• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:58
CEST 01:58
KST 08:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview19Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL46Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates6GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th12Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26Code S RO12 Results + RO8 Groups (2025 Season 2)3
StarCraft 2
General
Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th Serious Question: Mech
Tourneys
Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Cheeseadelphia 2025 - Open Bracket LAN! $25,000+ WardiTV 2025 Series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void
Brood War
General
[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates BW General Discussion Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ I made an ASL quiz
Tourneys
[BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET [ASL19] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Monster Hunter Wilds Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Research study on team perfo…
TrAiDoS
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 18272 users

[I] Dustin Browder, HotS + General Q&A - Page 7

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 24 Next All
Vestige
Profile Joined November 2009
United States303 Posts
August 02 2011 07:07 GMT
#121
On August 02 2011 11:18 Ketara wrote:
I can see how there are problems with Lurkers in SC2. Just from the way the SC2 Zergs tech tree is structured there are difficulties.

In BW Hydras were a hatch tech unit, so you could pop your lair and start your Lurker research right away. In SC2 you'd have to get a lair, then get a hydra den, then get Lurker tech. Having Lurkers before your opponent could have siege tanks or colossus or detection even if you rushed straight for them simply wouldn't happen.

In all honesty, Lurkers would probably make more sense for SC2 if they morphed from Roaches.


But anyway, neat interview. I'm pretty excited to see a HotS beta. I'm sure everybody is. I hope they'll have some more concrete multiplayer stuff for us by Blizzcon.

reading this got me thinking...
The baneling was supposed to repalce the lurkers role but failed...and in order to keep the tech structured...make roaches turn into "lurkers"...waht if you had that concept...but instead of the undergroundspines or whatever lurkers do, you have the upgraded roach launch pseudo banelings while burrowed since they both are acid based attacks. or maybe have like a kog'maw esque acid ball thing that is shot from underground
..just an idea
"You'd wish it were hell"
acrimoneyius
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States983 Posts
August 02 2011 07:09 GMT
#122
On August 02 2011 15:58 kodas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 15:55 acrimoneyius wrote:
On August 02 2011 14:48 Gfox wrote:
On August 02 2011 14:10 Inori wrote:
On August 02 2011 13:49 Falcor wrote:
if p gets reavers its almost guranteed that p will lose colli, archons or ht..no way tehyd give prot 4 aoe units would they?

I'd give away Colo for Reaver any day.


With the unit pathing and how well units clump in sc2 the reaver would literally break the game...


Stupid comments like this make me face palm. Yes, compare a reaver's shot that you can predict and react to the uninteresting, auto-move centric game play involved with colossus. We already see marine splitting against several splash units, how would reaver be any different?

Do you really want all of Starcraft to be played around a razers edge? How about this, every time a unit leaves the base, it has a 50% of just exploding?


The game is already about razor edges on so many levels, entire matchup's are based on the smallest micro mistakes (PvP). So many zerg losses from timing attacks come down to slightly bad scouting or one less round of units (that were drones instead). The sarcasm seems unwarranted if you actually even play this game at all.
Roe
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada6002 Posts
August 02 2011 07:10 GMT
#123
On August 02 2011 16:03 kodas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 16:00 Kipsate wrote:
On August 02 2011 15:58 kodas wrote:
On August 02 2011 15:55 acrimoneyius wrote:
On August 02 2011 14:48 Gfox wrote:
On August 02 2011 14:10 Inori wrote:
On August 02 2011 13:49 Falcor wrote:
if p gets reavers its almost guranteed that p will lose colli, archons or ht..no way tehyd give prot 4 aoe units would they?

I'd give away Colo for Reaver any day.


With the unit pathing and how well units clump in sc2 the reaver would literally break the game...


Stupid comments like this make me face palm. Yes, compare a reaver's shot that you can predict and react to the uninteresting, auto-move centric game play involved with colossus. We already see marine splitting against several splash units, how would reaver be any different?

Do you really want all of Starcraft to be played around a razers edge? How about this, every time a unit leaves the base, it has a 50% of just exploding?


Actually yes, I'd like more ''razor's edge'' units, where if you mismicro or your opponent mismicroes you SHOULD face the consequences. The reaver is such a unit.

Reaver would still need to be redesigned, but the reaver, or a unit LIKE it would make Starcraft(and especially Protoss) more interesting.

From my understanding the one of the things that makes a difference between a player like MVP,NesTea vs Combat EX, Deezer is their abilty to make good decisions over the period of a longer game, if you really wanted this just cheese everygame, A one shot mechanic has it's place but in no way should it be overused, we have plenty of that already

It would have to have an incredibly high investment cost, or just mediocre damage. Either way I think you risk having many units rendered almost useless(Terran bio in BW).
L3g3nd_
Profile Joined July 2010
New Zealand10461 Posts
August 02 2011 07:10 GMT
#124
finally a bit of sense coming from blizzard, we need this kinda thing more often
https://twitter.com/#!/IrisAnother
Roe
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada6002 Posts
August 02 2011 07:13 GMT
#125
On August 02 2011 16:07 Vestige wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 11:18 Ketara wrote:
I can see how there are problems with Lurkers in SC2. Just from the way the SC2 Zergs tech tree is structured there are difficulties.

In BW Hydras were a hatch tech unit, so you could pop your lair and start your Lurker research right away. In SC2 you'd have to get a lair, then get a hydra den, then get Lurker tech. Having Lurkers before your opponent could have siege tanks or colossus or detection even if you rushed straight for them simply wouldn't happen.

In all honesty, Lurkers would probably make more sense for SC2 if they morphed from Roaches.


But anyway, neat interview. I'm pretty excited to see a HotS beta. I'm sure everybody is. I hope they'll have some more concrete multiplayer stuff for us by Blizzcon.

reading this got me thinking...
The baneling was supposed to repalce the lurkers role but failed...and in order to keep the tech structured...make roaches turn into "lurkers"...waht if you had that concept...but instead of the undergroundspines or whatever lurkers do, you have the upgraded roach launch pseudo banelings while burrowed since they both are acid based attacks. or maybe have like a kog'maw esque acid ball thing that is shot from underground
..just an idea

Can you point me to where they said banes are supposed to replace lurkers? Seems like a lot of people using a straw argument
RogerX
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
New Zealand3180 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 07:17:51
August 02 2011 07:15 GMT
#126
I feel like most of the posts here are pretty much make SC2 to BW. Lol in my opinion i'd love to see them being creative and create new and unique units that does something different but is also viable in games..
Stick it up. take it up. step aside and see the world
Daralii
Profile Joined March 2010
United States16991 Posts
August 02 2011 07:16 GMT
#127
On August 02 2011 16:15 SEA_GenesiS wrote:
I feel like most of the posts here are pretty much make SC2 to BW. Lol in my opinion i'd love to see them being creative and create new units..

The best part is that, before beta, everyone was complaining that SC2 would be exactly like BW. Now they're complaining that it isn't exactly like BW.
Fear is freedom! Subjugation is liberation! Contradiction is truth!
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10663 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 07:25:01
August 02 2011 07:22 GMT
#128
On August 02 2011 15:55 DystopiaX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 15:53 Glockateer wrote:
On August 02 2011 15:09 Whitewing wrote:
On August 02 2011 15:03 Glockateer wrote:
The only thing I think Terran might need is a more expendable anti-air unit for mech. Thors are kind of "meh" in comparison to the Goliath. The thor shines in that splash damage and their ground damage is great but I miss seeing a group of Goliaths. Thors are big and expensive. It is hard to say they're good anti-air when the real damage is more based on splash instead of single target.


Vikings. Their range is just too good to really require any other unit for that role.


I forgot how exciting viking vs corruptor and viking vs viking battles are!

Vikings wouldn't lose their purpose but goliath-type units have their own purpose as well. Not to mention keeping upgrades having to be spread out or having 0/0 vikings, 0/0 marines to fight air units/brood lords. A goliath would add more options to combat the really strong broodlord/infestor play without having infestors/corruptors pooping on your marines and vikings all the time, for example.

If your first sentence is sarcasm, you obviously haven't seen Boxer vs Rain MLG anaheim game 1.


That wasn't exciting, if Goody vs EU-Terran X ends in a way like thsi (which they kinda often do, compared to other people playing TvT at least ) everyone would be like BOOOOORING...
JediGamer
Profile Joined August 2010
United States656 Posts
August 02 2011 07:25 GMT
#129
A biased zerg OP complaining about collosus and hydra lol. Patches may change, but yeah you know the rest.
http://www.z33k.com/starcraft2/coach/sc2coaching Tastosis Approved Coaching
Ribbon
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5278 Posts
August 02 2011 07:28 GMT
#130
On August 02 2011 16:10 L3g3nd_ wrote:
finally a bit of sense coming from blizzard, we need this kinda thing more often


Blizzard is fairly sensible, but the most passionate fans are here on team liquid while the majority of people on bnet are casuals. And whenever they cater to casuals (or do something for their bottom line), they try to sell it as good for e-sportsers and look silly.

I'd prefer if Blizz were more honest, and it'd improve their rep, but that's actually INSANELY hard to do for a large corporation while maintaining any message control at all. I work in a tiny business that became a large one, so I know that pretty well ;_;

With the lurker, putting it in and making it useful would require moving the hydra to T1, which is a pretty huge design switch. Having something other than hydras morph to lurkers makes the lore sad, so they'd probably make roaches morph into blurkers that are basically the same thing (I like Terralisk as a name for them), and have lurkers proper in the campaign as lair tech because why not.
Scarecrow
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Korea (South)9172 Posts
August 02 2011 07:31 GMT
#131
I liked alot of what Dustin's said here but the Blizzard's changes to PvP were not 'great' and haven't come close to fixing the matchup. 4 gate is still the 'go-to' strat even at pro level.
Yhamm is the god of predictions
Heavenly
Profile Joined January 2011
2172 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 07:46:15
August 02 2011 07:34 GMT
#132
On August 02 2011 16:31 Scarecrow wrote:
I liked alot of what Dustin's said here but the Blizzard's changes to PvP were not 'great' and haven't come close to fixing the matchup. 4 gate is still the 'go-to' strat even at pro level.


Yeah, all that nerf did was allow zerg to be greedier in the beginning since there is no threat of any attack while the protoss is on one base that can't be held off with spore crawlers. Four gate was still easily defensible by zerg but they would have to be careful just in case.

On August 02 2011 15:52 DystopiaX wrote:
^I dunno, just theorycrafting here but if you use it mid/late game to send units in all directions, kind of like an MMA style multi pronged drop harass everywhere, and then send your main army in as well, it could be a good kill move.


You want toss to create an additional robo (200/100) to spend 2 supply per warp prism (200 mins) to separate their army into multiple areas, which is when it is weakest, none of which are that good at killing workers? And each of them are 2+ supply, opposed to 1 supply marines. I would much rather have 6 marines than 3 zealots in a mineral line any day. And then attack their army? The only toss unit good at killing workers is a dt, which can be defended against and you can send in to multiple locations without a warp prism in the first place.
"thx for all my fans i'm many lost but cheer for me .. i lost but so happy my power is fans i will good play this is promise my fans" - oGsMC
mr_tolkien
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
France8631 Posts
August 02 2011 07:42 GMT
#133
«Hey, you know that unit that was fun and useful? Well, we ruined it, so now your race is balanced»
Sounds good to me.
The legend of Darien lives on
tomatriedes
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
New Zealand5356 Posts
August 02 2011 07:43 GMT
#134
Carriers definitely need a buff. The only time I ever see them these days is the occasional 4v4.
YMCApylons
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Taiwan359 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 07:56:16
August 02 2011 07:54 GMT
#135
On August 02 2011 15:58 kodas wrote:

Do you really want all of Starcraft to be played around a razers edge? How about this, every time a unit leaves the base, it has a 50% of just exploding?


Actually, yes...SC2 is much more forgiving than BW. More HP, less DPS. In BW, you saw control-groups of hydras get blown in two from one psi-storm. You cleared spider-mines by running speedlots past them, or with fancy dragoon micro. And EMP removed ALL shields. And siege tanks...more range, more damage.

So yes, more razor's edge please.
You must construct additional pylons.
HubertFelix
Profile Joined April 2010
France631 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 07:57:52
August 02 2011 07:57 GMT
#136
I really hope they remove corruptors & baneling for zerg.
Corruptor are just boring.
Baneling looked like fun at the release of sc2 but i'm sick of those battles where banelings are trying to roll run into marines (compare to lurker against marine in BW). It's just dumb.

Lol@ terran comment. I really hope that they won't add one lame unit + useless upgrades for terran. They should reduce their mobility (I hate so much the medivac concept since it was announced) and focus on giving terran really stong units but not mobile.
I may be wrong on this if they remove corruptor for scourges.
The viking is a fail for me. In the first months, we saw some cool strategies with viking landing but it was because of dumb maps (hello kulas ravine). Now, I see them landing 80% of the time in viking vs viking battles.
Reaper & hellion are too close in role and tech.
Terran has a lot of room for changes too.

For protoss, removing colossus for a more exciting unit would be so cool. It's the baneling feeling.


TedJustice
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada1324 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 08:06:49
August 02 2011 08:03 GMT
#137
I'd be really happy if they removed the marauder and gave terran something else to make up for it.

Because marauders aren't fun at all.

Or if they keep marauders, take away their rocket launchers and give them boxing gloves to make them melee units. Because the tanking damage part is neat, but the concussive shells and massive damage to armored units isn't.
DisaFear
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Australia4074 Posts
August 02 2011 08:09 GMT
#138
So he thinks Terran is really really good eh?
Good interview, hoping for some great new units
How devious | http://anartisticanswer.blogspot.com.au/
Seraphic
Profile Joined September 2010
United States3849 Posts
August 02 2011 08:14 GMT
#139
I have always thought Toss should have some stuff reworked.

Like, having not all units in Gateway, Warpable. (Follow me on this.) Allow certain units to be able to wrap in, while others gateway units build in que. I thought of this awhile ago since I felt if Toss gets another Gateway unit, it'll pose a problem.

Then again maybe not, who knows what they have in mind. I would love to have a Raider though, not a focus on DTs. I would love to have the damn Colossus removed, and rebuff Storm, or maybe the damage scale on the Storm.

I think Zerg needs Lurkers back, or something close to it, I honestly do not like Banelings one bit. I have always thought of Zergs as my 2nd race. They need a bit of stuff re-worked as well. Terrans don't need jack. One more Mech Unit would make mech builds viable again outside of TvT, but that would give the race another damn option of which they have too many. (Sorry AJ) I don't hate Terrans but there just too open in builds.

Probably just culture wise though, Koreans always loved Terrans over the other 2 races. (maybe Zerg.)
Natus Vincere Fan | Team Secret Fan | SK Telecom T1 Fan | Lanaya the Templar Assassin <3
DystopiaX
Profile Joined October 2010
United States16236 Posts
August 02 2011 08:15 GMT
#140
On August 02 2011 16:34 Heavenly wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 16:31 Scarecrow wrote:
I liked alot of what Dustin's said here but the Blizzard's changes to PvP were not 'great' and haven't come close to fixing the matchup. 4 gate is still the 'go-to' strat even at pro level.


Yeah, all that nerf did was allow zerg to be greedier in the beginning since there is no threat of any attack while the protoss is on one base that can't be held off with spore crawlers. Four gate was still easily defensible by zerg but they would have to be careful just in case.

Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 15:52 DystopiaX wrote:
^I dunno, just theorycrafting here but if you use it mid/late game to send units in all directions, kind of like an MMA style multi pronged drop harass everywhere, and then send your main army in as well, it could be a good kill move.


You want toss to create an additional robo (200/100) to spend 2 supply per warp prism (200 mins) to separate their army into multiple areas, which is when it is weakest, none of which are that good at killing workers? And each of them are 2+ supply, opposed to 1 supply marines. I would much rather have 6 marines than 3 zealots in a mineral line any day. And then attack their army? The only toss unit good at killing workers is a dt, which can be defended against and you can send in to multiple locations without a warp prism in the first place.

You say these things like it's hard. In the early game yeah, an additional 200/100 is alot but as the game progresses it's not that much; you have to build more buildings anyway. 2 supply isn't bad as it's comparable to medivacs, and 200 mins again isn't that bad in the mid to late game. On top of that, some tosses build a robo for an observer and then tech switch to HT anyway, or build collosus and tech switch, and then never use the robo again unless their observer gets killed. 200 mins isn't that much and you're not losing build time on anything anyway. Stop shitting on ideas before you actually try them, people have done that to current ideas/builds in the past and if anyone bothered to dig up those posts they'd look foolish.
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 24 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 163
ForJumy 46
Livibee 36
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 798
910 22
NaDa 21
Backho 19
Dota 2
LuMiX0
League of Legends
JimRising 497
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1840
flusha507
Foxcn330
taco 188
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0764
Other Games
summit1g11184
Grubby3088
shahzam1179
FrodaN683
hungrybox516
ViBE245
JuggernautJason65
KnowMe35
PPMD23
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick692
BasetradeTV38
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH298
• RyuSc2 47
• davetesta30
• Kozan
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 10
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22542
League of Legends
• Doublelift5209
Other Games
• imaqtpie1320
• Scarra1204
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
2m
CranKy Ducklings17
OSC
2m
Bellum Gens Elite
10h 2m
WardiTV Invitational
14h 2m
BSL 2v2 ProLeague
19h 2m
Replay Cast
1d
CranKy Ducklings
1d 10h
SC Evo League
1d 12h
Bellum Gens Elite
1d 12h
Fire Grow Cup
1d 15h
[ Show More ]
CSO Contender
1d 17h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 18h
StRyKeR vs MadiNho
Cross vs UltrA
TT1 vs JDConan
Bonyth vs Sziky
Replay Cast
2 days
SOOP Global
2 days
Creator vs Rogue
Cure vs Classic
SOOP
2 days
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
AllThingsProtoss
2 days
Fire Grow Cup
2 days
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
HBO vs Doodle
spx vs Tech
DragOn vs Hawk
Dewalt vs TerrOr
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
GSL Code S
5 days
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Replay Cast
6 days
GSL Code S
6 days
herO vs TBD
Classic vs TBD
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
2025 GSL S2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
NC Random Cup
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.