• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:20
CEST 14:20
KST 21:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202559RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings What tournaments are world championships? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Dewalt's Show Matches in China BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Post Pic of your Favorite Food! The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 921 users

[D] Marauders - Page 24

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 34 Next All
Crisium
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States1618 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-06 02:01:53
April 06 2010 02:01 GMT
#461
On April 06 2010 10:24 Daerthalus wrote:
I'm still very confused as to why Marauder NEED a slow effect? What specific match up does this matter in?

Vs Banelings?


Yes.
Broodwar and Stork forever! List of BW players with most Ro16, Ro8: http://tinyurl.com/BWRo16-Ro8
Thereisnosaurus
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Australia1822 Posts
April 06 2010 02:01 GMT
#462
I think the issue is a relatively simple one. Marauders at the moment are too like tanks, meaning that transitioning out of them makes no sense, given the investment one must commit to them early game, it's far easier to just keep going with them and getting upgrades/medivac etc. the presence of immortals in tvp makes going for tanks less likely. I honestly think the whole thing can be saved by slight cost/ hp adjustments. Take the marauder down to 75/25 and 85 HP, perhaps increasing their damage a little even further to 12/+10. Up the tank to 175 HP and leave cost as is. This makes massing marauders a lot more dangerous vs toss as immortals two hit them, and tanks a bit better as it takes 4 immortal hits to roll, making the differential 2/4 instead of the current 3/3. Marauders thus become a very good surgical counter to armor, excellent drop harass units, very good early game counters to unsupported roaches or zealots and so forth due to their ability to micro to avoid being hit, but significantly worse as line units late game, being 2hit by +1 upgraded collossi, more vulnerable to storms, hydras. mutas and banelings. admittedly this makes tanks the 'tank' unit of the terran army, but I personally would love to see tanks actually being used *as* tanks instead of artillery 100% of the time.
Poisonous Sheep counter Hydras
kidcrash
Profile Joined September 2009
United States620 Posts
April 06 2010 02:20 GMT
#463
+ Show Spoiler +
[QUOTE]On April 06 2010 08:27 228zip wrote:


Personnally, I would remove the slow. If you make it an upgrade, you give the opponent a chance to have air units or immortals by the time the upgrade is done. So, once the marauder doesn't counter zerglings and zealots, who can do the job ? Marines will die if they are in melee; getting them behind a wall or in a bunker will make them superior though. However that restricts the terran player terribly : he lets total control of the map to his opponent and can't expand without being obliterated.
/QUOTE]


Giving your opponent a chance to get air units and immortals is exactly what we need to solve this problem. 100/100 upgrade at the tech lab for the slow effect. Forces tension between 2nd tech lab and stim build timings. Forces the terran to make more choices and we all know this is never a bad thing. I don't think it's giving up map control as much as its giving protoss an equal playing field for it. To compensate for the extra out of pocket cost we could take 25 gas off the siege tank cost.

The terran would have to think to himself if he is ready to commit to marauders by researching it, or if he is just going to use them to hold himself over until factory units. If he does decide to commit to it, he can still switch tech to siege tank at any time. With the 25 gas decrease it will even out the gas you spent on slow effect.

Now some might argue that all terrans would still bite the bullet, take the 100/100 sacrifice every time, and we'd be back to the same mindless marauder spam as before. Essentially they would be right, this would not fix mid/late game whatsoever and there would be little reason for terrans to mass anything besides marauder. This means we need to take 25 hp off the marauder and give siege tank 180.

I do agree buffing the siege tanks hp will not change the fact that immortals completely own it. Increasing its effectiveness against other units will compensate for that. The immortal is just one unit that hard counters the tank, I think we might just have to deal with that fact. Increasing its durability and making it a little more cost appealing will compensate enough to ignore how bad the immortal counters it. Just guard your tanks from the immortals, in SC1 we had to guard our tanks but the effectiveness it gave us in return made it well worth it.

Some would argue that a 150/100 siege tank with 180 hp might be a little too powerful vs zerg. You have to remember the terran is taking a huge hit on the marauder at this point.


I would also like to add that I just don't like the idea of adding a special exception for zerglings and zealots. For one, I can't picture blizzard doing it. Also doesn't seem like a very creative solution. It's like saying "storm is too effective against zerglings, so we will just make it not affect them at all whatsoever".
xnub
Profile Joined August 2009
Canada610 Posts
April 06 2010 03:05 GMT
#464
On April 06 2010 10:24 Daerthalus wrote:
I'm still very confused as to why Marauder NEED a slow effect? What specific match up does this matter in?

I'd like to see reasonable comments. Not I need it cuz my unitz are teh suck. Or cuz I need it cuz I like PWNING NOOBS! If the issue is that your other units are bad, ask for a buff to them,

TvP
VS Zealots? Make more Marines?
Vs Stalkers? Marauders cost less and deal more damage to stalker than stalkers deal them?
Vs Robo units? I rarely care or fine slow even makes much of a difference vs Robo units. Colossi have super range and Immortals deal sick damage to Marauders.

TvZ
Vs Zergling? Make some Marines, Marines eat Lings for breakfast
Vs Banelings? Why would Zerg build banelings to counter Mass Marauders? Marauders are not light.
Vs Hydras? You shouldn't be making Marauders to beat hydras, Siege tanks are far superior.
Vs Ultralisks? You can't even slow them, so makes no difference.

All Matchups
Vs T2 Armor? You already have favourable 100% Damage bonus vs Armor do you rly need a slow?



its a cool ability that gives them a bit more use and makes them none boreing. just like stalker blink, zealot charge, roachs bury and move when under ground. Its just a cool spell ability from keeping units a little more unque and cool.

some cool things slow does very good for stopping fast moveing harsment units. ( Hellions, reapers ) Good at getting extra kills from retreating enemys a few extra stalkers hydras w/e. Good vs slowing a HT or ghost that gets caught by a scan and trys to run out of it. Also at slowing running probs from drops or attacks. More to but slow is a cool little thing. Really just should not work on melee units /shrug
Loving the beta !! Weeeeeeee
ZenDeX
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Philippines2916 Posts
April 06 2010 03:23 GMT
#465
On April 06 2010 12:05 xnub wrote:
its a cool ability that gives them a bit more use and makes them none boreing. just like stalker blink, zealot charge, roachs bury and move when under ground. Its just a cool spell ability from keeping units a little more unque and cool.

You have a shallow way of thinking if you close it as something that makes unit cool.
Stalker blink is there to compensate for the lack of range upgrade and adds mobility to the unit.
Zealot charge is simply the new Speedlot upgrade.
The roach started out as a tank + harass unit in the drawing board hence it has rapid regen and tunneling claws.

LET'S GET BACK ON TOPIC! Why does the marauder need a slow?
On April 06 2010 12:05 xnub wrote:
some cool things slow does very good for stopping fast moveing harsment units. ( Hellions, reapers ) Good at getting extra kills from retreating enemys a few extra stalkers hydras w/e. Good vs slowing a HT or ghost that gets caught by a scan and trys to run out of it. Also at slowing running probs from drops or attacks. More to but slow is a cool little thing. Really just should not work on melee units /shrug

This doesn't make sense. The Marauder has the passive slow attack solely for the purpose of getting a few extra kills? That's a tad too one-sided and boring IMO and it doesn't add depth to strategy.

If it was solely for the purpose of preventing your opponent's army from touching yours it would make a lot more sense seeing as a standard Terran army consists mainly of ranged units.
xnub
Profile Joined August 2009
Canada610 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-06 04:00:39
April 06 2010 03:50 GMT
#466
You have a shallow way of thinking if you close it as something that makes unit cool.
Stalker blink is there to compensate for the lack of range upgrade and adds mobility to the unit.
Zealot charge is simply the new Speedlot upgrade.
The roach started out as a tank + harass unit in the drawing board hence it has rapid regen and tunneling claws.

LET'S GET BACK ON TOPIC! Why does the marauder need a slow?


cool and usefull abilities thats what blizzard was going for cool abilities that could be fun to use or see and also usefull in the game. For the stalker blink what does it do ? Can be used to chase down units get extra kills and micro to avoid loseing units just like slow on marauders. Then you have the bonus of it being good for getting around the map and useing it for harsment. Same with roachs extra regen under ground cool for mirco to keep them alive and also they can get into postion to fight really easy. Can also be very good for harsment.


This doesn't make sense. The Marauder has the passive slow attack solely for the purpose of getting a few extra kills? That's a tad too one-sided and boring IMO and it doesn't add depth to strategy.


There was more reason then just getting those extras kills and thats big. Makes the enemy think twice about attacking you if he know he is going to lose even more units if he try to break off. Read it agian a hellion or reaper comes into your base trying to kite your guys around as they do as much dmg as they can. Slow kills that off right away no speed and they are GG. Not to mention you can still kite roachs sentrys and workers. Also slow is good for messing with the postion of there units hit move a side back watch them take twice as long to get back into a good formation.


If it was solely for the purpose of preventing your opponent's army from touching yours it would make a lot more sense seeing as a standard Terran army consists mainly of ranged units.




See thats the problem right now it is preventing your opponent's army from touching you with any melee units. Thats what is making the marauder imb. the melee units were the things made by blizzard to counter the marauder early game. They don't cause of it and micro and slow.

Loving the beta !! Weeeeeeee
brocoli
Profile Joined February 2010
Brazil264 Posts
April 06 2010 04:09 GMT
#467
Marauder Tweak Suggestion:

Attack: nerf bonus vs. armored from 10(+1) to +5(+1).
(note: Marauder attack cooldown : 1.5 )

Concussive Shells Preparation (replaces Concussive Shells)

Single-Target Autocast with 4.5 cooldown (becomes the Marauder's attack when available).
(Autocast can be turned off)

Description:

The marauder's attack gains a slowing effect on opponents, and becomes stronger against heavily armored targets once fully charged. If the marauder attacks with an unprepared shell, the cooldown is restarted without the activation of this ability. Massive units are immune to the slow effect.

Attack bonus: +5 vs. armored.
Slow: 60%~75% (current Marauder: 50%)


Research: "Nanomachine AI Optimisation : Speed" / Whatever name that looks cool

Researched at: Techlab attached to Barracks if Quality is researched

Drastically reduces production time of concussive shells on marauder weapons, at the cost of some of the slowing effect.
Cooldown reduced from 4.5 to 3.0, Slow effect reduced from 60%~75% to 45%~60%

Cost: 100/100. Research time: fast.


Research: "Nanomachine AI Optimisation : Quality" / Whatever name that looks cool

Researched at: Techlab attached to Barracks if Speed is researched
(marauders start with this researched)

Improves the quality of marauder's concussive shells, at the cost of production time.
Cooldown worsened from 3.0 to 4.5, Slow effect buffed from 45%~60% to 60%~75%

Cost: 100/100. Research time: slower.


Idea behind all this:

Make the Marauder more interesting overall. Keep its relation to units like Roaches Immortals or Infestors, but add some micro to these matchups. Also exploit the marauder's slow effect more as a support unit, by making it more sensible but harder/more expensive to use.

Also give them two "Weapons refit"-like upgrades, which will swap their role in the army, for more flexible builds, but once the modes are changed, you'll need to make the time lost and resources spent in the swap worth it.

This tweak won't affect Marauders vs. Immortals DPS-wise since the damage is 10 under hardened shields anyway. It will make kiting Immortals more effective, should the player micro correctly.

Even with nerfed damage vs. Roaches, the improved slow effect on the already slow roaches will balance themselves out even in "Quality" mode.

You can still pick Infestors with 3x Marauders since their first shot is as strong as before, and the second is still strong enough to kill. (And the improved slow may add an opportunity for a third shot)

Generally, the Marauder's DPS is weaker, but they kite more easily for full damage with the "Speed" mode. With the "Quality" mode, they fit more as support units.
xnub
Profile Joined August 2009
Canada610 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-06 04:26:48
April 06 2010 04:20 GMT
#468
On April 06 2010 13:09 brocoli wrote:
Marauder Tweak Suggestion:

Attack: nerf bonus vs. armored from 10(+1) to +5(+1).
(note: Marauder attack cooldown : 1.5 )

Concussive Shells Preparation (replaces Concussive Shells)

Single-Target Autocast with 4.5 cooldown (becomes the Marauder's attack when available).
(Autocast can be turned off)

Description:

The marauder's attack gains a slowing effect on opponents, and becomes stronger against heavily armored targets once fully charged. If the marauder attacks with an unprepared shell, the cooldown is restarted without the activation of this ability. Massive units are immune to the slow effect.

Attack bonus: +5 vs. armored.
Slow: 60%~75% (current Marauder: 50%)


Research: "Nanomachine AI Optimisation : Speed" / Whatever name that looks cool

Researched at: Techlab attached to Barracks if Quality is researched

Drastically reduces production time of concussive shells on marauder weapons, at the cost of some of the slowing effect.
Cooldown reduced from 4.5 to 3.0, Slow effect reduced from 60%~75% to 45%~60%

Cost: 100/100. Research time: fast.


Research: "Nanomachine AI Optimisation : Quality" / Whatever name that looks cool

Researched at: Techlab attached to Barracks if Speed is researched
(marauders start with this researched)

Improves the quality of marauder's concussive shells, at the cost of production time.
Cooldown worsened from 3.0 to 4.5, Slow effect buffed from 45%~60% to 60%~75%

Cost: 100/100. Research time: slower.


Idea behind all this:

Make the Marauder more interesting overall. Keep its relation to units like Roaches Immortals or Infestors, but add some micro to these matchups. Also exploit the marauder's slow effect more as a support unit, by making it more sensible but harder/more expensive to use.

Also give them two "Weapons refit"-like upgrades, which will swap their role in the army, for more flexible builds, but once the modes are changed, you'll need to make the time lost and resources spent in the swap worth it.

This tweak won't affect Marauders vs. Immortals DPS-wise since the damage is 10 under hardened shields anyway. It will make kiting Immortals more effective, should the player micro correctly.

Even with nerfed damage vs. Roaches, the improved slow effect on the already slow roaches will balance themselves out even in "Quality" mode.

You can still pick Infestors with 3x Marauders since their first shot is as strong as before, and the second is still strong enough to kill. (And the improved slow may add an opportunity for a third shot)

Generally, the Marauder's DPS is weaker, but they kite more easily for full damage with the "Speed" mode. With the "Quality" mode, they fit more as support units.



Still does not fix the real problem with marauders. Still will just mass them and when you get 4 - 6 go attack the toss base and watch as can't really def himself. Plus its really confusing and complicated. Altho i do like that you are trying to make them even more interesting as a unit. But think they are plenty interesting . Maybe not as much as roachs or stalkers but eh /shrug got stim to so makes up for it.

Also would effect end game to much where really tvp and tvz is really getting close to balance as it is.

oh also its 10 + 10 for armored so 5 + 10 was what you were looking for ?
Loving the beta !! Weeeeeeee
ZenDeX
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Philippines2916 Posts
April 06 2010 05:22 GMT
#469
On April 06 2010 12:50 xnub wrote:
See thats the problem right now it is preventing your opponent's army from touching you with any melee units. Thats what is making the marauder imb. the melee units were the things made by blizzard to counter the marauder early game. They don't cause of it and micro and slow.

I have thought of something better: Zealots being immune to the slow effect while charging.
xnub
Profile Joined August 2009
Canada610 Posts
April 06 2010 08:03 GMT
#470
On April 06 2010 14:22 lolaloc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2010 12:50 xnub wrote:
See thats the problem right now it is preventing your opponent's army from touching you with any melee units. Thats what is making the marauder imb. the melee units were the things made by blizzard to counter the marauder early game. They don't cause of it and micro and slow.

I have thought of something better: Zealots being immune to the slow effect while charging.


doesn;t fix early game where they are op
Loving the beta !! Weeeeeeee
abrasion
Profile Joined April 2010
Australia722 Posts
April 06 2010 08:33 GMT
#471
On April 06 2010 03:09 xnub wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 05 2010 19:09 Paladia wrote:
Any reason why the Marauder easily beats Stalkers in 1v1 (and even more so in bigger fights) when they cost like half of what the Stalker does, yet they can be healed, stimmed, not EMPed and has a passive slow attack?

Don't come with something like "Stalker can attack air so its balanced" since there is never anything the Marauder would ever even want to attack in air in TvP, as the Protoss air is extremely lackluster. So even if they could attack air as well there would be no difference for the balance of the match-up.

As Stalker, Roach and Marauder are way too similar in design I would suggest making the Marauder melee (with some altered stats), that would balance it and make the tier 1.5 more unique.


Marauders are the counter to stalkers .... it has been said so by blizzard deal with it ?

Also blink harsment by stalkers is crazy and has sooo much potential. You can blink anywhere on map you have a obs.

melee unit i don't even know what to say to that LOL



How can you actually seriously propose Stalkers with blink vs Marauders? The build time for the council and the research time, even with chrono boost is ridiculous let alone the costs too.

derpmods
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
April 06 2010 09:16 GMT
#472
Okay, after much discussion I feel that the only issue with Marauders is the strength they offer so early on in the game. Specifically, Marauder rushes and what not. I have no issues with Medivac/Marauder/Ghost being the core of Terran armies, Protoss have enough stuff to make it an even fight later on. Thus, I think that the best way to balance the Marauder (and potentially Reaper) is re-introduce the Merc Haven (or Academy) and make that building a prerequisite for building the Marauder. Perhaps adding slow as an upgrade there would be good too (as well as reaper speed, if you want to put the reaper there too). This slows down how fast Terran can get the Marauder and hence makes Rushes significantly weaker. It adds an extra tech building making them less attractive in TvZ (making Mech more favorable) and should iron out any problems in TvP.

Thoughts?
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
jeppew
Profile Joined April 2009
Sweden471 Posts
April 06 2010 09:23 GMT
#473
On April 06 2010 18:16 Plexa wrote:
Okay, after much discussion I feel that the only issue with Marauders is the strength they offer so early on in the game. Specifically, Marauder rushes and what not. I have no issues with Medivac/Marauder/Ghost being the core of Terran armies, Protoss have enough stuff to make it an even fight later on. Thus, I think that the best way to balance the Marauder (and potentially Reaper) is re-introduce the Merc Haven (or Academy) and make that building a prerequisite for building the Marauder. Perhaps adding slow as an upgrade there would be good too (as well as reaper speed, if you want to put the reaper there too). This slows down how fast Terran can get the Marauder and hence makes Rushes significantly weaker. It adds an extra tech building making them less attractive in TvZ (making Mech more favorable) and should iron out any problems in TvP.

Thoughts?


making the slow an upgrade at the tech lab should be sufficent, the cost + time would prevent the marauder cheese rush.
Tears.Of.The.Moon
Profile Joined September 2009
Slovenia715 Posts
April 06 2010 09:31 GMT
#474
Instead of the marauder losing it's pasive ability , or it being an reserach, the current pasive stun ability should be replaced by a new one.

The marauder could get a new pasive ability (instead of the current stun one) that would make it's atacks completely ignore enemy units armor ( an armor pircing atack or something, inspired by those antiarmor HEAT shells that tanks use).- would fit much more with an unit heavily specialied against armored targets gameplayvise, and would make much more sense than an stun ability lorevise ( lol how do you stun tanks and robots )

And they could give the stun ability to some other unit, a unit much more deserving of it, but that is for an another thread
ヽ(´ー`)┌
jeppew
Profile Joined April 2009
Sweden471 Posts
April 06 2010 10:01 GMT
#475
On April 06 2010 18:31 PerfectTear wrote:
Instead of the marauder losing it's pasive ability , or it being an reserach, the current pasive stun ability should be replaced by a new one.

The marauder could get a new pasive ability (instead of the current stun one) that would make it's atacks completely ignore enemy units armor ( an armor pircing atack or something, inspired by those antiarmor HEAT shells that tanks use).- would fit much more with an unit heavily specialied against armored targets gameplayvise, and would make much more sense than an stun ability lorevise ( lol how do you stun tanks and robots )

And they could give the stun ability to some other unit, a unit much more deserving of it, but that is for an another thread

you do realise that in the very best case scenario, this is a +6 damage and nothing more?
ZenDeX
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Philippines2916 Posts
April 06 2010 10:35 GMT
#476
On April 06 2010 18:16 Plexa wrote:
Okay, after much discussion I feel that the only issue with Marauders is the strength they offer so early on in the game. Specifically, Marauder rushes and what not. I have no issues with Medivac/Marauder/Ghost being the core of Terran armies, Protoss have enough stuff to make it an even fight later on. Thus, I think that the best way to balance the Marauder (and potentially Reaper) is re-introduce the Merc Haven (or Academy) and make that building a prerequisite for building the Marauder. Perhaps adding slow as an upgrade there would be good too (as well as reaper speed, if you want to put the reaper there too). This slows down how fast Terran can get the Marauder and hence makes Rushes significantly weaker. It adds an extra tech building making them less attractive in TvZ (making Mech more favorable) and should iron out any problems in TvP.

Thoughts?

I am curious on how it would work out with a Reactor add-on.
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
April 06 2010 10:36 GMT
#477
On April 06 2010 19:35 lolaloc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2010 18:16 Plexa wrote:
Okay, after much discussion I feel that the only issue with Marauders is the strength they offer so early on in the game. Specifically, Marauder rushes and what not. I have no issues with Medivac/Marauder/Ghost being the core of Terran armies, Protoss have enough stuff to make it an even fight later on. Thus, I think that the best way to balance the Marauder (and potentially Reaper) is re-introduce the Merc Haven (or Academy) and make that building a prerequisite for building the Marauder. Perhaps adding slow as an upgrade there would be good too (as well as reaper speed, if you want to put the reaper there too). This slows down how fast Terran can get the Marauder and hence makes Rushes significantly weaker. It adds an extra tech building making them less attractive in TvZ (making Mech more favorable) and should iron out any problems in TvP.

Thoughts?

I am curious on how it would work out with a Reactor add-on.

The same as it does for the Ghost. Tech lab + Tech building
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
ZenDeX
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Philippines2916 Posts
April 06 2010 10:38 GMT
#478
On April 06 2010 19:36 Plexa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2010 19:35 lolaloc wrote:
On April 06 2010 18:16 Plexa wrote:
Okay, after much discussion I feel that the only issue with Marauders is the strength they offer so early on in the game. Specifically, Marauder rushes and what not. I have no issues with Medivac/Marauder/Ghost being the core of Terran armies, Protoss have enough stuff to make it an even fight later on. Thus, I think that the best way to balance the Marauder (and potentially Reaper) is re-introduce the Merc Haven (or Academy) and make that building a prerequisite for building the Marauder. Perhaps adding slow as an upgrade there would be good too (as well as reaper speed, if you want to put the reaper there too). This slows down how fast Terran can get the Marauder and hence makes Rushes significantly weaker. It adds an extra tech building making them less attractive in TvZ (making Mech more favorable) and should iron out any problems in TvP.

Thoughts?

I am curious on how it would work out with a Reactor add-on.

The same as it does for the Ghost. Tech lab + Tech building

Errr.. I was thinking along the lines of having the ability to massing it more quickly.
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
April 06 2010 10:40 GMT
#479
On April 06 2010 19:38 lolaloc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2010 19:36 Plexa wrote:
On April 06 2010 19:35 lolaloc wrote:
On April 06 2010 18:16 Plexa wrote:
Okay, after much discussion I feel that the only issue with Marauders is the strength they offer so early on in the game. Specifically, Marauder rushes and what not. I have no issues with Medivac/Marauder/Ghost being the core of Terran armies, Protoss have enough stuff to make it an even fight later on. Thus, I think that the best way to balance the Marauder (and potentially Reaper) is re-introduce the Merc Haven (or Academy) and make that building a prerequisite for building the Marauder. Perhaps adding slow as an upgrade there would be good too (as well as reaper speed, if you want to put the reaper there too). This slows down how fast Terran can get the Marauder and hence makes Rushes significantly weaker. It adds an extra tech building making them less attractive in TvZ (making Mech more favorable) and should iron out any problems in TvP.

Thoughts?

I am curious on how it would work out with a Reactor add-on.

The same as it does for the Ghost. Tech lab + Tech building

Errr.. I was thinking along the lines of having the ability to massing it more quickly.

Oh mmm I'm not sure heh. I don't think it would work out too well because you'd still have the ability to rush them unless the build time on the merc haven was long. If the build time was sufficiently long I don't think it would impact things too greatly.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Daerthalus
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada73 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-06 11:07:21
April 06 2010 11:04 GMT
#480
I like that idea. Increase the tech cost to gain access to marauders also enables them to have their slow as an upgrade.

I still think a viable solution would be to have the Marauders gain an ability that "roots" them or slows them, but enables their slow. It would have no cast time (unlike siege) but a cooldown to prevent i from being toggled on and off between attacks.

Marauder Mode (5-10s CD)
Slows the Marauder by 50%, but grants their attacks a 50% slow.
**Numbers up to discussion**

Essentially they'd be unable to kite zealots with charge or avoid being boxed in by sentrys but would still be able to slow Banelings. Banelings themselves are not that disastrous vs Mass Rauders, but they do chew threw marines, so the slow would enable marines to move away, or burn the incoming Banelings down.

Seem far more viable than a 100.100 research or some new ability + 2 customizations. It's simply a change to an ability.

Thoughts?
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 34 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
11:00
2025 - Final Day
Serral vs CureLIVE!
Solar vs Classic
EWC_Arena13359
ComeBackTV 3228
TaKeTV 705
Hui .585
Fuzer 345
3DClanTV 313
JimRising 265
Rex248
EnkiAlexander 169
CranKy Ducklings147
Reynor125
BRAT_OK 66
SpeCial44
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena13359
Hui .585
Fuzer 345
JimRising 265
Rex 248
Reynor 125
BRAT_OK 66
ProTech65
SpeCial 44
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 8462
Nal_rA 3709
Shuttle 2121
BeSt 1404
Bisu 1240
EffOrt 553
Larva 457
Barracks 451
Stork 381
actioN 322
[ Show more ]
Mini 234
Hyun 184
Snow 175
Soma 163
ggaemo 160
Soulkey 124
TY 114
ZerO 71
Rush 52
Backho 50
Sharp 35
sorry 32
sSak 31
Dewaltoss 25
JYJ25
Icarus 16
Shinee 15
Sacsri 13
soO 12
Terrorterran 2
Stormgate
BeoMulf40
Dota 2
Gorgc3213
XcaliburYe235
KheZu40
Counter-Strike
fl0m1285
sgares195
Other Games
gofns7230
singsing2043
B2W.Neo1194
Beastyqt675
QueenE85
ArmadaUGS74
KnowMe60
ZerO(Twitch)9
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV481
League of Legends
• Nemesis3915
Upcoming Events
OSC
1h 40m
CranKy Ducklings
21h 40m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 1h
CSO Cup
1d 3h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 5h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 20h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
4 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.