013 06:32 GMT
#12178
On July 28 2013 15:26 plogamer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 15:24 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 15:22 Mehukannu wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:55 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:34 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:29 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
[quote]
What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.



Absurdly small sample size, and you're using words like "overwhelmingly" and "absurd". I just don't understand..

TvZ was 50% in June ffs.

80% chance of winning, is an overwhelming chance
87.5% advancing is an absurd amount
I am not referencing statistics, so sample size isnt what I am discussing (I wouldnt mention only WCS kr if I wanted statistical sample sizes). At the VERY top level, terrans beat zergs. And I mean TOP level. For some reason there is a huge difference amongst those in the top 20 (or even the top 10) when compared to the next 20 below them (in a tournament setting).

You get your conclusion from a small sample size which pretty much makes it relevant. The only thing ''absurd'' here is that you draw your conclusions from a ''overwhelmingly'' small amount of data.
All that can be said is that better players wins. Win rates sure as hell isn't going to stay at 50% in a tournament, probably never will.

What is my conclusion?

Really. Don't play games. This is online, just be straight. I don't know why you've been bemoaning these stats with terms like overwhelming and absurd.

I am not playing games, I have stated my conclusion already... which is not very conclusive. I also dont get why you are afraid of adjectives.
plogamer
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
Canada3132 Posts
July 28 2013 06:33 GMT
#12179
On July 28 2013 15:32 TheRabidDeer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 15:26 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 15:24 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 15:22 Mehukannu wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:55 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:34 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:29 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
[quote]

And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.



Absurdly small sample size, and you're using words like "overwhelmingly" and "absurd". I just don't understand..

TvZ was 50% in June ffs.

80% chance of winning, is an overwhelming chance
87.5% advancing is an absurd amount
I am not referencing statistics, so sample size isnt what I am discussing (I wouldnt mention only WCS kr if I wanted statistical sample sizes). At the VERY top level, terrans beat zergs. And I mean TOP level. For some reason there is a huge difference amongst those in the top 20 (or even the top 10) when compared to the next 20 below them (in a tournament setting).

You get your conclusion from a small sample size which pretty much makes it relevant. The only thing ''absurd'' here is that you draw your conclusions from a ''overwhelmingly'' small amount of data.
All that can be said is that better players wins. Win rates sure as hell isn't going to stay at 50% in a tournament, probably never will.

What is my conclusion?

Really. Don't play games. This is online, just be straight. I don't know why you've been bemoaning these stats with terms like overwhelming and absurd.

I am not playing games, I have stated my conclusion already... which is not very conclusive. I also dont get why you are afraid of adjectives.


Afraid? More like annoyed.
TheRabidDeer
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
United States3806 Posts
July 28 2013 06:38 GMT
#12180
On July 28 2013 15:31 Mehukannu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 15:24 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 15:22 Mehukannu wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:55 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:34 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:29 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:41 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:26 TheRabidDeer wrote:
[quote]
What do you have to say about so far hyvaa/life being the only zerg that dropped from the premier league to be returning to it next season? And of the other 2 zergs going back up, 1 was almost a full zerg bracket (only skyhigh being the offrace) and True (who did crush pretty much everybody)?

So 9 dropped down, and 1 returns (so far).


And the only two Terrans who are returning are Bbyong and (possibly) Flash. That's not entirely relevant. Across all of the OSL challenger league ZvT matches, Zerg has won 7 Bo3s and Terran 4.

Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.



Absurdly small sample size, and you're using words like "overwhelmingly" and "absurd". I just don't understand..

TvZ was 50% in June ffs.

80% chance of winning, is an overwhelming chance
87.5% advancing is an absurd amount
I am not referencing statistics, so sample size isnt what I am discussing (I wouldnt mention only WCS kr if I wanted statistical sample sizes). At the VERY top level, terrans beat zergs. And I mean TOP level. For some reason there is a huge difference amongst those in the top 20 (or even the top 10) when compared to the next 20 below them (in a tournament setting).

You get your conclusion from a small sample size which pretty much makes it relevant. The only thing ''absurd'' here is that you draw your conclusions from a ''overwhelmingly'' small amount of data.
All that can be said is that better players wins. Win rates sure as hell isn't going to stay at 50% in a tournament, probably never will.

What is my conclusion?

Oh, now you are saying that you don't conclusion? Then why the heck are you even trying to argue anything here? How about you stop posting if you aren't going to say anything anyway?

Sorry, you said my conclusion was from a small sample size. I thought you knew my conclusion already, it seems you dont. I will restate it again for you:

I think there is a possibility that the matchup favors terrans and my primary idea is that the widow mine needs to have multiple areas of AoE damage like the siege tank. This is my conclusion and concept idea to maybe fix it if there is in fact an issue with balance. I have said this specifically before already, I thought you wouldve seen it since you knew what my conclusion was.

The reason I am citing what I am is because I believe that the imbalance is primarily at the very top of play. The very top of play is important to me, because I dont want it to be considered an upset for a zerg to beat a terran. I like watching premier league and dont have enough time to watch everything else.
On July 28 2013 15:33 plogamer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 28 2013 15:32 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 15:26 plogamer wrote:
On July 28 2013 15:24 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 15:22 Mehukannu wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:55 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:34 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:29 TheRabidDeer wrote:
On July 28 2013 14:02 Terrasmith wrote:
On July 28 2013 13:53 TheRabidDeer wrote:
[quote]
Z wins
DRG vs skyhigh
life vs kop
life vs jjakji
curious vs bang
effort vs yoda
true vs keen
songduri vs sC

T wins
dream vs roro
reality vs kangho
mkp vs shine
gumiho vs soo

Who are skyhigh, kop, or bang?

EDIT: And it is most relevant because 9 zergs dropped while only 1 T dropped from the RO32
12 zergs dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning
4 terrans dropped to challenger league from premier, 1 (maybe 2) returning


Premier league also started with 14 Zergs to 8 Terrans.

Mamuri and Songduri are no better known than the Terrans that you listed; what's your point?

87.5% advance rate is absurd. If 12 zergs advanced from the RO32, hell wouldve broken loose.

I also didnt even include mamuri, I missed that one. So you were wrong even, 5 terrans, not 4. Regardless, my point was that 4 of the 7 zerg wins were overwhelmingly in favor of the zerg. If the zerg lost those, then I would declare without a doubt that there is imbalance in the matchup. It didnt happen though, so it is only a possibility.



Absurdly small sample size, and you're using words like "overwhelmingly" and "absurd". I just don't understand..

TvZ was 50% in June ffs.

80% chance of winning, is an overwhelming chance
87.5% advancing is an absurd amount
I am not referencing statistics, so sample size isnt what I am discussing (I wouldnt mention only WCS kr if I wanted statistical sample sizes). At the VERY top level, terrans beat zergs. And I mean TOP level. For some reason there is a huge difference amongst those in the top 20 (or even the top 10) when compared to the next 20 below them (in a tournament setting).

You get your conclusion from a small sample size which pretty much makes it relevant. The only thing ''absurd'' here is that you draw your conclusions from a ''overwhelmingly'' small amount of data.
All that can be said is that better players wins. Win rates sure as hell isn't going to stay at 50% in a tournament, probably never will.

What is my conclusion?

Really. Don't play games. This is online, just be straight. I don't know why you've been bemoaning these stats with terms like overwhelming and absurd.

I am not playing games, I have stated my conclusion already... which is not very conclusive. I also dont get why you are afraid of adjectives.


Afraid? More like annoyed.

Sorry that I use descriptive words when typing?
Prev 1 607 608 609 610 611 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 2
Reynor vs MaruLIVE!
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena11745
ComeBackTV 2569
TaKeTV 637
Hui .571
3DClanTV 396
Rex258
EnkiAlexander 244
CranKy Ducklings182
mcanning171
Reynor153
UpATreeSC121
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena11745
Hui .571
Rex 258
mcanning 171
Reynor 153
UpATreeSC 121
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 4146
Barracks 1880
Flash 1807
Jaedong 1449
BeSt 1421
EffOrt 1071
Mini 557
Stork 494
ggaemo 355
Snow 333
[ Show more ]
GuemChi 262
Soma 257
Soulkey 240
ZerO 239
ToSsGirL 185
Rush 118
Hyun 105
TY 49
soO 49
Sea.KH 37
Sacsri 37
scan(afreeca) 23
Terrorterran 14
Movie 12
ivOry 9
Bale 8
Britney 0
Dota 2
syndereN434
420jenkins289
XcaliburYe284
Counter-Strike
sgares671
flusha129
edward65
Super Smash Bros
Westballz37
Other Games
singsing2040
hiko1301
B2W.Neo1057
crisheroes444
Fuzer 168
ArmadaUGS108
KnowMe56
QueenE49
ZerO(Twitch)21
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 6
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH281
• Adnapsc2 3
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1624
• WagamamaTV576
League of Legends
• Nemesis4248
• TFBlade799
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
19h 19m
TBD vs Zoun
TBD vs SHIN
TBD vs ShoWTimE
TBD vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 20h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.