• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:15
CEST 09:15
KST 16:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed9Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll2Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension2Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Starcraft in widescreen BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 500 users

[I] Dustin Browder, HotS + General Q&A - Page 12

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 10 11 12 13 14 24 Next All
AmericanUmlaut
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Germany2577 Posts
August 02 2011 13:54 GMT
#221
On August 02 2011 22:31 lolsixtynine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 22:27 AmericanUmlaut wrote:
It would be really cool if such a change worked well from a balance standpoint and did in fact allow for more lategame harassment as toss. The question is whether you can get a supply cap at which lategame armies start to suffer from diminishing returns sufficiently that having an extra 20 supply in a fight doesn't mean an autowin. Otherwise you're just increasing the size of the Protoss deathball by 7 Colossi O.o


See the important thing is that (I'm assuming we're talking about ZvP) it takes longer for the Protoss to reach the max army, and also for the Zerg, so if a Z player is better he can still have a supply lead for longer.

That's an interesting point. I wasn't talking about PvZ specifically, but just about the advantage the previous poster was positing for having an increased unit cap. The only reason it's not as effective (not 'completely ineffective', just less effective than I understand to be the case in BW) to have a few supply off harassing currently is that dividing your army weakens it substantially relative to an army that sticks together. If you increase the food cap beyond the point where diminishing returns make that extra 10 food less cost effective in the army than harassing, then you could start seeing more harassment and divided-up armies with skirmishes taking place in multiple locations.

The point you bring up actually scares me a bit, though. I don't think I want to spend that long with Z at a large supply advantage...
The frumious Bandersnatch
Micket
Profile Joined April 2011
United Kingdom2163 Posts
August 02 2011 13:58 GMT
#222
In BW, Zerg had to be worried about Sair/Zealot, Sair/reaver, Sair/DT, HT drops, DT drops and everything. In SC2, Zerg has to worry about air and DTs, so they make spores and continue droning. If Protoss had a reaver, could zerg still drone like Nestea? Hmm...
Rah
Profile Joined February 2010
United States973 Posts
August 02 2011 14:01 GMT
#223
They definitly should bring back something like that reaver vs reaver PvP. Good times. Also give terran back mines. Make mech a more viable option for T! I hope they scrap or change the Immortal too for that reason.
Streaming on twitch. http://www.twitch.tv/rahsun86
AmericanUmlaut
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Germany2577 Posts
August 02 2011 14:05 GMT
#224
On August 02 2011 22:32 Fig wrote:
Anyone remember when the colossus had high damage high cooldown? If they aren't going to take it out, at least change it back to that. Then you could actually get something out of microing them. At the moment the only thing to do is a-move.

As a protoss, colossi are incredibly boring to use, but because they made this change so long ago I doubt they will give us reavers since reavers are an even more extreme version of this mechanic. Tons of damage extremely long cooldown. I don't know why blizzard doesn't like that but it would make the unit microable, something all protosses would welcome.

TLDR: give us reavers or change colossus back to high damage high cooldown

Actually, wasn't the potential for harassment the reason Colossi had their damage output changed in the first place? They were one-shotting workers, if I remember correctly, which seems a bit problematic for a unit that can cliff-walk, fire from siege range and deal splash damage. I'm toss and love killing me some workers, but I really can see the issue with potentially having 0 time to respond to an attack that can potentially completely clear a mineral line.

Though, arguably, Reavers in BW could do the same thing.
The frumious Bandersnatch
TheKefka
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Croatia11752 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 14:19:51
August 02 2011 14:13 GMT
#225
On August 02 2011 23:05 AmericanUmlaut wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 22:32 Fig wrote:
Anyone remember when the colossus had high damage high cooldown? If they aren't going to take it out, at least change it back to that. Then you could actually get something out of microing them. At the moment the only thing to do is a-move.

As a protoss, colossi are incredibly boring to use, but because they made this change so long ago I doubt they will give us reavers since reavers are an even more extreme version of this mechanic. Tons of damage extremely long cooldown. I don't know why blizzard doesn't like that but it would make the unit microable, something all protosses would welcome.

TLDR: give us reavers or change colossus back to high damage high cooldown

Actually, wasn't the potential for harassment the reason Colossi had their damage output changed in the first place? They were one-shotting workers, if I remember correctly, which seems a bit problematic for a unit that can cliff-walk, fire from siege range and deal splash damage. I'm toss and love killing me some workers, but I really can see the issue with potentially having 0 time to respond to an attack that can potentially completely clear a mineral line.

Though, arguably, Reavers in BW could do the same thing.


Yea,but you could scout the shuttle coming in and behind you mineral line.Colossus cliff walking and one shotting workers would be just bad map design.
For example the good old http://starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Kulas_Ravine
Cackle™
Jurassic
Profile Joined July 2010
Hungary79 Posts
August 02 2011 14:22 GMT
#226
On August 02 2011 23:13 TheKefka wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 23:05 AmericanUmlaut wrote:
On August 02 2011 22:32 Fig wrote:
Anyone remember when the colossus had high damage high cooldown? If they aren't going to take it out, at least change it back to that. Then you could actually get something out of microing them. At the moment the only thing to do is a-move.

As a protoss, colossi are incredibly boring to use, but because they made this change so long ago I doubt they will give us reavers since reavers are an even more extreme version of this mechanic. Tons of damage extremely long cooldown. I don't know why blizzard doesn't like that but it would make the unit microable, something all protosses would welcome.

TLDR: give us reavers or change colossus back to high damage high cooldown

Actually, wasn't the potential for harassment the reason Colossi had their damage output changed in the first place? They were one-shotting workers, if I remember correctly, which seems a bit problematic for a unit that can cliff-walk, fire from siege range and deal splash damage. I'm toss and love killing me some workers, but I really can see the issue with potentially having 0 time to respond to an attack that can potentially completely clear a mineral line.

Though, arguably, Reavers in BW could do the same thing.


Yea,but you could scout the shuttle coming in and behind you mineral line.Colossus cliff walking and one shotting workers would be just bad map design.


As I remember their reason was that Colossi melted low health units too quickly (like the hydra), so the enemy did not have the chance to deal damage back.
TheKefka
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Croatia11752 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 14:28:38
August 02 2011 14:26 GMT
#227
On August 02 2011 23:22 Jurassic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 23:13 TheKefka wrote:
On August 02 2011 23:05 AmericanUmlaut wrote:
On August 02 2011 22:32 Fig wrote:
Anyone remember when the colossus had high damage high cooldown? If they aren't going to take it out, at least change it back to that. Then you could actually get something out of microing them. At the moment the only thing to do is a-move.

As a protoss, colossi are incredibly boring to use, but because they made this change so long ago I doubt they will give us reavers since reavers are an even more extreme version of this mechanic. Tons of damage extremely long cooldown. I don't know why blizzard doesn't like that but it would make the unit microable, something all protosses would welcome.

TLDR: give us reavers or change colossus back to high damage high cooldown

Actually, wasn't the potential for harassment the reason Colossi had their damage output changed in the first place? They were one-shotting workers, if I remember correctly, which seems a bit problematic for a unit that can cliff-walk, fire from siege range and deal splash damage. I'm toss and love killing me some workers, but I really can see the issue with potentially having 0 time to respond to an attack that can potentially completely clear a mineral line.

Though, arguably, Reavers in BW could do the same thing.


Yea,but you could scout the shuttle coming in and behind you mineral line.Colossus cliff walking and one shotting workers would be just bad map design.


As I remember their reason was that Colossi melted low health units too quickly (like the hydra), so the enemy did not have the chance to deal damage back.


That's not my point.My point was that with a effective harass unit,if you get into the mineral line you should be almost guaranteed to do some heavy damage,if your enemy fails to react.
So there's nothing bad about units that one shot things and have a very slow attack speed and movement.
The problem with the colossus was that it was too mobile on his own,so it was a moving sieged tank.

I'm a protoss and i hate the colossus from the bottom of my hear.I almost never make that unit.I would be the happiest person in the world if they take it away and give us something like the reaver or just buff the gateway units overall.
Cackle™
CidO
Profile Joined June 2010
United States695 Posts
August 02 2011 14:28 GMT
#228
I don't play P all that much, are Phoenix and DTs used in standard army comps now and not used for harassing anymore?

I'll only accept a zerg siege unit if it's a blatent rip off of the bug siege things from starship troopers that are essentially sporecrawlers, but they rip battlecruisers in half in 1 shot. ya.... :D
:P
Jurassic
Profile Joined July 2010
Hungary79 Posts
August 02 2011 14:33 GMT
#229
On August 02 2011 23:26 TheKefka wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 23:22 Jurassic wrote:
On August 02 2011 23:13 TheKefka wrote:
On August 02 2011 23:05 AmericanUmlaut wrote:
On August 02 2011 22:32 Fig wrote:
Anyone remember when the colossus had high damage high cooldown? If they aren't going to take it out, at least change it back to that. Then you could actually get something out of microing them. At the moment the only thing to do is a-move.

As a protoss, colossi are incredibly boring to use, but because they made this change so long ago I doubt they will give us reavers since reavers are an even more extreme version of this mechanic. Tons of damage extremely long cooldown. I don't know why blizzard doesn't like that but it would make the unit microable, something all protosses would welcome.

TLDR: give us reavers or change colossus back to high damage high cooldown

Actually, wasn't the potential for harassment the reason Colossi had their damage output changed in the first place? They were one-shotting workers, if I remember correctly, which seems a bit problematic for a unit that can cliff-walk, fire from siege range and deal splash damage. I'm toss and love killing me some workers, but I really can see the issue with potentially having 0 time to respond to an attack that can potentially completely clear a mineral line.

Though, arguably, Reavers in BW could do the same thing.


Yea,but you could scout the shuttle coming in and behind you mineral line.Colossus cliff walking and one shotting workers would be just bad map design.


As I remember their reason was that Colossi melted low health units too quickly (like the hydra), so the enemy did not have the chance to deal damage back.


That's not my point.My point was that with a effective harass unit,if you get into the mineral line you should be almost guaranteed to do some heavy damage,if your enemy fails to react.
So there's nothing bad about units that one shot things and have a very slow attack speed and movement.
The problem with the colossus was that it was too mobile on his own,so it was a moving sieged tank.

I'm a protoss and i hate the colossus from the bottom of my hear.I almost never make that unit.I would be the happiest person in the world if they take it away and give us something like the reaver or just buff the gateway units overall.


I agree, I just responded to "bring back old Colossus damage". It wouldn't work.
okrane
Profile Joined April 2010
France265 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 14:36:27
August 02 2011 14:36 GMT
#230
On August 02 2011 23:28 CidO wrote:
I'll only accept a zerg siege unit if it's a blatent rip off of the bug siege things from starship troopers that are essentially sporecrawlers


well given that the starship troopers bugs are a rip-off the original starcraft zerg that might make the cycle complete.
Really disappointed with Starcraft II Zerg! :(
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
11817 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 14:51:56
August 02 2011 14:51 GMT
#231
On August 02 2011 23:36 okrane wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 23:28 CidO wrote:
I'll only accept a zerg siege unit if it's a blatent rip off of the bug siege things from starship troopers that are essentially sporecrawlers


well given that the starship troopers bugs are a rip-off the original starcraft zerg that might make the cycle complete.


Check the publication date of the book and the games?
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 15:03:38
August 02 2011 15:00 GMT
#232
On August 02 2011 23:05 AmericanUmlaut wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 02 2011 22:32 Fig wrote:
Anyone remember when the colossus had high damage high cooldown? If they aren't going to take it out, at least change it back to that. Then you could actually get something out of microing them. At the moment the only thing to do is a-move.

As a protoss, colossi are incredibly boring to use, but because they made this change so long ago I doubt they will give us reavers since reavers are an even more extreme version of this mechanic. Tons of damage extremely long cooldown. I don't know why blizzard doesn't like that but it would make the unit microable, something all protosses would welcome.

TLDR: give us reavers or change colossus back to high damage high cooldown

Actually, wasn't the potential for harassment the reason Colossi had their damage output changed in the first place? They were one-shotting workers, if I remember correctly, which seems a bit problematic for a unit that can cliff-walk, fire from siege range and deal splash damage. I'm toss and love killing me some workers, but I really can see the issue with potentially having 0 time to respond to an attack that can potentially completely clear a mineral line.

Though, arguably, Reavers in BW could do the same thing.


No offense, but there is just no way that THIS could be a reason.

What about a flock of mutas/banshees? What about a bunch of blue flame hellions? (lol..) What about baneling-bombs? What about even a simple dropship full of marines with stim? List goes on...

In all these cases workers WILL die if I don't react quickly. And rightly so. Since the amount of colossi that fit into one prism is actually quite limited (again: lol...) I don't see any problem here. If my opponent has one unit that can hit air, it can hit both the prism and the colossus "for free", meaning without taking damage, so I will lose these units with 100% certainty.
Compare this to double medivac drop, even if I spot it in time, marine/marauder/medivac still fights insanely cost-effective vs anything that's supposed to "clean up" the drop. The only real counter to medivac drops are HTs, and even then the medivac has to have enough energy on it to explode.

I realize we are on the "same side" here, but I think you are a little bit too soft on our enemies here They actually do have the ability to clear mineral-lines in seconds, so I don't see a problem if we had the same. Especially if its a high-tier unit and especially since the warpprism is made of paper and uses valuable robo-production-time and doesn't serve another purpose (like medivac-heal which is awsome in itself)
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
ZaaaaaM
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands1828 Posts
August 02 2011 15:05 GMT
#233
Lurker.. please please please please please please please.
I don't see it happening, blizzard says they aren't ashamed to put it in, I'm afraid they are tho. Also hydra speed upgrade would be great. (Or any change to the hydra. If lurkers come with the current hydra (unlikely), they will just be used purely for lurkers...)
no dude, the question
SeaSwift
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Scotland4486 Posts
August 02 2011 15:07 GMT
#234
On August 03 2011 00:00 sleepingdog wrote:
No offense, but there is just no way that THIS could be a reason.


It wasn't, AFAIK. It was because Blizz was worried about PvZ, with Colossi clearing out all Hydras in seconds, they thought Hydras would be useless in that match-up, ironically enough.

On August 03 2011 00:00 sleepingdog wrote:What about a flock of mutas/banshees? What about a bunch of blue flame hellions? (lol..) What about baneling-bombs? What about even a simple dropship full of marines with stim? List goes on...

In all these cases workers WILL die if I don't react quickly. And rightly so. Since the amount of colossi that fit into one prism is actually quite limited (again: lol...) I don't see any problem here. If my opponent has one unit that can hit air, it can hit both the prism and the colossus "for free", meaning without taking damage, so I will lose these units with 100% certainty.
Compare this to double medivac drop, even if I spot it in time, marine/marauder/medivac still fights insanely cost-effective vs anything that's supposed to "clean up" the drop. The only real counter to medivac drops are HTs, and even then the medivac has to have enough energy on it to explode.

I realize we are on the "same side" here, but I think you are a little bit too soft on our enemies here They actually do have the ability to clear mineral-lines in seconds, so I don't see a problem if we had the same. Especially if its a high-tier unit and especially since the warpprism is made of paper and uses valuable robo-production-time and doesn't serve another purpose (like medivac-heal which is awsome in itself)


Improving Colossi/the Warp Prism is not the solution, as Zerg will still only have to spam Spore Crawlers to survive.
Iberville
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada207 Posts
August 02 2011 15:10 GMT
#235
On August 02 2011 12:24 ChoiBoi wrote:
This is probably biased since I'm a Zerg, however:

They should implement scouts, dark archons, defilers, lurkers, vultures, goliaths, overlords with detection, shield batteries, hydra speed, and a super capital ship for zerg.

They should remove hellions, thors, planetary fortresses, phoenixes, double-usage dropship/medic (medivac reduced to two separate units), warpgates (reinforcement to any corner of the map instantly, really?), banelings (idc if they remove banelings as long as lurkers are back), and supply depot lowering.

They should fix: moving while using auto-repair along with max number of workers per unit (e.g 6 max per mech unit), mules being able to repair, forcefield SIZE (currently 3x3 hexagon, reduce to 2x2?), switch roach and hydra tech tiers (and reduce hydra damage, but increase roach damage), reduce marine range and put in range upgrade, banshee damage, this isn't specific, but the "armored but no armor," or "light but has armor," moving to attack enemy unit priority (especially of queens being baited out immediately after an inject), spine crawlers to sturdier defenses that can't unroot, but are definitely more defense oriented, ling surround ai (especially when marines are dropped into between a mineral patch, and when you actually take the time to micro some lings around, they actually go back all the way around to target that ONE marine in the front), and etc.

This seems more like rant, but meh, it should work out effectively.

This is the most hilarious post on TL to date.
I promise not to make a tasteless joke.
acrimoneyius
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States983 Posts
August 02 2011 15:18 GMT
#236
To all the people saying "remove baneling and give lurkers" or "baneling fulfills lurker role", it really doesn't. Lurker is essentially a cloaked unit when burrowed, and using infested terrans is too wishy washy for what you want to do. Lurker and baneling are different enough to warrant the existance of both.
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
August 02 2011 15:20 GMT
#237
On August 03 2011 00:07 SeaSwift wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 03 2011 00:00 sleepingdog wrote:
No offense, but there is just no way that THIS could be a reason.


It wasn't, AFAIK. It was because Blizz was worried about PvZ, with Colossi clearing out all Hydras in seconds, they thought Hydras would be useless in that match-up, ironically enough.


I didn't play beta, so this is actually hilarious to me right now haha

Improving Colossi/the Warp Prism is not the solution, as Zerg will still only have to spam Spore Crawlers to survive.


I agree. My post was simply to state that I strongly disagree that toss shouldn't have an effective (!) harassment-unit since the other races also have access to units that clear out mineral-lines in split-seconds. Blue-flame hellions and baneling-drops especially. Unspotted, they do insane damage - and rightly so.
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
RogerChillingworth
Profile Joined March 2010
2842 Posts
August 02 2011 15:23 GMT
#238
On August 02 2011 22:58 Micket wrote:
In BW, Zerg had to be worried about Sair/Zealot, Sair/reaver, Sair/DT, HT drops, DT drops and everything. In SC2, Zerg has to worry about air and DTs, so they make spores and continue droning. If Protoss had a reaver, could zerg still drone like Nestea? Hmm...



Uhmmm, that's not all zerg has to worry about lol
aka wilted_kale
tomatriedes
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
New Zealand5356 Posts
August 02 2011 15:23 GMT
#239
On August 02 2011 23:28 CidO wrote:
I don't play P all that much, are Phoenix and DTs used in standard army comps now and not used for harassing anymore?

I'll only accept a zerg siege unit if it's a blatent rip off of the bug siege things from starship troopers that are essentially sporecrawlers, but they rip battlecruisers in half in 1 shot. ya.... :D


To answer the first part zerg are getting better at building spore crawlers so DT and phoenix harassment isn't as effective as it used to be.
Zuxo
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden395 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-02 16:21:23
August 02 2011 15:44 GMT
#240
As a protoss please make Zerg more "swarmy". Like seriously fix the Roach. It should be 1 supply and weaker instead of the fucking beast unit it is now. IMO ofc

Edit: Also make it so that P can harass with a unit that isn't countered by 1 building, early-mid game. The Colossi could also use a change (maybe a red laser coming from it that does no damage like the HSM for a few seconds and then if fires with higher dam and lower attack speed) ,the same goes for the Raven, Corrupter, Hellion, Marauder and the Roach as I said above.
I'm a mother******* lyrical wordsmith, mother******* genius
Prev 1 10 11 12 13 14 24 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 45m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 221
mcanning 94
StarCraft: Brood War
Zeus 1169
yabsab 11
PianO 0
Dota 2
ODPixel454
canceldota88
NeuroSwarm87
League of Legends
JimRising 692
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K893
shoxiejesuss178
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King94
Other Games
summit1g13755
WinterStarcraft314
SortOf69
Trikslyr32
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3237
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH387
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2103
League of Legends
• Rush2316
• Lourlo1375
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
2h 45m
WardiTV European League
8h 45m
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
16h 45m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
4 days
CSO Contender
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Online Event
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.