• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:28
CEST 16:28
KST 23:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Server Blocker Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Soulkey Muta Micro Map? Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BW General Discussion
Tourneys
Starcraft Superstars Winner/Replays [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 732 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 433

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 431 432 433 434 435 1266 Next
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
April 08 2013 22:48 GMT
#8641
On April 09 2013 07:44 eoLiD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 07:34 aksfjh wrote:
How about, instead of watching Stephano's stream, which has a billion viewers and doesn't need any more, while raging about your "hero" losing to a strat he doesn't understand, you tune into the guy that's apparently abusing the strat to see how it works. QXC only has ~500 viewers despite causing this ruckus, so obviously not very many people care how to beat the style, just want to cry that it's broken.


Because its either to learn how to beat the style when watching the stream of the guy that is playing it than learning it by watching the stream of the guy who is actually beating it?

Obviously he's not beating it though...
Assirra
Profile Joined August 2010
Belgium4169 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-08 22:49:39
April 08 2013 22:49 GMT
#8642
On April 09 2013 07:06 Emzeeshady wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 07:04 aksfjh wrote:
On April 09 2013 06:47 wswas wrote:
meanwhile qxc is beating stephano with pure mine into air

even stephano is complaining about balance now. that's when you know shit's fucked up.

And then Stephano wins with pure roach the next game against mass mine+tanks...

Stephano >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QXC

The fact that QXC can beat Stephano frightens me.

So what has Stephano done exactly so far in HoTS? Don't forget this is a new game.
Emzeeshady
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
Canada4203 Posts
April 08 2013 22:52 GMT
#8643
--- Nuked ---
eoLiD
Profile Joined February 2013
Germany4 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-08 22:54:04
April 08 2013 22:52 GMT
#8644
On April 09 2013 07:48 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 07:44 eoLiD wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:34 aksfjh wrote:
How about, instead of watching Stephano's stream, which has a billion viewers and doesn't need any more, while raging about your "hero" losing to a strat he doesn't understand, you tune into the guy that's apparently abusing the strat to see how it works. QXC only has ~500 viewers despite causing this ruckus, so obviously not very many people care how to beat the style, just want to cry that it's broken.


Because its either to learn how to beat the style when watching the stream of the guy that is playing it than learning it by watching the stream of the guy who is actually beating it?

Obviously he's not beating it though...


On April 09 2013 07:04 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 06:47 wswas wrote:
meanwhile qxc is beating stephano with pure mine into air

even stephano is complaining about balance now. that's when you know shit's fucked up.

And then Stephano wins with pure roach the next game against mass mine+tanks...


44 minutes later ...
Emzeeshady
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
Canada4203 Posts
April 08 2013 22:53 GMT
#8645
--- Nuked ---
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
April 08 2013 22:54 GMT
#8646
On April 09 2013 07:47 Wombat_NI wrote:
The annoyance for me about mass mines, is that it's exactly what the unit should not be.

As a space-control/defensive unit, liberally sprinkled, I quite like it. If it's a unit that indeed is 'massable', well then it seems to have exceeded its remit design wise

Please do explain to me why creating small niches for units and then forcing them into those niches (through nerfs/buffs) is beneficial for the diversity of the game.

Isn't that exactly what people complain about, units in SC2 being too specialized compared to BW? Yet some people want to push that agenda even further?
Emzeeshady
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
Canada4203 Posts
April 08 2013 23:00 GMT
#8647
--- Nuked ---
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25103 Posts
April 08 2013 23:05 GMT
#8648
On April 09 2013 07:54 Bagi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 07:47 Wombat_NI wrote:
The annoyance for me about mass mines, is that it's exactly what the unit should not be.

As a space-control/defensive unit, liberally sprinkled, I quite like it. If it's a unit that indeed is 'massable', well then it seems to have exceeded its remit design wise

Please do explain to me why creating small niches for units and then forcing them into those niches (through nerfs/buffs) is beneficial for the diversity of the game.

Isn't that exactly what people complain about, units in SC2 being too specialized compared to BW? Yet some people want to push that agenda even further?

I am not against them being a core unit. They should not be MASSABLE, I most would share this opinion.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
April 08 2013 23:06 GMT
#8649
On April 09 2013 08:00 Emzeeshady wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 07:54 Bagi wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:47 Wombat_NI wrote:
The annoyance for me about mass mines, is that it's exactly what the unit should not be.

As a space-control/defensive unit, liberally sprinkled, I quite like it. If it's a unit that indeed is 'massable', well then it seems to have exceeded its remit design wise

Please do explain to me why creating small niches for units and then forcing them into those niches (through nerfs/buffs) is beneficial for the diversity of the game.

Isn't that exactly what people complain about, units in SC2 being too specialized compared to BW? Yet some people want to push that agenda even further?

So do you want mass widow mines to be viable? I agree that units should have some overlap purpose but not massed especially when the unit is so obviously designed to be a backup unit.

People massed vultures for mostly spider mines, didn't they?

I don't see a problem with it, as long as there are counters and the overall strat isn't deemed overpowered. FWIW I think once zergs get more comfortable at adding swarm hosts to their army, this mass widow mine gimmick will become obsolete in no time.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25103 Posts
April 08 2013 23:08 GMT
#8650
They made a lot of spider mines to back up tanks and to harass sometimes. Unless this isn't 'mass' widowmines and is instead them being used in that kind of capacity it's just silly to me.

'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
April 08 2013 23:12 GMT
#8651
On April 09 2013 08:05 Wombat_NI wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 07:54 Bagi wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:47 Wombat_NI wrote:
The annoyance for me about mass mines, is that it's exactly what the unit should not be.

As a space-control/defensive unit, liberally sprinkled, I quite like it. If it's a unit that indeed is 'massable', well then it seems to have exceeded its remit design wise

Please do explain to me why creating small niches for units and then forcing them into those niches (through nerfs/buffs) is beneficial for the diversity of the game.

Isn't that exactly what people complain about, units in SC2 being too specialized compared to BW? Yet some people want to push that agenda even further?

I am not against them being a core unit. They should not be MASSABLE, I most would share this opinion.

Define massable for me? If I make tanks and mines at a 1:2 ratio, so that the tanks are there to protect the mines, am I massing mines? Because that's the only scenario I can imagine where it becomes painful for zerg when you can't just slowly clear them with hydras/SHs/whatnot. But at the same time it seems like a smart unit comp for terran.

Now pure mine is more of a gimmick build that will only kill people when it catches them off guard, as there is no logical reason why anyone wouldn't be able to kill them with units that have superior range. So if that is your definition of massable, you can rest easy because they truly aren't.
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
April 08 2013 23:17 GMT
#8652
On April 09 2013 07:52 eoLiD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 07:48 aksfjh wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:44 eoLiD wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:34 aksfjh wrote:
How about, instead of watching Stephano's stream, which has a billion viewers and doesn't need any more, while raging about your "hero" losing to a strat he doesn't understand, you tune into the guy that's apparently abusing the strat to see how it works. QXC only has ~500 viewers despite causing this ruckus, so obviously not very many people care how to beat the style, just want to cry that it's broken.


Because its either to learn how to beat the style when watching the stream of the guy that is playing it than learning it by watching the stream of the guy who is actually beating it?

Obviously he's not beating it though...


Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 07:04 aksfjh wrote:
On April 09 2013 06:47 wswas wrote:
meanwhile qxc is beating stephano with pure mine into air

even stephano is complaining about balance now. that's when you know shit's fucked up.

And then Stephano wins with pure roach the next game against mass mine+tanks...


44 minutes later ...

Touche.
Mehukannu
Profile Joined October 2010
Finland421 Posts
April 08 2013 23:23 GMT
#8653
On April 09 2013 08:08 Wombat_NI wrote:
They made a lot of spider mines to back up tanks and to harass sometimes. Unless this isn't 'mass' widowmines and is instead them being used in that kind of capacity it's just silly to me.


Isn't that what most terrans use mines for now anyway? To back up other units and use them for harassment? I don't see the use of mines changed that much from BW to be honest. The only notable change is that they can be used to defend against air units.
C=('. ' Q)
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25103 Posts
April 08 2013 23:24 GMT
#8654
On April 09 2013 08:23 Mehukannu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 08:08 Wombat_NI wrote:
They made a lot of spider mines to back up tanks and to harass sometimes. Unless this isn't 'mass' widowmines and is instead them being used in that kind of capacity it's just silly to me.


Isn't that what most terrans use mines for now anyway? To back up other units and use them for harassment? I don't see the use of mines changed that much from BW to be honest. The only notable change is that they can be used to defend against air units.

I don't mind that, read my posts. I am referring to this trend where people claim that 'mass mines' is becoming a thing.

My bandwidth is too low to check at present, perhaps they are just exaggerating, which I very much hope.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Ben...
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3485 Posts
April 08 2013 23:25 GMT
#8655
On April 09 2013 08:00 Emzeeshady wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 07:54 Bagi wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:47 Wombat_NI wrote:
The annoyance for me about mass mines, is that it's exactly what the unit should not be.

As a space-control/defensive unit, liberally sprinkled, I quite like it. If it's a unit that indeed is 'massable', well then it seems to have exceeded its remit design wise

Please do explain to me why creating small niches for units and then forcing them into those niches (through nerfs/buffs) is beneficial for the diversity of the game.

Isn't that exactly what people complain about, units in SC2 being too specialized compared to BW? Yet some people want to push that agenda even further?

So do you want mass widow mines to be viable? I agree that units should have some overlap purpose but not massed especially when the unit is so obviously designed to be a backup unit.
Remember the era of roach max? Did it feel broken to play against at the time? Absolutely! Did it get figured out and go away? Yes it did. The roach didn't need anything done to it, just time for people to adapt and figure out how to beat it. That is what needs to happen here. Zergs need to adapt and take time to figure it out. The game hasn't even been out officially for a month yet. We already have people like Catz claiming another supposedly broken composition, Air Toss, is beatable when even two weeks ago people were convinced it was impossible. I would wager that it will be the same with widow mines. Once people are comfortable with them they won't be nearly as difficult to beat. Units like the Swarm Host haven't even been close to fully explored yet. I wouldn't be shocked if it were great at dealing with mass mines.
"Cliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide" -Tastosis
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
April 08 2013 23:30 GMT
#8656
On April 09 2013 08:24 Wombat_NI wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 08:23 Mehukannu wrote:
On April 09 2013 08:08 Wombat_NI wrote:
They made a lot of spider mines to back up tanks and to harass sometimes. Unless this isn't 'mass' widowmines and is instead them being used in that kind of capacity it's just silly to me.


Isn't that what most terrans use mines for now anyway? To back up other units and use them for harassment? I don't see the use of mines changed that much from BW to be honest. The only notable change is that they can be used to defend against air units.

I don't mind that, read my posts. I am referring to this trend where people claim that 'mass mines' is becoming a thing.

My bandwidth is too low to check at present, perhaps they are just exaggerating, which I very much hope.

There's some massing aspect. For the first 12-15 minutes, it's mostly being used as defense along with a couple of mine drops, then mines start getting made en mass. At that point, they're paired with ravens, tanks, BCs, and/or thors. Any opposing army is suicide rushed by mines, but the armies are both scrappy at that point.
Vanadiel
Profile Joined April 2012
France961 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-08 23:58:21
April 08 2013 23:57 GMT
#8657
On April 09 2013 08:25 Ben... wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 08:00 Emzeeshady wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:54 Bagi wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:47 Wombat_NI wrote:
The annoyance for me about mass mines, is that it's exactly what the unit should not be.

As a space-control/defensive unit, liberally sprinkled, I quite like it. If it's a unit that indeed is 'massable', well then it seems to have exceeded its remit design wise

Please do explain to me why creating small niches for units and then forcing them into those niches (through nerfs/buffs) is beneficial for the diversity of the game.

Isn't that exactly what people complain about, units in SC2 being too specialized compared to BW? Yet some people want to push that agenda even further?

So do you want mass widow mines to be viable? I agree that units should have some overlap purpose but not massed especially when the unit is so obviously designed to be a backup unit.
Remember the era of roach max? Did it feel broken to play against at the time? Absolutely! Did it get figured out and go away? Yes it did. The roach didn't need anything done to it, just time for people to adapt and figure out how to beat it. That is what needs to happen here. Zergs need to adapt and take time to figure it out. The game hasn't even been out officially for a month yet. We already have people like Catz claiming another supposedly broken composition, Air Toss, is beatable when even two weeks ago people were convinced it was impossible. I would wager that it will be the same with widow mines. Once people are comfortable with them they won't be nearly as difficult to beat. Units like the Swarm Host haven't even been close to fully explored yet. I wouldn't be shocked if it were great at dealing with mass mines.


The max roach build has been figured out and Protoss have learn to defend it by adapting build and timing, the problem wasn't the unit itself that was too strong, in reality roach are pretty much garbage, but the timing at which you could flood with roach that was really strong. That's why it isn't something comparable, problem with the Widow Mine in TvZ is, in my opinion, is the unit itself has no real answer to it, it's not the timing. It's a fast, really cheap, invisible unit that one shot almost every unit in the zerg arsenal, and then one shot ling/baneling in a huge area of effect that you don't need to micro to be effective (but if you do, it's might be even better).
Emzeeshady
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
Canada4203 Posts
April 09 2013 01:11 GMT
#8658
--- Nuked ---
govie
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
9334 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-09 01:35:14
April 09 2013 01:32 GMT
#8659
On April 09 2013 08:25 Ben... wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 08:00 Emzeeshady wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:54 Bagi wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:47 Wombat_NI wrote:
The annoyance for me about mass mines, is that it's exactly what the unit should not be.

As a space-control/defensive unit, liberally sprinkled, I quite like it. If it's a unit that indeed is 'massable', well then it seems to have exceeded its remit design wise

Please do explain to me why creating small niches for units and then forcing them into those niches (through nerfs/buffs) is beneficial for the diversity of the game.

Isn't that exactly what people complain about, units in SC2 being too specialized compared to BW? Yet some people want to push that agenda even further?

So do you want mass widow mines to be viable? I agree that units should have some overlap purpose but not massed especially when the unit is so obviously designed to be a backup unit.
Remember the era of roach max? Did it feel broken to play against at the time? Absolutely! Did it get figured out and go away? Yes it did. The roach didn't need anything done to it, just time for people to adapt and figure out how to beat it. That is what needs to happen here. Zergs need to adapt and take time to figure it out. The game hasn't even been out officially for a month yet. We already have people like Catz claiming another supposedly broken composition, Air Toss, is beatable when even two weeks ago people were convinced it was impossible. I would wager that it will be the same with widow mines. Once people are comfortable with them they won't be nearly as difficult to beat. Units like the Swarm Host haven't even been close to fully explored yet. I wouldn't be shocked if it were great at dealing with mass mines.


The biggest problem is the mechanic of a mine. How does it choose his target. My bet is that leaving 1 roach as a kamikazehotspot around minerallines would be usefull. Best defence against WMdrops with 5 zerglings and a overseer to clean the mines up after the roach has been hit. If it would work, u only need to deal with MMMM pushes, which arent scary when drops are less effective at killing your eco But, i dont know if thaats viable.. anyone?
The two NBA teams in states with legal weed are called the Nuggets and the Blazers...
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25103 Posts
April 09 2013 01:34 GMT
#8660
On April 09 2013 10:11 Emzeeshady wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 08:06 Bagi wrote:
On April 09 2013 08:00 Emzeeshady wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:54 Bagi wrote:
On April 09 2013 07:47 Wombat_NI wrote:
The annoyance for me about mass mines, is that it's exactly what the unit should not be.

As a space-control/defensive unit, liberally sprinkled, I quite like it. If it's a unit that indeed is 'massable', well then it seems to have exceeded its remit design wise

Please do explain to me why creating small niches for units and then forcing them into those niches (through nerfs/buffs) is beneficial for the diversity of the game.

Isn't that exactly what people complain about, units in SC2 being too specialized compared to BW? Yet some people want to push that agenda even further?

So do you want mass widow mines to be viable? I agree that units should have some overlap purpose but not massed especially when the unit is so obviously designed to be a backup unit.

People massed vultures for mostly spider mines, didn't they?

I don't see a problem with it, as long as there are counters and the overall strat isn't deemed overpowered. FWIW I think once zergs get more comfortable at adding swarm hosts to their army, this mass widow mine gimmick will become obsolete in no time.

I wouldn't know, I was too young to watch BW.

I am not sure there is a problem either. It just gets frustrating losing to Terrans that are way worse then me.

Welcome to T and P vZ for the last months of WoL man.

Not that Zergs should have to be made to feel our pain in HoTS, I advocate a game that is fun and challenging for all in equal measure.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Prev 1 431 432 433 434 435 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Epic.LAN
12:00
Epic.LAN 45 Group Stage
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 551
Hui .245
mcanning 62
SC2Nice 37
SpiritSC2 1
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 49670
Sea 11852
Shuttle 1548
EffOrt 1531
Larva 756
Hyuk 699
firebathero 577
Stork 571
actioN 571
Barracks 487
[ Show more ]
Light 189
Dewaltoss 154
Snow 133
PianO 122
Mind 103
TY 79
Rush 77
ToSsGirL 67
sSak 56
Sharp 52
Aegong 42
Backho 37
[sc1f]eonzerg 22
Free 19
scan(afreeca) 17
Shinee 11
SilentControl 7
Terrorterran 5
Bale 5
Dota 2
Gorgc11454
singsing3097
qojqva1632
Counter-Strike
sgares875
allub174
markeloff79
edward27
Other Games
B2W.Neo1403
hiko1301
DeMusliM608
Scarlett`496
Lowko362
Fuzer 242
Happy174
KnowMe113
ArmadaUGS91
ROOTCatZ79
Harstem72
elazer70
Trikslyr35
QueenE33
FrodaN0
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2951
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis6844
• Jankos1684
Upcoming Events
Big Brain Bouts
1h 32m
sebesdes vs SpeCial
Harstem vs YoungYakov
GgMaChine vs uThermal
CranKy Ducklings
19h 32m
Epic.LAN
21h 32m
CSO Contender
1d 2h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 19h
Online Event
2 days
Esports World Cup
3 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.