On December 14 2010 02:35 avidday04 wrote: I honestly don't see how being drunk can add anything of value :\ But hey, we'll have to see I guess.
itll be really fun for the casters and really funny to the 14 year olds who pretend to know what drunk is. for everyone else, they'll go out and get drunk themselves.
Can you guy's please stop pandering to all the haters in this thread. It's by far my least favorite thing about the podcast.
"Now I'm sure I'll get alot of hate on the forums about this comment..." I swear some sort of variation on this is said a dozen times each cast.
"Bawwww, Marauders have 6 range, not 5 InControl..." Yeah we get it Geoff, you've mentioned it like 5 times on the cast before. You're just vindicating all these people by bringing it up so often. Can't you just pretend there's no audience like most good podcasts (until user questions).
On December 14 2010 03:07 Accidentus wrote: Can you guy's please stop pandering to all the haters in this thread. It's by far my least favorite thing about the podcast.
"Now I'm sure I'll get alot of hate on the forums about this comment..." I swear some sort of variation on this is said a dozen times each cast.
"Bawwww, Marauders have 6 range, not 5 InControl..." Yeah we get it Geoff, you've mentioned it like 5 times on the cast before. You're just vindicating all these people by bringing it up so often. Can't you just pretend there's no audience like most good podcasts (until user questions).
Its actually my favorite thing about the podcast lately, incontrol making fun of certain grps of the audience is priceless and I just love reading comments from people who actually take his comments seriously.
And I definitely agree that based on the comments that most people have never been drunk before. There is a difference between head in a trash can and normal fun drinking.
And I definitely agree that based on the comments that most people have never been drunk before. There is a difference between head in a trash can and normal fun drinking.
well normal fun drinking can quickly turn into head in a trash can....
And I definitely agree that based on the comments that most people have never been drunk before. There is a difference between head in a trash can and normal fun drinking.
well normal fun drinking can quickly turn into head in a trash can....
And I definitely agree that based on the comments that most people have never been drunk before. There is a difference between head in a trash can and normal fun drinking.
well normal fun drinking can quickly turn into head in a trash can....
only if 4 loco is involved.
truth bomb.
OT: I love SotG, I'll listen to this one just like I would any other one. If it sucks, oh well, there's always next weeks.
On December 14 2010 03:07 Accidentus wrote: Can you guy's please stop pandering to all the haters in this thread. It's by far my least favorite thing about the podcast.
"Now I'm sure I'll get alot of hate on the forums about this comment..." I swear some sort of variation on this is said a dozen times each cast.
"Bawwww, Marauders have 6 range, not 5 InControl..." Yeah we get it Geoff, you've mentioned it like 5 times on the cast before. You're just vindicating all these people by bringing it up so often. Can't you just pretend there's no audience like most good podcasts (until user questions).
Ironically, InControl is probably going to mention this post in the cast.
On December 14 2010 03:07 Accidentus wrote: Can you guy's please stop pandering to all the haters in this thread. It's by far my least favorite thing about the podcast.
"Now I'm sure I'll get alot of hate on the forums about this comment..." I swear some sort of variation on this is said a dozen times each cast.
"Bawwww, Marauders have 6 range, not 5 InControl..." Yeah we get it Geoff, you've mentioned it like 5 times on the cast before. You're just vindicating all these people by bringing it up so often. Can't you just pretend there's no audience like most good podcasts (until user questions).
It also makes the honest criticism seem worse than it actually is.
The show will never be so perfect that you can make it critic-proof. Which is actually normal. Conan o'brien and bill maher don't knock it out of the park every single time, and I think its fair if someone wants to say, "yeah, that episode/bit didn't fly". Just because someone criticizes one aspect or episode of the show doesn't make them instant 'haters'.
On December 14 2010 03:07 Accidentus wrote: Can you guy's please stop pandering to all the haters in this thread. It's by far my least favorite thing about the podcast.
"Now I'm sure I'll get alot of hate on the forums about this comment..." I swear some sort of variation on this is said a dozen times each cast.
"Bawwww, Marauders have 6 range, not 5 InControl..." Yeah we get it Geoff, you've mentioned it like 5 times on the cast before. You're just vindicating all these people by bringing it up so often. Can't you just pretend there's no audience like most good podcasts (until user questions).
i thought the joke (and the point geoff was trying to make this whole time) was that there will always be people complaining about everything and anything. case in point here, we have someone complaining about the cast complaining about people complaining about the podcast.
seriously people, take the show for what it is. if you find something that's not for you, then skip the portion or the episode. these guys are taking time to make some free entertainment for the community. enjoy it. rather than nitpicking on every little thing that you don’t agree with… that’s not being critical, it’s just being an ass.
On December 14 2010 03:07 Accidentus wrote: Can you guy's please stop pandering to all the haters in this thread. It's by far my least favorite thing about the podcast.
"Now I'm sure I'll get alot of hate on the forums about this comment..." I swear some sort of variation on this is said a dozen times each cast.
"Bawwww, Marauders have 6 range, not 5 InControl..." Yeah we get it Geoff, you've mentioned it like 5 times on the cast before. You're just vindicating all these people by bringing it up so often. Can't you just pretend there's no audience like most good podcasts (until user questions).
i thought the joke (and the point geoff was trying to make this whole time) was that there will always be people complaining about everything and anything. case in point here, we have someone complaining about the cast complaining about people complaining about the podcast.
seriously people, take the show for what it is. if you find something that's not for you, then skip the portion or the episode. these guys are taking time to make some free entertainment for the community. enjoy it. rather than nitpicking on every little thing that you don’t agree with… that’s not being critical, it’s just being an ass.
True, true. But it's a testament to how good the show is overall that people want to talk about it whether its good or bad.
I don't treat the show like it's this precious little hobby by a bunch of guys that are trying their very-wery best. I treat it like any show I follow regularly, like the Daily Show or Politically InCorrect.
I think that's the best thing I can say about a show. The show has a shit-ton of potential, and I think a lot of fans just hope that it keeps getting better and better.
On December 09 2010 12:11 Defacer wrote: Alright then, broadening the topic. Who is the best macro Protoss? Or do they all suck balls because no one is chronoboosting effectively?
I'd have to go with HuK, based on a game I watched earlier today where he got WAY behind in a mirror match-up, but managed to pull out a win by chronoing out probes, upgrades, and Colossi faster than his opponent.
But I'd love to hear some other nominations.
Nony? I seem to remember this epic game against PainUser in MLG where he barely got beat by Pain's unit composition.
To be honest ... I'm having trouble thinking of the last good mid/late protoss game I've seen, where the quality of someone's macro might seem obvious ... or even a good game where protoss went three bases.