• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:31
CEST 08:31
KST 15:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week0[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation13$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation RSL Season 1 - Final Week The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Summer Games Done Quick 2025! US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 587 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 517

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 515 516 517 518 519 1266 Next
willstertben
Profile Joined May 2013
427 Posts
June 09 2013 10:06 GMT
#10321
also: hellbats force you to pull pretty much every worker you have off minerals until they're dead.
that lost mining time usually WAY exceeds the cost terran puts in. so even if you THINK it didn't do damage it actually did a lot of damage.
Magbane
Profile Joined June 2013
Finland95 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-09 10:07:58
June 09 2013 10:07 GMT
#10322
One tank kill two hellbats fast/forces them away from workers. Also that small period of non-mining time is not as costly as sending medivac to its potential death and losing two hellbats.
RaFox17
Profile Joined May 2013
Finland4581 Posts
June 09 2013 10:07 GMT
#10323
On June 09 2013 19:07 Magbane wrote:
One tank kill two hellbats fast/forces them away from workers.

Can you please stop posting in this thread?
willstertben
Profile Joined May 2013
427 Posts
June 09 2013 10:07 GMT
#10324
On June 09 2013 19:04 plogamer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2013 19:01 willstertben wrote:
On June 09 2013 17:04 Sissors wrote:
Should I make the list which units counter 3-3 banshees?


because a gimmicky harasser air unit countered by 0-0 'anti-air' is totally the same thing as
____3-3 CORE ARMY UNITS_____ getting hard countered by a 100 mineral 2 supply high damage with splash unit.


Core or not, Terrans have no equivalent response to mass chargelots without hellbats.


it's not like hellbats wouldn't still be a good unit if they were weaker.

(a lot weaker please, they're hilariously broken.)
Melliflue
Profile Joined October 2012
United Kingdom1389 Posts
June 09 2013 10:08 GMT
#10325
On June 09 2013 18:09 Snowbear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2013 17:31 saddaromma wrote:
Its very clear that Innovation is a better player. But even then, protoss looks inferior in PvT. Terrans have way much options and power.

Game 1 is prime example. Terran losing all drops for nothing and having a better army, also, sOs didnt slip up his macro, his mineral/gas was low and bases were saturated. I think there is a reason why P and Z are allining so much.


Protoss looks inferior in PvT? And on what do you base that? On innovation, the best player in the world, crushing other players? Does that make protoss inferior? Meanwhile the stats show that it's a pretty balanced matchup (http://i.imgur.com/9orDwMj.png).
- But but but.... 50% doesn't mean it's imbalanced! Okay, then let's look around. Talk to GM players. 90% of my gm - high master terran friends have problems against protoss.
- But but but... 50% doesn't mean the matchup is fun! True. For terran it's very fun (multitasking, micro, macro). I can understand that it's not fun for protoss tough (turtle style). But that's a design problem, not a balance problem.

Where did you get those winrates from? The WCS finals went 4-7, GSL was 9-14, WCS EU was 14-23 (0-0 in Korean only and 5-11 in foreigner only), WCS AM was 16-14 (3-5 Korean only, 2-1 foreigner only).

In Pro League? Round 4 PvT was 14-13 and Round 5 was 16-20.

Total (only considering Korean vs Korean): 46-59 for a win % of 43.81. The PvT winrates don't actually look that good for Protoss right now.

All that said, I occasionally look at this thread and I see it is obsessed with winrates (which is why I decided to look at PvT winrates for the WCS (and Pro League since it is seemingly Protoss heavy)). I think winrates are fairly inaccurate unless you have a league structure where everyone plays everyone else once and only once (or twice and only twice perhaps). Otherwise the winrates get skewed by the people who do well. For example, TvZ in the GSL finished 18-17, but Innovation alone went 15-5. Does one player dominating a match-up make up for the rest of the race struggling in the match-up? (I would point to Parting in PvZ at the end of WoL as another example of this.)
scypio
Profile Joined December 2011
Poland2127 Posts
June 09 2013 10:10 GMT
#10326
On June 09 2013 19:07 willstertben wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2013 19:04 plogamer wrote:
On June 09 2013 19:01 willstertben wrote:
On June 09 2013 17:04 Sissors wrote:
Should I make the list which units counter 3-3 banshees?


because a gimmicky harasser air unit countered by 0-0 'anti-air' is totally the same thing as
____3-3 CORE ARMY UNITS_____ getting hard countered by a 100 mineral 2 supply high damage with splash unit.


Core or not, Terrans have no equivalent response to mass chargelots without hellbats.


it's not like hellbats wouldn't still be a good unit if they were weaker.

(a lot weaker please, they're hilariously broken.)


The game is balanced, therefore the hellbats are not broken. You don't like them and want them nerfed - ok, but how should terran deal with P or Z then? Terran representation is at an all-time low for the Code-S already, so that's not like there is a lot of them to spare.
I play random | I like Hots | INnoVation | sOs | Tefel TOP1!
Magbane
Profile Joined June 2013
Finland95 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-09 10:16:15
June 09 2013 10:12 GMT
#10327
For cost to cost: sending medivac and two hellbats costs more than having one tank at your base.

Hellbat drops are zero issue in TvT
Acritter
Profile Joined August 2010
Syria7637 Posts
June 09 2013 10:17 GMT
#10328
On June 09 2013 19:12 Magbane wrote:
For cost to cost: sending medivac and two hellbats costs more than having one tank at your base.

Reactive costs are a big deal. By forcing that tank to remain behind, you weaken your front lines and limit your own potential for aggression.

Also, consider that this requires you have one tank remain for each expansion. 3 bases=3 tanks. Your opponent still only needs the one Medivac.

I mean, this isn't conclusive proof that Hellbat drops are broken or anything. I'm just trying to say that there's more to consider in offensive/defensive situations than just sunk cost.
dont let your memes be dreams - konydora, motivational speaker | not actually living in syria
Chaggi
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)1936 Posts
June 09 2013 10:18 GMT
#10329
On June 09 2013 19:08 Melliflue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2013 18:09 Snowbear wrote:
On June 09 2013 17:31 saddaromma wrote:
Its very clear that Innovation is a better player. But even then, protoss looks inferior in PvT. Terrans have way much options and power.

Game 1 is prime example. Terran losing all drops for nothing and having a better army, also, sOs didnt slip up his macro, his mineral/gas was low and bases were saturated. I think there is a reason why P and Z are allining so much.


Protoss looks inferior in PvT? And on what do you base that? On innovation, the best player in the world, crushing other players? Does that make protoss inferior? Meanwhile the stats show that it's a pretty balanced matchup (http://i.imgur.com/9orDwMj.png).
- But but but.... 50% doesn't mean it's imbalanced! Okay, then let's look around. Talk to GM players. 90% of my gm - high master terran friends have problems against protoss.
- But but but... 50% doesn't mean the matchup is fun! True. For terran it's very fun (multitasking, micro, macro). I can understand that it's not fun for protoss tough (turtle style). But that's a design problem, not a balance problem.

Where did you get those winrates from? The WCS finals went 4-7, GSL was 9-14, WCS EU was 14-23 (0-0 in Korean only and 5-11 in foreigner only), WCS AM was 16-14 (3-5 Korean only, 2-1 foreigner only).

In Pro League? Round 4 PvT was 14-13 and Round 5 was 16-20.

Total (only considering Korean vs Korean): 46-59 for a win % of 43.81. The PvT winrates don't actually look that good for Protoss right now.

All that said, I occasionally look at this thread and I see it is obsessed with winrates (which is why I decided to look at PvT winrates for the WCS (and Pro League since it is seemingly Protoss heavy)). I think winrates are fairly inaccurate unless you have a league structure where everyone plays everyone else once and only once (or twice and only twice perhaps). Otherwise the winrates get skewed by the people who do well. For example, TvZ in the GSL finished 18-17, but Innovation alone went 15-5. Does one player dominating a match-up make up for the rest of the race struggling in the match-up? (I would point to Parting in PvZ at the end of WoL as another example of this.)


I'm not disagreeing with any win % be ause I don't always watch pro league and i don't have the energy to check the numbers but whoever pulls out win rates, and only win rates without any additional evidence for how the win was gotten is stupid. You can't have a discussion about balance without going much further in depth a d seeing how each game was lost. An extreme example is if hellbats were thought of as OP and someone pulled out a 60% win rate in TvZ, you can't say that unless its shown that hellbats were used in a vast majority of the wins to get those wins. It's why it took forever to nerf infester Broodlord cause even though it passes the eye test of being op (which Stephanos 12 min roach felt op at the time too), you need a lot of data

Not directed at you but in general it's p dumb to use win rates, especially across different tournaments in different formats
Magbane
Profile Joined June 2013
Finland95 Posts
June 09 2013 10:19 GMT
#10330
1 tank at your base doesnt have any real effect on your army strenght, its incredibly unrealistic to assume that 1 tank at your base would cost you the game because it wasnt with your main army. On the contrary, if you dont have sufficient defence at home you WILL lose.
willstertben
Profile Joined May 2013
427 Posts
June 09 2013 10:20 GMT
#10331
On June 09 2013 19:10 scypio wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2013 19:07 willstertben wrote:
On June 09 2013 19:04 plogamer wrote:
On June 09 2013 19:01 willstertben wrote:
On June 09 2013 17:04 Sissors wrote:
Should I make the list which units counter 3-3 banshees?


because a gimmicky harasser air unit countered by 0-0 'anti-air' is totally the same thing as
____3-3 CORE ARMY UNITS_____ getting hard countered by a 100 mineral 2 supply high damage with splash unit.


Core or not, Terrans have no equivalent response to mass chargelots without hellbats.


it's not like hellbats wouldn't still be a good unit if they were weaker.

(a lot weaker please, they're hilariously broken.)


The game is balanced, therefore the hellbats are not broken. You don't like them and want them nerfed - ok, but how should terran deal with P or Z then? Terran representation is at an all-time low for the Code-S already, so that's not like there is a lot of them to spare.



i don't think there should be this efficient of a counter for core army units...?

there are really strong counters to marine/marauder but those

1) cost gas
2) are expensive and high tech
3) you can do something about them

1) hellbats cost is only minerals and just 100 of them. that's just ridiculous for how strong they counter lings especially

2) colossus ultras storm fungal banelings. all expensive (1 baneling is 75/25 and you need a lot + constantly replace cause they die)

3) you can kill colossus with vikings and spread out in a good arc while kiting back to kill chargelots
you can kite ultras
you can spread out, run out of storm or just dodge it altogether or snipe/emp the ht
you can spread out, dodge fungal or snipe/emp the ht
you can kite banelings and spread out




on the other hand you can't spread out melee units against hellbats because melee units have to run in and get close to attack. you can't quickly kill or disable hellbats with something from far away during or before a fight.
they are ALWAYS getting their damage of and just a couple of them are going to seriously FUCK UP all zerglings in like a 2 seconds.





Snowbear
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Korea (South)1925 Posts
June 09 2013 10:22 GMT
#10332
On June 09 2013 19:19 Magbane wrote:
1 tank at your base doesnt have any real effect on your army strenght, its incredibly unrealistic to assume that 1 tank at your base would cost you the game because it wasnt with your main army. On the contrary, if you dont have sufficient defence at home you WILL lose.

Dude really, stop with your "1 tank at each base" madness. In the early-midgame you go hellion tank viking, so you just defend with vikings, turrets, and fast hellions. Then you make 3 - 6 turrets and you move out and kill him, because you defended so easy against his hellbat drops.
Chaggi
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)1936 Posts
June 09 2013 10:23 GMT
#10333
On June 09 2013 19:19 Magbane wrote:
1 tank at your base doesnt have any real effect on your army strenght, its incredibly unrealistic to assume that 1 tank at your base would cost you the game because it wasnt with your main army. On the contrary, if you dont have sufficient defence at home you WILL lose.


If you don't react in time. Having tanks at home is huge especially early or mid game when a tank could be 20% of your tank count. You can react, split better or set up better defense like e bunker + turret to deter hellbat drops
Magbane
Profile Joined June 2013
Finland95 Posts
June 09 2013 10:23 GMT
#10334
Im not talking about some fucking early cheesy hellbat drops, im talking about constant threat of them.
CR1PPLeR
Profile Joined May 2013
Greece14 Posts
June 09 2013 10:24 GMT
#10335
I think that they will just remove the healing effect on hellbats which is ridiculous anyway (and I am a terran player) and maybe also add about 25gas cost.
Magbane
Profile Joined June 2013
Finland95 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-09 10:26:12
June 09 2013 10:25 GMT
#10336
On June 09 2013 19:23 Chaggi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2013 19:19 Magbane wrote:
1 tank at your base doesnt have any real effect on your army strenght, its incredibly unrealistic to assume that 1 tank at your base would cost you the game because it wasnt with your main army. On the contrary, if you dont have sufficient defence at home you WILL lose.


If you don't react in time. Having tanks at home is huge especially early or mid game when a tank could be 20% of your tank count. You can react, split better or set up better defense like e bunker + turret to deter hellbat drops

If you want to attack very early then its not as good option, but later stages of the game it is very good way to defend.

But even if you were to attack early, one less tank is not neccesarily going to affect much depending of the engagement.
Snowbear
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Korea (South)1925 Posts
June 09 2013 10:25 GMT
#10337
On June 09 2013 19:20 willstertben wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On June 09 2013 19:10 scypio wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2013 19:07 willstertben wrote:
On June 09 2013 19:04 plogamer wrote:
On June 09 2013 19:01 willstertben wrote:
On June 09 2013 17:04 Sissors wrote:
Should I make the list which units counter 3-3 banshees?


because a gimmicky harasser air unit countered by 0-0 'anti-air' is totally the same thing as
____3-3 CORE ARMY UNITS_____ getting hard countered by a 100 mineral 2 supply high damage with splash unit.


Core or not, Terrans have no equivalent response to mass chargelots without hellbats.


it's not like hellbats wouldn't still be a good unit if they were weaker.

(a lot weaker please, they're hilariously broken.)


The game is balanced, therefore the hellbats are not broken. You don't like them and want them nerfed - ok, but how should terran deal with P or Z then? Terran representation is at an all-time low for the Code-S already, so that's not like there is a lot of them to spare.



i don't think there should be this efficient of a counter for core army units...?

there are really strong counters to marine/marauder but those

1) cost gas
2) are expensive and high tech
3) you can do something about them

1) hellbats cost is only minerals and just 100 of them. that's just ridiculous for how strong they counter lings especially

2) colossus ultras storm fungal banelings. all expensive (1 baneling is 75/25 and you need a lot + constantly replace cause they die)

3) you can kill colossus with vikings and spread out in a good arc while kiting back to kill chargelots
you can kite ultras
you can spread out, run out of storm or just dodge it altogether or snipe/emp the ht
you can spread out, dodge fungal or snipe/emp the ht
you can kite banelings and spread out




on the other hand you can't spread out melee units against hellbats because melee units have to run in and get close to attack. you can't quickly kill or disable hellbats with something from far away during or before a fight.
they are ALWAYS getting their damage of and just a couple of them are going to seriously FUCK UP all zerglings in like a 2 seconds.







If hellbats were as OP as you say, then we would see way more terrans dominate in tournaments, and then we would see way more terrans in GM. Neither of these 2 happened.
Melliflue
Profile Joined October 2012
United Kingdom1389 Posts
June 09 2013 10:25 GMT
#10338
On June 09 2013 19:10 scypio wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2013 19:07 willstertben wrote:
On June 09 2013 19:04 plogamer wrote:
On June 09 2013 19:01 willstertben wrote:
On June 09 2013 17:04 Sissors wrote:
Should I make the list which units counter 3-3 banshees?


because a gimmicky harasser air unit countered by 0-0 'anti-air' is totally the same thing as
____3-3 CORE ARMY UNITS_____ getting hard countered by a 100 mineral 2 supply high damage with splash unit.


Core or not, Terrans have no equivalent response to mass chargelots without hellbats.


it's not like hellbats wouldn't still be a good unit if they were weaker.

(a lot weaker please, they're hilariously broken.)


The game is balanced, therefore the hellbats are not broken. You don't like them and want them nerfed - ok, but how should terran deal with P or Z then? Terran representation is at an all-time low for the Code-S already, so that's not like there is a lot of them to spare.

It's 10P 8T 14Z in WCS KR next season. Season 1 was 7P 11T 14Z. It's only an all-time low for Terran because Terran have almost always been over-represented (by which I mean >=1/3 people were Terran).

By the way, the last season of WoL was 5P 13T 14Z (would have been 14T and 13Z but Polt pulled out).

I think Terran in WCS KR was most affected by Koreans leaving for other regions; TaeJa, Ryung, Mvp could all make Code S (I'm not saying that they would be guaranteed to be in Code S but they could qualify). They also have ForGG, MMA, TheSTC gone. Protoss only really lost HerO and MC, in terms of people who could make Code S, and maybe Oz besides.
Chaggi
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)1936 Posts
June 09 2013 10:28 GMT
#10339
On June 09 2013 19:25 Magbane wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2013 19:23 Chaggi wrote:
On June 09 2013 19:19 Magbane wrote:
1 tank at your base doesnt have any real effect on your army strenght, its incredibly unrealistic to assume that 1 tank at your base would cost you the game because it wasnt with your main army. On the contrary, if you dont have sufficient defence at home you WILL lose.


If you don't react in time. Having tanks at home is huge especially early or mid game when a tank could be 20% of your tank count. You can react, split better or set up better defense like e bunker + turret to deter hellbat drops

If you want to attack very early then its not as good option, but later stages of the game it is very good way to defend.

But even if you were to attack early, one less tank is not neccesarily going to affect much depending of the engagement.


Or I could react better and pull my SCVs sooner aka play better
Snowbear
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Korea (South)1925 Posts
June 09 2013 10:30 GMT
#10340
On June 09 2013 19:25 Magbane wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2013 19:23 Chaggi wrote:
On June 09 2013 19:19 Magbane wrote:
1 tank at your base doesnt have any real effect on your army strenght, its incredibly unrealistic to assume that 1 tank at your base would cost you the game because it wasnt with your main army. On the contrary, if you dont have sufficient defence at home you WILL lose.


If you don't react in time. Having tanks at home is huge especially early or mid game when a tank could be 20% of your tank count. You can react, split better or set up better defense like e bunker + turret to deter hellbat drops

If you want to attack very early then its not as good option, but later stages of the game it is very good way to defend.

But even if you were to attack early, one less tank is not neccesarily going to affect much depending of the engagement.

In the later stages you have turrets and reinforcements man ..
Prev 1 515 516 517 518 519 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 29m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 241
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 300
Noble 117
PianO 104
Bale 23
JulyZerg 16
Dota 2
ODPixel211
NeuroSwarm94
League of Legends
JimRising 714
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor106
Other Games
summit1g8818
Stewie2K792
shahzam739
monkeys_forever422
SortOf65
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick38137
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH361
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• tankgirl 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota250
League of Legends
• Lourlo1505
• Stunt547
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 29m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
6h 29m
Replay Cast
17h 29m
RSL Revival
1d 3h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 9h
OSC
1d 13h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.