| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
cloudJR
United States266 Posts
On April 23 2010 06:14 KolosoK wrote: I heard that some people are stuck in an update loop. I'm now one of those people. Is there a fix? I just re-downloaded the software and it's adding the patch right now. I'll let you know if it works once it finishes | ||
|
RatherGood
Canada147 Posts
| ||
|
DrSmoke
United States175 Posts
I checked tl when I first woke up today, so I just didn't start it yet. I've heard that you should close the launcher out of the loop, and that they are working on a fix. Other than that, the bnet servers are still down anyway. (i think) | ||
|
zergporn
Estonia156 Posts
Not mention annoying long cast itself. (which is unchanged) | ||
|
Tyrannon
Germany113 Posts
One Tankbuff i can imagine. 300HP/2 Armor(=twice the HP/+1Armor) for Tank but Double Dmg on Sieged Tanks. No Lift off by the Phonix if Sieged. And a little bit lowered Firing Rate for unsieged Tanks because of the increased HP. | ||
|
CptBluebear
United Kingdom19 Posts
| ||
|
btlyger
United States470 Posts
On April 23 2010 06:14 KolosoK wrote: I heard that some people are stuck in an update loop. I'm now one of those people. Is there a fix? "If all else fails and you have a StarCraft II Beta\Versions\Base15097 folder, you do have the patch that we released today. You can use the StarCraft II Beta\Support\SC2Switcher.exe to start the game but Battle.net is currently down for the ladder reset." From the sc2 beta support thread http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=24401903745&sid=5000&pageNo=1#15 | ||
|
AmstAff
Germany949 Posts
On April 23 2010 06:11 Integra wrote: You don't because. 1) Then you would had killed any resource efficient counter Terran has which is the banshee 2) Unlike what most Protoss players believes, you guys actually have to make more than 1 unit during the whole damn game, yea yea I know you are jealous at Zerg since they only need to use 2 units but that's life! rofl you serious? as i mentioned i (and i think every other p that plays platinum) build immortals just to counter mass marauders/roaches. immortals arent as effective as other P units in killing other units. they are just the only viable unit against roaches and against early marauder(ghost) pushes unless you went for a 4 warpgate build. | ||
|
fspikec
United States30 Posts
| ||
|
omeg
Poland19 Posts
On April 23 2010 06:17 CptBluebear wrote: Why were metalopolis and lost temple removed? Only in 2v2 ladder, no? | ||
|
GX.Sigma
United States49 Posts
Which is it? Has it been increased from 1.6 to 1.85 or has it been "decreased" as they say? Does it hit faster or slower? Augh! | ||
|
MorroW
Sweden3522 Posts
On April 23 2010 06:16 Tyrannon wrote: @Morrow One Tankbuff i see viable would be. 300HP/2 Armor(=twice the HP/+1Armor) for Tank but Double Dmg on Sieged Tanks. No Lift off by the Phonix if Sieged. And a little bit lowered Firing Rate for unsieged Tanks because of the increased HP. ye that that would make zvt go down in the rofl On April 23 2010 06:18 GX.Sigma wrote: "Spine Crawler - Attack period decreased from 1.6 to 1.85." Um, that's not a decrease.... Which is it? Has it been increased from 1.6 to 1.85 or has it been "decreased" as they say? Does it hit faster or slower? Augh! also the number is the cooldown (cd). it has to wait this period before it can attack again. i dont know why blizzard is against writing cool down since they basically invented that word xd | ||
|
HOLYCOWBATMAN
Canada51 Posts
| ||
|
Bibdy
United States3481 Posts
On April 23 2010 06:17 CptBluebear wrote: Why were metalopolis and lost temple removed? Probably because they've done enough testing on them and they're happy. Now they want you to suffer some more Twilight Fortress and a bunch of other crazy maps! | ||
|
Canukian
Canada69 Posts
On April 23 2010 06:10 TheLittleOne wrote: I.... I dont understand the infestor buff. It felt like the strongest caster unit in the game already. :o Bye bye Thors! No more Thor drops on zerg! | ||
|
wthre
Germany46 Posts
| ||
|
Bibdy
United States3481 Posts
On April 23 2010 06:18 GX.Sigma wrote: "Spine Crawler - Attack period decreased from 1.6 to 1.85." Um, that's not a decrease.... Which is it? Has it been increased from 1.6 to 1.85 or has it been "decreased" as they say? Does it hit faster or slower? Augh! That'd be a nerf. | ||
|
NisseC
Sweden2 Posts
The CS boost, dunno really if it was necessary I felt it havn't affected my much. This immortal build time increase is ofc. a huge nerf but I havn't had the problem that people have had with immortals. I think i can fend them of pretty good with my 2/3 rax early ghost build. (PM me if you'd like some reps from Patch 8). Other then that it will be interesting to see the change at scrap station since I thought it was a terrible map for terran with such a hard defended expansion. Aswell when attacking it will be easier for terran with a one was attack route. | ||
|
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
On April 23 2010 06:18 GX.Sigma wrote: "Spine Crawler - Attack period decreased from 1.6 to 1.85." Um, that's not a decrease.... Which is it? Has it been increased from 1.6 to 1.85 or has it been "decreased" as they say? Does it hit faster or slower? Augh! They are called spine ticklers for a reason. So i hope they have decreased the attack cooldown, if they haven't then Zerg won't be making many of them in the future. | ||
|
zergporn
Estonia156 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
The PondCast
OSC
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
RSL Revival
BSL
GSL
Cure vs herO
SHIN vs Maru
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
