• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:23
CEST 18:23
KST 01:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence3Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups2WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time
Tourneys
WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 General Discussion Playing StarCraft as 2 people on the same network
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group C [ASL20] Ro16 Group B [IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info! Is there English video for group selection for ASL
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Borderlands 3
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1672 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 1130

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1266 Next
-Celestial-
Profile Joined September 2011
United Kingdom3867 Posts
October 07 2014 15:56 GMT
#22581
On October 07 2014 23:33 Wombat_NI wrote:
God forbid Protoss lament the current death of Templar openings, although they may yet pull a Lazarus.


I really, really miss Templar starts to be honest.

And I don't understand this argument that "Templars are made in some games that result in a win therefore its not unviable". People seem to be arguing completely different things here; one group about whether you physically CAN do something and the other whether its viable as a playstyle (the latter of which is the more important question when it comes to openings). You can't conflate an attempt to surprise someone in a game and capitalise on it with an overall viable playstyle; because its a trick you can only pull so many times.

Hell, the (Wiki)Mothership Rush All In was used a couple of times in pro games and resulted in a win or two. That doesn't mean it was viable as an overall playstyle to go Mothership first with any regularity.
"Protoss simultaneously feels unbeatably strong and unwinnably weak." - kcdc
( bush
Profile Joined April 2011
321 Posts
October 07 2014 16:06 GMT
#22582
Protoss cannot open with HT's these days because widow mines will hardcounter that type of play.

How is that any more unacceptable than terran being unable to go mech?
oo
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
October 07 2014 16:21 GMT
#22583
On October 08 2014 01:06 ( bush wrote:
Protoss cannot open with HT's these days because widow mines will hardcounter that type of play.

How is that any more unacceptable than terran being unable to go mech?


Well first of, "going Mech" is quite an arbitrary demand. Not being able to play a composition and being capable to play without a large amount of your options no matter what the opponent does is quite a stronger claim than "I want to play HTs". After all the race is Terran, not "bio" or "mech". However, to demand that certain units should have reasonably large roles should be acceptes by both sides. In that regard I think to ask for a siege tank buff is quite a more urgent matter than to have HTs faster, since HTs do have a huge place in the matchup regardless of them being viable in openings or not.
In that regard I think both sides have massive holes in their viable choices.
MstrJinbo
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1251 Posts
October 07 2014 16:31 GMT
#22584
On October 08 2014 01:06 ( bush wrote:
Protoss cannot open with HT's these days because widow mines will hardcounter that type of play.

How is that any more unacceptable than terran being unable to go mech?


Protoss do open High Templar There was a post a couple pages back with recent games with templar opening. It's less common, but not completely dead
Lexender
Profile Joined September 2013
Mexico2648 Posts
October 07 2014 16:37 GMT
#22585
On October 08 2014 01:21 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2014 01:06 ( bush wrote:
Protoss cannot open with HT's these days because widow mines will hardcounter that type of play.

How is that any more unacceptable than terran being unable to go mech?


Well first of, "going Mech" is quite an arbitrary demand. Not being able to play a composition and being capable to play without a large amount of your options no matter what the opponent does is quite a stronger claim than "I want to play HTs". After all the race is Terran, not "bio" or "mech". However, to demand that certain units should have reasonably large roles should be acceptes by both sides. In that regard I think to ask for a siege tank buff is quite a more urgent matter than to have HTs faster, since HTs do have a huge place in the matchup regardless of them being viable in openings or not.
In that regard I think both sides have massive holes in their viable choices.


THIS.

Is not like they can't make HTs, they just have to get some colossus and range before that.
On the other hand terran can't use over 1/3 of their tech tree it any given point in time.

It is hard, yeah, but I think mech should be a more pressing matter because:

A) Not really a balance issue, so changes wouldn't affect much.
B) More variety is good.
C) This actually opens more of the protoss tech tree at the same time (immortals/carriers/tempest/etc)

Much like what I posted about Zerg, whatever is patched next should be underused things, to make the MUs better without breaking them.
Ouija
Profile Joined December 2011
United States129 Posts
October 07 2014 16:52 GMT
#22586
If blizzard actually buffed mech vs toss it would become the most OP unit comp. Mech armies can already roll through protoss armies with 0 trouble at all. The meching player just needs to be on top of their scouting and have the correct composition to deal with whatever the protoss is building.
johnbongham
Profile Joined April 2014
451 Posts
October 07 2014 16:53 GMT
#22587
On October 08 2014 01:37 Lexender wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2014 01:21 Big J wrote:
On October 08 2014 01:06 ( bush wrote:
Protoss cannot open with HT's these days because widow mines will hardcounter that type of play.

How is that any more unacceptable than terran being unable to go mech?


Well first of, "going Mech" is quite an arbitrary demand. Not being able to play a composition and being capable to play without a large amount of your options no matter what the opponent does is quite a stronger claim than "I want to play HTs". After all the race is Terran, not "bio" or "mech". However, to demand that certain units should have reasonably large roles should be acceptes by both sides. In that regard I think to ask for a siege tank buff is quite a more urgent matter than to have HTs faster, since HTs do have a huge place in the matchup regardless of them being viable in openings or not.
In that regard I think both sides have massive holes in their viable choices.


THIS.

Is not like they can't make HTs, they just have to get some colossus and range before that.
On the other hand terran can't use over 1/3 of their tech tree it any given point in time.

It is hard, yeah, but I think mech should be a more pressing matter because:

A) Not really a balance issue, so changes wouldn't affect much.
B) More variety is good.
C) This actually opens more of the protoss tech tree at the same time (immortals/carriers/tempest/etc)

Much like what I posted about Zerg, whatever is patched next should be underused things, to make the MUs better without breaking them.


EXACTLY! Maybe if protoss had to play against more than unit composition than they would have the option to explore more of their own tech tree at different points in the game! brings me back to my point about how just about every unit in the protoss army has a place in the matchup whether it be early late or mid-game. On the other hand terran has no use for helions, hellbats, thors, tanks, banshees, bc except for some early game helion pressure which usually isnt even worth it. Why should terran be forced into bio but protoss able to have two distinct tech choices available as an opening that counter bio? I dont understand how that argument has any leg to stand on.
( bush
Profile Joined April 2011
321 Posts
October 07 2014 17:07 GMT
#22588
On October 08 2014 01:52 Ouija wrote:
If blizzard actually buffed mech vs toss it would become the most OP unit comp. Mech armies can already roll through protoss armies with 0 trouble at all. The meching player just needs to be on top of their scouting and have the correct composition to deal with whatever the protoss is building.


No, just no. There are people playing this game 12 hours a day everyday and they don't attemp to mech vs protoss, and you think that is because they don't have the proper scout to handle their opponents strategy?
oo
Faust852
Profile Joined February 2012
Luxembourg4004 Posts
October 07 2014 17:16 GMT
#22589
On October 08 2014 01:52 Ouija wrote:
If blizzard actually buffed mech vs toss it would become the most OP unit comp. Mech armies can already roll through protoss armies with 0 trouble at all. The meching player just needs to be on top of their scouting and have the correct composition to deal with whatever the protoss is building.

That was funny. Let me guess, you just lost to it in gold and you are mad right now and you felt the rush to complain about mech in PvT here right?
Ouija
Profile Joined December 2011
United States129 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-10-07 17:26:49
October 07 2014 17:22 GMT
#22590
On October 08 2014 02:07 ( bush wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2014 01:52 Ouija wrote:
If blizzard actually buffed mech vs toss it would become the most OP unit comp. Mech armies can already roll through protoss armies with 0 trouble at all. The meching player just needs to be on top of their scouting and have the correct composition to deal with whatever the protoss is building.


No, just no. There are people playing this game 12 hours a day everyday and they don't attemp to mech vs protoss, and you think that is because they don't have the proper scout to handle their opponents strategy?


I hate to break it to you, but there is also the opposite. People who do play mech vs protoss every single day and win. I'm not saying that is the only problem terran players have but IMO it is one problem. And honestly I feel sorry for all those poeple who play 12 hours a day and never try out a composition. It's actually quite sad : (

So many people in the forums have this mob like mentality where if a few people say something then by gosh it must be true. Yet very few people to my knowledge have spent the time trying to understand how to play mech and make it work.

I am far from playing against top level players, but I have told protoss players at masters level that i play mech vs toss and still roll them over. So if I, along with the other mech players out there can do it, so can everyone else!!!

@Faust -- If you actually want to have a discussion drop the childish stuff. I'm headed to class now, but I will be back to continue the discussion.
Lexender
Profile Joined September 2013
Mexico2648 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-10-07 17:31:40
October 07 2014 17:30 GMT
#22591
On October 08 2014 02:22 Ouija wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2014 02:07 ( bush wrote:
On October 08 2014 01:52 Ouija wrote:
If blizzard actually buffed mech vs toss it would become the most OP unit comp. Mech armies can already roll through protoss armies with 0 trouble at all. The meching player just needs to be on top of their scouting and have the correct composition to deal with whatever the protoss is building.


No, just no. There are people playing this game 12 hours a day everyday and they don't attemp to mech vs protoss, and you think that is because they don't have the proper scout to handle their opponents strategy?


I hate to break it to you, but there is also the opposite. People who do play mech vs protoss every single day and win. I'm not saying that is the only problem terran players have but IMO it is one problem. And honestly I feel sorry for all those poeple who play 12 hours a day and never try out a composition. It's actually quite sad : (

So many people in the forums have this mob like mentality where if a few people say something then by gosh it must be true. Yet very few people to my knowledge have spent the time trying to understand how to play mech and make it work.

I am far from playing against top level players, but I have told protoss players at masters level that i play mech vs toss and still roll them over. So if I, along with the other mech players out there can do it, so can everyone else!!!


As a Terran that played pretty much mech only for the first half of 2014 this is not only a lie but an obvious troll bait.

I know of a lot of players who are masters of mech such as Lyyna and HTOmario (who is constantly GM in both NA and KR), SuperNova too, plays mech a lot on his stream.

Following your logic I can only SkyTerran only for 12 hours and beat master players with it.
Funny thing is, it has done been too, and it worked.

But that is NOT what we are discussing, so if you are just going to use personal anecdote with no real value, please at least post something more meaningful than "it Works for some people" and "I've beat masters protoss".
RaFox17
Profile Joined May 2013
Finland4581 Posts
October 07 2014 17:33 GMT
#22592
On October 08 2014 02:22 Ouija wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2014 02:07 ( bush wrote:
On October 08 2014 01:52 Ouija wrote:
If blizzard actually buffed mech vs toss it would become the most OP unit comp. Mech armies can already roll through protoss armies with 0 trouble at all. The meching player just needs to be on top of their scouting and have the correct composition to deal with whatever the protoss is building.


No, just no. There are people playing this game 12 hours a day everyday and they don't attemp to mech vs protoss, and you think that is because they don't have the proper scout to handle their opponents strategy?


I hate to break it to you, but there is also the opposite. People who do play mech vs protoss every single day and win. I'm not saying that is the only problem terran players have but IMO it is one problem. And honestly I feel sorry for all those poeple who play 12 hours a day and never try out a composition. It's actually quite sad : (

So many people in the forums have this mob like mentality where if a few people say something then by gosh it must be true. Yet very few people to my knowledge have spent the time trying to understand how to play mech and make it work.

I am far from playing against top level players, but I have told protoss players at masters level that i play mech vs toss and still roll them over. So if I, along with the other mech players out there can do it, so can everyone else!!!

@Faust -- If you actually want to have a discussion drop the childish stuff. I'm headed to class now, but I will be back to continue the discussion.

Almost any composition is viable below the pro level. The problem is that in the pro level those builds are not the meta, cause they are simply inferior to many other builds/styles. They are used sometimes as a surprise but they need that surprise element to work properly. Mech v toss can be done but it is a surprise build, not a way to win consistently.
( bush
Profile Joined April 2011
321 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-10-07 17:35:38
October 07 2014 17:33 GMT
#22593
Your argument doesn't make too much sense to me. You say that you and a bunch of other people can make mech work vs Protoss at masters level. That means exactly what it says, nothing else.

I can crush people with mass reapers at masters level, and I know a lot of other people who are also capable of doing that.
Does it mean mass reapers is a viable strategy which people can do in GSL and win with it?
oo
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9396 Posts
October 07 2014 17:35 GMT
#22594
Not being able to play a composition and being capable to play without a large amount of your options no matter what the opponent does is quite a stronger claim than "I want to play HTs"


Terarn infastructure is much less flexible than toss. Terran can't really switch back and fourth between mech and bio like toss can with HT's.
Pursuit_
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States1330 Posts
October 07 2014 17:43 GMT
#22595
On October 08 2014 00:56 -Celestial- wrote:
I really, really miss Templar starts to be honest.

And I don't understand this argument that "Templars are made in some games that result in a win therefore its not unviable". People seem to be arguing completely different things here; one group about whether you physically CAN do something and the other whether its viable as a playstyle (the latter of which is the more important question when it comes to openings). You can't conflate an attempt to surprise someone in a game and capitalise on it with an overall viable playstyle; because its a trick you can only pull so many times.

Hell, the (Wiki)Mothership Rush All In was used a couple of times in pro games and resulted in a win or two. That doesn't mean it was viable as an overall playstyle to go Mothership first with any regularity.


We just have very different definitions of viable then. Would you say 3 Gate Oracle isn't viable at the moment because if you did it every game, your opponent would just blind counter it and win? How about Reactor Factory / Medivac openings in TvP, are they 'not viable' because all Protoss has to do is scout on 9 to see gas first then make Stalkers + Observer / Cannon to get a huge lead?

To me, something doesn't have to be usable every game in every scenario in order to be considered a viable strategy. It just needs to be something that has a reasonable chance of success (i.e. doesn't straight up lose to standard play) in the current metagame.
In Somnis Veritas
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
October 07 2014 18:04 GMT
#22596
On October 08 2014 02:35 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
Not being able to play a composition and being capable to play without a large amount of your options no matter what the opponent does is quite a stronger claim than "I want to play HTs"


Terarn infastructure is much less flexible than toss. Terran can't really switch back and fourth between mech and bio like toss can with HT's.


I think adding the one or other tank or thor isn't harder than having a Stargate or Robotics adding Immortals or Colossi (or Phoenix/Voidrays/Tempest against Zerg). Given that there is always a little upgrade dilemma, however, if a unit really has a good reason to be played, being 1-2 upgrades behind doesn't immidiatly invalidate it. Moreso when we talk about units that are not like marines, zerglings or zealots which do profit a lot or get punished very hard depending on upgrade advantages.

The thing just is, that there is no reason to build a Thor over Marine/Marauder or a tank. Those units do hardly help you in any way. They do not really have a unique role when fighting, but are quite a burden to your army when not.
SC2Toastie
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
Netherlands5725 Posts
October 07 2014 18:26 GMT
#22597
On October 08 2014 02:43 Pursuit_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2014 00:56 -Celestial- wrote:
I really, really miss Templar starts to be honest.

And I don't understand this argument that "Templars are made in some games that result in a win therefore its not unviable". People seem to be arguing completely different things here; one group about whether you physically CAN do something and the other whether its viable as a playstyle (the latter of which is the more important question when it comes to openings). You can't conflate an attempt to surprise someone in a game and capitalise on it with an overall viable playstyle; because its a trick you can only pull so many times.

Hell, the (Wiki)Mothership Rush All In was used a couple of times in pro games and resulted in a win or two. That doesn't mean it was viable as an overall playstyle to go Mothership first with any regularity.


We just have very different definitions of viable then. Would you say 3 Gate Oracle isn't viable at the moment because if you did it every game, your opponent would just blind counter it and win? How about Reactor Factory / Medivac openings in TvP, are they 'not viable' because all Protoss has to do is scout on 9 to see gas first then make Stalkers + Observer / Cannon to get a huge lead?

To me, something doesn't have to be usable every game in every scenario in order to be considered a viable strategy. It just needs to be something that has a reasonable chance of success (i.e. doesn't straight up lose to standard play) in the current metagame.

You are comparing (poorly represented) all ins with a macro/turtlde build....
Mura Ma Man, Dark Da Dude, Super Shot Sos!
Thezzy
Profile Joined October 2010
Netherlands2117 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-10-07 18:42:41
October 07 2014 18:41 GMT
#22598
I do agree that TvP is very restricted for both sides.
Where as TvZ can vary from Bio vs Ling/Bane/Muta to Mech vs Swarm Host, TvP feels destined to always nearly be MMMVG vs Gateway + Colossi/Storm.

I think the primary reason is that the other options (Mech, Sky Terran, HT, Sky Toss) don't provide enough flexibility like the standard builds do. MMM and Gateway + Colossi can deal with just about anything equally well.
It doesn't mean the other builds don't exist and that they are completely horrible, it just means they struggle dealing with solid standard play.

Whereas Bio can deal with any composition nearly equally well, Mech can die horribly against an Air transition because Mech AA is limited and at the same time HT openings seem to have trouble dealing with Widow Mines for Protoss.
Whilst I am fine with builds have varying strengths and weaknesses, the balance is off for these types of play.

I play Terran so I can't provide too much detail into the Protoss side of things, but for me, what Mech is lacking:

1. Flexibility vs Protoss compositions
+ Show Spoiler +
Mech is more much a one trick pony than Bio is, without really giving much in return.
Hellbat + Siege Tank will probably murder most Gateway/Colossi armies, but it has no AA at all.
Adding AA to counter that will make it safer against Air play, but in return its more vulnerable on the ground (Thors/Vikings aren't very good in dealing with Protoss ground).
Immortals can be dealt with to an extent with Hellbats and Ghosts, but it is much easier for Protoss to mix in Immortals than it is for a Mech army to adapt to it.

As a result, a Mech army is only good at one thing at a time, and horrible versus anything else.
The much longer build time of the Tank and Thor also further restrict the flexibility of a Mech composition.
If Mech was really really good at that one thing, something could be said for that, but this is currently not the case in TvP.

Bio suffers from none of this for the simple reason that its core unit can shoot Air, is fast and has a lot of DPS and is great against Immortals. This outweighs the downside of Marines not having long AA range and being vulnerable to splash.
Adding Vikings to a Bio composition is also not as much of a detriment as the Starport with a Reactor is a natural component of a Bio composition and Gas is not the primary spender for Bio units.


2. Siege Tanks lack raw damage
+ Show Spoiler +
In Brood War, a field of Siege Tanks pretty much said: 'no, you can't go here'.
In SC2, Protoss just laughs in your face, sends in the Chargelot/Immortal/Archons and gone are the Tanks.
On top of that, they cost a very gas expensive 150/125/3 and only deal 35 damage to Archons/Chargelots and a pitiful 10 to Immortals with shields.

Instead of Tanks being the powerful artillery to counter the lack of mobility in a Mech army, it doesn't add much of anything.
Of course, just flatly increasing the Tank's damage could unbalance TvZ so the unit is in a tricky spot.
None the less, the changes I propose to aid the Tank:

Cost modified to 150/100/3.

Single target damage increased to 60 (splash damage remains unchanged) and will always deal this full damage to shielded targets.

Immortal shields (as mentioned by TheDwf) will half the damage of any attack dealing more than 20 damage, rather than reducing it to 10. This means a Siege Tank shot would deal 60 / 2 = 30 damage.


Until three bases, Mech is very fragile due to the gas cost of the composition.
The gas cost of Tanks is a big reason here and for what it does, 125 gas each is a little too much.
By reducing this to 100, there is a little more breathing room in the composition and Tanks can be brought in a numbers a bit more easily.

The damage changes would mean a Zealot would take the full 60 damage from the first shot and 35 damage from any further shots.
If it had only 1 shield left before it takes the first shot, it would take 35 (regular damage) + 1 = 36 damage.
Archons would always take the full 60 damage, but other than that, no unit match-ups outside of TvP are really affected as the 10 additional damage vs Armored (only on the primary target) would have no real effect in TvZ or TvT.

The main reason for the damage change on the primary target is due to the difference between a Zerg army and a Protoss army.
Zerg units can die to Tanks because they are numerous, but with low HP (100 minerals = 4 zerglings = 4 units with 35 HP each).
This means the splash damage does most of the work.

Protoss units generally do not die to Tanks because they are relatively few, but with high HP. (100 minerals = 1 zealot = 1 unit with 150 hp)
This means the direct damage does most of the work.

As such, increasing the direct damage without increasing splash damage would only really affect TvP.
By changing it so that Tanks always deal full damage to shields, again only TvP Tanks are affected.

Tanks with these changes would more strongly balance out the severe lack of mobility.
They still can't shoot up, will still mass murder each other against any Zealots on top of Tanks and they still have to siege up. But when they do, they can truly zone out an area.


3. Lack of mobile AA
+ Show Spoiler +
There is no decent mobile AA available in the Terran Mech army. Thors are far too slow, too bulky and too expensive. They are also horrible when it comes to raw AA DPS for their cost. Void Rays alone will easily beat a Thor.
Although Widow Mines could provide some AA, it only has range 5 and needs to burrow.
To deal with air units, you need either speed, DPS or range (preferably at least two of these) and the Widow Mine's attack has none (the DPS is low due to the cooldown).

Vikings are an option, but getting those out in decent numbers to survive against Air will heavily chew into your Mech army due to the gas cost and it's for a unit that is essentially only AA. It cannot help too much on the ground as it only has 125 health, no armor and average DPS for a hefty 150/75 each.

As such, some type of Goliath like unit is needed. Something that moves at decent speed (2.75 or 2.95), has decent Air range (at least 6) and can deal some acceptable AA damage whilst still being able to support on the ground.
A kind of Mech Stalker if you will. I had hoped that the Warhound would've fulfilled this role, but instead it became some weird anti-ground unit that got binned.

I'd consider bringing it back with a normal damage to cost ratio with the primary role being support and AA.
Something around the 125/75/2 mark with ~35-40 second build time and a decent DPS/range AA attack (say 9-10 DPS and 7 range). The cost is similar to a Viking but this time it doesn't take away as much from the ground army. It would have a weaker but still acceptable ranged ground attack (range 6 or 7) so it can support the ground army.
On their own they should suck against ground units, to make sure they stick to a supporting role.


Obviously all these changes at once would probably be too much, but Mech (especially Tanks) currently struggle too much against what standard Protoss play can bring for a Terran to truly consider using it.
Playing Terran is like flying down a MULE drop in a marine suit, firing a Gauss Rifle
Samx
Profile Joined August 2013
Singapore149 Posts
October 07 2014 18:43 GMT
#22599
Do not know if anyone watched ty vs myunsik final game today. I think ty is such a great thinker of the game. Still remember his Proleague game against maru. Total domination.

Anyway back to balance 'discussion'. Go watch Ty's games today. All tvp. To everyone saying mech is not viable. Ty used the tanks to supplement his bio to great effect. Sure it wasn't a pure mech build. But he used 2-3 tanks in some games to great effect.

I think a lot of terran players get sucked into a narrow minset. Either bio or mech. And because bio is already so powerful that mech pales in comparison, terrans complain about mech sucking.

Looking at Protoss and Zerg plays. Hydra/roach use ranged upgrades but trade horribly against bio. Zerg still use them in the composition, successfully too (hyun). Zergs takes to the air with mutas, broodlords and corruptors. Use infestors/swarm hosts and ultras. Likewise for Protoss players. Hampered by incredibly weak gateway units. Protoss players have to use tech to deal with marines and marauders. From watching pro games, I see the willingness of Protoss and zergs to adapt, to try to use different units. Like snute with swarm host. Like hyun with roach. Protosses need to use higher techs to play else they are dead on gateway units.

Over 4 years of watching pro Starcraft 2. This is the mindset I see. Terrans complain about spending a scan to clear creep, kill observer. Build the damn raven. Remember pigbaby? He built 7 observers for bloody detection and scouting. You already have the star port. You already have the tech lab. Roach bane allin can kill you. Build the bloody tank. You already have tech lab and factory. Terran players are too pigeon-holed in their thinking. 4M everyday. When it don't work. Buff terran.
Our enemies are a legion and STILL you procrastinate
Tyrhanius
Profile Joined April 2011
France947 Posts
October 07 2014 18:45 GMT
#22600
I'm pretty sure there is ways to open high templar. It just require some micro and not a move mass chargelots +s torm like it was. Ofc open colossus is way easier so protoss don't try to throw only a few zealots before engaging like zerg do vs WM, to attack from two angles to maximize friendly fire, to use blink stalker to trigger WM without losing anything, to use hallucinated archons or phoenix or even hallucinated zealots to trigger WM.
Prev 1 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
16:00
#23
RotterdaM241
TKL 153
IndyStarCraft 84
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 397
RotterdaM 241
TKL 153
IndyStarCraft 84
SteadfastSC 48
UpATreeSC 27
MindelVK 21
Codebar 1
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 4247
Rain 2954
Sea 1759
Shuttle 1408
EffOrt 1162
firebathero 361
Stork 356
BeSt 266
ggaemo 158
Rush 145
[ Show more ]
Hyuk 140
Zeus 112
Mong 89
hero 82
JYJ72
Mind 66
sas.Sziky 46
zelot 43
Movie 26
soO 25
yabsab 21
Noble 19
SilentControl 18
Shine 16
Rock 13
Terrorterran 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 11
sSak 9
Hm[arnc] 7
IntoTheRainbow 5
Dewaltoss 1
Dota 2
Fuzer 258
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
flusha219
edward93
Other Games
tarik_tv21016
gofns18494
B2W.Neo867
ceh9365
crisheroes333
Lowko292
Beastyqt286
Liquid`VortiX213
XaKoH 194
FrodaN180
KnowMe94
QueenE83
Trikslyr66
NeuroSwarm46
Mew2King40
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 11
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler98
League of Legends
• Nemesis1587
• Jankos1405
• TFBlade462
Other Games
• Shiphtur276
Upcoming Events
OSC
7h 37m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
17h 37m
Afreeca Starleague
17h 37m
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
2v2
18h 37m
PiGosaur Monday
1d 7h
LiuLi Cup
1d 18h
RSL Revival
2 days
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
BSL Team Wars
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Online Event
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Team Wars
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.