• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:29
CEST 17:29
KST 00:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202541RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 688 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 385

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 383 384 385 386 387 1266 Next
President Dead
Profile Joined November 2012
97 Posts
November 08 2012 04:41 GMT
#7681
On November 08 2012 09:05 Shiori wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2012 08:30 President Dead wrote:
Not killing a Zerg before 200 supply implies you must all-in.


This is a defeatist attitude which negates the idea of possibility in ones game. If you can stop worrying so much about a result, it's actually really fun opening and expanding your mind creatively to get the upper hand.


I think you guys even know it's completely wrong, as you're not dumb, but feel frustrated and thus causes you to fall into a confined box of thought?


Stop conducting naive psychoanalysis. None of us are telling you that killing a Zerg before 200/200 = all-in





"Shiori November 08 2012 08:22. Posts 2427 PM Profile Quote #


Oh I'm sorry. I wasn't aware that competitive matchups are supposed to boil down to one all-in every game."



And don't tell em what to do. For all the complaining I haven't heard one solid, non-contradicting point.

Hey, I'm a police officer. Just do what I tell ya.
KamikazeDurrrp
Profile Joined January 2012
United States95 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-08 04:50:37
November 08 2012 04:47 GMT
#7682
I don't why there are so many people asking fungal being changed from a root to a slow. It still wouldn't change the fact that fungal is a large aoe root/slow spell that does dot damage. Zerg would still be massing infestor with unlimited IT and broodlords would still be untouchable. There is literally no downside to using fungal, considering its utility is just unmatched offensively and defensively. Fungal should just be removed from the game or changed to the point where it is either costly and/or risky to use a fungal.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
November 08 2012 08:34 GMT
#7683
On November 08 2012 09:49 CosmicSpiral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2012 09:28 Entirety wrote:
On November 08 2012 09:20 VanGarde wrote:
On November 08 2012 09:10 TheRabidDeer wrote:
mutalisks will lose to in a direct confrontation.

So my proposal is this: Broodlords morph from mutalisks instead of corruptors.


I think your solution is wrong, but your analysis is correct. I agree that corruptors is a big part of the problem in TvZ. In fact if the zerg lategame was broodlord/infestor then things would be very different. The issue is that while you can make all the vikings you want, the zerg can match you on corruptor count and still have enough infestors to fungal and infested terran. I find that the mass corruptor count is what screws me over every single time in the lategame tvz because even if I transition to air in time for the broodlord switch, competent zergs will just make infinity corruptors and then just enough broodlords to deal the damage because they know that with infestor/broodlord blocking all pathing the broodlords can only be attacked from the air, so it doesn't matter if you just have 6 broodlords and the rest in corruptors because Terran can't just abose the overcommitment to air and go marine.


What if Corruptors were changed to do less damage with a generous helping of +damage against Massive? Essentially, this would allow the Corruptor to take out Carriers, Battlecruisers, and Colossi, but they would do FAR less damage against Vikings, Phoenix, Void Rays. Then, we could see Protoss incorporating Void Rays to help fight the Corruptors and we could see Terran utilizing their Vikings to ward off Corruptors as well.


That would still make Carriers and Battlecruisers nearly obsolete against zerg. T and P players want air armies to be viable in this game, which means you need to have a core component that cannot be straight-up countered.


If a race cannot counter(or get equal with) a unit/composition, then there is a win condition in the game (like BL/Inf/Cor vs Protoss right now). Then games will come down to preventing that wincondition from happening, while the other player just turtles. Or it comes down to baseracing. Two stupid alternatives...

To the original idea... The corruptor is fine. Boring as hell, but fine balancewise. Voidrays break even against them or even beat them, Vikings do very well against them and can kite/run easily to locations where they have ground to airsupport, if they are not in sufficient numbers available.
The mere problem is, that Infestors ground to air support is way to strong. ITs are like stimmed marines - a unit that destroys every Air unit but the BC and the BL. Fungal prevents you from running, and wins the game if you clump just once while hitting ground and air units alike with it's splash.

+ Show Spoiler +
The game as a core problem balancing air unit's stats with ground units stats. Air units stats are just way weaker, which renders most of them unavailable when the opponent has antiair. The only really available air units, are mutalisks, broodlords, medivacs, vikings and banshees.
Mutas and banshees are available because they are not combat units and therefore it doesn't matter as much that their stats are kind of bad.
Broodlords are available, because zerg can build huge amounts of them at once to overcome the volatile transitioning phase + long range helps a ton.
Vikings are available because they have long enough range and enough mobility, that they usually can be protected from ground to air while they are in combat + they nearly always find air to air targets, or at least increase the siege range.
Medivacs...

All the others? Void rays, BCs, Carriers are engagement units, that even on paper only pay off if you have a ton of them. They get destroyed because ground to air just overwhelms them before they kick off, or in the case of the carrier... everything just overwhelms it. Phoenix is semiviable, because it's an harassment unit... but it is really easy to shut down by fungal, blink, marines and statics. Corruptors are only viable if your opponent goes heavy into air, before that, they are a joke as they lack mobility to combat anything. Ravens are crap, unless your opponent has a ton of slow units and you a ton of time/ressources to build an expensive unit that does essentially what Tank and Thor do, just a bit better.
Wen_Jie
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia38 Posts
November 08 2012 09:33 GMT
#7684
On November 08 2012 13:41 President Dead wrote:

And don't tell em what to do. For all the complaining I haven't heard one solid, non-contradicting point.



Stop being that guy who says "prove it, prove it, prove it, prove it" to everything, but ignores the responses. For all your (rhetorical) questions, it's obvious that nobody is going to be able to give an answer you'll be happy with.

On topic: pretty much everything that can be said has been said, but i think it would be a good idea to test fungals that can't hit air, with improved hydralisks to fill the role.

MikeMM
Profile Joined November 2012
Russian Federation221 Posts
November 08 2012 11:50 GMT
#7685
SC2 as eSport is broken.
Let’s see at finalists of last five CodeS tournaments.
Life MVP
Seed MC
MVP Squirtle
DRG Genius
Jiakji Leenok
5 different winers and 5 different runner-ups. Only MVP managed to reach finals twice.
SC2 is a game where there is a lof of random and skill mean little.

So all talks about Colossus, sentrie, infestors and others being imba are pointless until mechanics of the game allow skill prevail over random.
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
November 08 2012 15:36 GMT
#7686
On November 08 2012 13:41 President Dead wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2012 09:05 Shiori wrote:
On November 08 2012 08:30 President Dead wrote:
Not killing a Zerg before 200 supply implies you must all-in.


This is a defeatist attitude which negates the idea of possibility in ones game. If you can stop worrying so much about a result, it's actually really fun opening and expanding your mind creatively to get the upper hand.


I think you guys even know it's completely wrong, as you're not dumb, but feel frustrated and thus causes you to fall into a confined box of thought?


Stop conducting naive psychoanalysis. None of us are telling you that killing a Zerg before 200/200 = all-in





"Shiori November 08 2012 08:22. Posts 2427 PM Profile Quote #


Oh I'm sorry. I wasn't aware that competitive matchups are supposed to boil down to one all-in every game."



And don't tell em what to do. For all the complaining I haven't heard one solid, non-contradicting point.


Did you actually just cut off a quote in the middle of a sentence to make it seem like I was saying something I didn't? Get the fuck out, please.
arfyron
Profile Joined July 2011
518 Posts
November 08 2012 15:55 GMT
#7687
There was a time when T were saying that it was impossible to win against P if the P got to 200/200 and you had to all in every game. People started to figure it out. Everyone needs to calm down for a while
convention
Profile Joined October 2011
United States622 Posts
November 08 2012 16:14 GMT
#7688
On November 09 2012 00:55 arfyron wrote:
There was a time when T were saying that it was impossible to win against P if the P got to 200/200 and you had to all in every game. People started to figure it out. Everyone needs to calm down for a while

Except even when people were saying P was hard to beat 200/200, Taeja and others were still destroying lategame toss armies. Which meant that while it was really really hard, it was clearly possible because Taeja would always seem to win those battles over and over again. However, with TvZ and PvZ, no one has ever been consistently beating BL/infestor armies. It doesn't matter whether it is taeja v some mediocre foreign zerg, he would usually get destroyed by a BL/infestor army still. The only difference is, he would be better at hitting timings or allins to prevent the ultimate army from happening.
ckcornflake
Profile Joined October 2010
United States53 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-08 18:22:44
November 08 2012 18:19 GMT
#7689
On November 08 2012 13:47 KamikazeDurrrp wrote:
I don't why there are so many people asking fungal being changed from a root to a slow. It still wouldn't change the fact that fungal is a large aoe root/slow spell that does dot damage. Zerg would still be massing infestor with unlimited IT and broodlords would still be untouchable. There is literally no downside to using fungal, considering its utility is just unmatched offensively and defensively. Fungal should just be removed from the game or changed to the point where it is either costly and/or risky to use a fungal.


Changing to a slow instead of a root would actually be a huge nerf. One good fungal on a clump of units means you can follow up with chain fungals to guarantee kills. Fungal growth itself actually has terrible (as in shitty) damage (30) compared to other AOE spells like Psi Storm that does 80 damage. So it really does have a downside. By changing it to a slow, players can spread their units out while being FG'd which either allow more of their units to survive, or force the Zerg to use a lot more energy. It also means that air units such as void rays and medivacs that get fungaled can still escape if there is enough air space at the edge the map.
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
November 08 2012 18:30 GMT
#7690
On November 09 2012 03:19 ckcornflake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2012 13:47 KamikazeDurrrp wrote:
I don't why there are so many people asking fungal being changed from a root to a slow. It still wouldn't change the fact that fungal is a large aoe root/slow spell that does dot damage. Zerg would still be massing infestor with unlimited IT and broodlords would still be untouchable. There is literally no downside to using fungal, considering its utility is just unmatched offensively and defensively. Fungal should just be removed from the game or changed to the point where it is either costly and/or risky to use a fungal.


Changing to a slow instead of a root would actually be a huge nerf. One good fungal on a clump of units means you can follow up with chain fungals to guarantee kills. Fungal growth itself actually has terrible (as in shitty) damage (30) compared to other AOE spells like Psi Storm that does 80 damage.

Only on paper. People don't bath in Storms, so they don't take 80 damage because they don't stay in the AoE. People are forced to bath in Fungals if Infestors have enough energy, so they do take more than 30/40 damage. In the end I'm fairly sure than an average Storm deals much less damage than a Fungal Growth because of the lesser radius and the possibility to dodge the spell.
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
November 08 2012 19:12 GMT
#7691
On November 09 2012 03:19 ckcornflake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2012 13:47 KamikazeDurrrp wrote:
I don't why there are so many people asking fungal being changed from a root to a slow. It still wouldn't change the fact that fungal is a large aoe root/slow spell that does dot damage. Zerg would still be massing infestor with unlimited IT and broodlords would still be untouchable. There is literally no downside to using fungal, considering its utility is just unmatched offensively and defensively. Fungal should just be removed from the game or changed to the point where it is either costly and/or risky to use a fungal.


Changing to a slow instead of a root would actually be a huge nerf. One good fungal on a clump of units means you can follow up with chain fungals to guarantee kills. Fungal growth itself actually has terrible (as in shitty) damage (30) compared to other AOE spells like Psi Storm that does 80 damage. So it really does have a downside. By changing it to a slow, players can spread their units out while being FG'd which either allow more of their units to survive, or force the Zerg to use a lot more energy. It also means that air units such as void rays and medivacs that get fungaled can still escape if there is enough air space at the edge the map.


You also have to take into consideration when comparing Fungal vs. Storm is that Fungal is very click effective. Point, click, guarenteed 30/40 dmg to that unit. Storm has a delay, HTs are slow and Storm range is more limited than you think, the cast has a delay too, so the effective damage is usually 0-40. One has root, guarenteed damage, can be used right out of the box. The other has inconsistent damage, cannot be used right then, needs to be researched. Notice the imbalance now? Infestor is far and away the best caster of the 3.
The more you know, the less you understand.
teamhozac
Profile Joined April 2012
404 Posts
November 08 2012 20:47 GMT
#7692
On November 09 2012 00:55 arfyron wrote:
There was a time when T were saying that it was impossible to win against P if the P got to 200/200 and you had to all in every game. People started to figure it out. Everyone needs to calm down for a while


Still impossible for me lol
President Dead
Profile Joined November 2012
97 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-09 00:52:48
November 09 2012 00:50 GMT
#7693
On November 09 2012 00:36 Shiori wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2012 13:41 President Dead wrote:
On November 08 2012 09:05 Shiori wrote:
On November 08 2012 08:30 President Dead wrote:
Not killing a Zerg before 200 supply implies you must all-in.


This is a defeatist attitude which negates the idea of possibility in ones game. If you can stop worrying so much about a result, it's actually really fun opening and expanding your mind creatively to get the upper hand.


I think you guys even know it's completely wrong, as you're not dumb, but feel frustrated and thus causes you to fall into a confined box of thought?


Stop conducting naive psychoanalysis. None of us are telling you that killing a Zerg before 200/200 = all-in





"Shiori November 08 2012 08:22. Posts 2427 PM Profile Quote #


Oh I'm sorry. I wasn't aware that competitive matchups are supposed to boil down to one all-in every game."





And don't tell em what to do. For all the complaining I haven't heard one solid, non-contradicting point.


Did you actually just cut off a quote in the middle of a sentence to make it seem like I was saying something I didn't? Get the fuck out, please.




That is not nice. It is very clear what you wrote. If you dont mean something you shouldnt say it so there is no confusion. You telling and swearing at me to leave when I am just trying to enlighten the conversation is in poor tatse and not conducive to the conversation. I ask not to be sworn at and please reply with something substantial.


Also, the idea of rhetorical questions and demanding "proof" is very valid. If someone has a mathematically consistent point, then there is no way I can counter argue it. As far as I know, Blizzard are the professionals and have worked very hard and doing a good job with balance.
Hey, I'm a police officer. Just do what I tell ya.
Wen_Jie
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia38 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-09 07:32:20
November 09 2012 07:31 GMT
#7694
On November 09 2012 09:50 President Dead wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2012 00:36 Shiori wrote:
On November 08 2012 13:41 President Dead wrote:
On November 08 2012 09:05 Shiori wrote:
On November 08 2012 08:30 President Dead wrote:
Not killing a Zerg before 200 supply implies you must all-in.


This is a defeatist attitude which negates the idea of possibility in ones game. If you can stop worrying so much about a result, it's actually really fun opening and expanding your mind creatively to get the upper hand.


I think you guys even know it's completely wrong, as you're not dumb, but feel frustrated and thus causes you to fall into a confined box of thought?


Stop conducting naive psychoanalysis. None of us are telling you that killing a Zerg before 200/200 = all-in





"Shiori November 08 2012 08:22. Posts 2427 PM Profile Quote #


Oh I'm sorry. I wasn't aware that competitive matchups are supposed to boil down to one all-in every game."





And don't tell em what to do. For all the complaining I haven't heard one solid, non-contradicting point.


Did you actually just cut off a quote in the middle of a sentence to make it seem like I was saying something I didn't? Get the fuck out, please.




That is not nice. It is very clear what you wrote. If you dont mean something you shouldnt say it so there is no confusion. You telling and swearing at me to leave when I am just trying to enlighten the conversation is in poor tatse and not conducive to the conversation. I ask not to be sworn at and please reply with something substantial.


Also, the idea of rhetorical questions and demanding "proof" is very valid. If someone has a mathematically consistent point, then there is no way I can counter argue it. As far as I know, Blizzard are the professionals and have worked very hard and doing a good job with balance.


The problem is that your posts have literally no content, with the possible exception of your statistics from back in 2011. Rhetorical questions are a language device and contribute nothing to an actual discussion.

As for mathematical consistency... balance is completely subjective. Going into a subjective discussion and asking for mathematical evidence is pointless when any numbers can and will be interpreted subjectively. Pointing out that a subjective discussion is subjective, as you're constantly doing as though it's some kind of evidence against points being raised, is redundant.
K3Nyy
Profile Joined February 2010
United States1961 Posts
November 09 2012 07:45 GMT
#7695
I've always thought that both Storm's and Fungal's damage should be reduced by the armor level the opponent has. Something like -3 damage per level would be really nice. It would prevent Marines from pretty much dying instantly to Storm/Fungal and make it more forgiving on the Terran in those large 200/200 battles.

Or maybe an alternative solution is place a cool down on both the spells so each player can cast one Storm or Fungal every 2-3 seconds. Blanket storms and Fungals would not exist and the player would need more precision and accuracy to use one.

Either way though, Fungal's radius should be reduced slightly.
Salteador Neo
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Andorra5591 Posts
November 09 2012 13:01 GMT
#7696
So even the GSL pros accept the fact that zerg is the strongest race and no one picked a zerg as opponent as long as there was a toss/terran avaliable? (read it on another thread, haven't checked myself)
Revolutionist fan
Glorfindel!
Profile Joined May 2011
Sweden1815 Posts
November 09 2012 13:52 GMT
#7697
"Although better mechanics are also important, I think Zerg's Broodlord and Infestor army is too strong. I don't know about ZvT, but in some maps they are way too strong in ZvP. Daybreak is a good example. Even though I am a big whiner for Zerg, I honestly think this composition is imbalanced. Solutions for this strategy should come out pretty soon though." - Nestea

Even the Zergs seems to agree to BL/Infestor actually being OP right now. Would be interesting to here Blizzard give some kind of statement regarding the current balance-situation.

Source/Interview from here
http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/598681/1/Glorfindel/ladder/161337#current-rank
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
November 09 2012 14:01 GMT
#7698
On November 09 2012 09:50 President Dead wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2012 00:36 Shiori wrote:
On November 08 2012 13:41 President Dead wrote:
On November 08 2012 09:05 Shiori wrote:
On November 08 2012 08:30 President Dead wrote:
Not killing a Zerg before 200 supply implies you must all-in.


This is a defeatist attitude which negates the idea of possibility in ones game. If you can stop worrying so much about a result, it's actually really fun opening and expanding your mind creatively to get the upper hand.


I think you guys even know it's completely wrong, as you're not dumb, but feel frustrated and thus causes you to fall into a confined box of thought?


Stop conducting naive psychoanalysis. None of us are telling you that killing a Zerg before 200/200 = all-in





"Shiori November 08 2012 08:22. Posts 2427 PM Profile Quote #


Oh I'm sorry. I wasn't aware that competitive matchups are supposed to boil down to one all-in every game."





And don't tell em what to do. For all the complaining I haven't heard one solid, non-contradicting point.


Did you actually just cut off a quote in the middle of a sentence to make it seem like I was saying something I didn't? Get the fuck out, please.




That is not nice. It is very clear what you wrote.

Apparently it isn't. I said that none of us are telling you that killing a Zerg before 200/200 is an all-in because of our biases. Not that it isn't an all-in. I said that the reason we're telling you that has nothing to do with our own personal biases. I understand the ambiguity, but seeing as how there wasn't a period or semicolon...
Saigon2246
Profile Joined October 2012
Hungary23 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-09 20:26:00
November 09 2012 20:20 GMT
#7699
Let's swing a little away from BL-Inf, it should be pretty much obvious for now to even Blizzard that it's too strong. Even the solution is sort of outlined, slow instead of rooting units.

Since the start major changes took place and in the current situation terran seems to be the weakest race (the irony ). As far as I know, the dramatic decline both in terran ladder presence and tournament placements started since the Queen buff, which was in Patch 1.4.3. (Of course effects added up with the previous terran nerfs.)

Unfortunately I don't play a lot because I'm more of a watcher, which is why I'm pretty bad, but because I watch a lot of pro games I'm quite up-to-date with the current metagame and strategies.

So, as of the Queen buff, suddenly all terran pressure builds and timings started not to work anymore and terrans more and more struggled against zerg which is where we are at the moment. Catching some matches last MLG, it just amazed me how hopeless terrans looked against zerg creep spread. If you remember Scarlett vs Bomber, zerg creep was nearly at the terrans third all of the matches like at 10-12 minutes, I don't remember exactly, but it was so insane, Bomber could hardly move out or take a third, and only managed to take off one game of Scarlett, and even that was because Scarlett screwed up big time.

So I was wondering, what if Queens could only use their buffed ground range after Lair? Would this help a little bit for terrans, what do you think? I guess this would mean that hellions could deny creep and reactor hellion would be useful again until the zerg gets Lair. I guess this would delay at least creep spread, which would help terrans moving out.
Asymptote1
Profile Joined December 2011
121 Posts
November 09 2012 20:56 GMT
#7700
Since the start major changes took place and in the current situation terran seems to be the weakest race (the irony ). As far as I know, the dramatic decline both in terran ladder presence and tournament placements started since the Queen buff, which was in Patch 1.4.3. (Of course effects added up with the previous terran nerfs.)


How do you figure that? Protoss is the race with the least representation in GSL..
Prev 1 383 384 385 386 387 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 2
Reynor vs MaruLIVE!
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena14706
ComeBackTV 2850
TaKeTV 710
Hui .646
3DClanTV 456
EnkiAlexander 272
Rex270
mcanning197
CranKy Ducklings185
Reynor167
UpATreeSC144
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena14706
Hui .646
Rex 270
mcanning 199
Reynor 175
UpATreeSC 147
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 5034
Flash 1831
Jaedong 1788
Barracks 1467
BeSt 1207
EffOrt 793
ggaemo 743
Stork 698
Mini 673
Snow 447
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 319
GuemChi 253
Soma 246
ZerO 223
Rush 131
Hyun 84
Dewaltoss 74
TY 65
soO 38
Sacsri 37
scan(afreeca) 33
sas.Sziky 26
Yoon 19
Terrorterran 16
Movie 15
Bale 6
Aegong 2
Dota 2
syndereN512
420jenkins360
XcaliburYe283
Counter-Strike
sgares647
fl0m626
flusha284
byalli152
edward55
Super Smash Bros
Westballz33
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor76
Other Games
singsing1966
hiko998
crisheroes451
Fuzer 164
ArmadaUGS86
KnowMe77
QueenE58
ZerO(Twitch)18
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 6
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH230
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2658
• WagamamaTV629
• masondota2616
League of Legends
• Nemesis5604
• TFBlade844
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
18h 32m
TBD vs Zoun
TBD vs SHIN
TBD vs ShoWTimE
TBD vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 19h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.