• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:41
CEST 16:41
KST 23:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202538RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 726 users

Charge still does not hit - Page 9

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 13 Next All
BeefAvenger
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada54 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-23 19:21:20
March 23 2011 19:20 GMT
#161
The incorrectness in the topic title is going to lead to a lot of misconceptions. Nothing's broken, they fixed a dumb bug the end

whether charge should negate slow effects is a different discussion and was not supposed to be addressed by this patch
dogmeatstew
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada574 Posts
March 23 2011 19:31 GMT
#162
On March 24 2011 00:09 BronzeKnee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 24 2011 00:04 TimeSpiral wrote:
You guys really think Charge should negate c-shells? Seriously?


Yes. With the removal of amulet, chargelots actually need to do some damage against Terran bio to make it a viable tech tree. If Templar tech is going to be viable, we'll need to get far ahead in economy and have HT's sitting around collecting energy. But the game doesn't work like that. So now all we have is Colossus.

Watch this: http://www.gomtv.net/2011gslsponsors2/vod/62509


I'm not sure why you would think that a game could be considered balanced if one upgrade just simply ignores the other, massive already ignores CS but I don't see why I speed upgrade should negate a anti-speed upgrade, that just seems like raging to me.

Now what I actually want to know is, does the application of one effect over right any existing effects?

If a marauder hits a zealot with CS and then the zealot charges the the charge get off? I'm pretty sure if zealot charges and it gets hit with a concussive shell the charge is slowed but it would seem completely fair if the effects over wrote each other.

OR, if I'm not mistaken CS slows a unit by 50%? and charge increases the zealots movement speed by 100%? so doing some maths, a zealot who is charging and hit by a concussive shell should move at the speed of a normal zealot who is not charging right? Is this currently how it works? I don't actually know but that seems like it would make the most sense to me, that the effect is applied on the units current speed not their base speed.
caradoc
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada3022 Posts
March 23 2011 19:32 GMT
#163
On March 23 2011 20:12 GhostFoxer wrote:
Charge in its normal form and in the new patch, has a benefit that I think some you maybe over looking. If you have a mix of Protoss gateway units (stalker, sentry, zealot) you can force field to block the escape route of kiteing units. Then the "wall" of zealots can close that gap faster, pining the army. Its not so much about "catching" as it is about closeing. The faster they get in to combat the more damage they do in a shorter time. So its an upgrade that helps in a diverse army, and is not so good in the early game, hence the high price.



I dont quite see how this relates to the change. If they're FFded from retreating, they aren't fleeing. You seem to have just summarized how charge works with FF in general, which I believe people already knew, unless I read your post wrong.
Salvation a la mode and a cup of tea...
caradoc
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada3022 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-23 19:36:31
March 23 2011 19:35 GMT
#164
In general, I think its fair/working as intended-- the patch notes never said anything about being immune to marauder slow, they just said they'd hit fleeing targets at least once. Of course they can't hit marauders if they can't GET to marauders. That's just common sense.

As it was before, if the fleeing units' move speed was greater than the zealot move speed after charge expires, they would never hit, now they will.

Essentially the coding prior to the change didn't include an attack with charge, charge would expire with the zealot standing next to the unit, and then the zealot would auto-attack the unit if its in range-- since the target's move speed is greater than the zealots move speed, it would not attack and would proceed to try to chase it down and never get a hit in. After the change, an attack 'comes with' charge, or the move cycle happens after an attack, so they get one in.

Hopefully that's clear.
Salvation a la mode and a cup of tea...
ptrpb
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada753 Posts
March 23 2011 19:41 GMT
#165
I'd be interested in seeing how different TvP would be if Chargelots were immune to Concussive Shell.
MBAACC | SG | shit at fighting games
Tef
Profile Joined April 2008
Sweden443 Posts
March 23 2011 19:48 GMT
#166
I interpreted that zealots, if they catched up with an enemy would always hit. Not that they would always catch up with a fleing unit. Why should they be able to hit something they can't catch up with? Sounds kind of stupid imo.
Dont fuck up, dont fuck yourself
NexUmbra
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Scotland3776 Posts
March 23 2011 19:49 GMT
#167
On March 23 2011 18:01 NguN wrote:
....give me Zealot leg speed from BW instead of Charge please =D


^This, at first I thought charge was better but tbh its just annoying
Life has won two GSLs and a Blizzard Cup. NOT three GSLs.
ZeromuS
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada13389 Posts
March 23 2011 19:52 GMT
#168
On March 24 2011 04:49 NexUmbra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 23 2011 18:01 NguN wrote:
....give me Zealot leg speed from BW instead of Charge please =D


^This, at first I thought charge was better but tbh its just annoying


Zealots base speed is increased when charge is available so you do get a speed buff. In small engagements you can micro for a surround with charge
StrategyRTS forever | @ZeromuS_plays | www.twitch.tv/Zeromus_
Snowbear
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Korea (South)1925 Posts
March 23 2011 19:53 GMT
#169
On March 24 2011 04:41 ptrpb wrote:
I'd be interested in seeing how different TvP would be if Chargelots were immune to Concussive Shell.


Ye, it would make the matchup even more protoss favoured
RemrafGrez
Profile Joined November 2010
United States180 Posts
March 23 2011 19:57 GMT
#170
To be fair, let's compare with Protoss:

Explanatory List
(1) Siege Tanks have to transform twice for every positional adjustment and you have to account for transformation time, you have to spot for siege tanks. They have a minimum range. They kill your own stuff, lol. All units now have to consider friendly fire for the whole battle.

>>Protoss don't have anything like a siege tank, I'll give you that. They do have immortals, which require positioning very carefully to absorb siege tank fire before other units. But have to avoid marines. Protoss and Zerg have to try to arrange units to avoid siege fire splash if possible... very hard to do.

(2) marines and marauders have to activate stim (sometimes multiple times) and be sliced, split, or use kite micro, sometimes combining retreat with split/slice and kite micro.

>>Protoss need sentries on a different hotkey than other units ideally for perfect FF placement. Stalkers should be on another hotkey for blinking or focus fire air unit killing.

>> Protoss have to keep zealots in front of sentries and stalkers. No easy task since stalkers are so fast.

(3) Ghosts cannot be in the same selection (hot key) as your MM ball otherwise you have to tab+stim. Ghosts have to forward scout, sometimes cloak, and then preemptively cast well placed EMPs or single target snipes.

>> Protoss, same problem for HT and Sentry and stalkers blink.

(4) Air units, such as the Raven, have purely casted spells that have to be placed or targeted and will fly straight into the enemy if issued an accidental attack+move command.

>>Some of the same problems for phoenix, observer.

(5) Flying units such as the Viking have to be separately hot-keyed, positioned for a flank, and then shift+focus-fired. They also need to transform to target ground units, then transform again to target air units.

>>Same problem for phoenix, voidray, and warp prism holding high templar... dropping off HT and possibly changing to warp mode. Not popular yet, but will be one day... hard to do in a battle though.

(6) medivacs have to be on a separate hotkey to effectively heal while the MM micro, or so they are not issued attack move commands and fly into hostile air-space.

>>I don't think medivacs have this problem anmore. They are slower now and generally never fly in stupidly... but I guess you have a point, it happens sometimes.

(7) Helions are ineffective attack move units. They need to be grouped and positioned to attack line-formation flanks.

>>I want to compare them to colossus. In a perfect world, you would get your colossus firing at bigger groups of units. Hard to do in a big fight. Minimal Colossus micro means moving out of air unit range.

I'm not even going to touch base on multi-pronged medivac harass during big battles, reapers, banshees with cloak, strike cannon, or Yamato cannon because the list is already too long.

>>Warping units in during a fight kills micro for Protoss. I guess you could add feedbacks, individually blinking stalkers to avoid damage, making sure guardian shield covers all units, turning off charge during certain battles, retreating HT, splitting HT, splitting Sentries, etc.

You have a good list, but I think Protoss have just as much to worry about.


Vimsey
Profile Joined May 2010
United Kingdom2235 Posts
March 23 2011 20:20 GMT
#171
Its how I expected the change to work to be fair, having your zealots charge endlessly till they get a one hit could be as much a disadvantage because chargelots could be kited away from the main army and isolated.
Thrasymachus725
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada527 Posts
March 23 2011 20:21 GMT
#172
Oh wow... this nerf to charge went too far. I cannot believe they would take this already underused ability and nerf it...

What? Whats that, sorry? .... they didn't nerf Charge? They BUFFED Charge?

Are you saying that there are literally 0 negative changes to Charge in the latest patch, and that the only changes are positive ones making Chargelots better now than they were before the patch?
With all the whining and complaining, I could swear that wasn't the case...


Look people, we got a buff. We hit more units now, more often. Chargelot DPS went up over the course of the game. Marauders negate Charge... so what? They always have. Nothing is changing now. Marines no longer do, Hellions probably don't, Siege Tanks won't...
Why are we complaining again? Because the change wasn't EXACTLY what you expected? Did you go on the PTR to test and give feedback to this change? No, didn't think so.

We got buffed guys... be happy!
The meaning of life is to fight.
ThaZenith
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada3116 Posts
March 23 2011 20:27 GMT
#173
If they get close enough to swing, they'll swing, and they'll always hit.

That's it. Before you sometimes wouldn't swing, or you'd swing but do no damage cuz they moved. Now you always hit if you swing.

Whoo?
Jotoco
Profile Joined October 2010
Brazil1342 Posts
March 23 2011 20:32 GMT
#174
A 50/50 Tier 1 upgrade still negates a 200/200 Tier 2 upgrade. Great.

I think it is a bug in implementation.
Ghost-z
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1291 Posts
March 23 2011 20:37 GMT
#175
The patch didn't address anything regarding Zealot Charge VS Concussive Shells. That is working as Blizzard intended.

What the patch did fix was that Zealots would Charge after fleeing units like Hellions/Roaches/Stalkers but not get a single hit on target. Now whenever a Zealot goes into charge mode if he doesn't get hit by a Concussive Shell it will guarantee a hit!!!
Fairy Tales when you're a child begin with "Once upon a time" and when you're an adult begin, "If elected I promise..."
Exarl25
Profile Joined November 2010
1887 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-23 20:41:44
March 23 2011 20:40 GMT
#176
On March 24 2011 05:21 Zanez.smarty wrote:
Oh wow... this nerf to charge went too far. I cannot believe they would take this already underused ability and nerf it...

What? Whats that, sorry? .... they didn't nerf Charge? They BUFFED Charge?

Are you saying that there are literally 0 negative changes to Charge in the latest patch, and that the only changes are positive ones making Chargelots better now than they were before the patch?
With all the whining and complaining, I could swear that wasn't the case...


Look people, we got a buff. We hit more units now, more often. Chargelot DPS went up over the course of the game. Marauders negate Charge... so what? They always have. Nothing is changing now. Marines no longer do, Hellions probably don't, Siege Tanks won't...
Why are we complaining again? Because the change wasn't EXACTLY what you expected? Did you go on the PTR to test and give feedback to this change? No, didn't think so.

We got buffed guys... be happy!


It's misleading patch notes people are complaining about here. Prior to release virtually everyone was under the impression that charging Zealots would always get at least 1 hit off on a fleeing unit, because that happens to be exactly what the patch notes say.

Not to mention the key fact that the change is listed under "balance" rather than bug fix.

I'll say that again, Blizzard have labelled this as a balance change and not as a bug fix as many on here are suggesting it is.
TimeSpiral
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1010 Posts
March 23 2011 20:41 GMT
#177
On March 24 2011 04:57 RemrafGrez wrote:
To be fair, let's compare with Protoss:

Explanatory List
(1) Siege Tanks have to transform twice for every positional adjustment and you have to account for transformation time, you have to spot for siege tanks. They have a minimum range. They kill your own stuff, lol. All units now have to consider friendly fire for the whole battle.

>>Protoss don't have anything like a siege tank, I'll give you that. They do have immortals, which require positioning very carefully to absorb siege tank fire before other units. But have to avoid marines. Protoss and Zerg have to try to arrange units to avoid siege fire splash if possible... very hard to do.

(2) marines and marauders have to activate stim (sometimes multiple times) and be sliced, split, or use kite micro, sometimes combining retreat with split/slice and kite micro.

>>Protoss need sentries on a different hotkey than other units ideally for perfect FF placement. Stalkers should be on another hotkey for blinking or focus fire air unit killing.

>> Protoss have to keep zealots in front of sentries and stalkers. No easy task since stalkers are so fast.

(3) Ghosts cannot be in the same selection (hot key) as your MM ball otherwise you have to tab+stim. Ghosts have to forward scout, sometimes cloak, and then preemptively cast well placed EMPs or single target snipes.

>> Protoss, same problem for HT and Sentry and stalkers blink.

(4) Air units, such as the Raven, have purely casted spells that have to be placed or targeted and will fly straight into the enemy if issued an accidental attack+move command.

>>Some of the same problems for phoenix, observer.

(5) Flying units such as the Viking have to be separately hot-keyed, positioned for a flank, and then shift+focus-fired. They also need to transform to target ground units, then transform again to target air units.

>>Same problem for phoenix, voidray, and warp prism holding high templar... dropping off HT and possibly changing to warp mode. Not popular yet, but will be one day... hard to do in a battle though.

(6) medivacs have to be on a separate hotkey to effectively heal while the MM micro, or so they are not issued attack move commands and fly into hostile air-space.

>>I don't think medivacs have this problem anmore. They are slower now and generally never fly in stupidly... but I guess you have a point, it happens sometimes.

(7) Helions are ineffective attack move units. They need to be grouped and positioned to attack line-formation flanks.

>>I want to compare them to colossus. In a perfect world, you would get your colossus firing at bigger groups of units. Hard to do in a big fight. Minimal Colossus micro means moving out of air unit range.

I'm not even going to touch base on multi-pronged medivac harass during big battles, reapers, banshees with cloak, strike cannon, or Yamato cannon because the list is already too long.

>>Warping units in during a fight kills micro for Protoss. I guess you could add feedbacks, individually blinking stalkers to avoid damage, making sure guardian shield covers all units, turning off charge during certain battles, retreating HT, splitting HT, splitting Sentries, etc.

You have a good list, but I think Protoss have just as much to worry about.




Well, to clarify, I was not trying to imply that the other races don't have "just as much to worry about," I was simply saying that the Terran army has a lot of very specific things like activated abilities. It could probably be argued that the Terran forces benefit the most from higher levels of micro, and suffer the most from a lack of micro.

Now, in response to your list you mentioned a lot of similar things in response to multiple line items. And it is only fair to mention everyone has to worry about things like positioning your units in "basically" the correct position: short range in front, long range in back, etc ...
[G] Positioning, Formations, and Tactics: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=187892
Thrasymachus725
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada527 Posts
March 23 2011 20:42 GMT
#178
On March 24 2011 05:32 Jotoco wrote:
A 50/50 Tier 1 upgrade still negates a 200/200 Tier 2 upgrade. Great.


Really?
I wasn't aware that concussive shells existed on every single unit the Terran made.
When did they add concussive shells to siege tanks?
When did they add concussive shells to marines?
When did they add concussive shells to hellions?

These are all units that I have replays showing my Chargelots MISSING their attacks against these units on the run. This won't happen anymore. BUFF.

Charge is used on units besides Marauders... u know that right?
The meaning of life is to fight.
jgelling
Profile Joined February 2011
55 Posts
March 23 2011 20:43 GMT
#179
Well the movement speed of a zealot with charge is 6, concussive reduces that by 50% to ~3. Meanwhile, a marauder moves at 2.25 and stim increases that 50% to 3.37.

Since 3 < 3.37, a chargelot can never catch a stimmed + concussive marauder (at least not one on one with micro). The chargelot still needs to get in range to hit (and isn't).

But what was happening before was even worse. Take away stim for a second. A chargelot would charge at 6, get reduced to 3, catch up with the target, but the target is moving away at 2.25. The chargelot can't hit targets that are moving - even ones that are moving slower - during the duration of the charge effect!

Before patch: Chargelots cannot hit targets that are moving away at ANY speed
After patch: Chargelots can hit targets that are moving away at slower speeds (so they can catch up) - the only thing that can outrun a chargelot is stimmed, concussive marauders.

BUT, I'd note that's not so bad - while those stimmed units are running away, their stim attack boost is fading and they've taken damage from the stim. You can just pull back and wait for the stim to end.

But yeah, you're right: overall it's not a very significant change in patch 1.3, certainly not as big a deal as removing KA.
OsoVega
Profile Joined December 2010
926 Posts
March 23 2011 20:43 GMT
#180
On March 24 2011 05:21 Zanez.smarty wrote:
Oh wow... this nerf to charge went too far. I cannot believe they would take this already underused ability and nerf it...

What? Whats that, sorry? .... they didn't nerf Charge? They BUFFED Charge?

Are you saying that there are literally 0 negative changes to Charge in the latest patch, and that the only changes are positive ones making Chargelots better now than they were before the patch?
With all the whining and complaining, I could swear that wasn't the case...


Look people, we got a buff. We hit more units now, more often. Chargelot DPS went up over the course of the game. Marauders negate Charge... so what? They always have. Nothing is changing now. Marines no longer do, Hellions probably don't, Siege Tanks won't...
Why are we complaining again? Because the change wasn't EXACTLY what you expected? Did you go on the PTR to test and give feedback to this change? No, didn't think so.

We got buffed guys... be happy!

To me it seems more like a bug got fixed.
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 13 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 2
Reynor vs MaruLIVE!
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena11745
ComeBackTV 2569
TaKeTV 637
Hui .571
3DClanTV 396
Rex258
EnkiAlexander 244
CranKy Ducklings182
mcanning171
Reynor153
UpATreeSC121
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena11596
Hui .571
Rex 258
mcanning 171
Reynor 149
UpATreeSC 121
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 4343
Barracks 1887
Flash 1877
BeSt 1527
Jaedong 1498
EffOrt 1056
Mini 582
Stork 496
ggaemo 377
Snow 357
[ Show more ]
Soma 272
GuemChi 266
ZerO 253
Soulkey 252
ToSsGirL 188
Rush 132
Hyun 107
TY 57
soO 55
Sacsri 38
Sea.KH 35
scan(afreeca) 26
Terrorterran 14
Movie 14
Yoon 11
ivOry 9
Bale 7
Britney 0
Dota 2
syndereN412
XcaliburYe295
420jenkins289
Counter-Strike
sgares671
flusha135
edward65
Super Smash Bros
Westballz40
Other Games
singsing2040
hiko1301
B2W.Neo1057
crisheroes444
Fuzer 168
ArmadaUGS108
KnowMe50
QueenE49
ZerO(Twitch)20
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 4
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH281
• Adnapsc2 3
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1624
• WagamamaTV564
League of Legends
• Nemesis4058
• TFBlade799
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
19h 19m
TBD vs Zoun
TBD vs SHIN
TBD vs ShoWTimE
TBD vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 20h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.