He calls it a Sparta remix. Seriously, isn't that credit enough?
Sure. And from now on whenever a book is written on another author's works, there's no need to cite the works. It's enough that the book is "about his works".
Seriously, it's a legitimate problem in the music world. I'm just trying to defend people who put in a lot of work, only to have their work ripped off. How hard is it to copy paste a link to the original song? Not hard at all. No matter what standpoint you look at it, moral, legal, or what-have-you, it's necessary. This lazyman idea that we can just take whatever we want, and not give any credit where it's due, is just bs. If you disagree, I really hope you come up with a major idea for a company, and then someone else steals it, submits the idea before you with a few things changed, and gets promoted.
The entire history of art is people taking something someone else did and change it a little and make it their own.
He calls it a Sparta remix. Seriously, isn't that credit enough?
Sure. And from now on whenever a book is written on another author's works, there's no need to cite the works. It's enough that the book is "about his works".
Seriously, it's a legitimate problem in the music world. I'm just trying to defend people who put in a lot of work, only to have their work ripped off. How hard is it to copy paste a link to the original song? Not hard at all. No matter what standpoint you look at it, moral, legal, or what-have-you, it's necessary. This lazyman idea that we can just take whatever we want, and not give any credit where it's due, is just bs. If you disagree, I really hope you come up with a major idea for a company, and then someone else steals it, submits the idea before you with a few things changed, and gets promoted.
The entire history of art is people taking something someone else did and change it a little and make it their own.
I, for one, find the OP's idea of stealing Keaton-World's song before Keaton-World could do anything with it abhorrent. I mean, Keaton-World didn't even publish that beat, and the OP goes and steals it. And there was so much profit motive unrealized.
He calls it a Sparta remix. Seriously, isn't that credit enough?
Sure. And from now on whenever a book is written on another author's works, there's no need to cite the works. It's enough that the book is "about his works".
Seriously, it's a legitimate problem in the music world. I'm just trying to defend people who put in a lot of work, only to have their work ripped off. How hard is it to copy paste a link to the original song? Not hard at all. No matter what standpoint you look at it, moral, legal, or what-have-you, it's necessary. This lazyman idea that we can just take whatever we want, and not give any credit where it's due, is just bs. If you disagree, I really hope you come up with a major idea for a company, and then someone else steals it, submits the idea before you with a few things changed, and gets promoted.
The entire history of art is people taking something someone else did and change it a little and make it their own.
Show me the Mona Lisa with a mustache that made millions,
On November 05 2010 15:06 forgotten0ne wrote: Seriously, you guys are just picking fights to pick fights. You know that as a moral human, you should credit where it's due. Quit being idiots.
He calls it a Sparta remix. Seriously, isn't that credit enough?
Sure. And from now on whenever a book is written on another author's works, there's no need to cite the works. It's enough that the book is "about his works".
Seriously, it's a legitimate problem in the music world. I'm just trying to defend people who put in a lot of work, only to have their work ripped off. How hard is it to copy paste a link to the original song? Not hard at all. No matter what standpoint you look at it, moral, legal, or what-have-you, it's necessary. This lazyman idea that we can just take whatever we want, and not give any credit where it's due, is just bs. If you disagree, I really hope you come up with a major idea for a company, and then someone else steals it, submits the idea before you with a few things changed, and gets promoted.
The entire history of art is people taking something someone else did and change it a little and make it their own.
Show me the Mona Lisa with a mustache that made millions,
Stop being so tight-assed its annoying, who cares seriously if someone took the beat of someone else and made a youtube video with it. This is the internet, deal with it.
On November 05 2010 14:30 Mellotron wrote: If you can find and DL it, there is a program called X-Noise that comes with the Waves Restoration audio bundle that can take snapshots of frequencies and reduce or remove them from audio. They use it in forensics and other types of audio production. You could use it to take out the garbled hiss from artosis voice on some of those sound clips.
Thanks I'll check it out.
@forgotten0ne You look like you're just trying to get a flame war going. I'm sorry that I didn't realize to give credit to the music creator, sure I'll edit to fix that no problem. I hope I can end this stupid flame war before it gets any worse. :-)
Anyone noticed at GSL today when Tasteless said "So many banelings!", Artosis kind of had to laugh at that at little? I bet he was thinking of this ;-)
On November 05 2010 15:06 forgotten0ne wrote: Seriously, you guys are just picking fights to pick fights. You know that as a moral human, you should credit where it's due. Quit being idiots.
He calls it a Sparta remix. Seriously, isn't that credit enough?
Sure. And from now on whenever a book is written on another author's works, there's no need to cite the works. It's enough that the book is "about his works".
Seriously, it's a legitimate problem in the music world. I'm just trying to defend people who put in a lot of work, only to have their work ripped off. How hard is it to copy paste a link to the original song? Not hard at all. No matter what standpoint you look at it, moral, legal, or what-have-you, it's necessary. This lazyman idea that we can just take whatever we want, and not give any credit where it's due, is just bs. If you disagree, I really hope you come up with a major idea for a company, and then someone else steals it, submits the idea before you with a few things changed, and gets promoted.
The entire history of art is people taking something someone else did and change it a little and make it their own.
Show me the Mona Lisa with a mustache that made millions,
I repeat; the entire history of art is people taking something someone else did and change it a little to make it their own. Even the Beatles and Led Zep were constant thieves of other peoples work, not only admitting it, but being sued for it on many occasions.
The 1980s hit "Girls Just Want to Have Fun" by Cyndi Lauper was a massive success and she was given awards and a ton of credit for being a super charismatic and original performer, and yet, it was a song written by some other person, who wrote it as a parody of 50s pop hits, and even uses the EXACT same chord progression as songs from that era. We literally do not have the time to list even 1/10000000th of these types of instances where straight up plagiarism was not only allowed, but was applauded in art history.
Anyone saying otherwise is being a complete and total fool, not only for not knowing how to spot similarities in form from one work of art to the next, but also for being foolish enough to assume what "should be" actually "is". Originality "should be" sacred. But it isnt, and never was, or will be. The only thing that seems to be sacred is how human beings like to view "originality". Which can be seen by the attitudes of posters in this thread who seem to think that people dont steal ideas, and that art itself isnt just a bunch of people stealing ideas and changing them just enough to make it their own. Thats all art is.
On November 05 2010 15:06 forgotten0ne wrote: Seriously, you guys are just picking fights to pick fights. You know that as a moral human, you should credit where it's due. Quit being idiots.
On November 05 2010 14:38 Mellotron wrote:
On November 05 2010 14:33 forgotten0ne wrote:
On November 05 2010 14:27 AJMcSpiffy wrote:
He calls it a Sparta remix. Seriously, isn't that credit enough?
Sure. And from now on whenever a book is written on another author's works, there's no need to cite the works. It's enough that the book is "about his works".
Seriously, it's a legitimate problem in the music world. I'm just trying to defend people who put in a lot of work, only to have their work ripped off. How hard is it to copy paste a link to the original song? Not hard at all. No matter what standpoint you look at it, moral, legal, or what-have-you, it's necessary. This lazyman idea that we can just take whatever we want, and not give any credit where it's due, is just bs. If you disagree, I really hope you come up with a major idea for a company, and then someone else steals it, submits the idea before you with a few things changed, and gets promoted.
The entire history of art is people taking something someone else did and change it a little and make it their own.
Show me the Mona Lisa with a mustache that made millions,
I repeat; the entire history of art is people taking something someone else did and change it a little to make it their own. Even the Beatles and Led Zep were constant thieves of other peoples work, not only admitting it, but being sued for it on many occasions.
The 1980s hit "Girls Just Want to Have Fun" by Cyndi Lauper was a massive success and she was given awards and a ton of credit for being a super charismatic and original performer, and yet, it was a song written by some other person, who wrote it as a parody of 50s pop hits, and even uses the EXACT same chord progression as songs from that era. We literally do not have the time to list even 1/10000000th of these types of instances where straight up plagiarism was not only allowed, but was applauded in art history.
Anyone saying otherwise is being a complete and total fool, not only for not knowing how to spot similarities in form from one work of art to the next, but also for being foolish enough to assume what "should be" actually "is". Originality "should be" sacred. But it isnt, and never was, or will be. The only thing that seems to be sacred is how human beings like to view "originality". Which can be seen by the attitudes of posters in this thread who seem to think that people dont steal ideas, and that art itself isnt just a bunch of people stealing ideas and changing them just enough to make it their own. Thats all art is.
On November 05 2010 21:16 bobthemage wrote: Anyone noticed at GSL today when Tasteless said "So many banelings!", Artosis kind of had to laugh at that at little? I bet he was thinking of this ;-)
Hehe, it was actually artosis that said so many banelings.
I knew the moment that he said it that he knew about this video =P
Some improvement tips: - Higher video quality - Game play matches the music and lyrics
Remember this from the beta, really good video. I mean, it actually looks like it took a lot of effort to make, whereas that piece of shit in the OP probably took the better part of 5 minutes to put together.
EPT
I mean, it actually looks like it took a lot of effort to make, whereas that piece of shit in the OP probably took the better part of 5 minutes to put together.
