• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:21
CEST 15:21
KST 22:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out7RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-2212Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-611SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-64
StarCraft 2
General
SC4ALL: II Talent Announcement! GSTL Returns in 2026! https://www.facebook.com/Eco.Fuel.Reviews/ Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Protoss AoE skill expression
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) 2026 KungFu Cup Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
u4gm Diablo 4: QoL Secrets for Faster Gameplay u4gm POE2 Frostbolt Build: A Powerful Boss Killer U4GM CFB 27 Guide: Why UTSA’s Offense Is So Danger Mutation # 538 Media Blackout
Brood War
General
StarCraft 64 is coming to Philly at SC4ALL II ASL22 General Discussion BW General Discussion [Personal Project Share] Terran Defense v0.60 BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-6 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3 2v2v2v2 Tournament
Strategy
Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates Any training maps people recommend? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation General RTS Discussion Thread Diablo 2 thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread The Letting Off Steam Thread Iain M Banks Says He Has Cancer And Months To Live Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Chinese Gen Z: Between Dream…
TrAiDoS
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 4552 users

Tournament winners since release - Page 12

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 10 11 12 13 14 43 Next All
crms
Profile Joined February 2010
United States11933 Posts
September 13 2010 22:13 GMT
#221
On September 14 2010 01:45 Khol wrote:
this shows how bad zergs outside of korea really are. :D


because those korean zergs are doing SO much better right? I mean 3 have qualifed in the top 32 for GSL, with 2 more still waiting to play, so at BEST 5 of 32 will be zerg in GSL the most prestigious korean (or otherwise) tournament in the world.

Stop talking out of your ass as if Korean zergs are somehow 'owning.'
http://i.imgur.com/fAUOr2c.png | Fighting games are great
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
September 13 2010 22:16 GMT
#222
On September 14 2010 06:48 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 06:38 Klockan3 wrote:
On September 14 2010 06:29 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
It's dangerous to muck with balance simply because there seems to be a lot of Terrans in Diamond.

Nah, not if you do it just a little and don't do it just because there are many terrans in diamond, like the situation is now. Patch 1.1 doesn't change a lot balance wise and it doesn't really matter if we don't got total balance all the time since during the next 3 years we will see a ton of changes to the game from the expansions alone.
Also patches might give Blizzard more information on how the game should be fixed with the expansions allowing them to make a better job. Identifying what is missing for each race that can't be fixed in a minor balance patch is pivotal for making good expansions.
On September 14 2010 06:31 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
To explain that a bit: something like allowing Zerg players to stack vomits on a hatchery if they miss a few (similar to how P and T's energy-based macro mechanics work) seems like it wouldn't affect the 'top level' because a perfect player doesn't miss barfs

Um, that would allow zerg to build 3 queens for his first hatch and then get 22 larvae per minute, not really comparable at all to what he said.


I don't understand the first part of your post, you said "don't do it just because there are many terrans in diamond" and I said "It's dangerous to muck with balance simply because there seems to be a lot of Terrans in Diamond". Where is the disagreement?

Yes, I realize its not a comparable example -_- Read his post, he says there's a problem in that Terran can just MULE at 67 energy instead of 50 and not really lose anything, whereas a Zerg missing a barf can be totally critical. The problem with that assessment is that the larva barf mechanic is far more complicated than a brief mineral boost, and allows far greater customization of economy, IE, when you get yer queens, HOW MANY (this should be a huge talking point for Zerg players and strangely it isn't!), when you barf, if you spread creep & how often, etc etc. You have to realize that while there is certainly a lot that can go wrong in all that, it's not necessarily a balance issue, and the incessant griping of Zerg players who have little to no concept of how to actually play with this mechanic is being blown way out of proportion (relevant to this thread). This is why you need to benchmark against perfection (IE, a Zerg player who properly uses these mechanics to solve various issues that arise in-game) and examine it from that perspective. It's also why blanket comparisons like "Terran's MULE vs the Queen" and attempting to 'keep them in line with each other' doesn't work. The Queen is far more complex than the MULE, and needs to be dealt with accordingly, which is once again where the perfect player comes in.


But in reality you need to compare it to supply calldown and scan as well. There's complexity there as wel. In fact, many people would say "knowing when to scan, when to mule," is much more complex than thinking "ok, creep tumor first time, inject permanently after that."
LaLuSh
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden2358 Posts
September 13 2010 22:18 GMT
#223
Perfection is very hard to achieve when the matchup involves such a high degree of guessing for zerg. Even when you scout a certain tech path from the terran, you still cannot be sure what is coming. Yesterday for example (one out of a thousand examples), I scouted a very fast tech starport tech lab switch from brat_ok in a tournament game, and I began making spore crawlers and queens while massing drones. I was sure I was going to come out far ahead. What happens next? He only uses the starport to build 1 banshee. Switches his strat around instantly, builds 1 medivac and 1 thor, drops it on my cliff, completely shuts down mining and easily takes out my expansion hatchery.

There is no way a zerg can account for all these possibilities at the same time. Every terran is unique. Every terran has got their own specialized (and often retarded) transition. Banshee doesn't have to mean banshee. 2 rax doesn't have to mean aggressive infantry build. It might as well mean a nonsensical delayed 2 or 1 port banshee with cloak.

You have all these idiot terrans scoring easy instant wins vs zergs everywhere, because even if you scout their production buildings, half of the time you've still got no fucking clue what they're doing. You scout a barrack constantly producing marines and a starport without addons? Maybe he'll use it for 1 viking and then medivacs. Maybe he'll use it for a fast medivac dropping 8 marines straight into your base. Maybe he's the kind of terran that built another rax in his base and waits for 2 medivacs before dropping you. Maybe he's the kind of retarded terran that waits for so long, that eventually you start making drones again, and in flies 3medivacs fully loaded with units. Sometimes they make a medivac and don't even use it for anything, they just expand and pretend it's a logical strategy.

You make drones and go for the early spire vs the 1 medivac 8 marine drop? You'll take sick damage. You start making units too late vs the 2 medivac drop and even hint at making the spire? You die. You start making units too early vs the 3 medivac drop instead of making the spire, and then suddenly think the coast is clear and proceed into making a round of drones because the drop never seems to come? You die.

You make too many units vs the nonsensical terran that went a 1-1-1 build into an 11-minute mark expand with medivacs and lots of marines before expanding but didn't even drop you ? You die from mining 600 less minerals per minute every subsequent minute.

Even when watching Sen's stream - who I consider to be 20x better than me and a complete monster ZvT - you see him losing instantly to noob terrans after overdroning vs a 3rax or 2rax/hellion all-in, or making too many units vs a faked aggression into fast expand build, or upgrading ling speed before lair and subsequently dying to 2port banshee without even having a fighting chance.

The main reason you see so many zergs getting eliminated so early, is because you have to have sick amount of LUCK to beat 5-6 terrans in a row. It doesn't matter how good and how skilled you are. Beating that many terrans in a row will require more luck than it will require skill.

The point is, there is too much of an element of randomness for zerg in the matchup depending on which tech path they opt for. And it cannot be fixed by simply "scouting better". The difference in win rate from playing a terran ranked #60 as opposed to a terran ranked #5 isn't that great. There's still the ~20% of games where you instantly lose due to a build order/tech path loss, no matter how good/bad your terran opponent is.

Then there are the truly good terrans. The ones of equal skill to you. The ones who'll win at least 50% of the games that reach beyond the "zerg guesses wrong instantly loses" phase.

The win ratio against those terrans won't ever be 50% for zergs. Much like the scrub terrans, the good terrans too will instantly win about ~20% of their games on pure build order errors from zerg. If they win half of the rest of games that puts them at 60% vs the zergs.

For a good terran facing a scrub zerg. There's perhaps a 1% chance of a build order loss. Again, number pulled out of my ass, but I should really think it's single digit, and amongst the lower single digits. You don't see morrow, brat_ok or demuslim losing to scrub zergs, EVER.

TvP, they might lose a higher percentage of games against no name protosses. But not nearly as high as zergs vs terran and protoss.

So what you end up with (poker analogy) is top zergs having to fight their way through 5-6 top pocket pair vs lower pocket pair preflop all-ins without getting drawn out one single time! And of course a couple of other key hands that actually reach the flop, turn and river (normal games where the zerg had some influence on the outcome and didn't instantly lose).

This post was written as a rant from start from finish. Forgive me if it's very incoherent.

Sqq
Profile Joined August 2010
Norway2023 Posts
September 13 2010 22:19 GMT
#224
On September 14 2010 07:16 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 06:48 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
On September 14 2010 06:38 Klockan3 wrote:
On September 14 2010 06:29 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
It's dangerous to muck with balance simply because there seems to be a lot of Terrans in Diamond.

Nah, not if you do it just a little and don't do it just because there are many terrans in diamond, like the situation is now. Patch 1.1 doesn't change a lot balance wise and it doesn't really matter if we don't got total balance all the time since during the next 3 years we will see a ton of changes to the game from the expansions alone.
Also patches might give Blizzard more information on how the game should be fixed with the expansions allowing them to make a better job. Identifying what is missing for each race that can't be fixed in a minor balance patch is pivotal for making good expansions.
On September 14 2010 06:31 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
To explain that a bit: something like allowing Zerg players to stack vomits on a hatchery if they miss a few (similar to how P and T's energy-based macro mechanics work) seems like it wouldn't affect the 'top level' because a perfect player doesn't miss barfs

Um, that would allow zerg to build 3 queens for his first hatch and then get 22 larvae per minute, not really comparable at all to what he said.


I don't understand the first part of your post, you said "don't do it just because there are many terrans in diamond" and I said "It's dangerous to muck with balance simply because there seems to be a lot of Terrans in Diamond". Where is the disagreement?

Yes, I realize its not a comparable example -_- Read his post, he says there's a problem in that Terran can just MULE at 67 energy instead of 50 and not really lose anything, whereas a Zerg missing a barf can be totally critical. The problem with that assessment is that the larva barf mechanic is far more complicated than a brief mineral boost, and allows far greater customization of economy, IE, when you get yer queens, HOW MANY (this should be a huge talking point for Zerg players and strangely it isn't!), when you barf, if you spread creep & how often, etc etc. You have to realize that while there is certainly a lot that can go wrong in all that, it's not necessarily a balance issue, and the incessant griping of Zerg players who have little to no concept of how to actually play with this mechanic is being blown way out of proportion (relevant to this thread). This is why you need to benchmark against perfection (IE, a Zerg player who properly uses these mechanics to solve various issues that arise in-game) and examine it from that perspective. It's also why blanket comparisons like "Terran's MULE vs the Queen" and attempting to 'keep them in line with each other' doesn't work. The Queen is far more complex than the MULE, and needs to be dealt with accordingly, which is once again where the perfect player comes in.


But in reality you need to compare it to supply calldown and scan as well. There's complexity there as wel. In fact, many people would say "knowing when to scan, when to mule," is much more complex than thinking "ok, creep tumor first time, inject permanently after that."


Are you trying to convince yourself of this or have you never played zerg in starcraft 2 ? Jesus christ.
Dead girls don't say no.
OPSavioR
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden1465 Posts
September 13 2010 22:22 GMT
#225
I smell a nerf...
i dunno lol
Cranberries
Profile Joined July 2010
Wales567 Posts
September 13 2010 22:23 GMT
#226
This data is incorrect.

Just sayin'.
crms
Profile Joined February 2010
United States11933 Posts
September 13 2010 22:23 GMT
#227
On September 14 2010 07:18 LaLuSh wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Perfection is very hard to achieve when the matchup involves such a high degree of guessing for zerg. Even when you scout a certain tech path from the terran, you still cannot be sure what is coming. Yesterday for example (one out of a thousand examples), I scouted a very fast tech starport tech lab switch from brat_ok in a tournament game, and I began making spore crawlers and queens while massing drones. I was sure I was going to come out far ahead. What happens next? He only uses the starport to build 1 banshee. Switches his strat around instantly, builds 1 medivac and 1 thor, drops it on my cliff, completely shuts down mining and easily takes out my expansion hatchery.

There is no way a zerg can account for all these possibilities at the same time. Every terran is unique. Every terran has got their own specialized (and often retarded) transition. Banshee doesn't have to mean banshee. 2 rax doesn't have to mean aggressive infantry build. It might as well mean a nonsensical delayed 2 or 1 port banshee with cloak.

You have all these idiot terrans scoring easy instant wins vs zergs everywhere, because even if you scout their production buildings, half of the time you've still got no fucking clue what they're doing. You scout a barrack constantly producing marines and a starport without addons? Maybe he'll use it for 1 viking and then medivacs. Maybe he'll use it for a fast medivac dropping 8 marines straight into your base. Maybe he's the kind of terran that built another rax in his base and waits for 2 medivacs before dropping you. Maybe he's the kind of retarded terran that waits for so long, that eventually you start making drones again, and in flies 3medivacs fully loaded with units. Sometimes they make a medivac and don't even use it for anything, they just expand and pretend it's a logical strategy.

You make drones and go for the early spire vs the 1 medivac 8 marine drop? You'll take sick damage. You start making units too late vs the 2 medivac drop and even hint at making the spire? You die. You start making units too early vs the 3 medivac drop instead of making the spire, and then suddenly think the coast is clear and proceed into making a round of drones because the drop never seems to come? You die.

You make too many units vs the nonsensical terran that went a 1-1-1 build into an 11-minute mark expand with medivacs and lots of marines before expanding but didn't even drop you ? You die from mining 600 less minerals per minute every subsequent minute.

Even when watching Sen's stream - who I consider to be 20x better than me and a complete monster ZvT - you see him losing instantly to noob terrans after overdroning vs a 3rax or 2rax/hellion all-in, or making too many units vs a faked aggression into fast expand build, or upgrading ling speed before lair and subsequently dying to 2port banshee without even having a fighting chance.

The main reason you see so many zergs getting eliminated so early, is because you have to have sick amount of LUCK to beat 5-6 terrans in a row. It doesn't matter how good and how skilled you are. Beating that many terrans in a row will require more luck than it will require skill.

The point is, there is too much of an element of randomness for zerg in the matchup depending on which tech path they opt for. And it cannot be fixed by simply "scouting better". The difference in win rate from playing a terran ranked #60 as opposed to a terran ranked #5 isn't that great. There's still the ~20% of games where you instantly lose due to a build order/tech path loss, no matter how good/bad your terran opponent is.

Then there are the truly good terrans. The ones of equal skill to you. The ones who'll win at least 50% of the games that reach beyond the "zerg guesses wrong instantly loses" phase.

The win ratio against those terrans won't ever be 50% for zergs. Much like the scrub terrans, the good terrans too will instantly win about ~20% of their games on pure build order errors from zerg. If they win half of the rest of games that puts them at 60% vs the zergs.

For a good terran facing a scrub zerg. There's perhaps a 1% chance of a build order loss. Again, number pulled out of my ass, but I should really think it's single digit, and amongst the lower single digits. You don't see morrow, brat_ok or demuslim losing to scrub zergs, EVER.

TvP, they might lose a higher percentage of games against no name protosses. But not nearly as high as zergs vs terran and protoss.

So what you end up with (poker analogy) is top zergs having to fight their way through 5-6 top pocket pair vs lower pocket pair preflop all-ins without getting drawn out one single time! And of course a couple of other key hands that actually reach the flop, turn and river (normal games where the zerg had some influence on the outcome and didn't instantly lose).

This post was written as a rant from start from finish. Forgive me if it's very incoherent.



Really great post, while a rant and random %'s still reiterates a lot of the problems TvZ. Thanks.
http://i.imgur.com/fAUOr2c.png | Fighting games are great
Punkstar
Profile Joined July 2010
Slovakia522 Posts
September 13 2010 22:26 GMT
#228
Hard to see a zerg success when u got things like Viking cup ( 7/8 terrans in top 8 wtf?) every week.
When in doubt, just drone up.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
September 13 2010 22:28 GMT
#229
On September 14 2010 07:19 Sqq wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 07:16 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 14 2010 06:48 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
On September 14 2010 06:38 Klockan3 wrote:
On September 14 2010 06:29 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
It's dangerous to muck with balance simply because there seems to be a lot of Terrans in Diamond.

Nah, not if you do it just a little and don't do it just because there are many terrans in diamond, like the situation is now. Patch 1.1 doesn't change a lot balance wise and it doesn't really matter if we don't got total balance all the time since during the next 3 years we will see a ton of changes to the game from the expansions alone.
Also patches might give Blizzard more information on how the game should be fixed with the expansions allowing them to make a better job. Identifying what is missing for each race that can't be fixed in a minor balance patch is pivotal for making good expansions.
On September 14 2010 06:31 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
To explain that a bit: something like allowing Zerg players to stack vomits on a hatchery if they miss a few (similar to how P and T's energy-based macro mechanics work) seems like it wouldn't affect the 'top level' because a perfect player doesn't miss barfs

Um, that would allow zerg to build 3 queens for his first hatch and then get 22 larvae per minute, not really comparable at all to what he said.


I don't understand the first part of your post, you said "don't do it just because there are many terrans in diamond" and I said "It's dangerous to muck with balance simply because there seems to be a lot of Terrans in Diamond". Where is the disagreement?

Yes, I realize its not a comparable example -_- Read his post, he says there's a problem in that Terran can just MULE at 67 energy instead of 50 and not really lose anything, whereas a Zerg missing a barf can be totally critical. The problem with that assessment is that the larva barf mechanic is far more complicated than a brief mineral boost, and allows far greater customization of economy, IE, when you get yer queens, HOW MANY (this should be a huge talking point for Zerg players and strangely it isn't!), when you barf, if you spread creep & how often, etc etc. You have to realize that while there is certainly a lot that can go wrong in all that, it's not necessarily a balance issue, and the incessant griping of Zerg players who have little to no concept of how to actually play with this mechanic is being blown way out of proportion (relevant to this thread). This is why you need to benchmark against perfection (IE, a Zerg player who properly uses these mechanics to solve various issues that arise in-game) and examine it from that perspective. It's also why blanket comparisons like "Terran's MULE vs the Queen" and attempting to 'keep them in line with each other' doesn't work. The Queen is far more complex than the MULE, and needs to be dealt with accordingly, which is once again where the perfect player comes in.


But in reality you need to compare it to supply calldown and scan as well. There's complexity there as wel. In fact, many people would say "knowing when to scan, when to mule," is much more complex than thinking "ok, creep tumor first time, inject permanently after that."


Are you trying to convince yourself of this or have you never played zerg in starcraft 2 ? Jesus christ.


What the hell are you talking about?
Fitz
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada77 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-13 22:32:05
September 13 2010 22:30 GMT
#230
On September 14 2010 07:18 LaLuSh wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

Perfection is very hard to achieve when the matchup involves such a high degree of guessing for zerg. Even when you scout a certain tech path from the terran, you still cannot be sure what is coming. Yesterday for example (one out of a thousand examples), I scouted a very fast tech starport tech lab switch from brat_ok in a tournament game, and I began making spore crawlers and queens while massing drones. I was sure I was going to come out far ahead. What happens next? He only uses the starport to build 1 banshee. Switches his strat around instantly, builds 1 medivac and 1 thor, drops it on my cliff, completely shuts down mining and easily takes out my expansion hatchery.

There is no way a zerg can account for all these possibilities at the same time. Every terran is unique. Every terran has got their own specialized (and often retarded) transition. Banshee doesn't have to mean banshee. 2 rax doesn't have to mean aggressive infantry build. It might as well mean a nonsensical delayed 2 or 1 port banshee with cloak.

You have all these idiot terrans scoring easy instant wins vs zergs everywhere, because even if you scout their production buildings, half of the time you've still got no fucking clue what they're doing. You scout a barrack constantly producing marines and a starport without addons? Maybe he'll use it for 1 viking and then medivacs. Maybe he'll use it for a fast medivac dropping 8 marines straight into your base. Maybe he's the kind of terran that built another rax in his base and waits for 2 medivacs before dropping you. Maybe he's the kind of retarded terran that waits for so long, that eventually you start making drones again, and in flies 3medivacs fully loaded with units. Sometimes they make a medivac and don't even use it for anything, they just expand and pretend it's a logical strategy.

You make drones and go for the early spire vs the 1 medivac 8 marine drop? You'll take sick damage. You start making units too late vs the 2 medivac drop and even hint at making the spire? You die. You start making units too early vs the 3 medivac drop instead of making the spire, and then suddenly think the coast is clear and proceed into making a round of drones because the drop never seems to come? You die.

You make too many units vs the nonsensical terran that went a 1-1-1 build into an 11-minute mark expand with medivacs and lots of marines before expanding but didn't even drop you ? You die from mining 600 less minerals per minute every subsequent minute.

Even when watching Sen's stream - who I consider to be 20x better than me and a complete monster ZvT - you see him losing instantly to noob terrans after overdroning vs a 3rax or 2rax/hellion all-in, or making too many units vs a faked aggression into fast expand build, or upgrading ling speed before lair and subsequently dying to 2port banshee without even having a fighting chance.

The main reason you see so many zergs getting eliminated so early, is because you have to have sick amount of LUCK to beat 5-6 terrans in a row. It doesn't matter how good and how skilled you are. Beating that many terrans in a row will require more luck than it will require skill.

The point is, there is too much of an element of randomness for zerg in the matchup depending on which tech path they opt for. And it cannot be fixed by simply "scouting better". The difference in win rate from playing a terran ranked #60 as opposed to a terran ranked #5 isn't that great. There's still the ~20% of games where you instantly lose due to a build order/tech path loss, no matter how good/bad your terran opponent is.

Then there are the truly good terrans. The ones of equal skill to you. The ones who'll win at least 50% of the games that reach beyond the "zerg guesses wrong instantly loses" phase.

The win ratio against those terrans won't ever be 50% for zergs. Much like the scrub terrans, the good terrans too will instantly win about ~20% of their games on pure build order errors from zerg. If they win half of the rest of games that puts them at 60% vs the zergs.

For a good terran facing a scrub zerg. There's perhaps a 1% chance of a build order loss. Again, number pulled out of my ass, but I should really think it's single digit, and amongst the lower single digits. You don't see morrow, brat_ok or demuslim losing to scrub zergs, EVER.

TvP, they might lose a higher percentage of games against no name protosses. But not nearly as high as zergs vs terran and protoss.

So what you end up with (poker analogy) is top zergs having to fight their way through 5-6 top pocket pair vs lower pocket pair preflop all-ins without getting drawn out one single time! And of course a couple of other key hands that actually reach the flop, turn and river (normal games where the zerg had some influence on the outcome and didn't instantly lose).

This post was written as a rant from start from finish. Forgive me if it's very incoherent.



I think it was very coherent and worth the read.

The only think I'd like you to take the time to think is how could that change ? It seem to me like the problem you're describing is deeper than a 5 second additionnal reaper build time.

Every now and then terrans will tell you that the scouting answer is to sacc. an ovie or even two (ovie pincer, whoever came up with this idea) at a very low food count, which is very weakening for a zerg to do. Just to hope you get the general idea of what the T is doing behind his walls.

Ive read your other thread and your suggestions, but none of them (I think) address this issue.
lol
teamsolid
Profile Joined October 2007
Canada3668 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-13 22:52:17
September 13 2010 22:36 GMT
#231
On September 14 2010 07:18 LaLuSh wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Perfection is very hard to achieve when the matchup involves such a high degree of guessing for zerg. Even when you scout a certain tech path from the terran, you still cannot be sure what is coming. Yesterday for example (one out of a thousand examples), I scouted a very fast tech starport tech lab switch from brat_ok in a tournament game, and I began making spore crawlers and queens while massing drones. I was sure I was going to come out far ahead. What happens next? He only uses the starport to build 1 banshee. Switches his strat around instantly, builds 1 medivac and 1 thor, drops it on my cliff, completely shuts down mining and easily takes out my expansion hatchery.

There is no way a zerg can account for all these possibilities at the same time. Every terran is unique. Every terran has got their own specialized (and often retarded) transition. Banshee doesn't have to mean banshee. 2 rax doesn't have to mean aggressive infantry build. It might as well mean a nonsensical delayed 2 or 1 port banshee with cloak.

You have all these idiot terrans scoring easy instant wins vs zergs everywhere, because even if you scout their production buildings, half of the time you've still got no fucking clue what they're doing. You scout a barrack constantly producing marines and a starport without addons? Maybe he'll use it for 1 viking and then medivacs. Maybe he'll use it for a fast medivac dropping 8 marines straight into your base. Maybe he's the kind of terran that built another rax in his base and waits for 2 medivacs before dropping you. Maybe he's the kind of retarded terran that waits for so long, that eventually you start making drones again, and in flies 3medivacs fully loaded with units. Sometimes they make a medivac and don't even use it for anything, they just expand and pretend it's a logical strategy.

You make drones and go for the early spire vs the 1 medivac 8 marine drop? You'll take sick damage. You start making units too late vs the 2 medivac drop and even hint at making the spire? You die. You start making units too early vs the 3 medivac drop instead of making the spire, and then suddenly think the coast is clear and proceed into making a round of drones because the drop never seems to come? You die.

You make too many units vs the nonsensical terran that went a 1-1-1 build into an 11-minute mark expand with medivacs and lots of marines before expanding but didn't even drop you ? You die from mining 600 less minerals per minute every subsequent minute.

Even when watching Sen's stream - who I consider to be 20x better than me and a complete monster ZvT - you see him losing instantly to noob terrans after overdroning vs a 3rax or 2rax/hellion all-in, or making too many units vs a faked aggression into fast expand build, or upgrading ling speed before lair and subsequently dying to 2port banshee without even having a fighting chance.

The main reason you see so many zergs getting eliminated so early, is because you have to have sick amount of LUCK to beat 5-6 terrans in a row. It doesn't matter how good and how skilled you are. Beating that many terrans in a row will require more luck than it will require skill.

The point is, there is too much of an element of randomness for zerg in the matchup depending on which tech path they opt for. And it cannot be fixed by simply "scouting better". The difference in win rate from playing a terran ranked #60 as opposed to a terran ranked #5 isn't that great. There's still the ~20% of games where you instantly lose due to a build order/tech path loss, no matter how good/bad your terran opponent is.

Then there are the truly good terrans. The ones of equal skill to you. The ones who'll win at least 50% of the games that reach beyond the "zerg guesses wrong instantly loses" phase.

The win ratio against those terrans won't ever be 50% for zergs. Much like the scrub terrans, the good terrans too will instantly win about ~20% of their games on pure build order errors from zerg. If they win half of the rest of games that puts them at 60% vs the zergs.

For a good terran facing a scrub zerg. There's perhaps a 1% chance of a build order loss. Again, number pulled out of my ass, but I should really think it's single digit, and amongst the lower single digits. You don't see morrow, brat_ok or demuslim losing to scrub zergs, EVER.

TvP, they might lose a higher percentage of games against no name protosses. But not nearly as high as zergs vs terran and protoss.

So what you end up with (poker analogy) is top zergs having to fight their way through 5-6 top pocket pair vs lower pocket pair preflop all-ins without getting drawn out one single time! And of course a couple of other key hands that actually reach the flop, turn and river (normal games where the zerg had some influence on the outcome and didn't instantly lose).

This post was written as a rant from start from finish. Forgive me if it's very incoherent.


Very good read, pretty much summarizes one of the major faults in the ZvT matchup. What is most interesting to me is that these issues have existed since the beta was first out, BUT Zergs were still winning their fair share of tournaments in early beta regardless of the inherent randomness of the matchup. Even though any top level Z could just randomly drop a game to any T, the sheer power of late game Z could carry them through to tournament wins. Whether this was because people hadn't developed the other races enough, and Z was just figured out faster since there are less units/combinations, I can't say for certain though. And then came the nerfs... and more nerfs, followed by more nerfs.

So ideally in order to balance the matchup, you'd have to fix these underlying guessing issues, BUT if you gave Zergs enough actual buffs (especially in the early-mid game) they might still be able to overcome this even with their flaws.
SC2Phoenix
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada2814 Posts
September 13 2010 22:41 GMT
#232
Zergs doing so good!
Who the fuck has a family of fucking trees? This song is so god damn stupid. Fuck you song, fuck you and your stupid trees. -itmeJP
Pekkz
Profile Joined June 2009
Norway1505 Posts
September 13 2010 22:42 GMT
#233
On September 14 2010 07:30 Fitz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 07:18 LaLuSh wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

Perfection is very hard to achieve when the matchup involves such a high degree of guessing for zerg. Even when you scout a certain tech path from the terran, you still cannot be sure what is coming. Yesterday for example (one out of a thousand examples), I scouted a very fast tech starport tech lab switch from brat_ok in a tournament game, and I began making spore crawlers and queens while massing drones. I was sure I was going to come out far ahead. What happens next? He only uses the starport to build 1 banshee. Switches his strat around instantly, builds 1 medivac and 1 thor, drops it on my cliff, completely shuts down mining and easily takes out my expansion hatchery.

There is no way a zerg can account for all these possibilities at the same time. Every terran is unique. Every terran has got their own specialized (and often retarded) transition. Banshee doesn't have to mean banshee. 2 rax doesn't have to mean aggressive infantry build. It might as well mean a nonsensical delayed 2 or 1 port banshee with cloak.

You have all these idiot terrans scoring easy instant wins vs zergs everywhere, because even if you scout their production buildings, half of the time you've still got no fucking clue what they're doing. You scout a barrack constantly producing marines and a starport without addons? Maybe he'll use it for 1 viking and then medivacs. Maybe he'll use it for a fast medivac dropping 8 marines straight into your base. Maybe he's the kind of terran that built another rax in his base and waits for 2 medivacs before dropping you. Maybe he's the kind of retarded terran that waits for so long, that eventually you start making drones again, and in flies 3medivacs fully loaded with units. Sometimes they make a medivac and don't even use it for anything, they just expand and pretend it's a logical strategy.

You make drones and go for the early spire vs the 1 medivac 8 marine drop? You'll take sick damage. You start making units too late vs the 2 medivac drop and even hint at making the spire? You die. You start making units too early vs the 3 medivac drop instead of making the spire, and then suddenly think the coast is clear and proceed into making a round of drones because the drop never seems to come? You die.

You make too many units vs the nonsensical terran that went a 1-1-1 build into an 11-minute mark expand with medivacs and lots of marines before expanding but didn't even drop you ? You die from mining 600 less minerals per minute every subsequent minute.

Even when watching Sen's stream - who I consider to be 20x better than me and a complete monster ZvT - you see him losing instantly to noob terrans after overdroning vs a 3rax or 2rax/hellion all-in, or making too many units vs a faked aggression into fast expand build, or upgrading ling speed before lair and subsequently dying to 2port banshee without even having a fighting chance.

The main reason you see so many zergs getting eliminated so early, is because you have to have sick amount of LUCK to beat 5-6 terrans in a row. It doesn't matter how good and how skilled you are. Beating that many terrans in a row will require more luck than it will require skill.

The point is, there is too much of an element of randomness for zerg in the matchup depending on which tech path they opt for. And it cannot be fixed by simply "scouting better". The difference in win rate from playing a terran ranked #60 as opposed to a terran ranked #5 isn't that great. There's still the ~20% of games where you instantly lose due to a build order/tech path loss, no matter how good/bad your terran opponent is.

Then there are the truly good terrans. The ones of equal skill to you. The ones who'll win at least 50% of the games that reach beyond the "zerg guesses wrong instantly loses" phase.

The win ratio against those terrans won't ever be 50% for zergs. Much like the scrub terrans, the good terrans too will instantly win about ~20% of their games on pure build order errors from zerg. If they win half of the rest of games that puts them at 60% vs the zergs.

For a good terran facing a scrub zerg. There's perhaps a 1% chance of a build order loss. Again, number pulled out of my ass, but I should really think it's single digit, and amongst the lower single digits. You don't see morrow, brat_ok or demuslim losing to scrub zergs, EVER.

TvP, they might lose a higher percentage of games against no name protosses. But not nearly as high as zergs vs terran and protoss.

So what you end up with (poker analogy) is top zergs having to fight their way through 5-6 top pocket pair vs lower pocket pair preflop all-ins without getting drawn out one single time! And of course a couple of other key hands that actually reach the flop, turn and river (normal games where the zerg had some influence on the outcome and didn't instantly lose).

This post was written as a rant from start from finish. Forgive me if it's very incoherent.



I think it was very coherent and worth the read.

The only think I'd like you to take the time to think is how could that change ? It seem to me like the problem you're describing is deeper than a 5 second additionnal reaper build time.

Every now and then terrans will tell you that the scouting answer is to sacc. an ovie or even two (ovie pincer, whoever came up with this idea) at a very low food count, which is very weakening for a zerg to do. Just to hope you get the general idea of what the T is doing behind his walls.

Ive read your other thread and your suggestions, but none of them (I think) address this issue.


What about making overseer require evo chamber instead of lair. Zergs would be able to scout and delay tech/units with that overseer spell earlier.
Gingerninja
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United Kingdom1339 Posts
September 13 2010 22:53 GMT
#234
On September 14 2010 01:52 Melt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 01:45 Bibdy wrote:
I'm sure a lot of those top guys have played all of the races to death and just eventually settled on whichever one they felt most comfortable with.


Best example is TLO! He used to play random and i quite enjoyed his Zerg play, but than he switched to Terran only.


You do know that's because he was doing a lot worse with Protoss, than with Terran or Zerg.
But yeah I liked his Zerg play a lot too. He'd prob be still random if his P matched his T and Z.
戦いの中に答えはある
Palm
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia18 Posts
September 13 2010 22:58 GMT
#235
The OP, as well as this whole discussion about Zerg imbalance reminds me of something the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer said -

"All truth passes through three stages. First it is ridiculed. Secondly, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."


We are going to look back on this whole saga which is unfolding and be like "Balance was pretty messed up back then, anyone who said otherwise must have been smoking something crazy, it's so obvious. Thank god Blizzard patches their games!"
Sworn
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada920 Posts
September 13 2010 23:00 GMT
#236
Idra has won the King of the Beta tourney and second place in IEM and i think some others. Personally the statistics look nice and are some what true. But i do believe bias has led to some tourneys being included for terrans and less looked for zerg. Of course this is going to happen when your trying to prove a point but I think it would be a little bit less drastic but still showing how zergs are lacking.
"Duty is heavy as a mountain, death is light as a feather." CJ Entus Fighting! <3 Effort
Gingerninja
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United Kingdom1339 Posts
September 13 2010 23:00 GMT
#237
Why are people saying theres only 3 Zergs in the GSL.. I count 5.. and a very strong lineup of Zergs it is too.. Cool, Check, IdrA, JookToJung and oGSTheWinD. Hoping Check goes all the way too. Love his aggressive style.
戦いの中に答えはある
ilbh
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil1606 Posts
September 13 2010 23:01 GMT
#238
On September 14 2010 07:42 Pekkz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 07:30 Fitz wrote:
On September 14 2010 07:18 LaLuSh wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

Perfection is very hard to achieve when the matchup involves such a high degree of guessing for zerg. Even when you scout a certain tech path from the terran, you still cannot be sure what is coming. Yesterday for example (one out of a thousand examples), I scouted a very fast tech starport tech lab switch from brat_ok in a tournament game, and I began making spore crawlers and queens while massing drones. I was sure I was going to come out far ahead. What happens next? He only uses the starport to build 1 banshee. Switches his strat around instantly, builds 1 medivac and 1 thor, drops it on my cliff, completely shuts down mining and easily takes out my expansion hatchery.

There is no way a zerg can account for all these possibilities at the same time. Every terran is unique. Every terran has got their own specialized (and often retarded) transition. Banshee doesn't have to mean banshee. 2 rax doesn't have to mean aggressive infantry build. It might as well mean a nonsensical delayed 2 or 1 port banshee with cloak.

You have all these idiot terrans scoring easy instant wins vs zergs everywhere, because even if you scout their production buildings, half of the time you've still got no fucking clue what they're doing. You scout a barrack constantly producing marines and a starport without addons? Maybe he'll use it for 1 viking and then medivacs. Maybe he'll use it for a fast medivac dropping 8 marines straight into your base. Maybe he's the kind of terran that built another rax in his base and waits for 2 medivacs before dropping you. Maybe he's the kind of retarded terran that waits for so long, that eventually you start making drones again, and in flies 3medivacs fully loaded with units. Sometimes they make a medivac and don't even use it for anything, they just expand and pretend it's a logical strategy.

You make drones and go for the early spire vs the 1 medivac 8 marine drop? You'll take sick damage. You start making units too late vs the 2 medivac drop and even hint at making the spire? You die. You start making units too early vs the 3 medivac drop instead of making the spire, and then suddenly think the coast is clear and proceed into making a round of drones because the drop never seems to come? You die.

You make too many units vs the nonsensical terran that went a 1-1-1 build into an 11-minute mark expand with medivacs and lots of marines before expanding but didn't even drop you ? You die from mining 600 less minerals per minute every subsequent minute.

Even when watching Sen's stream - who I consider to be 20x better than me and a complete monster ZvT - you see him losing instantly to noob terrans after overdroning vs a 3rax or 2rax/hellion all-in, or making too many units vs a faked aggression into fast expand build, or upgrading ling speed before lair and subsequently dying to 2port banshee without even having a fighting chance.

The main reason you see so many zergs getting eliminated so early, is because you have to have sick amount of LUCK to beat 5-6 terrans in a row. It doesn't matter how good and how skilled you are. Beating that many terrans in a row will require more luck than it will require skill.

The point is, there is too much of an element of randomness for zerg in the matchup depending on which tech path they opt for. And it cannot be fixed by simply "scouting better". The difference in win rate from playing a terran ranked #60 as opposed to a terran ranked #5 isn't that great. There's still the ~20% of games where you instantly lose due to a build order/tech path loss, no matter how good/bad your terran opponent is.

Then there are the truly good terrans. The ones of equal skill to you. The ones who'll win at least 50% of the games that reach beyond the "zerg guesses wrong instantly loses" phase.

The win ratio against those terrans won't ever be 50% for zergs. Much like the scrub terrans, the good terrans too will instantly win about ~20% of their games on pure build order errors from zerg. If they win half of the rest of games that puts them at 60% vs the zergs.

For a good terran facing a scrub zerg. There's perhaps a 1% chance of a build order loss. Again, number pulled out of my ass, but I should really think it's single digit, and amongst the lower single digits. You don't see morrow, brat_ok or demuslim losing to scrub zergs, EVER.

TvP, they might lose a higher percentage of games against no name protosses. But not nearly as high as zergs vs terran and protoss.

So what you end up with (poker analogy) is top zergs having to fight their way through 5-6 top pocket pair vs lower pocket pair preflop all-ins without getting drawn out one single time! And of course a couple of other key hands that actually reach the flop, turn and river (normal games where the zerg had some influence on the outcome and didn't instantly lose).

This post was written as a rant from start from finish. Forgive me if it's very incoherent.



I think it was very coherent and worth the read.

The only think I'd like you to take the time to think is how could that change ? It seem to me like the problem you're describing is deeper than a 5 second additionnal reaper build time.

Every now and then terrans will tell you that the scouting answer is to sacc. an ovie or even two (ovie pincer, whoever came up with this idea) at a very low food count, which is very weakening for a zerg to do. Just to hope you get the general idea of what the T is doing behind his walls.

Ive read your other thread and your suggestions, but none of them (I think) address this issue.


What about making overseer require evo chamber instead of lair. Zergs would be able to scout and delay tech/units with that overseer spell earlier.


if we could make queen and lair at the same time...
we also need ling speed, so, to get lair done, we need 200 gas. reduce ling speed to 50/50, could also reduce ov speed to 50/50 and then we can scout properly early game. lair/hive should be independent of any hatchery upgrade like ov speed, queen, overlord drop, burrow.

tbh, I don't even like to discuss game balancing, because it is frustrating. there is nothing we can do about it.
I tried using blizzard forums, but no one answered. it's like an old company ruled by rednecks that threat their costumers as enemies, no communication at all.
they said they are reading the forums and then comes up with +5 seconds to reapers.

The saddest thing is that ZvT is completely broken and only true zerg players knows that. it's not a matter of nerffing some terran units, it's way more complex than that. it is the entire zerg system, mechanics, etc.
Part of the inhumanity of the computer is that, once it is competently programmed and working smoothly, it is completely honest.
FakeSteve[TPR]
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Valhalla18444 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-13 23:21:11
September 13 2010 23:05 GMT
#239
On September 14 2010 07:18 LaLuSh wrote:
Perfection is very hard to achieve when the matchup involves such a high degree of guessing for zerg. Even when you scout a certain tech path from the terran, you still cannot be sure what is coming. Yesterday for example (one out of a thousand examples), I scouted a very fast tech starport tech lab switch from brat_ok in a tournament game, and I began making spore crawlers and queens while massing drones. I was sure I was going to come out far ahead. What happens next? He only uses the starport to build 1 banshee. Switches his strat around instantly, builds 1 medivac and 1 thor, drops it on my cliff, completely shuts down mining and easily takes out my expansion hatchery.

There is no way a zerg can account for all these possibilities at the same time. Every terran is unique. Every terran has got their own specialized (and often retarded) transition. Banshee doesn't have to mean banshee. 2 rax doesn't have to mean aggressive infantry build. It might as well mean a nonsensical delayed 2 or 1 port banshee with cloak.

You have all these idiot terrans scoring easy instant wins vs zergs everywhere, because even if you scout their production buildings, half of the time you've still got no fucking clue what they're doing. You scout a barrack constantly producing marines and a starport without addons? Maybe he'll use it for 1 viking and then medivacs. Maybe he'll use it for a fast medivac dropping 8 marines straight into your base. Maybe he's the kind of terran that built another rax in his base and waits for 2 medivacs before dropping you. Maybe he's the kind of retarded terran that waits for so long, that eventually you start making drones again, and in flies 3medivacs fully loaded with units. Sometimes they make a medivac and don't even use it for anything, they just expand and pretend it's a logical strategy.

You make drones and go for the early spire vs the 1 medivac 8 marine drop? You'll take sick damage. You start making units too late vs the 2 medivac drop and even hint at making the spire? You die. You start making units too early vs the 3 medivac drop instead of making the spire, and then suddenly think the coast is clear and proceed into making a round of drones because the drop never seems to come? You die.

You make too many units vs the nonsensical terran that went a 1-1-1 build into an 11-minute mark expand with medivacs and lots of marines before expanding but didn't even drop you ? You die from mining 600 less minerals per minute every subsequent minute.

Even when watching Sen's stream - who I consider to be 20x better than me and a complete monster ZvT - you see him losing instantly to noob terrans after overdroning vs a 3rax or 2rax/hellion all-in, or making too many units vs a faked aggression into fast expand build, or upgrading ling speed before lair and subsequently dying to 2port banshee without even having a fighting chance.

The main reason you see so many zergs getting eliminated so early, is because you have to have sick amount of LUCK to beat 5-6 terrans in a row. It doesn't matter how good and how skilled you are. Beating that many terrans in a row will require more luck than it will require skill.

The point is, there is too much of an element of randomness for zerg in the matchup depending on which tech path they opt for. And it cannot be fixed by simply "scouting better". The difference in win rate from playing a terran ranked #60 as opposed to a terran ranked #5 isn't that great. There's still the ~20% of games where you instantly lose due to a build order/tech path loss, no matter how good/bad your terran opponent is.

Then there are the truly good terrans. The ones of equal skill to you. The ones who'll win at least 50% of the games that reach beyond the "zerg guesses wrong instantly loses" phase.

The win ratio against those terrans won't ever be 50% for zergs. Much like the scrub terrans, the good terrans too will instantly win about ~20% of their games on pure build order errors from zerg. If they win half of the rest of games that puts them at 60% vs the zergs.

For a good terran facing a scrub zerg. There's perhaps a 1% chance of a build order loss. Again, number pulled out of my ass, but I should really think it's single digit, and amongst the lower single digits. You don't see morrow, brat_ok or demuslim losing to scrub zergs, EVER.

TvP, they might lose a higher percentage of games against no name protosses. But not nearly as high as zergs vs terran and protoss.

So what you end up with (poker analogy) is top zergs having to fight their way through 5-6 top pocket pair vs lower pocket pair preflop all-ins without getting drawn out one single time! And of course a couple of other key hands that actually reach the flop, turn and river (normal games where the zerg had some influence on the outcome and didn't instantly lose).

This post was written as a rant from start from finish. Forgive me if it's very incoherent.



good post, sums up entirely what I view as the current problem as well - I don't feel that the Zerg lacks the tools necessary adapt, i think they lack the tools necessary to gain that information in the first place. Slow overlords were fine for a game like Brood War, which had far more rigid build commitments and far more telling signs. Zerg really needs an option pre-lair to scout better, because being shoehorned into fast lair isn't a good option either.

I want it to be clear this is something i feel is a weakness of zerg that needs to be addressed. It's important to make that clarification or things like 'look how many terrans win these bumblefuck tournaments' look like they have more weight than they should

(For anyone who cares, the fix I have in mind is moving overlord speed to hatchery but it requires spawning pool. pool timing very important! ^_^)
Moderatormy tatsu loops r fuckin nice
Raiznhell
Profile Joined January 2010
Canada786 Posts
September 13 2010 23:15 GMT
#240
this clearly shows that MorroW is OP not terran
Cake or Death?
Prev 1 10 11 12 13 14 43 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill #259
Liquipedia
PiG Sty Festival
12:00
PiGfest 8.0 Group A
Serral vs Lambo
SHIN vs Rogue
PiGStarcraft695
ComeBackTV 439
Rex118
BRAT_OK 66
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft695
IndyStarCraft 155
Rex 118
BRAT_OK 66
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 34599
Shuttle 3517
Leta 1631
Bisu 1368
Soulkey 538
EffOrt 466
Mini 368
firebathero 304
Rush 295
actioN 290
[ Show more ]
Stork 261
Light 230
Pusan 225
Last 181
Snow 163
Larva 137
Hyuk 137
ZerO 121
hero 63
Sea.KH 52
ToSsGirL 40
Hm[arnc] 35
Sharp 32
zelot 25
sSak 23
Sacsri 21
yabsab 18
Sexy 17
HiyA 15
scan(afreeca) 15
sorry 13
Icarus 8
Terrorterran 2
Dota 2
The International66420
Gorgc15143
singsing3670
XBOCT599
Dendi536
Fuzer 398
BananaSlamJamma179
KheZu67
Counter-Strike
fl0m4305
olofmeister1151
hiko468
zeus118
Heroes of the Storm
XaKoH 57
Khaldor38
Other Games
B2W.Neo563
Lowko369
crisheroes278
Hui .178
Liquid`VortiX167
Livibee97
KnowMe82
QueenE53
ZerO(Twitch)8
Organizations
StarCraft 2
IntoTheiNu 1455
WardiTV182
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 14
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• 3DClanTV 50
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota246
League of Legends
• Jankos2085
• TFBlade635
Upcoming Events
OSC
6h 39m
Replay Cast
10h 39m
Escore
20h 39m
PiG Sty Festival
22h 39m
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs Zoun
CranKy Ducklings
1d 20h
PiG Sty Festival
1d 22h
herO vs Krystianer
Solar vs Cure
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
PiG Sty Festival
2 days
Maru vs Shameless
Reynor vs TriGGeR
OSC
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Rush vs Hm
Bisu vs Shuttle
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
The Patches Monday
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Sharp vs Shinee
Action vs Shine
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
BeSt vs Paralyze
Jaedong vs Speed
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
KCM Race Survival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-08-12
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
Acropolis #5
RSL Revival: Season 6
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W7
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
META DYMY #4
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Thunderpick World Champ.
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.