• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:19
CEST 00:19
KST 07:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202552RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams7Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 722 users

Ultralisk bug/issue with patch 1.1.1 - Page 34

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 32 33 34 35 36 38 Next All
GathFox
Profile Joined September 2010
United States58 Posts
October 04 2010 02:34 GMT
#661
On October 04 2010 11:01 theqat wrote:
you can't possibly tell zerg/protoss to "just kill the SCVs." Killing a Terran's SCVs is borderline meaningless thanks to MULEs.

That said I think Cool demonstrated that Ultras are far from useless or neutered, plus he brought a couple Infestors for keeping SCVs from repairing PFs. Seems reasonable to me as you should be building Infestors in almost any game vs. T


Your assessment of mules to me is a bit innacurate. Yes they do help especialy if you have been saving up the energy for the rainy day *or due to lazy macro* and perhaps it really does soften the blow more than it should but while this boosts resource gathering it doesnt deny the fact that if you destroyed the SCV's you still would have slowed his economy much more compared to what you would have accomplished if you had just targeted the PF alone and lost most of your forces while still not destroying the PF. Im not saying microing to kill scv's is easy, but its more worth your effort to kill those than waste an army on a PF. And If your already there, them using mules that are still vulnerable to attacks if he hasnt routed your army back can pose another oppertunity, perhaps for an infestor burrowed in the chaos of an attack.

At least you have the cunning to respond with an arguement.
wise men win before they fight while the ignorant fight to win
ClanRH.TV
Profile Joined July 2010
United States462 Posts
October 04 2010 02:49 GMT
#662
On September 29 2010 12:34 afiddy wrote:
Dear Blizzard,

Please stop putting your dick in my anus, it is very uncomfortable and I think it's bleeding.

User was warned for this post


LoL. He gets a warning for this and I get banned for saying "blue is being a scumbag." I don't think that is very consistent but w/e. Anywho, I'm not sure what to do anymore with this change.
"Don't take life too seriously because you'll never get out alive."
GathFox
Profile Joined September 2010
United States58 Posts
October 04 2010 02:50 GMT
#663
On October 04 2010 11:09 Moa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 04 2010 11:01 theqat wrote:
you can't possibly tell zerg/protoss to "just kill the SCVs." Killing a Terran's SCVs is borderline meaningless thanks to MULEs.


I am inclined to agree with you but instead of calling killing SCVs meaningless I would say that it is as meaningless (or meaningful) as killing drones.

Gathfox: On the subject of killing larvae the re-saturation of a mineral line not only costs a ton of minerals it also costs a production cycle or two which means that zerg will be able to make less units. Each egg could be an ultralisk but it has to be a drone.

Comparing the production cycles of each race is a fruitless task because of the differences between them. That is not the issue at hand. The thread is discussing the changes to the ultralisk, a unit which is an anti-ground anti-armor unit which has now lost the ability to be cost effective against a unit that is both armored and ground, the thor.


Indeed you have a point about the larvae cost, which would come into play if the actual larvae count has been pressured a lot in a game. To say comparing each races mode of production is fruitless is incorrect i believe since it allows you to understand how to better neuter that production *killing a tech building to deny zerg an entire particular unit for example* but if anything is fruitless about it its arguing balance with it.

And yes this is rather off topic a thing for me to get fired up about. And i can imagine what a psychological blow losing the ultralisks profficiency at its prior tasks can be for a zerg.

I must ask though. are Ultras the only way to deal with a thor? And if other counters can be made enough against them what should the ultras purpose be changed to?
wise men win before they fight while the ignorant fight to win
P00RKID
Profile Joined December 2009
United States424 Posts
October 04 2010 03:09 GMT
#664
Ultra AoE nerf has a huge affect ZvZ as well. Used to be able to pump out Ultras to beat hydra infestor roach, which was somewhat soft countering eachother, except the ultras cant be rooted down like if you sent in lings + banelings.

Now, the splash is so minimal that even the slightest positional spacing of hydras or roaches will nullify it entirely. With no micro, its a fairly even battle usually ending with almost no forces for either side, or, all of you ultras dieing and you having to reinforce. The only reason units will take ultra splash is because they don't take the time to space a few packed units apart, and you nulify that damage. Before 1.1.1, if you saw Ultras, you needed mutas, or lots more hydra in a choke, and even then there was even losses for hydra. Now hydra do so much better vs ultra.
"Does your butt hurt? 'cause you fell from heaven once the cast was over?" Artosis
EriktheGuy
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada132 Posts
October 04 2010 06:58 GMT
#665
I think the latest patch makes more sense, even if it is unfair to zerg. The splash area should not depend on the unit you are hitting. That said, the splash area could be buffed to compensate for this difference. Ultras are really the only good AoE zerg gets without lurks. A larger splash would help them hit Thors and SCVs more easily.
In mathematics you don't understand things, you just get used to them. -Neumann
chimthegrim
Profile Joined June 2010
United States31 Posts
October 04 2010 07:03 GMT
#666
ultras are pretty beastly even with this "nerf," so its not that big a deal for most players. its the professionals who might have a real pain with it.
fdsdfg
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States1251 Posts
October 04 2010 07:39 GMT
#667
On October 04 2010 11:23 NewDeal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 04 2010 11:09 Moa wrote:
The thread is discussing the changes to the ultralisk, a unit which is an anti-ground anti-armor unit which has now lost the ability to be cost effective against a unit that is both armored and ground, the thor.


I find it most annoying that when the opposing units are armored and also anti-armored, the Ultras get raped. That shows the ineffectiveness of the Ultra to me. Marauders and Immortals are armored and anti-armored and they make Ultras wish they were still in the larva stage. Of course Immortals aren't that good against, uh, lings I guess, and Marauders don't have counters as we all know. But Ultras have great counters, including units they're supposed to be good against (Marauders/Immortals/Thors/Blink Stalkers) and units like Marines, Zealots, Archons, and of course flying units.

Why does it have to be this way? Why do zerg units always have half the unit pool as counters, while units like Marauders, Thors, Tanks, Stalkers, Colossi, Immortals all can be massed and have at most one (ground) unit that are good against them, and have to be dealt with using spells and good micro? Zerg units can be countered just building a different attacking unit and you're ok.




It's so true...

The thor is armored, ground, and can attack ground and air, and is all around good vs everything - especially light air units.

The ultralisk is an anti-armored unit that can only attack ground, and costs the same. It takes much much much longer to tech to.

And it loses!

But, that's really how Zerg is - with the exception of the zergling and muta, every unit is just plain BAD on paper. Marauder vs Roach, which would you rather have? Hydralisk or Stalker? Infestor or any other caster? Corruptor or Viking?

However, Zerg's advantages can overcome this. Zerg's advantage of building everything from larvae is enough to overcome their inherent speed gimp off creep, their early game impotence, their difficult macro, their battles with one-way micro (ie roach/hydra vs army w/ forcefields), their slow-as-hell tech, their expensive tech, their inability to wall, etc etc.

They have a looong list of disadvantages, and one huge advantage - the larvae mechanic. That's enough to make up for it, believe it or not, as Cool demonstrated.
aka Siyko
xs101
Profile Joined June 2010
Romania86 Posts
October 04 2010 07:48 GMT
#668
Cool demonstrated he can win with a race no one else can consistently. GSL prooved that Cool was better than the rest, NOT that zerg is better than terran or protoss.
AcOrP
Profile Joined November 2009
Bulgaria148 Posts
October 04 2010 07:50 GMT
#669
On October 04 2010 16:39 fdsdfg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 04 2010 11:23 NewDeal wrote:
On October 04 2010 11:09 Moa wrote:
The thread is discussing the changes to the ultralisk, a unit which is an anti-ground anti-armor unit which has now lost the ability to be cost effective against a unit that is both armored and ground, the thor.


I find it most annoying that when the opposing units are armored and also anti-armored, the Ultras get raped. That shows the ineffectiveness of the Ultra to me. Marauders and Immortals are armored and anti-armored and they make Ultras wish they were still in the larva stage. Of course Immortals aren't that good against, uh, lings I guess, and Marauders don't have counters as we all know. But Ultras have great counters, including units they're supposed to be good against (Marauders/Immortals/Thors/Blink Stalkers) and units like Marines, Zealots, Archons, and of course flying units.

Why does it have to be this way? Why do zerg units always have half the unit pool as counters, while units like Marauders, Thors, Tanks, Stalkers, Colossi, Immortals all can be massed and have at most one (ground) unit that are good against them, and have to be dealt with using spells and good micro? Zerg units can be countered just building a different attacking unit and you're ok.




It's so true...

The thor is armored, ground, and can attack ground and air, and is all around good vs everything - especially light air units.

The ultralisk is an anti-armored unit that can only attack ground, and costs the same. It takes much much much longer to tech to.

And it loses!

But, that's really how Zerg is - with the exception of the zergling and muta, every unit is just plain BAD on paper. Marauder vs Roach, which would you rather have? Hydralisk or Stalker? Infestor or any other caster? Corruptor or Viking?

However, Zerg's advantages can overcome this. Zerg's advantage of building everything from larvae is enough to overcome their inherent speed gimp off creep, their early game impotence, their difficult macro, their battles with one-way micro (ie roach/hydra vs army w/ forcefields), their slow-as-hell tech, their expensive tech, their inability to wall, etc etc.

They have a looong list of disadvantages, and one huge advantage - the larvae mechanic. That's enough to make up for it, believe it or not, as Cool demonstrated.

Larva mechanic still require great economy which you cannot get vs decent terran that harass you, cool won only becouse ITR failed to do any harass.
evanthebouncy!
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
United States12796 Posts
October 04 2010 07:54 GMT
#670
I'll be happy with an ultra speed buff.
I maen in BW they move as fast as zerglings so you can 1a your entire army w/o worryin gabout they become dislodged
Life is run, it is dance, it is fast, passionate and BAM!, you dance and sing and booze while you can for now is the time and time is mine. Smile and laugh when still can for now is the time and soon you die!
Burban
Profile Joined August 2010
48 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-04 10:20:46
October 04 2010 10:17 GMT
#671
On October 04 2010 15:58 EriktheGuy wrote:
Ultras are really the only good AoE zerg gets without lurks. .


Right... what?
Ever heard about mutalisks, infestors, broodlords or banelings?

On topic.. This is not a nerf, this not a bug, its a FIX. Blizzard just said it pretty clearly.. Ultra splash was bigger than intended, it needed to be fixed. And as far as I am concerned, this splash was indeed too big. And I'm not talking about PF splash, but pre 1.1 splash.
Even now, Ultra is still a killer unit.

So when siege tank got heavily nerfed, it's normal and l2p. But if the bugged ultralisk is fixed (and slightly nerfed, -5 dmg v armor), it is a very cruel nerf and the unit is now useless (lol at that seriously, you obviously dont know what a 1.1 ultra is, because as a terran, I know it very precisely).

And what's your problem, Moa makes some points, he comes up with an elaborate text, and you ppl just insult him ? What kind of person are you...
ALPINA
Profile Joined May 2010
3791 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-04 11:23:21
October 04 2010 11:22 GMT
#672
On October 04 2010 19:17 Burban wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 04 2010 15:58 EriktheGuy wrote:
Ultras are really the only good AoE zerg gets without lurks. .


Right... what?
Ever heard about mutalisks, infestors, broodlords or banelings?

On topic.. This is not a nerf, this not a bug, its a FIX. Blizzard just said it pretty clearly.. Ultra splash was bigger than intended, it needed to be fixed. And as far as I am concerned, this splash was indeed too big. And I'm not talking about PF splash, but pre 1.1 splash.
Even now, Ultra is still a killer unit.

So when siege tank got heavily nerfed, it's normal and l2p. But if the bugged ultralisk is fixed (and slightly nerfed, -5 dmg v armor), it is a very cruel nerf and the unit is now useless (lol at that seriously, you obviously dont know what a 1.1 ultra is, because as a terran, I know it very precisely).

And what's your problem, Moa makes some points, he comes up with an elaborate text, and you ppl just insult him ? What kind of person are you...


First of all siege tank nerf is really small, cause it only works vs. non armored (lings, hydras, banes), which dies in seconds vs. tanks anyway, so no big deal.

It seems that you don't understand the point people are saying, that it is okey that they fixed Ultra's splash, but right before they nerfed Ultra according to old spash. So Ultras has now double nerf, and that wasn't intended!

I didn't try much Ultras vs. terran but vs. toss they are so weak that it just does not worth making them anymore, unless you have absolutely perfect flank where ultras attack from all angles. Yesterday I played vs. toss and had 11 Ultras and they died in ~3 seconds w/o dealing any damage. Yeah they wasn't in good position, but still 11 of strongest unit in game shouldn't be like a paper.
You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity
FliedLice
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Germany7494 Posts
October 04 2010 11:50 GMT
#673
On September 28 2010 23:41 OreoBoi wrote:
Awesome, psi storm splash nerfed, ultra splash nerfed, tank splash BUFFED! (talking about patches in the beta till now)


you mean the one where they changed it from 60 to 50?
Kevmeister @ Dota2
Jzerg
Profile Joined October 2009
84 Posts
October 04 2010 12:09 GMT
#674
The biggest problem I've had since the ultra nerf is dealing with Protoss in the late game. Fully upgraded blink stalkers with colossi backup and sentries are a tough army to kill. Broodlords are useless as they die so fast, but ultras were always the end game goal to even things out. Now I feel I'm at a big disadvantage in the late game.

Obviously my experiences only count as anecdotal evidence, but I think I've also noticed a change in ZvT because of it. The terrans I've faced are much more likely to go mass thor/hellion/marine but maybe that's just the current popular strat. I think someone mentioned earlier how powerful ultras forced terran to not sit and sit and sit to mass these because once zerg had too many ultras out the army got countered pretty well. In any case, I've been using more broodlords once again. At least they do benefit a lot from melee/carapace upgrades that I get for lings/blings (my broodling wall gets that much stronger).

In any case, it's well known that the patch where they changed the ultra splash to target centered +radius was the same patch where they changed the splash damage from 100% to 33%. I think if the ultras splash is now reverted to pre- beta patch 13 levels the splash damage should be increased somewhat, probably to 50-60%, and the 5dmg vs armored reduction should be undone, as it was based on faulty aoe area.
AcOrP
Profile Joined November 2009
Bulgaria148 Posts
October 04 2010 12:15 GMT
#675
On October 04 2010 19:17 Burban wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 04 2010 15:58 EriktheGuy wrote:
Ultras are really the only good AoE zerg gets without lurks. .


Right... what?
Ever heard about mutalisks, infestors, broodlords or banelings?

On topic.. This is not a nerf, this not a bug, its a FIX. Blizzard just said it pretty clearly.. Ultra splash was bigger than intended, it needed to be fixed. And as far as I am concerned, this splash was indeed too big. And I'm not talking about PF splash, but pre 1.1 splash.
Even now, Ultra is still a killer unit.

So when siege tank got heavily nerfed, it's normal and l2p. But if the bugged ultralisk is fixed (and slightly nerfed, -5 dmg v armor), it is a very cruel nerf and the unit is now useless (lol at that seriously, you obviously dont know what a 1.1 ultra is, because as a terran, I know it very precisely).

And what's your problem, Moa makes some points, he comes up with an elaborate text, and you ppl just insult him ? What kind of person are you...

Please test the ultras vs any terran units at same cost... add roaches to the ultras and see how beutiful they get stuck behind the roaches... or how roaches with their great range of 3 cannot shoot becouse ultras are huge! Do you realize that mele units need time to get to the enemy... Zerg vs T is like goin to gun fight with knife... with the spalsh T had to have bio behind thors so thors tank while low health terran army do dmg. Now bio take the hits and thors doing the damage once the ultras are low hp terran still has the thors which then repair and after such battle T is way ahead destroying 1-2 expos b4 your next ultras pop out...
xs101
Profile Joined June 2010
Romania86 Posts
October 04 2010 14:13 GMT
#676
Bad times to be a zerg for sure...
but to cheer every zerg up, imagine, just imagine when blizzard will fix zerg balance just how awesome every match will be, because we're already doing OK with this half broken race.
EriktheGuy
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada132 Posts
October 04 2010 15:41 GMT
#677
On October 04 2010 19:17 Burban wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 04 2010 15:58 EriktheGuy wrote:
Ultras are really the only good AoE zerg gets without lurks. .


Right... what?
Ever heard about mutalisks, infestors, broodlords or banelings?

On topic.. This is not a nerf, this not a bug, its a FIX. Blizzard just said it pretty clearly.. Ultra splash was bigger than intended, it needed to be fixed. And as far as I am concerned, this splash was indeed too big. And I'm not talking about PF splash, but pre 1.1 splash.
Even now, Ultra is still a killer unit.

So when siege tank got heavily nerfed, it's normal and l2p. But if the bugged ultralisk is fixed (and slightly nerfed, -5 dmg v armor), it is a very cruel nerf and the unit is now useless (lol at that seriously, you obviously dont know what a 1.1 ultra is, because as a terran, I know it very precisely).

And what's your problem, Moa makes some points, he comes up with an elaborate text, and you ppl just insult him ? What kind of person are you...

I forgot about banes. Broods don't AoE (but I know what you mean). Fungal and muta are good damage against bio, but I sort of meant that ultra is the only good AoE against the heavy units they are meant to deal with (Thors, tanks). Fungal stops these units from moving (like terran was going to move anyways ), mutas get depressed when your opponent gets his armory up. Even banes do way less than zerglings against these targets.
If any unit is dealing good AoE damage to Thor/tank, it is the ultralisk (and perhaps the broodlord as you mentioned).
In mathematics you don't understand things, you just get used to them. -Neumann
DoubleReed
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States4130 Posts
October 04 2010 16:38 GMT
#678
Please test the ultras vs any terran units at same cost... add roaches to the ultras and see how beutiful they get stuck behind the roaches... or how roaches with their great range of 3 cannot shoot becouse ultras are huge!


This is easily mitigated by roach-burrow. It works insanely well.

I agree, the main problem with the ultra-nerf is now they don't work well against stalkers-balls. Which is actually something we desperately need.

On topic.. This is not a nerf, this not a bug, its a FIX. Blizzard just said it pretty clearly.. Ultra splash was bigger than intended, it needed to be fixed. And as far as I am concerned, this splash was indeed too big. And I'm not talking about PF splash, but pre 1.1 splash.


Regardless of whether its a fix, a bug, or whatever, it's also a nerf. A significant nerf to the splash of the ultralisk. The damage output of the ultralisk is significantly decreased (much moreso than the -5 to armored).
urashimakt
Profile Joined October 2009
United States1591 Posts
October 04 2010 16:48 GMT
#679
On October 04 2010 19:17 Burban wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 04 2010 15:58 EriktheGuy wrote:
Ultras are really the only good AoE zerg gets without lurks. .


Right... what?
Ever heard about mutalisks, infestors, broodlords or banelings?

On topic.. This is not a nerf, this not a bug, its a FIX. Blizzard just said it pretty clearly.. Ultra splash was bigger than intended, it needed to be fixed. And as far as I am concerned, this splash was indeed too big. And I'm not talking about PF splash, but pre 1.1 splash.
Even now, Ultra is still a killer unit.

So when siege tank got heavily nerfed, it's normal and l2p. But if the bugged ultralisk is fixed (and slightly nerfed, -5 dmg v armor), it is a very cruel nerf and the unit is now useless (lol at that seriously, you obviously dont know what a 1.1 ultra is, because as a terran, I know it very precisely).

And what's your problem, Moa makes some points, he comes up with an elaborate text, and you ppl just insult him ? What kind of person are you...

The Ultralisk attack didn't change from 1.0 to 1.1 apart from Headbutt being removed, Kaiser Blades being allowed to attack buildings, and +5 armor damage being taken off. The splash radius was not increased or decreased. The AoE was decreased universally, but to a varying degree based on target, from 1.1 to 1.1.1. This means that 1.0 to 1.1.1 universally weakened the ultralisk attack.

What they should do is flag the current Ultralisk attack as hidden and make it only capable of attacking buildings. Then, give the 1.1 attack back to Ultralisks and make it only capable of hitting non-buildings. It'll be just like 1.1 without the insane building splash.
Who dat ninja?
Uranium
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1077 Posts
October 04 2010 17:05 GMT
#680
On October 04 2010 21:09 Jzerg wrote:
In any case, it's well known that the patch where they changed the ultra splash to target centered +radius was the same patch where they changed the splash damage from 100% to 33%. I think if the ultras splash is now reverted to pre- beta patch 13 levels the splash damage should be increased somewhat, probably to 50-60%, and the 5dmg vs armored reduction should be undone, as it was based on faulty aoe area.


I think this bears repeating.
"Sentry imba! You see? YOU SEE??!!" - Sen | "Marauder die die!" - oGsMC | "Oh my god, she texted me back!" - Day[9]
Prev 1 32 33 34 35 36 38 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 12h 41m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 215
StarCraft: Brood War
ivOry 10
Dota 2
monkeys_forever809
League of Legends
Dendi917
syndereN152
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1537
Stewie2K1005
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken54
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu598
Other Games
summit1g8099
FrodaN3245
tarik_tv1803
C9.Mang0208
PPMD37
ViBE10
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 56
• davetesta49
• musti20045 39
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 48
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade579
Other Games
• imaqtpie1592
• Shiphtur408
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
12h 41m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
15h 41m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 11h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
CSO Cup
1d 17h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.