On September 18 2010 07:07 RedLuck wrote:
"The first feature and balance patch"

First feature, AND balance patch.. what's the first feature going to be? Chat rooms??

idk where u saw that but i hope they did say that.

features = good

Bosu

United States3247 Posts

September 17 2010 22:29 GMT

#63

On September 18 2010 07:28 blitzkrieger wrote:

Show nested quote +

Do you really want chat rooms?

I figure it will be something minor and we won't have chat rooms till HotS and prob never get Lan.

I really want to see what other changes they made, assuming they have more that they haven't released. Overall I am happy with the patch but it seems odd that marauders have been left alone when they are the most glaring issue...

I think Blizzard has made it pretty clear that we definitely will never see lan.

Nomak

United States32 Posts

September 17 2010 22:29 GMT

#64

9/22 is for EU. Looks like NA gets it the day prior.

Ayush_SCtoss

India3051 Posts

September 17 2010 22:31 GMT

#65

Awesome. Just saw this on my facebook feed.

KebertXela

United States322 Posts

September 17 2010 22:31 GMT

#66

I hope this doesn't mess up the GSL.

TBO

Germany1350 Posts

September 17 2010 22:31 GMT

#67

woohoo TLO will be happy the patch comes before RO16

MorroW

Sweden3522 Posts

September 17 2010 22:31 GMT

#68

no more money for me i guess :/ anyhow was fun, i quit sc2 now bye

+ Show Spoiler +

ah good finally new patch

it gets boring in the long run to win knowing its because of the balance instead of the players

ZomgTossRush

United States1041 Posts

September 17 2010 22:32 GMT

#69

Excited!!!!!!!

Barook

Germany143 Posts

September 17 2010 22:32 GMT

#70

On September 18 2010 07:24 HeaveNTiMe wrote:
balance doesn't matter as much cuz its not crazy ass changes but the features have me intrigued. hopefully myspace integration. cuz myspace isn't dead!

Why not Twitter to the world that you just finished your Psi Storm tech or called down some Mules on a gold expansion?

teekuppi

78 Posts

September 17 2010 22:33 GMT

#71

They will add twitter integration so people can follow your losing streak's
edit: guy above me, great minds think alike

Apolo

Portugal1259 Posts

September 17 2010 22:35 GMT

#72

"Due to the zealot build time increase, reapers would be a bit problematic in combination with proxy barracks, bunkers, and/or marauders against protoss. Therefore, we have decided to increase the build time of reapers as well from 40 to 45 seconds."

Since when does anyone uses zealots vs reaper? :S

birdkicker

United States752 Posts

September 17 2010 22:35 GMT

#73

On September 18 2010 07:31 MorroW wrote:
no more money for me i guess :/ anyhow was fun, i quit sc2 now bye

+ Show Spoiler +

ah good finally new patch

it gets boring in the long run to win knowing its because of the balance instead of the players

Lol :D.

On a serious note, i hope the leaked 1.1 changes would be applied instead of the 1.1 situation report. The changes in the 1.1 situation report isn't as helpful.

TBO

Germany1350 Posts

September 17 2010 22:36 GMT

#74

usually you build a zealot after Cybercore to win some time

FrostedMiniWeet

United States636 Posts

September 17 2010 22:37 GMT

#75

I really hope there are more changes than the ones listed in the report, because those won't have any noticeable affect on the game balance, as Z v T struggles against more than just reaper..

Khalleb

Canada1909 Posts

September 17 2010 22:37 GMT

#76

On September 18 2010 07:35 Apolo wrote:
"Due to the zealot build time increase, reapers would be a bit problematic in combination with proxy barracks, bunkers, and/or marauders against protoss. Therefore, we have decided to increase the build time of reapers as well from 40 to 45 seconds."

Since when does anyone uses zealots vs reaper? :S

i use a zealots because you can get 1 bfr your core is up and it help to force the T to micro his reaper and not to do that much of dmg

Wihl

Sweden472 Posts

September 17 2010 22:39 GMT

#77

On September 18 2010 07:15 Xxio wrote:
Good news everyone!

I'm greatly looking forward to this.

FFFFFF

Headshot

United States1656 Posts

September 17 2010 22:39 GMT

#78

Yeah, I really hope there is more to this patch balance-wise than they have listed in the situation report, too. I don't think an additional 5 seconds to Reaper build time is going to fix anything.

ZomgTossRush

United States1041 Posts

September 17 2010 22:40 GMT

#79

On September 18 2010 07:37 FrostedMiniWeet wrote:
I really hope there are more changes than the ones listed in the report, because those won't have any noticeable affect on the game balance, as Z v T struggles against more than just reaper..

Yeah because tanks being nerfed from 50 to 35 vs hydras/lings/blings isn't a big deal....