| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Deckkie
Netherlands1595 Posts
On May 25 2011 00:59 pR0gR4m3R wrote: In a couple of hours Heading to Blizz hqs right now Cyaa!! Is this true? I thought it would take a couple more weeks Man if this true I am so excited  no sleep for me tonight  | ||
|
voltaic
1071 Posts
did you mean it's true that the hands-on is on 25 (it is true) or did you mean it is true that we will get the info only on may 31st, or can you give us some coverage tomorrow? can you say when it is? i mean what time is it when it begins? | ||
|
wolfe
United States761 Posts
Judging from random tidbits of info. it appears that whatever is going on is going on pretty much now, but we won't hear about it until the 31st. | ||
|
tsuxiit
1305 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On May 25 2011 01:07 Deckkie wrote: Is this true? I thought it would take a couple more weeks Man if this true I am so excited no sleep for me tonight I wouldnt stay up, this stuff is always embargoed because they have people from all over the world visit, but not all at once. So everyone gets a shot at releasing the information mostly at once, they embargo it for X time. | ||
|
voltaic
1071 Posts
 : .....( real sad... | ||
|
kaisertoss
United States43 Posts
| ||
|
NeonGenesis
Norway260 Posts
| ||
|
Ballistixz
United States1269 Posts
On May 25 2011 01:03 Dommk wrote: Indeed, people are looking at some of the older units with Rose-tinted glasses and failing to realize how they would actually fit in Starcraft 2 as it is now. ridiculous. that same logic u are using can be applied to siege tanks and templars. ive played a alot of custom melee games were lurkers were edited for the zerg race and they worked fine. the main thing lurkers provide is stopping power AND the ability to actually make more offensive pushes. the main reason to why blizz didnt put lurkers in SC2, from my understanding and what i read, was because they didnt want them to "outshadow" the new unit called baneling. they also had trouble with where the lurker should be placed in the tier because hydras are tier 2 in SC2. however lurkers provided alot of uses for the match ups. in TvZ a zerg could actually contain a terran with proper lurker placement and it forced terrans to use more scans and in PvZ FFs werent as effective against zerg because lurkers atks could easily bypass FFs. so the tosses couldnt just up and roll a zerg with the col+zealot+stalker+sentry death ball since they had to be more cautious of lurkers. TL;DR lurkers provide alot of pushing power and defense power for zerg mid game. something they otherwise really dont have without lurkers. for zerg lurkers do what cols do for toss. for zerg lurkers do what siege tanks do for terran. get it now? there a long ranged siege unit with a linear splash radius. something zerg doesnt have with the exception of brood lords which take insanely long to tech to. | ||
|
Scila
Canada1849 Posts
On May 24 2011 10:28 Sapphire.lux wrote: And a FACTORY unit that is good against armored air. That is all i want for Christmas! OMG yes. It's really stupid that Mech in SC2 doesn't have a good response to air at all because Thor air damage sucks. They should've just kept it at 40 as it was in Beta. | ||
|
Ballistixz
United States1269 Posts
On May 25 2011 02:54 Scila wrote: OMG yes. It's really stupid that Mech in SC2 doesn't have a good response to air at all because Thor air damage sucks. They should've just kept it at 40 as it was in Beta. what? have u ever seen how 3/3 upgraded marines tear trough just about any kind of air unit? infact the only air unit marines dont rape is carriers, BCs, and brood lords... who needs mech when u have tier 1 units that is a jack of all trades? not only that but if u do want to go mech u still have vikings for anti air which has a range of 9 btw.... | ||
|
dcemuser
United States3248 Posts
On May 25 2011 02:54 Scila wrote: OMG yes. It's really stupid that Mech in SC2 doesn't have a good response to air at all because Thor air damage sucks. They should've just kept it at 40 as it was in Beta. Why is it so difficult to build a Starport and get Vikings? | ||
|
voltaic
1071 Posts
| ||
|
Treemonkeys
United States2082 Posts
| ||
|
cilinder007
Slovenia7251 Posts
On May 25 2011 03:00 dcemuser wrote: Why is it so difficult to build a Starport and get Vikings? how is this turning into a balance discution ??? | ||
|
MoreFaSho
United States1427 Posts
On May 25 2011 03:08 cilinder007 wrote: how is this turning into a balance discution ??? 40 damage thors in beta were awesome, against some units, but they still basically suck because they couldn't zone mutas at all. I actually think blizzard needs to both add and remove units if they want to add units because there are already so many units. I would be happy with 1 new unit and some cool new mechanics that have a good skill requirement. | ||
|
Ballistixz
United States1269 Posts
On May 25 2011 03:08 cilinder007 wrote: how is this turning into a balance discution ??? its not, some ppl just dont know how to use there own race and make comments like terran needs a better response to air... between missle turrets+range upgrade to missle turrets, thors with range 10 air dmg, range 9 vikings and tier 1 marines terrans have a pretty damn great answer to air... | ||
|
Apolo
Portugal1259 Posts
On May 25 2011 02:57 Ballistixz wrote: infact the only air unit marines dont rape is carriers, BCs, and brood lords... . Actually.... User was warned for this post | ||
|
genius_man16
United States749 Posts
On May 25 2011 03:00 dcemuser wrote: Why is it so difficult to build a Starport and get Vikings? It's as difficult as it was in BW to get a starport and Wraiths. | ||
|
Bobster
Germany3075 Posts
With the variety of units and buildings the Terrans had in the SP but not the MP, there will definitely be several new units - question is how many of those will transfer to the MP. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Wardi Open
PiGosaur Monday
GSL
WardiTV Team League
The PondCast
WardiTV Team League
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Team League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
