• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:27
CEST 09:27
KST 16:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins Maestros of the Game 213ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7
Community News
MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon315.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes36Weekly Cups (June 22-28): Zergs thrive in new patch5[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation05.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)99
StarCraft 2
General
Server Blocker 5.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes Serral wins Maestros of the Game 2 Weekly Cups (June 22-28): Zergs thrive in new patch MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon
Tourneys
Vespene Cup #1 — $300+ USD, July 10 HomeStory Cup 29 Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28) Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery Mutation # 530 One For All
Brood War
General
ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool Farewell Beloved Starcraft (Youtube Videos) BW General Discussion FlaShFTW vs A.Alm Grudge Match Event BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 The Casual Games of the Week Thread [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Grand Finals
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies Why doesn't anyone use restoration?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Summer Games Done Quick 2026! ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Power Rank Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Men's Fashion Thread
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard? Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Listen To The Coaches!
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 16789 users

Blizzard: "No plans for chatrooms, crossrealm play" - Page…

Forum Index > SC2 General
2308 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 92 93 94 95 96 116 Next
Subversive
Profile Joined October 2009
Australia2229 Posts
June 01 2010 08:21 GMT
#1861
On June 01 2010 16:53 FrozenArbiter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2010 03:03 Magmar wrote:
On May 31 2010 13:11 fuzzehbunneh wrote:
yet another instance of our culture's everybody is a winner attitude creeping into competition and ruining it for everyone.



Consider this: You are not a korean Programer. Korean Progamer could say everybody who is not on our level and earning money with this Game is per definition a stupid loser. How would you feel? And don´t claim that you would shrug this off. Not when you hold up the flag of competition and winner gets it all.




blizzard keeps trying to cater to casual gamers, and honestly this turns off the hardcore gamers when the casual gamers COULDNT CARE LESS about any of it as they are by definition CASUAL



Blizzard knows there are only a few dozen thousands of "hardcore gamers" that look like Count Dracula because they don´t see the sun very often. It would be stupid to cater to these male virgins. Better to make games that appeal to millions of people. It´s not only better for them. Computergames became relevant when companies started to make content for people who knew Sex and Sunlight. The 99,9% of the overall male and female population. Thats the horrible thing about this: WE ALLOW ONLY THE GAME FANATICS TO COMPLAIN ABOUOT B NET 2.0. And thats stupid! The casual gamers have to step up forward too or you and your kind will ruin it for everyone.


Hello.

Good bye.

Lol I just read this and then saw it in the banned thread. Man, what a jerk. 2 posts and already flaming people and abusing. I struggle to pick a favourite mod on this site because you all just get rid of the trash so fast
#1 Great fan ~ // Khan // FlaSh // JangBi // EffOrt //
rS.Sinatra
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada785 Posts
June 01 2010 08:22 GMT
#1862
I sincerely hope that they implement the ability to be a part of multiple groups (not clans) so that u could join say... a tournament group that sort of works like a clan.. with moderators instead of clan leaders.. so that u could coordinate effectively... etc.. if they implemented that i wouldn't care about whether chat channels existed or not... cause then u could have any type of group you wanted (like chat channel) but who could join the group could be moderated.. (no spam or randoms)

might sound sort of elitist.. but i'm sure if they implemented that there could also be "general" groups that have moderation but at the same time allow randoms to join..
www.rsgaming.com
Santriel
Profile Joined May 2010
Belgium33 Posts
June 01 2010 09:26 GMT
#1863
Anyone noticed the irony in the official forum's post ?


Xordiah:

What I wanted to bring up though was, that while having a lot of players have a very strong opinion about something is a good thing, it is a very bad thing if they are not able to communicate this in a constructive manner.


We... have... no... chat... channels.
By fire be purged !
Jaug
Profile Joined February 2010
Sweden249 Posts
June 01 2010 10:39 GMT
#1864
Blizzard are losing their connection to reality, if you can't even take feedback from beta testers then something is seriously wrong.
PobTheCad
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
Australia893 Posts
June 01 2010 10:47 GMT
#1865
just wondering when did blizzard get a hard on for the whole battle.net account structure , linking games to a specific bnet account?

i remember it being after activision took over
Once again back is the incredible!
y8ycgl
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1 Post
June 01 2010 10:51 GMT
#1866
dont forget guys that they also took away numbers in names.
Adun Toridas
Daxten
Profile Joined October 2009
Germany127 Posts
June 01 2010 11:28 GMT
#1867
On June 01 2010 17:22 Paramore wrote:
I sincerely hope that they implement the ability to be a part of multiple groups (not clans) so that u could join say... a tournament group that sort of works like a clan.. with moderators instead of clan leaders.. so that u could coordinate effectively... etc.. if they implemented that i wouldn't care about whether chat channels existed or not... cause then u could have any type of group you wanted (like chat channel) but who could join the group could be moderated.. (no spam or randoms)

might sound sort of elitist.. but i'm sure if they implemented that there could also be "general" groups that have moderation but at the same time allow randoms to join..

I think that is exactly how it will work.. I actualy dont understand all the rage around here..
DiTH
Profile Joined March 2010
Greece116 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-01 12:43:38
June 01 2010 12:42 GMT
#1868
On June 01 2010 20:28 Daxten wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2010 17:22 Paramore wrote:
I sincerely hope that they implement the ability to be a part of multiple groups (not clans) so that u could join say... a tournament group that sort of works like a clan.. with moderators instead of clan leaders.. so that u could coordinate effectively... etc.. if they implemented that i wouldn't care about whether chat channels existed or not... cause then u could have any type of group you wanted (like chat channel) but who could join the group could be moderated.. (no spam or randoms)

might sound sort of elitist.. but i'm sure if they implemented that there could also be "general" groups that have moderation but at the same time allow randoms to join..

I think that is exactly how it will work.. I actualy dont understand all the rage around here..


The rage is because of this being implemented "at a later date" so actually even if it works this way for atleast the first 3 months of battle.net this wont exist in any form according to their statements.A later date may be 3 months or 6 months or at the 1st expansion.And until then you are forced to make an account on another site to have a "community like" feature that is offering actually far less than every other form of battle.net offered in the past.
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-01 12:44:07
June 01 2010 12:42 GMT
#1869
People argueing about hardcore vs casual gamers are missing the point. Almost everyone wants chat channels OR at the very least sees nothing wrong with them. WOW the most casual Blizzard game on the planet has chat channels. The BNET forums are raging about no chat rooms. It is not that Blizzard is catering to the casual gamer. I suspect that many are falling back to that old arguement because its been used so much on this site before :p



But that is not the reason. The reason is money.


We are subject to risks associated with the collaborative online features in our games, such as World of Warcraft 's online chat feature, which allows consumers to post narrative comment, in real time, that is visible to other players. Despite our efforts to restrict inappropriate consumer content, from time to time objectionable and offensive consumer content may be posted to a World of Warcraft gaming site or the sites of other games or game services, such as Battle.net, with online chat features or game forums which allow consumers to post comments. We may be subject to lawsuits, governmental regulation or restrictions, and consumer backlash (including decreased sales and harmed reputation), as a result of consumers posting offensive content, any of which could harm our operating results.

http://investor.activision.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1047469-10-1649
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
KameZerg
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Sweden1772 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-01 12:50:28
June 01 2010 12:49 GMT
#1870
We can get LAN support and CR play if we want to, all we have to do is not buy the game. And i swear to god that it would most definantly work
asdasdasdasdasd123123123
myopia
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States2928 Posts
June 01 2010 12:56 GMT
#1871
I like Bashiok
it's my first day
RaGe
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
Belgium9950 Posts
June 01 2010 13:03 GMT
#1872
On June 01 2010 21:42 Archerofaiur wrote:
People argueing about hardcore vs casual gamers are missing the point. Almost everyone wants chat channels OR at the very least sees nothing wrong with them. WOW the most casual Blizzard game on the planet has chat channels. The BNET forums are raging about no chat rooms. It is not that Blizzard is catering to the casual gamer. I suspect that many are falling back to that old arguement because its been used so much on this site before :p



But that is not the reason. The reason is money.


Show nested quote +
We are subject to risks associated with the collaborative online features in our games, such as World of Warcraft 's online chat feature, which allows consumers to post narrative comment, in real time, that is visible to other players. Despite our efforts to restrict inappropriate consumer content, from time to time objectionable and offensive consumer content may be posted to a World of Warcraft gaming site or the sites of other games or game services, such as Battle.net, with online chat features or game forums which allow consumers to post comments. We may be subject to lawsuits, governmental regulation or restrictions, and consumer backlash (including decreased sales and harmed reputation), as a result of consumers posting offensive content, any of which could harm our operating results.

http://investor.activision.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1047469-10-1649


lol, any lawsuit based on that would be won by Blizzard easily. ISPs, Server hosters, and forum hosters are all not responsible for the non endorsed content of their service. Otherwise some random dude could post something on TL and we would be responsible for it. Same goes for Battle.net. It would be an easy win.
Moderatorsometimes I get intimidated by the size of my right testicle
zealing
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Canada806 Posts
June 01 2010 13:06 GMT
#1873
well im quiting sc2 now. later.
Think you got lag? It took Jesus 3 days to respawn.
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
June 01 2010 13:17 GMT
#1874
On June 01 2010 22:03 RaGe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2010 21:42 Archerofaiur wrote:
People argueing about hardcore vs casual gamers are missing the point. Almost everyone wants chat channels OR at the very least sees nothing wrong with them. WOW the most casual Blizzard game on the planet has chat channels. The BNET forums are raging about no chat rooms. It is not that Blizzard is catering to the casual gamer. I suspect that many are falling back to that old arguement because its been used so much on this site before :p



But that is not the reason. The reason is money.


We are subject to risks associated with the collaborative online features in our games, such as World of Warcraft 's online chat feature, which allows consumers to post narrative comment, in real time, that is visible to other players. Despite our efforts to restrict inappropriate consumer content, from time to time objectionable and offensive consumer content may be posted to a World of Warcraft gaming site or the sites of other games or game services, such as Battle.net, with online chat features or game forums which allow consumers to post comments. We may be subject to lawsuits, governmental regulation or restrictions, and consumer backlash (including decreased sales and harmed reputation), as a result of consumers posting offensive content, any of which could harm our operating results.

http://investor.activision.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1047469-10-1649


lol, any lawsuit based on that would be won by Blizzard easily. ISPs, Server hosters, and forum hosters are all not responsible for the non endorsed content of their service. Otherwise some random dude could post something on TL and we would be responsible for it. Same goes for Battle.net. It would be an easy win.



Lets look at the facts

Fact 1: Activision views chat features as a significant investment risk factor.

Fact 2: Starcraft 2 will not feature chat channels.

Fact 3: At some point in the future chat rooms devoted to specific subjects may be implemented.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Takkara
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2503 Posts
June 01 2010 14:01 GMT
#1875
On June 01 2010 22:17 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2010 22:03 RaGe wrote:
On June 01 2010 21:42 Archerofaiur wrote:
People argueing about hardcore vs casual gamers are missing the point. Almost everyone wants chat channels OR at the very least sees nothing wrong with them. WOW the most casual Blizzard game on the planet has chat channels. The BNET forums are raging about no chat rooms. It is not that Blizzard is catering to the casual gamer. I suspect that many are falling back to that old arguement because its been used so much on this site before :p



But that is not the reason. The reason is money.


We are subject to risks associated with the collaborative online features in our games, such as World of Warcraft 's online chat feature, which allows consumers to post narrative comment, in real time, that is visible to other players. Despite our efforts to restrict inappropriate consumer content, from time to time objectionable and offensive consumer content may be posted to a World of Warcraft gaming site or the sites of other games or game services, such as Battle.net, with online chat features or game forums which allow consumers to post comments. We may be subject to lawsuits, governmental regulation or restrictions, and consumer backlash (including decreased sales and harmed reputation), as a result of consumers posting offensive content, any of which could harm our operating results.

http://investor.activision.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1047469-10-1649


lol, any lawsuit based on that would be won by Blizzard easily. ISPs, Server hosters, and forum hosters are all not responsible for the non endorsed content of their service. Otherwise some random dude could post something on TL and we would be responsible for it. Same goes for Battle.net. It would be an easy win.



Lets look at the facts

Fact 1: Activision views chat features as a significant investment risk factor.

Fact 2: Starcraft 2 will not feature chat channels.

Fact 3: At some point in the future chat rooms devoted to specific subjects may be implemented.


Which is half of what I was saying 2-3 pages ago that people were flipping out about. A lot of people here that work in mid-to-large companies know far too well about Risk Management. For better or worse it's the mantra that a lot of firms use in their development. All things being equal, it would take a lot of resources to mitigate the potential risks of public chat channels.

All things are not equal in this case, and it's really important for there to be chat channels, but it's a non-trivial add in this case.
Gee gee gee gee baby baby baby
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
June 01 2010 14:08 GMT
#1876
On June 01 2010 23:01 Takkara wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2010 22:17 Archerofaiur wrote:
On June 01 2010 22:03 RaGe wrote:
On June 01 2010 21:42 Archerofaiur wrote:
People argueing about hardcore vs casual gamers are missing the point. Almost everyone wants chat channels OR at the very least sees nothing wrong with them. WOW the most casual Blizzard game on the planet has chat channels. The BNET forums are raging about no chat rooms. It is not that Blizzard is catering to the casual gamer. I suspect that many are falling back to that old arguement because its been used so much on this site before :p



But that is not the reason. The reason is money.


We are subject to risks associated with the collaborative online features in our games, such as World of Warcraft 's online chat feature, which allows consumers to post narrative comment, in real time, that is visible to other players. Despite our efforts to restrict inappropriate consumer content, from time to time objectionable and offensive consumer content may be posted to a World of Warcraft gaming site or the sites of other games or game services, such as Battle.net, with online chat features or game forums which allow consumers to post comments. We may be subject to lawsuits, governmental regulation or restrictions, and consumer backlash (including decreased sales and harmed reputation), as a result of consumers posting offensive content, any of which could harm our operating results.

http://investor.activision.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1047469-10-1649


lol, any lawsuit based on that would be won by Blizzard easily. ISPs, Server hosters, and forum hosters are all not responsible for the non endorsed content of their service. Otherwise some random dude could post something on TL and we would be responsible for it. Same goes for Battle.net. It would be an easy win.



Lets look at the facts

Fact 1: Activision views chat features as a significant investment risk factor.

Fact 2: Starcraft 2 will not feature chat channels.

Fact 3: At some point in the future chat rooms devoted to specific subjects may be implemented.


Which is half of what I was saying 2-3 pages ago that people were flipping out about. A lot of people here that work in mid-to-large companies know far too well about Risk Management. For better or worse it's the mantra that a lot of firms use in their development. All things being equal, it would take a lot of resources to mitigate the potential risks of public chat channels.

All things are not equal in this case, and it's really important for there to be chat channels, but it's a non-trivial add in this case.



Can't you just see some investor taking off his glasses and saying "Now Bob Ive been taking a look at our investment risk analysis and do you know what I think could drastically improve investor confidence...."
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Angryhorse
Profile Joined January 2010
Sweden387 Posts
June 01 2010 14:19 GMT
#1877
Well I'm not gonna buy Starcraft 2 now atleast.
Don't cry blood, the world doesn't revolve around you
L
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Canada4732 Posts
June 01 2010 14:44 GMT
#1878
On June 01 2010 23:01 Takkara wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2010 22:17 Archerofaiur wrote:
On June 01 2010 22:03 RaGe wrote:
On June 01 2010 21:42 Archerofaiur wrote:
People argueing about hardcore vs casual gamers are missing the point. Almost everyone wants chat channels OR at the very least sees nothing wrong with them. WOW the most casual Blizzard game on the planet has chat channels. The BNET forums are raging about no chat rooms. It is not that Blizzard is catering to the casual gamer. I suspect that many are falling back to that old arguement because its been used so much on this site before :p



But that is not the reason. The reason is money.


We are subject to risks associated with the collaborative online features in our games, such as World of Warcraft 's online chat feature, which allows consumers to post narrative comment, in real time, that is visible to other players. Despite our efforts to restrict inappropriate consumer content, from time to time objectionable and offensive consumer content may be posted to a World of Warcraft gaming site or the sites of other games or game services, such as Battle.net, with online chat features or game forums which allow consumers to post comments. We may be subject to lawsuits, governmental regulation or restrictions, and consumer backlash (including decreased sales and harmed reputation), as a result of consumers posting offensive content, any of which could harm our operating results.

http://investor.activision.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1047469-10-1649


lol, any lawsuit based on that would be won by Blizzard easily. ISPs, Server hosters, and forum hosters are all not responsible for the non endorsed content of their service. Otherwise some random dude could post something on TL and we would be responsible for it. Same goes for Battle.net. It would be an easy win.



Lets look at the facts

Fact 1: Activision views chat features as a significant investment risk factor.

Fact 2: Starcraft 2 will not feature chat channels.

Fact 3: At some point in the future chat rooms devoted to specific subjects may be implemented.


Which is half of what I was saying 2-3 pages ago that people were flipping out about. A lot of people here that work in mid-to-large companies know far too well about Risk Management. For better or worse it's the mantra that a lot of firms use in their development. All things being equal, it would take a lot of resources to mitigate the potential risks of public chat channels.

All things are not equal in this case, and it's really important for there to be chat channels, but it's a non-trivial add in this case.

It wouldn't take "a lot of resources to mitigate the potential risks of public chat channels". It would take a single splash screen that says "ERSB RATING MAY NOT APPLY TO ONLINE PLAY" and bam, you're done.
The number you have dialed is out of porkchops.
DTWolfwood
Profile Joined May 2010
38 Posts
June 01 2010 14:45 GMT
#1879
i have to admit, i am finding myself a lot lonelier in SC2 than i did in SC.

Guess you don't know what your missing till you lose it
No its not Dark Templar
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-01 15:50:17
June 01 2010 15:48 GMT
#1880
From the recent SCL iNcontroL interview

iNcontroL:
I think that where the ladder fails, and I use that word in its literal sense, meaning I think it will be a complete failure if it remains the same, is with channels. I think the current system that we see with Battle.net is extremely lonely. It's very hard to socialize. It makes the game feels very void of anything. You know the only thing that keeps me going through it is that I've sit on Ventrilo with my team and we joke around and talk all day. But if i didn't have that, I don't know if I would be able to enjoy multiple hours on Battle.net 2 where it seems like you're alone. And you play these games against people that you know, don't necessarily care for you and every once in a while you hit a friend, but even that's very rare.


http://sclegacy.com/interviews/12-esports/714-scl-interviews-incontrol



When famous pro gamers feel lonely on Battlenet you know you have a problem
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Prev 1 92 93 94 95 96 116 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 33m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 238
Nina 135
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 33456
Hyuk 1262
Shuttle 1007
actioN 303
Leta 173
ToSsGirL 96
Larva 46
Sacsri 39
Hm[arnc] 36
Dewaltoss 31
[ Show more ]
Yoon 27
Bale 18
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
Britney 0
Dota 2
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 809
Other Games
WinterStarcraft532
C9.Mang0353
Sick247
RuFF_SC262
amsayoshi5
NotJumperer3
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream135
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1844
• Stunt1002
Upcoming Events
HomeStory Cup
3h 33m
Replay Cast
16h 33m
HomeStory Cup
1d 3h
OSC
1d 5h
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S3: W1
Douyu Cup 2026
Murky Cup 2026

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
SCTL 2026 Spring
HSC XXIX
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
Escore Tournament S3: W2
ASL Season 22:Wild Card Qualifier
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E3
Eternal Conflict S2 E2
Heroes Pulsing #3
Eternal Conflict S2 E1
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.