Think it depends more on the coaching/person than their level. Plenty of diamond players wouldn't be able to coach for shit. I think even at Gold you might be able to start giving advice to bronze players.
Keep in mind that at diamond level you're constantly thinking about mechanics and timings when really mostly all you need to get to gold is building probes, expanding at good times, and building units.
A plat player might know EXACTLY what to do but lacks the mechanics or micro refinement to get to the next level. I think a fair amount of poeple that spectate a lot of pro-games, stream-watch, day9 fall into this category, because they're constantly getting good advice on a variety of situations
actually yes, it isn't very difficult as to see what you need to do etc, especially the lower league. I am only in plat because I can't do what I know I need to do correctly. For example, under 2 rax bunker pressure, I always pump way too much lings after the pressure is over
They can coach players in bronze, silver, and maybe gold. People in bronze and silver don't need super complicated strategies, they just need a few solid build orders and work on macro.
I don't understand why everybody thinks lower level players cant be higher level coaches. How many sports coaches do you know that can compete in the sport theyre coaching? I'll admit that the comparison isn't completely fair because sports are typically much more physical than SC2, but even so, while some people may not be able to keep their composure and analyze strategy real time while playing the game, it doesn't mean they wouldn't be able to give sound advice from the coaches seat.
Obviously a coach needs good game sense and that TYPICALLY comes from hundreds of actual game hours, but not always.
On August 06 2011 11:50 tossuaway wrote: Sorry guys, guess it was a dumb idea, when a mod see's this feel free to close it. Thanks guys.
It's not a dumb idea at all, you don't have to be a master at something to coach it. Just stick to what you know and admit when you don't have the right answer or only a partial answer. Coaching is about helping people improve, not being some demigod who can impart divine knowledge.
When I was a low bronze player: - I felt safe having 2k minerals banked - My only pressure was with warp prism dts - My only attacks were with 3/3/3 200 food armies - I never got off 2 bases until maybe 30 minutes in - I thought you could stack chrono boost - I didn't know warp gates had lower cooldowns than gateway build times - I never built sentries or colossi, favored air armies or blink stalker armies
If the plat me met the bronze me, I think he would have helped a ton. No, a plat player won't teach you enough to make you a grandmaster, but can certainly teach you basics of the game.
Platinum Coaching represents the theory of comparative advantages and their contributions to specialization. A analogy which is famously simple is: In a town there is a lawyer. He is the best lawyer and the best secretary in the town. However, if he hires a secretary he will get more work done than if he does both. He holds the absolute advantage in both lawyering and secretarying. However, when you apply comparative advantage, it is obvious he would get more done with a less competent secretary than if he would do 4 hours of law, 4 hours of secretarial work.
Applying it to the Platinum/Masters example, the Masters has the absolute advantage in coaching over the platinum players, be the coach-ee be bronze or diamond. However, the platinum player would have the relative advantage. The Masters player has all this game knowledge about timings, builds, counters, while the bronze student only wants to learn how to macro properly and use hotkeys. Would it really be the most efficient use of time if the masters player taught the bronze student? The masters players time is best spent catering to higher level players and the platinum would be competent in teaching bronze players how to tell stim from combat shield.
On August 06 2011 11:49 thepeonwhocould wrote: Your sample size is too small, and your method is flawed. Say someone gets promoted from silver to gold, what possible reason's could there be for their promotion?
-Coach trained them well -The player was dedicated and practiced hard -The player was already close to promotion and luckily blizzards system decided to promote him
Theres no real guarantee that the promotion would be due to the coaching.
Will a platinum player coaching a silver player help their play? Probably a little bit - but they could just as easily pass on bad habbits (hey, just use this 4 gate build every game! then it stops working at high diamond and the player has to relearn everything about the game).
At the end of the day, the requirment for a good coach is knowledge about the game, and understanding what you need to be a master player (which is simply, 1 good, safe build for each matchup practiced over and over, and excellent macro). Unfortunately most platinum players don't understand this, which is why they are in platinum - and most masters players DO understand this, which is why they are in masters.
I think that your mindset is kind of silly and a reason that a lot of players are in master league that probably don't deserve to be there. I've got two accounts - one master league and the other diamond - and on my diamond (main account) I've got tons of games played - and my MMR is probably very well tuned to my abilities. Yet my master account - I'm constantly outplaying other master league players. Like there's a tier of master league players that are worse than diamond players. I don't know where I belong, but my main account gives me competitive games vs low master/high diamond players.
Anyway, I guess my point is that learning a solid build in every matchup is a farce and what a lot of coaches do to superficially promote their 'students'. If you learn a solid build order then yes you will probably win a fair amount of games vs better opponents simply because of your build order/timing when you attack. But you don't understand the fundamentals of the game like a master league player should. A master league player should understand different unit compositions, counters, etc. And just have a general game sense instead of just a-moving at 7 minutes because that's when his teacher taught him to .
Firstly, the determination of who is in master leagues is mathematically defined. With the exception of cheating players, everyone who is in master's league deserves to be in masters league, even if they are cheesing every game.
Now I want to deal with your criticism of the "one build per matchup" method. You say that a person who uses one build per matchup will not learn about the game because they just a-move at 7 minutes. I never said that your one build has to be a 7 minute timing attack. Your ZvP build could be focused around getting to 4 bases and teching to broodlords - that is to say, your build is intended to win the game at the 20 minute mark! In fact, your 1 build should be focused on getting you into the late game - that way, you get more experience in the late game and will crush players whenever you get to the late game.
Of course, for some matchups timing attacks are almost a necessity (TvZ and TvP on some maps) - even GSL players understand this.
Now your second criticism of the one build method is that you won't learn about unit counters. Well, your build/plan should account for the opponents composition and be contingent on what units they are getting.
For example my TvP build has a different response for a fast HT player compared to a fast colossus player.
The point is, you should be practicing the same builds, the same reactions, the same responses over and over again, it is by far the quickest way to improve.
When you get to master's league, that's the point where you can worry about branching out, adjusting to the metagame, having a range of builds so that you are unpredictable, being creative. Until that point you should be focusing on one build and macro macro macro.
any players from bronze to even low masters should not coach, they don't understand the game, or have really bad mechanics and that's why they are in low leagues. its only at high master or grandmaster do players actually have an understanding of the game. even now i see a lot of high master/GM play the game improperly, but they still win
i've seen many players make ling/roach when the protoss comes with a bunch of air units as a response, when the proper thing to do is to get hydra tech, and drone harder since a protoss wont be able to amount a strong push if he's invested so much into air tech, that you can lighten up on ground to ground units-although this is a more simpler and well known answer, there are more detailed intricacies that players don't realize or learn until they are at higher levels
coaching from players will help some aspects, but at the same time cause hinderance, just because something works well, doesn't mean it's correct, because honestly you can more or less do anything and still win in the lower leagues
On August 06 2011 13:03 Geniuszerg wrote: in short no
any players from bronze to even low masters should not coach, they don't understand the game, or have really bad mechanics and that's why they are in low leagues. its only at high master or grandmaster do players actually have an understanding of the game. even now i see a lot of high master/GM play the game improperly, but they still win
i've seen many players make ling/roach when the protoss comes with a bunch of air units as a response, when the proper thing to do is to get hydra tech, and drone harder since a protoss wont be able to amount a strong push if he's invested so much into air tech, that you can lighten up on ground to ground units-although this is a more simpler and well known answer, there are more detailed intricacies that players don't realize or learn until they are at higher levels
coaching from players will help some aspects, but at the same time cause hinderance, just because something works well, doesn't mean it's correct, because honestly you can more or less do anything and still win in the lower leagues
Mechanics has nothing to do with coaching, though. I'm a part-time debate coach and if I had to debate right now my "mechanics" wouldn't be where they need to be to debate at a high level. It just doesn't matter.
I believe that they CAN help through personal experience. Back a while ago I was in gold league and I was helping my bronze league friend out a lot, showed him how to macro effectively, taught him some game sense, while I improved myself. We put a bunch of time in it together, and after 1 month or 2 of it he got into gold league, which in all likelihood would not have happened if it wasn't for that. I also played a lot (and watched wayyy too many streams) and got into diamond, and i'm sure my coaching of him helped me see some small things that I could fix in my play. Coaching lower level players may give them one or two bad habits, but the important thing IMHO is that it will jumpstart their game knowledge and just in general get them a little higher tier where they then can learn new things on their own or with a higher, more experienced level coach. That's just my take on things. I really hope this pans out because I think it'd be interesting to see the results. Gl
On August 06 2011 11:50 Newbistic wrote: Can a high school biology student treat patients effectively?
Considering the average knowledge of the general american population, the student probably know more about the human body than the patients themselves lol
But yeah, i think plat ppl can coach i guess, However, i don't see the point of coaching for lower league players. Do you need someone to remind you to make probes and pylons every 20 seconds? Come on bro, play enough games and basic mechanics will take over. Of course you may improve better with someone reminding you everything to do, but unless you are rich, i dont see the point.
Hell, if the coach is in plat, maybe the coach wont even remind the player to constantly make probes past early game.
Platinum people are platinum for a reason, they could be giving wrong information to their pupils, which will be worse for him in the long run. They may be able to give general information, but there is always a chance that what they were teaching isn't the best way or even the right way. Coaches should be high level enough to teach RIGHT information.