• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 04:34
CET 10:34
KST 18:34
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2
Community News
BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion6Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)16Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 105
StarCraft 2
General
I am looking for StarCraft 2 Beta Patch files Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets When will we find out if there are more tournament
Tourneys
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC2 AI Tournament 2026 $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone
Brood War
General
Video Footage from 2005: The Birth of G2 in Spain [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Navigating the Risks and Rew…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2651 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 247

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 245 246 247 248 249 1266 Next
vthree
Profile Joined November 2011
Hong Kong8039 Posts
July 08 2012 09:19 GMT
#4921
If you look at the top 10 ELO Terrans and Zergs and compare their last 10 vZ/vT, you can pretty tell what the patch has done for balance. Problem was that the Queen buff was to shore up the early game in TvZ since things like 2 rax/hellion push was deemed too strong (in the sense that it is easy to execute and hard to defend). But the side effect was the mid game is totally zerg favor now because zerg can drone up without only Queens as defense and creep spread. Pretty much ALL terran mid game timings no longer work. So terrans now have to go quick 3CC which is venerable to roach/ling/bang busts. Or the zerg and just go 4 hatch with 80 drones and just outproduce the terran anyways.
Pinna
Profile Joined April 2011
Finland152 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-08 20:47:30
July 08 2012 20:43 GMT
#4922
On July 08 2012 11:25 Shiori wrote:


Show nested quote +
Just why do Terrans think that ravens are a god-awful unit and an ridicilously expensive one?

Because they are, and because 1 slip up means they all get Fungaled and you lose thousands of Gas.

Yes, because it is like terrans use all their gas in the lategame. Oh wait.. Using ravens brings Terran to the same situation as Zerg and Protoss are already in, which is: lose your army once, lose the game.
Show nested quote +
Why won't we see thors in the lategame compositions?
We do.

I disagree. Thors are actually ok'ish if you can get them to target the broodlords before they un-split. Thors are also good against the ultralisk-switches which may be incoming if you make a ton of vikings. And if the Zerg is starting to run away, you might get to snipe couple of infestors with them.
Show nested quote +
Why can't BC:s be buffed?
Because Blizzard hates buffing Capital Ships.

I agree, and that's because of the strenght of the basic units.

School..
hzflank
Profile Joined August 2011
United Kingdom2991 Posts
July 08 2012 20:50 GMT
#4923
Pinna, how on earth can you say Thors are good against Broods? If thors could walk over the broodlings then they might get some shots off, but between broodlings and fungals the thors just cannot get into range.

And if any race can lose their whole army and not lose the game it is zerg in the midgame ZvP or protoss in the lategame PvT. Terran is never in that situation after the very early game (first few drops).

I am a protoss player and have no pro-terran bias, but can we please be the slightest bit neutral?
Toastie.NL
Profile Joined July 2012
Netherlands232 Posts
July 08 2012 20:52 GMT
#4924
On July 09 2012 05:43 Pinna wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 08 2012 11:25 Shiori wrote:


Just why do Terrans think that ravens are a god-awful unit and an ridicilously expensive one?

Because they are, and because 1 slip up means they all get Fungaled and you lose thousands of Gas.

Yes, because it is like terrans use all their gas in the lategame. Oh wait.. Using ravens brings Terran to the same situation as Zerg and Protoss are already in, which is: lose your army once, lose the game.
What he means is that Ravens have a casting range of 6 (IIRC) on Seeker Missile (the useful spell) which can be countered with a range 8+2 spell for Zerg or a range 9 spell for Protoss. Ravens rely on the opponent not paying attention to get their shots off. And once they got them off, they'll die regardless.

Show nested quote +
Why won't we see thors in the lategame compositions?
We do.

I disagree. Thors are actually ok'ish if you can get them to target the broodlords before they un-split. Thors are also good against the ultralisk-switches which may be incoming if you make a ton of vikings. And if the Zerg is starting to run away, you might get to snipe couple of infestors with them.
Again, using thors relies on your opponent not splitting (and thus messing up), also, Thors without an upgrade advantage do pretty terrible damage.


Show nested quote +
Why can't BC:s be buffed?
Because Blizzard hates buffing Capital Ships.

I agree, and that's because of the strenght of the basic units.


That, and the fact that 3/3/3 Carriers or 3/3 Battlecruisers are pretty fucking powerful units, it's just hard to transition into them.
EU Random Player - Contact me for anything :-)!
ahole-surprise
Profile Joined August 2007
United States813 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-08 21:12:29
July 08 2012 21:08 GMT
#4925
Good luck getting Blizzard to revert the balance changes. I think it's a marketing ploy to get people to play Zerg since they're so strong and create interest in Zerg, so casual players will give a fuck about Zerg single player campaign and hardcore players will have an extra incentive to buy HoTS since WoL is so "broken." Not that hardcore players would need that incentive since they have to buy the expansion anyway if they want to play competitively, but by making the game so "imbalanced" straddlers who would have stuck around in WoL for a few months maybe will just buy HoTs now on day one.

I'm convinced of this conspiracy theory because it's exactly what I would do as Blizzard, if I were the currently existing Blizzard that forced B.net to even install the game so as to prevent piracy.
Pulp can move, baby!
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
July 08 2012 21:15 GMT
#4926
On July 09 2012 05:52 Toastie.NL wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 09 2012 05:43 Pinna wrote:
On July 08 2012 11:25 Shiori wrote:


Just why do Terrans think that ravens are a god-awful unit and an ridicilously expensive one?

Because they are, and because 1 slip up means they all get Fungaled and you lose thousands of Gas.

Yes, because it is like terrans use all their gas in the lategame. Oh wait.. Using ravens brings Terran to the same situation as Zerg and Protoss are already in, which is: lose your army once, lose the game.
What he means is that Ravens have a casting range of 6 (IIRC) on Seeker Missile (the useful spell) which can be countered with a range 8+2 spell for Zerg or a range 9 spell for Protoss. Ravens rely on the opponent not paying attention to get their shots off. And once they got them off, they'll die regardless.
Show nested quote +

Why won't we see thors in the lategame compositions?
We do.

I disagree. Thors are actually ok'ish if you can get them to target the broodlords before they un-split. Thors are also good against the ultralisk-switches which may be incoming if you make a ton of vikings. And if the Zerg is starting to run away, you might get to snipe couple of infestors with them.
Again, using thors relies on your opponent not splitting (and thus messing up), also, Thors without an upgrade advantage do pretty terrible damage.
Show nested quote +


Why can't BC:s be buffed?
Because Blizzard hates buffing Capital Ships.

I agree, and that's because of the strenght of the basic units.


That, and the fact that 3/3/3 Carriers or 3/3 Battlecruisers are pretty fucking powerful units, it's just hard to transition into them.


Fungal has range 9 (+radius 2)

And yes, clumping air is bad, spreading it out too far is bad as well. When you move stuff clumps automatically, so good spreading is not possible. But amazingly, such comments come from Terrans that keep on complaining about how spreading up armies against splah and keeping it spread is so hard.

I agree on the BCs (and Carriers and also on Ravens) being really hard to transition into properly. However, I don't think anybody apart from MVP even has a proper gameplan for such a thing yet - and MVP simply gets there when he wants to, because - unlike everyone else - he sets up for it.
HinagikUx
Profile Joined January 2011
United States178 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-08 21:25:12
July 08 2012 21:24 GMT
#4927
On July 09 2012 06:15 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 09 2012 05:52 Toastie.NL wrote:
On July 09 2012 05:43 Pinna wrote:
On July 08 2012 11:25 Shiori wrote:


Just why do Terrans think that ravens are a god-awful unit and an ridicilously expensive one?

Because they are, and because 1 slip up means they all get Fungaled and you lose thousands of Gas.

Yes, because it is like terrans use all their gas in the lategame. Oh wait.. Using ravens brings Terran to the same situation as Zerg and Protoss are already in, which is: lose your army once, lose the game.
What he means is that Ravens have a casting range of 6 (IIRC) on Seeker Missile (the useful spell) which can be countered with a range 8+2 spell for Zerg or a range 9 spell for Protoss. Ravens rely on the opponent not paying attention to get their shots off. And once they got them off, they'll die regardless.

Why won't we see thors in the lategame compositions?
We do.

I disagree. Thors are actually ok'ish if you can get them to target the broodlords before they un-split. Thors are also good against the ultralisk-switches which may be incoming if you make a ton of vikings. And if the Zerg is starting to run away, you might get to snipe couple of infestors with them.
Again, using thors relies on your opponent not splitting (and thus messing up), also, Thors without an upgrade advantage do pretty terrible damage.


Why can't BC:s be buffed?
Because Blizzard hates buffing Capital Ships.

I agree, and that's because of the strenght of the basic units.


That, and the fact that 3/3/3 Carriers or 3/3 Battlecruisers are pretty fucking powerful units, it's just hard to transition into them.


Fungal has range 9 (+radius 2)

And yes, clumping air is bad, spreading it out too far is bad as well. When you move stuff clumps automatically, so good spreading is not possible. But amazingly, such comments come from Terrans that keep on complaining about how spreading up armies against splah and keeping it spread is so hard.

I agree on the BCs (and Carriers and also on Ravens) being really hard to transition into properly. However, I don't think anybody apart from MVP even has a proper gameplan for such a thing yet - and MVP simply gets there when he wants to, because - unlike everyone else - he sets up for it.


creator vs Coca in gstl recently. Sets up really well for carrier transition, but imo the build time is way too long and makes them unviable; he literally loses 100 supply and 2 mining bases while trying to pump one round of carriers out. The game is designed so that you need to stay 200/200 in the late game and throwing away a chunk of supply for carriers or BC's leads to an impossible to defend counter attack due to the strength of the infestor/BL comp which will kill what you have before you get a healthy number of capital ships out
uGpTaiga/HinagikUx NA Server
InoyouS2
Profile Joined December 2011
1005 Posts
July 08 2012 21:26 GMT
#4928
Considering the amount of Terran players pre-patch, post-patch you're looking at maybe 80% of players being Zerg and Protoss, the 20% being Terran players who were actually committed enough to the race to keep playing it.

At least in the era of Terran dominance there was actually something to watch except: 200-200 go kill him, gg.
IMMvp|fOrGG|IMNesTea|oGsMC|Liquid`Hero|DongRaeGu|Slayers_MMA|Liquid`TLO|MarineKingPrime|IMSeed
phiinix
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States1169 Posts
July 08 2012 21:37 GMT
#4929
On July 09 2012 06:08 ahole-surprise wrote:
Good luck getting Blizzard to revert the balance changes. I think it's a marketing ploy to get people to play Zerg since they're so strong and create interest in Zerg, so casual players will give a fuck about Zerg single player campaign and hardcore players will have an extra incentive to buy HoTS since WoL is so "broken." Not that hardcore players would need that incentive since they have to buy the expansion anyway if they want to play competitively, but by making the game so "imbalanced" straddlers who would have stuck around in WoL for a few months maybe will just buy HoTs now on day one.

I'm convinced of this conspiracy theory because it's exactly what I would do as Blizzard, if I were the currently existing Blizzard that forced B.net to even install the game so as to prevent piracy.


Well that only really works if the change is reverted in HotS or if there are more mid and late game choices for terran. Not trying to sound like I know how the game will work out, but looking at the battle hellion, widow mine, and warhound (am I missing anything else?) they seem much more geared towards tvt and tvp, not so much tvz. Additionally, swarm hosts, ultra burrow charge, and vipers are additions to the zerg mid and late game, which would make tvz even more hard, and even more apparent that terrans are struggling in the matchup, since this problem is about those stages in the game.


I have to heavily disagree with Pinna that using gas and ravens put terran on the same footing with zerg and protoss "lose army once and lose the game" It's not actually how it works. I think it would take a fool to honestly argue that terran has the same rebuilding capacity as zerg larve or protoss warp gate/chrono.
Corvi
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Germany1406 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-08 21:46:09
July 08 2012 21:44 GMT
#4930
here is how i would fix terran:

- vikings are now low armored
- vikings ground dmg +1
- ground mech updates effects viking ground dmg

here is what we would get:

1.: cant get killed so easily by infestors or focused down by stalkers

2.: dont let them and the fact you have air superiority be absolutely useless when opponent transitions away from broodlords or collossi.

3.: make mech viable tvp, to have at least one metal unit that doesnt get roflstomped by immortals.

what do you think?
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-08 21:50:12
July 08 2012 21:46 GMT
#4931
On July 09 2012 06:24 HinagikUx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 09 2012 06:15 Big J wrote:
On July 09 2012 05:52 Toastie.NL wrote:
On July 09 2012 05:43 Pinna wrote:
On July 08 2012 11:25 Shiori wrote:


Just why do Terrans think that ravens are a god-awful unit and an ridicilously expensive one?

Because they are, and because 1 slip up means they all get Fungaled and you lose thousands of Gas.

Yes, because it is like terrans use all their gas in the lategame. Oh wait.. Using ravens brings Terran to the same situation as Zerg and Protoss are already in, which is: lose your army once, lose the game.
What he means is that Ravens have a casting range of 6 (IIRC) on Seeker Missile (the useful spell) which can be countered with a range 8+2 spell for Zerg or a range 9 spell for Protoss. Ravens rely on the opponent not paying attention to get their shots off. And once they got them off, they'll die regardless.

Why won't we see thors in the lategame compositions?
We do.

I disagree. Thors are actually ok'ish if you can get them to target the broodlords before they un-split. Thors are also good against the ultralisk-switches which may be incoming if you make a ton of vikings. And if the Zerg is starting to run away, you might get to snipe couple of infestors with them.
Again, using thors relies on your opponent not splitting (and thus messing up), also, Thors without an upgrade advantage do pretty terrible damage.


Why can't BC:s be buffed?
Because Blizzard hates buffing Capital Ships.

I agree, and that's because of the strenght of the basic units.


That, and the fact that 3/3/3 Carriers or 3/3 Battlecruisers are pretty fucking powerful units, it's just hard to transition into them.


Fungal has range 9 (+radius 2)

And yes, clumping air is bad, spreading it out too far is bad as well. When you move stuff clumps automatically, so good spreading is not possible. But amazingly, such comments come from Terrans that keep on complaining about how spreading up armies against splah and keeping it spread is so hard.

I agree on the BCs (and Carriers and also on Ravens) being really hard to transition into properly. However, I don't think anybody apart from MVP even has a proper gameplan for such a thing yet - and MVP simply gets there when he wants to, because - unlike everyone else - he sets up for it.


creator vs Coca in gstl recently. Sets up really well for carrier transition, but imo the build time is way too long and makes them unviable; he literally loses 100 supply and 2 mining bases while trying to pump one round of carriers out. The game is designed so that you need to stay 200/200 in the late game and throwing away a chunk of supply for carriers or BC's leads to an impossible to defend counter attack due to the strength of the infestor/BL comp which will kill what you have before you get a healthy number of capital ships out


lol, no he didnt setup properly. He went to 200/200 and then started building 7carriers when he was losing a combat and needed units instantly.It's what happens to Zergs when they max on roaches in ZvP, what happens to Terran when they max on MMM in TvP and apparently happens when you get destroyed in a battle and start 42 supply of carriers while your SGs are being sieged by a maxed (? or at least 50supply advantage BL) army (the creator game).
darthfoley
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States8004 Posts
July 08 2012 21:52 GMT
#4932
On July 09 2012 06:44 Corvi wrote:
here is how i would fix terran:

- vikings are now low armored
- vikings ground dmg +1
- ground mech updates effects viking ground dmg

here is what we would get:

1.: cant get killed so easily by infestors or focused down by stalkers

2.: dont let them and the fact you have air superiority be absolutely useless when opponent transitions away from broodlords or collossi.

3.: make mech viable tvp, to have at least one metal unit that doesnt get roflstomped by immortals.

what do you think?


that's actually an interesting idea, i'm not good enough to gauge it though (only high diamond)
watch the wall collide with my fist, mostly over problems that i know i should fix
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-08 21:55:49
July 08 2012 21:53 GMT
#4933
I think everyone's missing the bigger problem: neither Protoss nor Terran have any way of dealing with lategame Zerg reliably. Whether it's the massive, scaling economy which benefits from stacked Larva, or the potency of the Infestor/BL, both races have an incredibly hard time playing standard against lategame Zerg armies. While it's certainly true that there are numerous problems existing for mid and early game XvZ, mostly insofar as pressure has been totally stifled by patch after patch, the true problem is that this pressure is necessary. No matchup should be on a timer. Period.

Please don't give me any ridiculous examples about lategame TvP in BW. It's not the same. I want a dynamic matchup in XvZ, and right now we don't have it. Archon Toileting, trying to out-multitask your opponent, and so on are just gimmicky bandaids on the problem that is lategame Zerg. I'm not entirely sure how to fix it, but it needs to be a real change, or we're going to keep alternating between strategy X being too strong in he midgame and summarily being nerfed so that that race can't actually play anymore.

The real problem isn't that Terran's early game is/was too strong, or that Protoss's all-ins are/were too strong. Maybe they were, and maybe they still are, but it doesn't matter because that's the only way to play against Zerg. I desperately, dearly want to macro against Zerg, and on ladder I often do, but any time I know I'm playing someone who has good mechanics, I all-in, because even if we're evenly skilled, he'll beat me in a macro game just due to the obscene power of BL/Infestor compositions. Terrans work the same way. Of all the GM Terrans I know, not a single one wants to get into a macro situation against a player they know is skilled. They will always go for some sort of all-innish pressure opening, and only macro if it pays off.

This is bad, and I'm sick of hearing people just lament this particular change or that particular change or pretend that things can be fixed by increasing the movement speed of the BC or some bullshit. The problem is that Zerg's economy is untouchable for most of the game barring all-in pressure, and that Zergs think the level of economy they are allowed right now should be the baseline, so that whenever a strategy is developed that reliably denies 80 Drones before 10 minutes, they complain that it's overpowered. It's not. You shouldn't be getting that many Drones by 10 minutes, because it means you're fucking miles ahead.

It's so frustrating to read this thread sometimes because people don't understand that since Zerg's economy is so fucking steroided right now, anything which fixes the matchups will mean that ZERG IS WEAKER AND CAN'T DREAM OF GETTING A 15 MINUTE BL FORCE.

When a Terran/Protoss can 'risk-free' stop you from purely Droning in the early game, that's the way it should be. It's not imbalanced that they can do this. You should never be able to purely Drone against someone who's playing standard. Never. It's fucking obscene to even suggest that. You shouldn't be taking a free third at 5 minutes against someone who didn't fast expand.
gillon
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Sweden1578 Posts
July 08 2012 21:59 GMT
#4934
On July 09 2012 06:53 Shiori wrote:
I think everyone's missing the bigger problem: neither Protoss nor Terran have any way of dealing with lategame Zerg reliably. Whether it's the massive, scaling economy which benefits from stacked Larva, or the potency of the Infestor/BL, both races have an incredibly hard time playing standard against lategame Zerg armies. While it's certainly true that there are numerous problems existing for mid and early game XvZ, mostly insofar as pressure has been totally stifled by patch after patch, the true problem is that this pressure is necessary. No matchup should be on a timer. Period.

Please don't give me any ridiculous examples about lategame TvP in BW. It's not the same. I want a dynamic matchup in XvZ, and right now we don't have it. Archon Toileting, trying to out-multitask your opponent, and so on are just gimmicky bandaids on the problem that is lategame Zerg. I'm not entirely sure how to fix it, but it needs to be a real change, or we're going to keep alternating between strategy X being too strong in he midgame and summarily being nerfed so that that race can't actually play anymore.

The real problem isn't that Terran's early game is/was too strong, or that Protoss's all-ins are/were too strong. Maybe they were, and maybe they still are, but it doesn't matter because that's the only way to play against Zerg. I desperately, dearly want to macro against Zerg, and on ladder I often do, but any time I know I'm playing someone who has good mechanics, I all-in, because even if we're evenly skilled, he'll beat me in a macro game just due to the obscene power of BL/Infestor compositions. Terrans work the same way. Of all the GM Terrans I know, not a single one wants to get into a macro situation against a player they know is skilled. They will always go for some sort of all-innish pressure opening, and only macro if it pays off.

This is bad, and I'm sick of hearing people just lament this particular change or that particular change or pretend that things can be fixed by increasing the movement speed of the BC or some bullshit. The problem is that Zerg's economy is untouchable for most of the game barring all-in pressure, and that Zergs think the level of economy they are allowed right now should be the baseline, so that whenever a strategy is developed that reliably denies 80 Drones before 10 minutes, they complain that it's overpowered. It's not. You shouldn't be getting that many Drones by 10 minutes, because it means you're fucking miles ahead.

It's so frustrating to read this thread sometimes because people don't understand that since Zerg's economy is so fucking steroided right now, anything which fixes the matchups will mean that ZERG IS WEAKER AND CAN'T DREAM OF GETTING A 15 MINUTE BL FORCE.

When a Terran/Protoss can 'risk-free' stop you from purely Droning in the early game, that's the way it should be. It's not imbalanced that they can do this. You should never be able to purely Drone against someone who's playing standard. Never. It's fucking obscene to even suggest that. You shouldn't be taking a free third at 5 minutes against someone who didn't fast expand.


I agree, there are some serious fundamental problems with zerg economy, it's in such a ridiculous situation right now.
www.teamproperty.net | "You should hate losing, but you should never fear defeat." - 이윤열
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
July 08 2012 22:08 GMT
#4935
On July 09 2012 06:59 gillon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 09 2012 06:53 Shiori wrote:
I think everyone's missing the bigger problem: neither Protoss nor Terran have any way of dealing with lategame Zerg reliably. Whether it's the massive, scaling economy which benefits from stacked Larva, or the potency of the Infestor/BL, both races have an incredibly hard time playing standard against lategame Zerg armies. While it's certainly true that there are numerous problems existing for mid and early game XvZ, mostly insofar as pressure has been totally stifled by patch after patch, the true problem is that this pressure is necessary. No matchup should be on a timer. Period.

Please don't give me any ridiculous examples about lategame TvP in BW. It's not the same. I want a dynamic matchup in XvZ, and right now we don't have it. Archon Toileting, trying to out-multitask your opponent, and so on are just gimmicky bandaids on the problem that is lategame Zerg. I'm not entirely sure how to fix it, but it needs to be a real change, or we're going to keep alternating between strategy X being too strong in he midgame and summarily being nerfed so that that race can't actually play anymore.

The real problem isn't that Terran's early game is/was too strong, or that Protoss's all-ins are/were too strong. Maybe they were, and maybe they still are, but it doesn't matter because that's the only way to play against Zerg. I desperately, dearly want to macro against Zerg, and on ladder I often do, but any time I know I'm playing someone who has good mechanics, I all-in, because even if we're evenly skilled, he'll beat me in a macro game just due to the obscene power of BL/Infestor compositions. Terrans work the same way. Of all the GM Terrans I know, not a single one wants to get into a macro situation against a player they know is skilled. They will always go for some sort of all-innish pressure opening, and only macro if it pays off.

This is bad, and I'm sick of hearing people just lament this particular change or that particular change or pretend that things can be fixed by increasing the movement speed of the BC or some bullshit. The problem is that Zerg's economy is untouchable for most of the game barring all-in pressure, and that Zergs think the level of economy they are allowed right now should be the baseline, so that whenever a strategy is developed that reliably denies 80 Drones before 10 minutes, they complain that it's overpowered. It's not. You shouldn't be getting that many Drones by 10 minutes, because it means you're fucking miles ahead.

It's so frustrating to read this thread sometimes because people don't understand that since Zerg's economy is so fucking steroided right now, anything which fixes the matchups will mean that ZERG IS WEAKER AND CAN'T DREAM OF GETTING A 15 MINUTE BL FORCE.

When a Terran/Protoss can 'risk-free' stop you from purely Droning in the early game, that's the way it should be. It's not imbalanced that they can do this. You should never be able to purely Drone against someone who's playing standard. Never. It's fucking obscene to even suggest that. You shouldn't be taking a free third at 5 minutes against someone who didn't fast expand.


I agree, there are some serious fundamental problems with zerg economy, it's in such a ridiculous situation right now.

It really is, and I'm so sick of reading the complacency that Zergs have adopted. "Have you tried this?" It doesn't matter. I shouldn't have to be trying all kinds of obscure shit just to get into an even position from something you do by default.
Gumbotwins
Profile Joined October 2011
Netherlands256 Posts
July 08 2012 22:12 GMT
#4936
+ Show Spoiler +
On July 09 2012 06:59 gillon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 09 2012 06:53 Shiori wrote:
I think everyone's missing the bigger problem: neither Protoss nor Terran have any way of dealing with lategame Zerg reliably. Whether it's the massive, scaling economy which benefits from stacked Larva, or the potency of the Infestor/BL, both races have an incredibly hard time playing standard against lategame Zerg armies. While it's certainly true that there are numerous problems existing for mid and early game XvZ, mostly insofar as pressure has been totally stifled by patch after patch, the true problem is that this pressure is necessary. No matchup should be on a timer. Period.

Please don't give me any ridiculous examples about lategame TvP in BW. It's not the same. I want a dynamic matchup in XvZ, and right now we don't have it. Archon Toileting, trying to out-multitask your opponent, and so on are just gimmicky bandaids on the problem that is lategame Zerg. I'm not entirely sure how to fix it, but it needs to be a real change, or we're going to keep alternating between strategy X being too strong in he midgame and summarily being nerfed so that that race can't actually play anymore.

The real problem isn't that Terran's early game is/was too strong, or that Protoss's all-ins are/were too strong. Maybe they were, and maybe they still are, but it doesn't matter because that's the only way to play against Zerg. I desperately, dearly want to macro against Zerg, and on ladder I often do, but any time I know I'm playing someone who has good mechanics, I all-in, because even if we're evenly skilled, he'll beat me in a macro game just due to the obscene power of BL/Infestor compositions. Terrans work the same way. Of all the GM Terrans I know, not a single one wants to get into a macro situation against a player they know is skilled. They will always go for some sort of all-innish pressure opening, and only macro if it pays off.

This is bad, and I'm sick of hearing people just lament this particular change or that particular change or pretend that things can be fixed by increasing the movement speed of the BC or some bullshit. The problem is that Zerg's economy is untouchable for most of the game barring all-in pressure, and that Zergs think the level of economy they are allowed right now should be the baseline, so that whenever a strategy is developed that reliably denies 80 Drones before 10 minutes, they complain that it's overpowered. It's not. You shouldn't be getting that many Drones by 10 minutes, because it means you're fucking miles ahead.

It's so frustrating to read this thread sometimes because people don't understand that since Zerg's economy is so fucking steroided right now, anything which fixes the matchups will mean that ZERG IS WEAKER AND CAN'T DREAM OF GETTING A 15 MINUTE BL FORCE.

When a Terran/Protoss can 'risk-free' stop you from purely Droning in the early game, that's the way it should be. It's not imbalanced that they can do this. You should never be able to purely Drone against someone who's playing standard. Never. It's fucking obscene to even suggest that. You shouldn't be taking a free third at 5 minutes against someone who didn't fast expand.


I agree, there are some serious fundamental problems with zerg economy, it's in such a ridiculous situation right now.


100% agree with this fine man
Polt, MMA, MVP. Terran triforce!
darthfoley
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States8004 Posts
July 08 2012 22:12 GMT
#4937
On July 09 2012 07:08 Shiori wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 09 2012 06:59 gillon wrote:
On July 09 2012 06:53 Shiori wrote:
I think everyone's missing the bigger problem: neither Protoss nor Terran have any way of dealing with lategame Zerg reliably. Whether it's the massive, scaling economy which benefits from stacked Larva, or the potency of the Infestor/BL, both races have an incredibly hard time playing standard against lategame Zerg armies. While it's certainly true that there are numerous problems existing for mid and early game XvZ, mostly insofar as pressure has been totally stifled by patch after patch, the true problem is that this pressure is necessary. No matchup should be on a timer. Period.

Please don't give me any ridiculous examples about lategame TvP in BW. It's not the same. I want a dynamic matchup in XvZ, and right now we don't have it. Archon Toileting, trying to out-multitask your opponent, and so on are just gimmicky bandaids on the problem that is lategame Zerg. I'm not entirely sure how to fix it, but it needs to be a real change, or we're going to keep alternating between strategy X being too strong in he midgame and summarily being nerfed so that that race can't actually play anymore.

The real problem isn't that Terran's early game is/was too strong, or that Protoss's all-ins are/were too strong. Maybe they were, and maybe they still are, but it doesn't matter because that's the only way to play against Zerg. I desperately, dearly want to macro against Zerg, and on ladder I often do, but any time I know I'm playing someone who has good mechanics, I all-in, because even if we're evenly skilled, he'll beat me in a macro game just due to the obscene power of BL/Infestor compositions. Terrans work the same way. Of all the GM Terrans I know, not a single one wants to get into a macro situation against a player they know is skilled. They will always go for some sort of all-innish pressure opening, and only macro if it pays off.

This is bad, and I'm sick of hearing people just lament this particular change or that particular change or pretend that things can be fixed by increasing the movement speed of the BC or some bullshit. The problem is that Zerg's economy is untouchable for most of the game barring all-in pressure, and that Zergs think the level of economy they are allowed right now should be the baseline, so that whenever a strategy is developed that reliably denies 80 Drones before 10 minutes, they complain that it's overpowered. It's not. You shouldn't be getting that many Drones by 10 minutes, because it means you're fucking miles ahead.

It's so frustrating to read this thread sometimes because people don't understand that since Zerg's economy is so fucking steroided right now, anything which fixes the matchups will mean that ZERG IS WEAKER AND CAN'T DREAM OF GETTING A 15 MINUTE BL FORCE.

When a Terran/Protoss can 'risk-free' stop you from purely Droning in the early game, that's the way it should be. It's not imbalanced that they can do this. You should never be able to purely Drone against someone who's playing standard. Never. It's fucking obscene to even suggest that. You shouldn't be taking a free third at 5 minutes against someone who didn't fast expand.


I agree, there are some serious fundamental problems with zerg economy, it's in such a ridiculous situation right now.

It really is, and I'm so sick of reading the complacency that Zergs have adopted. "Have you tried this?" It doesn't matter. I shouldn't have to be trying all kinds of obscure shit just to get into an even position from something you do by default.


you've sold me through your last 3 posts. you make sense
watch the wall collide with my fist, mostly over problems that i know i should fix
TibblesEvilCat
Profile Joined March 2010
United Kingdom766 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-08 22:20:21
July 08 2012 22:14 GMT
#4938
i don't understand why people are stressing so bad, if the changes are really that horribley bad, changes will made or unmade etc.

My issue is the maps are HUGE! i mean really? were talking 2 min rush distances for some of these maps, i think there needs to be some scale down with some maps.

To understand what that means to a lowish zerg player?

* can scout a push happening late and still have 1-2 rounds of units to defend

pro player

* scout push happening, setup awsome flanks, and still get to 90 drones comfortabily etc

that my issue, if players played some of the more oldschool maps vs there freinds, you'll see that you can still do timing pushes that punnish zerg for not doing everything correct there side
Live Fast Die Young :D
Willzzz
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom774 Posts
July 08 2012 22:16 GMT
#4939
Yes but you once you test it out and find that it works it becomes the new default.

Hellions were default between the queen buff, but they weren't default until they were 'discovered'.

Oh and I play terran

But yeah queens seem to do too many jobs for just one unit, they are too versatile.
neoghaleon55
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7435 Posts
July 08 2012 22:18 GMT
#4940
On July 09 2012 07:16 Willzzz wrote:
Yes but you once you test it out and find that it works it becomes the new default.

Hellions were default between the queen buff, but they weren't default until they were 'discovered'.

Oh and I play terran

But yeah queens seem to do too many jobs for just one unit, they are too versatile.


...kind of like the marine...wouldn't you agree?
moo...for DRG
Prev 1 245 246 247 248 249 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
09:00
WardiTV Mondays #69
CranKy Ducklings65
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft528
SortOf 152
Livibee 103
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2204
Calm 2063
Horang2 505
Larva 362
Zeus 308
Stork 245
Rush 154
EffOrt 141
Mini 133
Hm[arnc] 85
[ Show more ]
ajuk12(nOOB) 77
Aegong 76
Shuttle 74
Pusan 56
Sharp 51
ToSsGirL 42
Mind 33
Killer 30
zelot 20
Bale 14
Noble 7
ivOry 5
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm93
League of Legends
JimRising 587
C9.Mang0481
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1005
shoxiejesuss924
allub276
zeus0
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King84
Other Games
summit1g10094
ceh9465
Happy243
Sick171
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2226
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH127
• LUISG 26
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Kozan
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Laughngamez YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 7
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1455
• Stunt466
• HappyZerGling137
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
2h 26m
Monday Night Weeklies
7h 26m
PiGosaur Monday
15h 26m
OSC
1d 1h
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
Big Brain Bouts
4 days
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
5 days
BSL 21
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

IPSL Winter 2025-26
SC2 All-Star Inv. 2025
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W5
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.