|
On September 18 2010 07:26 mnofstl007 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2010 07:24 HeaveNTiMe wrote: balance doesn't matter as much cuz its not crazy ass changes but the features have me intrigued. hopefully myspace integration. cuz myspace isn't dead! lol myspace integration... that will make 5-6 12 yr olds happy i guess. That way they can show the SC2 community their mirror pics and such.
Brings new meaning to mirror match-ups, now doesn't it?
|
On September 18 2010 07:07 RedLuck wrote: "The first feature and balance patch"
First feature, AND balance patch.. what's the first feature going to be? Chat rooms??
idk where u saw that but i hope they did say that. features = good
|
On September 18 2010 07:28 blitzkrieger wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2010 07:07 RedLuck wrote: "The first feature and balance patch"
First feature, AND balance patch.. what's the first feature going to be? Chat rooms?? Do you really want chat rooms? I figure it will be something minor and we won't have chat rooms till HotS and prob never get Lan. I really want to see what other changes they made, assuming they have more that they haven't released. Overall I am happy with the patch but it seems odd that marauders have been left alone when they are the most glaring issue...
I think Blizzard has made it pretty clear that we definitely will never see lan.
|
9/22 is for EU. Looks like NA gets it the day prior.
|
Awesome. Just saw this on my facebook feed.
|
I hope this doesn't mess up the GSL.
|
woohoo TLO will be happy the patch comes before RO16
|
no more money for me i guess :/ anyhow was fun, i quit sc2 now bye
+ Show Spoiler +ah good finally new patch data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" it gets boring in the long run to win knowing its because of the balance instead of the players
|
|
On September 18 2010 07:24 HeaveNTiMe wrote: balance doesn't matter as much cuz its not crazy ass changes but the features have me intrigued. hopefully myspace integration. cuz myspace isn't dead! Why not Twitter to the world that you just finished your Psi Storm tech or called down some Mules on a gold expansion?
|
They will add twitter integration so people can follow your losing streak's edit: guy above me, great minds think alike
|
"Due to the zealot build time increase, reapers would be a bit problematic in combination with proxy barracks, bunkers, and/or marauders against protoss. Therefore, we have decided to increase the build time of reapers as well from 40 to 45 seconds."
Since when does anyone uses zealots vs reaper? :S
|
On September 18 2010 07:31 MorroW wrote:no more money for me i guess :/ anyhow was fun, i quit sc2 now bye + Show Spoiler +ah good finally new patch data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" it gets boring in the long run to win knowing its because of the balance instead of the players
Lol :D.
On a serious note, i hope the leaked 1.1 changes would be applied instead of the 1.1 situation report. The changes in the 1.1 situation report isn't as helpful.
|
usually you build a zealot after Cybercore to win some time
|
I really hope there are more changes than the ones listed in the report, because those won't have any noticeable affect on the game balance, as Z v T struggles against more than just reaper..
|
On September 18 2010 07:35 Apolo wrote: "Due to the zealot build time increase, reapers would be a bit problematic in combination with proxy barracks, bunkers, and/or marauders against protoss. Therefore, we have decided to increase the build time of reapers as well from 40 to 45 seconds."
Since when does anyone uses zealots vs reaper? :S
i use a zealots because you can get 1 bfr your core is up and it help to force the T to micro his reaper and not to do that much of dmg
|
On September 18 2010 07:15 Xxio wrote: Good news everyone!
I'm greatly looking forward to this.
![[image loading]](http://prostheticallyhip.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/farnsworth.jpg) FFFFFF
|
Yeah, I really hope there is more to this patch balance-wise than they have listed in the situation report, too. I don't think an additional 5 seconds to Reaper build time is going to fix anything.
|
On September 18 2010 07:37 FrostedMiniWeet wrote: I really hope there are more changes than the ones listed in the report, because those won't have any noticeable affect on the game balance, as Z v T struggles against more than just reaper..
Yeah because tanks being nerfed from 50 to 35 vs hydras/lings/blings isn't a big deal....
|
Hell, It's about damn time!
|
|
|
|