• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:55
CEST 02:55
KST 09:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun12[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists22[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9
Community News
Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results02026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers25Maestros of the Game 2 announced92026 GSL Tour plans announced15Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool MaNa leaves Team Liquid
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) SC2 INu's Battles#15 <BO.9 2Matches> WardiTV Spring Cup SEL Masters #6 - Solar vs Classic (SC: Evo)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 523 Firewall Mutation # 522 Flip My Base Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss
Brood War
General
[BSL22] RO16 Group A - Sunday 21:00 CEST [BSL22] RO16 Group B - Saturday 21:00 CEST Pros React To: Leta vs Tulbo (ASL S21, Ro.8) RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site BW General Discussion
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [BSL22] RO16 Group Stage - 02 - 10 May [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro8 Day 2
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend?
Other Games
General Games
Daigo vs Menard Best of 10 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Diablo IV
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread 3D technology/software discussion Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sexual Health Of Gamers
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2022 users

Ultras vs Repaired PF - Page 24

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 55 Next
0neder
Profile Joined July 2009
United States3733 Posts
September 22 2010 03:26 GMT
#461
Ummm...hopefully blizz fixes this before GSL starts again? Wait, I guess there are no zergs left so it doesn't matter, hahaha.
Whiladan
Profile Joined September 2010
United States463 Posts
September 22 2010 03:29 GMT
#462
Here's a demonstration of the splash radius: (click to enlarge)
[image loading]

As Blizzard has said, it's 2 range around the building, which is 3 SCV's stacked as close as possible. The roach is attacking at maximum distance, 3 range. Note that the second and second SCV's take substantially less damage than the first.

I personally feel that this is far more balanced than before, as Zerg had no answer to a PF expansion short of Brood Lords, and even then ~10 supply of Vikings totally eliminates any risk to the Terran. At the very most, I would say a 1 range deduction, as well as sharper splash decline would feel balanced. PF expansions should not be invincible.




koppik
Profile Joined April 2010
United States676 Posts
September 22 2010 03:29 GMT
#463
Blizzard added psychic, range six pincers to the ultralisk, lol. It just looks so hilarious when the ultralisk is hitting the scvs from sooo far away.
SpaceYeti
Profile Joined June 2010
United States723 Posts
September 22 2010 03:30 GMT
#464
On September 22 2010 09:55 Pekkz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2010 09:43 SpaceYeti wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:39 Pekkz wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:31 SpaceYeti wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:22 Pekkz wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:19 SpaceYeti wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:18 Pekkz wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:13 Whomp wrote:
You terrans QQ'ing know how fast you can kill a hive with the same amount of stimmed marauders compared to those ultras? Just pull away your workers much like we have to do when you have banshees, helions, thor drops, marauder drops, viking lands and cliffed tanks. seriously l2p


Ye, its hilarious. Terran has 5 ways to harass a expansion. Zerg had ZERO ways to harass terran expo with PF. Now there is a tier 3 unit that can do it, and all terrans here scream imbalance, its so god damn funny

Really? Zero? Do you play this game? Please don't make Zerg look bad.


Ok, enlighten me how im gonna kill or harass a PF with turrets around it, i would love to know. And dont say banelings, they die before they can scrach the scvs and prolly cost more then the PF to begin with.

Lol. Micro and positioning are your friends....or they should be. Banelings can easily reach SCVs on a PF protected mineral line unless you're A-moving them in with no other attention paid to them. Also, two fungal growths kill SCVs. Wanna get your banelings in? Spam ITs by the PF (spread them and it's even better) and roll those puppies on in. There are lots of ways to harass a Terran player in midgame if you are imaginative and especially use infestors.


Post something that happens above your bronze league. Never seen a high level game where a zerg has successfully harassed a PF with turrets without taking massive losses.


Are you also serious about zerg having to invest in mass infestors + banelings ( hello gass?) to take down a PF? Terran will only counter attack and own you after you used silly ammouny of resources/energy on taking down a building. To do somthing like that you need to be miles ahead.

You just crack me up man
SpaceYeti.391 - Bronze league material. Look it up.

Anyway, people have given you plenty of tips on how to deal with this, but you can choose to ignore them and keep losing games, that's no skin off my back.

Or, you could actually *try* to think outside the 1a2a3a mass roach/hydra box and consider that other players may actually have helpful solutions to your problems.

Either way, I'm done trying to help you. As Day[9] would say, "there's no value in being right on the internet...take your knowledge and go win games."


Your help is not applyable in diamond league. You ignore what I wrote and instead type some random things thats got nothing to do with this thread. If you would like to post a replay where you cost effectivly take down or harass a PF with towers around, be my guest, else just stop writing bullshit.
Seems to work in my diamond play...

How's Bronze working out for you?

http://sc2ranks.com/eu/1458390/Pekkz

Anyway, like I said. Plenty of people have given you tips on how to harass a PF + turrets. You can choose to ignore these and continue to lose, and that's your right, but don't come on here whining and then refuse advice from others with possible solutions to your problems.
Behavior is a function of its consequences.
ohN
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States1075 Posts
September 22 2010 03:33 GMT
#465
On September 22 2010 12:08 DooMDash wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2010 11:49 Fruscainte wrote:
On September 22 2010 11:48 Fa1nT wrote:
The ONE thing that I am happy about for all this -

Cleave is RANGED slightly

This means ultras can STILL attack the fortress even if there is a wall of SCV repairing. This means if the AoE is placed in front of the ultra, SCV will still die, just not all of them.

Before, with Ram, the ultras would run in circles trying to find an opening to attack while getting blasted.


EDIT: DoomDash, I do not think this is fair or unfair. IT JUST CAME OUT TODAY. Jesus tit fucking Christ, how can you base your entire opinion on one video and less than a day of real game testing? There was a video a while back of like 5 thors taking on 35 1a'd mutalisks and everyone was having a huge hissy fit that Thors were OP. Now look at them, 35 muta's could probably take on 8-10 thors easily. It's the same shit with this, I am not throwing out the possibility that this is OP but Terran's crying imba at the first sight of something that might be great against them is just hilarious.


But Thor's always had a logical argument against them. This PF thing does not. Pretty much one ultralisk vs a PF means you better run your scvs and abandon base. It's not a intentional change, which is why it's pretty blatantly broken. There are some things you need to play out to see ( like the new tank damage for example ), and there are some things you just need a brain to realize its brokeness / wrongness.

I didn't need any actual testing to realize that vortex + ff was broken.

I wonder what zerg has to do in a one thor vs hatchery situation.
DooMDash
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1015 Posts
September 22 2010 03:34 GMT
#466
On September 22 2010 12:33 ohN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2010 12:08 DooMDash wrote:
On September 22 2010 11:49 Fruscainte wrote:
On September 22 2010 11:48 Fa1nT wrote:
The ONE thing that I am happy about for all this -

Cleave is RANGED slightly

This means ultras can STILL attack the fortress even if there is a wall of SCV repairing. This means if the AoE is placed in front of the ultra, SCV will still die, just not all of them.

Before, with Ram, the ultras would run in circles trying to find an opening to attack while getting blasted.


EDIT: DoomDash, I do not think this is fair or unfair. IT JUST CAME OUT TODAY. Jesus tit fucking Christ, how can you base your entire opinion on one video and less than a day of real game testing? There was a video a while back of like 5 thors taking on 35 1a'd mutalisks and everyone was having a huge hissy fit that Thors were OP. Now look at them, 35 muta's could probably take on 8-10 thors easily. It's the same shit with this, I am not throwing out the possibility that this is OP but Terran's crying imba at the first sight of something that might be great against them is just hilarious.


But Thor's always had a logical argument against them. This PF thing does not. Pretty much one ultralisk vs a PF means you better run your scvs and abandon base. It's not a intentional change, which is why it's pretty blatantly broken. There are some things you need to play out to see ( like the new tank damage for example ), and there are some things you just need a brain to realize its brokeness / wrongness.

I didn't need any actual testing to realize that vortex + ff was broken.

I wonder what zerg has to do in a one thor vs hatchery situation.

Does a hatchery cost 550/150?
S1 3500+ Master T. S2 1600+ Master T.
gozima
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada602 Posts
September 22 2010 03:35 GMT
#467
As disappointed as I am that Blizzard considers this a bug, it was fairly obvious from the start.

The OP should include the blue post acknowledging that this is indeed a bug.
synapse
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
China13814 Posts
September 22 2010 03:39 GMT
#468
On September 22 2010 12:30 SpaceYeti wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2010 09:55 Pekkz wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:43 SpaceYeti wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:39 Pekkz wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:31 SpaceYeti wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:22 Pekkz wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:19 SpaceYeti wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:18 Pekkz wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:13 Whomp wrote:
You terrans QQ'ing know how fast you can kill a hive with the same amount of stimmed marauders compared to those ultras? Just pull away your workers much like we have to do when you have banshees, helions, thor drops, marauder drops, viking lands and cliffed tanks. seriously l2p


Ye, its hilarious. Terran has 5 ways to harass a expansion. Zerg had ZERO ways to harass terran expo with PF. Now there is a tier 3 unit that can do it, and all terrans here scream imbalance, its so god damn funny

Really? Zero? Do you play this game? Please don't make Zerg look bad.


Ok, enlighten me how im gonna kill or harass a PF with turrets around it, i would love to know. And dont say banelings, they die before they can scrach the scvs and prolly cost more then the PF to begin with.

Lol. Micro and positioning are your friends....or they should be. Banelings can easily reach SCVs on a PF protected mineral line unless you're A-moving them in with no other attention paid to them. Also, two fungal growths kill SCVs. Wanna get your banelings in? Spam ITs by the PF (spread them and it's even better) and roll those puppies on in. There are lots of ways to harass a Terran player in midgame if you are imaginative and especially use infestors.


Post something that happens above your bronze league. Never seen a high level game where a zerg has successfully harassed a PF with turrets without taking massive losses.


Are you also serious about zerg having to invest in mass infestors + banelings ( hello gass?) to take down a PF? Terran will only counter attack and own you after you used silly ammouny of resources/energy on taking down a building. To do somthing like that you need to be miles ahead.

You just crack me up man
SpaceYeti.391 - Bronze league material. Look it up.

Anyway, people have given you plenty of tips on how to deal with this, but you can choose to ignore them and keep losing games, that's no skin off my back.

Or, you could actually *try* to think outside the 1a2a3a mass roach/hydra box and consider that other players may actually have helpful solutions to your problems.

Either way, I'm done trying to help you. As Day[9] would say, "there's no value in being right on the internet...take your knowledge and go win games."


Your help is not applyable in diamond league. You ignore what I wrote and instead type some random things thats got nothing to do with this thread. If you would like to post a replay where you cost effectivly take down or harass a PF with towers around, be my guest, else just stop writing bullshit.
Seems to work in my diamond play...

How's Bronze working out for you?

http://sc2ranks.com/eu/1458390/Pekkz

Anyway, like I said. Plenty of people have given you tips on how to harass a PF + turrets. You can choose to ignore these and continue to lose, and that's your right, but don't come on here whining and then refuse advice from others with possible solutions to your problems.


If that's actually him... ouch. Low blow right there.
:)
evanthebouncy!
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
United States12796 Posts
September 22 2010 03:41 GMT
#469
On September 22 2010 12:21 BrodiaQ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2010 12:17 Fr33t wrote:
All they have to do is triple the size of the ultralisk blades whenever they are attacking a PF and everything will be just fine. It would be so awesome to see the blades instantly grow and shrink. And come on, who wouldn't jizz themselves at the sight of an ultralisk with GIANT blades? mmm


This sounds like a reasonable solution. I second this motion.


hear hear
Life is run, it is dance, it is fast, passionate and BAM!, you dance and sing and booze while you can for now is the time and time is mine. Smile and laugh when still can for now is the time and soon you die!
SpaceYeti
Profile Joined June 2010
United States723 Posts
September 22 2010 03:42 GMT
#470
On September 22 2010 12:39 synapse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2010 12:30 SpaceYeti wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:55 Pekkz wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:43 SpaceYeti wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:39 Pekkz wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:31 SpaceYeti wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:22 Pekkz wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:19 SpaceYeti wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:18 Pekkz wrote:
On September 22 2010 09:13 Whomp wrote:
You terrans QQ'ing know how fast you can kill a hive with the same amount of stimmed marauders compared to those ultras? Just pull away your workers much like we have to do when you have banshees, helions, thor drops, marauder drops, viking lands and cliffed tanks. seriously l2p


Ye, its hilarious. Terran has 5 ways to harass a expansion. Zerg had ZERO ways to harass terran expo with PF. Now there is a tier 3 unit that can do it, and all terrans here scream imbalance, its so god damn funny

Really? Zero? Do you play this game? Please don't make Zerg look bad.


Ok, enlighten me how im gonna kill or harass a PF with turrets around it, i would love to know. And dont say banelings, they die before they can scrach the scvs and prolly cost more then the PF to begin with.

Lol. Micro and positioning are your friends....or they should be. Banelings can easily reach SCVs on a PF protected mineral line unless you're A-moving them in with no other attention paid to them. Also, two fungal growths kill SCVs. Wanna get your banelings in? Spam ITs by the PF (spread them and it's even better) and roll those puppies on in. There are lots of ways to harass a Terran player in midgame if you are imaginative and especially use infestors.


Post something that happens above your bronze league. Never seen a high level game where a zerg has successfully harassed a PF with turrets without taking massive losses.


Are you also serious about zerg having to invest in mass infestors + banelings ( hello gass?) to take down a PF? Terran will only counter attack and own you after you used silly ammouny of resources/energy on taking down a building. To do somthing like that you need to be miles ahead.

You just crack me up man
SpaceYeti.391 - Bronze league material. Look it up.

Anyway, people have given you plenty of tips on how to deal with this, but you can choose to ignore them and keep losing games, that's no skin off my back.

Or, you could actually *try* to think outside the 1a2a3a mass roach/hydra box and consider that other players may actually have helpful solutions to your problems.

Either way, I'm done trying to help you. As Day[9] would say, "there's no value in being right on the internet...take your knowledge and go win games."


Your help is not applyable in diamond league. You ignore what I wrote and instead type some random things thats got nothing to do with this thread. If you would like to post a replay where you cost effectivly take down or harass a PF with towers around, be my guest, else just stop writing bullshit.
Seems to work in my diamond play...

How's Bronze working out for you?

http://sc2ranks.com/eu/1458390/Pekkz

Anyway, like I said. Plenty of people have given you tips on how to harass a PF + turrets. You can choose to ignore these and continue to lose, and that's your right, but don't come on here whining and then refuse advice from others with possible solutions to your problems.


If that's actually him... ouch. Low blow right there.

Well, it's the only Pekkz on all of sc2ranks.com, and he happens to be from Europe and play Zerg. Seems likely.
Behavior is a function of its consequences.
logicalmayhem
Profile Joined August 2010
Australia25 Posts
September 22 2010 03:45 GMT
#471
lol i was scared for a min that it was gonna stay like that bring on the T buffs 1.2 or better yet 1.1 hotfix
KICK LOGIC OUT AND DO THE IMPOSSIBLE!
Hadraziel
Profile Joined May 2010
Russian Federation114 Posts
September 22 2010 03:49 GMT
#472
Even if it is fixed, with a cleave range of 2, 3 Ultras placed around a PF would still be able to hit all the scv's repairing. This might look broken right now, but even after the fix, Ultras will stay that effective against PF with a bit of micro.
Ronald_McD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada807 Posts
September 22 2010 03:49 GMT
#473
On September 22 2010 07:49 AlBundy wrote:
I'm sure that Blizzard have made tests involving 1.1 ultras vs. repaired PF before releasing this patch and therefore it's safe to assume that's it is working as intended.


Pffft as if
This shit will get patched so fast
Sure Zerg could use a buff
But this just looks stupid as hell
FUCKING GAY LAGS
Luvz
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Norway356 Posts
September 22 2010 03:49 GMT
#474
sick. wonder how a protoss is going to get against PF.

+ Show Spoiler +
prob nothing......
Norway ~ Home of the brave <3
Nihility
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada72 Posts
September 22 2010 03:53 GMT
#475
On September 22 2010 12:34 DooMDash wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2010 12:33 ohN wrote:
On September 22 2010 12:08 DooMDash wrote:
On September 22 2010 11:49 Fruscainte wrote:
On September 22 2010 11:48 Fa1nT wrote:
The ONE thing that I am happy about for all this -

Cleave is RANGED slightly

This means ultras can STILL attack the fortress even if there is a wall of SCV repairing. This means if the AoE is placed in front of the ultra, SCV will still die, just not all of them.

Before, with Ram, the ultras would run in circles trying to find an opening to attack while getting blasted.


EDIT: DoomDash, I do not think this is fair or unfair. IT JUST CAME OUT TODAY. Jesus tit fucking Christ, how can you base your entire opinion on one video and less than a day of real game testing? There was a video a while back of like 5 thors taking on 35 1a'd mutalisks and everyone was having a huge hissy fit that Thors were OP. Now look at them, 35 muta's could probably take on 8-10 thors easily. It's the same shit with this, I am not throwing out the possibility that this is OP but Terran's crying imba at the first sight of something that might be great against them is just hilarious.


But Thor's always had a logical argument against them. This PF thing does not. Pretty much one ultralisk vs a PF means you better run your scvs and abandon base. It's not a intentional change, which is why it's pretty blatantly broken. There are some things you need to play out to see ( like the new tank damage for example ), and there are some things you just need a brain to realize its brokeness / wrongness.

I didn't need any actual testing to realize that vortex + ff was broken.

I wonder what zerg has to do in a one thor vs hatchery situation.

Does a hatchery cost 550/150?


Does hatchery do 40 damage? Please don't make comparisons like that, thors on LT high ground can easily take out the hatchery if the zerg had FE'd.
ghermination
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States2851 Posts
September 22 2010 03:56 GMT
#476
Awesome, finally those gay PF are killable. Now they need to give toss a way to beat them too.
U Gotta Skate.
DooMDash
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1015 Posts
September 22 2010 03:58 GMT
#477
On September 22 2010 12:53 Nihility wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2010 12:34 DooMDash wrote:
On September 22 2010 12:33 ohN wrote:
On September 22 2010 12:08 DooMDash wrote:
On September 22 2010 11:49 Fruscainte wrote:
On September 22 2010 11:48 Fa1nT wrote:
The ONE thing that I am happy about for all this -

Cleave is RANGED slightly

This means ultras can STILL attack the fortress even if there is a wall of SCV repairing. This means if the AoE is placed in front of the ultra, SCV will still die, just not all of them.

Before, with Ram, the ultras would run in circles trying to find an opening to attack while getting blasted.


EDIT: DoomDash, I do not think this is fair or unfair. IT JUST CAME OUT TODAY. Jesus tit fucking Christ, how can you base your entire opinion on one video and less than a day of real game testing? There was a video a while back of like 5 thors taking on 35 1a'd mutalisks and everyone was having a huge hissy fit that Thors were OP. Now look at them, 35 muta's could probably take on 8-10 thors easily. It's the same shit with this, I am not throwing out the possibility that this is OP but Terran's crying imba at the first sight of something that might be great against them is just hilarious.


But Thor's always had a logical argument against them. This PF thing does not. Pretty much one ultralisk vs a PF means you better run your scvs and abandon base. It's not a intentional change, which is why it's pretty blatantly broken. There are some things you need to play out to see ( like the new tank damage for example ), and there are some things you just need a brain to realize its brokeness / wrongness.

I didn't need any actual testing to realize that vortex + ff was broken.

I wonder what zerg has to do in a one thor vs hatchery situation.

Does a hatchery cost 550/150?


Does hatchery do 40 damage? Please don't make comparisons like that, thors on LT high ground can easily take out the hatchery if the zerg had FE'd.


You obviously did not see that I was saying they aren't comparable. Of course I know they do 40 damage and they are great, I was just explaining that's because they are 550/150 vs 300 that does nothing. If a hatchery was 550/150 I would expect it to do 40 damage as well.

And that Thor example really has nothing to do with this. Are you asking for all the races to have equally equivalent everything? Because that's not SC and never has been. Plenty of other RTS's out there if that's what you want.
S1 3500+ Master T. S2 1600+ Master T.
SpaceYeti
Profile Joined June 2010
United States723 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-22 04:00:19
September 22 2010 03:58 GMT
#478
On September 22 2010 12:56 ghermination wrote:
Awesome, finally those gay PF are killable. Now they need to give toss a way to beat them too.
I think it's called Immortals + Psi Storm.

I don't play Protoss tho, but it seems like a possibility. Odd tech combo tho I suppose...

EDIT:
BTW, why are we debating the cost effectiveness of Ultras vs PFs in this situation when Blizzard has already acknowledged that it is indeed a bug and will be patched?
Behavior is a function of its consequences.
Fa1nT
Profile Joined September 2010
United States3423 Posts
September 22 2010 03:59 GMT
#479
On September 22 2010 12:56 ghermination wrote:
Awesome, finally those gay PF are killable. Now they need to give toss a way to beat them too.


Colossi

Zerg have no siege unit until brolords, but they are basically the highest tier unit in the game next to motherships =|
DooMDash
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1015 Posts
September 22 2010 04:00 GMT
#480
On September 22 2010 12:58 SpaceYeti wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2010 12:56 ghermination wrote:
Awesome, finally those gay PF are killable. Now they need to give toss a way to beat them too.
I think it's called Immortals + Psi Storm.

I don't play Protoss tho, but it seems like a possibility. Odd tech combo tho I suppose...


or Colossi.

Zerg has banelings / or Ultras ( even pre patch ) , or any unit with fungel growth to prevent repairing / kill SCV's. or Air? So many options.
S1 3500+ Master T. S2 1600+ Master T.
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 55 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
2026 GSL S1: Ro12 Group A
CranKy Ducklings76
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft351
SpeCial 255
ROOTCatZ 33
ProTech21
Dota 2
monkeys_forever856
League of Legends
Doublelift3983
Counter-Strike
fl0m3965
taco 1
Other Games
gofns15706
tarik_tv10433
summit1g7479
C9.Mang0431
JimRising 336
WinterStarcraft63
ViBE52
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick836
BasetradeTV165
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream58
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 19
• musti20045 12
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 53
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Scarra1126
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
8h 5m
RSL Revival
9h 5m
Classic vs GgMaChine
Rogue vs Maru
WardiTV Invitational
10h 5m
Percival vs Shameless
ByuN vs YoungYakov
IPSL
15h 5m
Ret vs Art_Of_Turtle
Radley vs TBD
BSL
18h 5m
Replay Cast
23h 5m
RSL Revival
1d 9h
herO vs TriGGeR
NightMare vs Solar
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 13h
BSL
1d 18h
IPSL
1d 18h
eOnzErG vs TBD
G5 vs Nesh
[ Show More ]
Patches Events
1d 23h
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Jaedong vs Light
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Snow vs Flash
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
GSL
4 days
Classic vs Cure
Maru vs Rogue
GSL
5 days
SHIN vs Zoun
ByuN vs herO
Replay Cast
5 days
Escore
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W5
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
KK 2v2 League Season 1
Acropolis #4
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026

Upcoming

BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.