• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:04
CET 19:04
KST 03:04
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT28Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0258LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)46Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2
StarCraft 2
General
Buy high-quality undetectable fake counterfeit USD Buy Weed In Sydney telegram @greenplug420 Terran AddOns placement How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SEL Doubles (SC Evo Bimonthly) WardiTV Team League Season 10
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare
Brood War
General
Recent recommended BW games It's March 3rd Soma Explains: JD's Unrelenting Aggro vs FlaSh TvZ is the most complete match up BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues BWCL Season 64 Announcement The Casual Games of the Week Thread [LIVE] [S:21] ASL Season Open Day 1
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Online Quake Live Config Editor Tool Diablo 2 thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Just Watchers: Why Some Only…
TrAiDoS
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2768 users

Beta Balance Update #10 - Page 35

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
1835 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 33 34 35 36 37 92 Next
xxjcdentonxx
Profile Joined November 2012
Canada163 Posts
December 19 2012 04:07 GMT
#681
I had gotten the impression that some people on the TL forums believed that a Goliath-like unit would be helpful in SC2. So, I'm pretty sure this has been suggested before, and I'd like to what the consensus is on this concept. Blizzard said they were considering making the Hellbat biological (regenerable) as well as mechanical(repairable), maybe even making it separate from the Hellion. What about a biological unit riding in a mech suit, with the Hellion's ground attack, and a Goliath-like air attack. I don't know enough about Terran units to know why this isn't a good idea, but I'm curious.
"Expand or die." —Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #45
mprs
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada2933 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 04:08:57
December 19 2012 04:08 GMT
#682
On December 19 2012 12:46 nomyx wrote:
83 days left until HOTS is released.

My wishlist (please read santa)

1. Widow mine no longer hits air, but is much stronger vs ground
2. Infestor nerfs, they should be a support unit like a spellcaster should be. My favorite change would be to make fungal a 50%~ slow and a slight damage buff, but it only brings targets to 1 hp (like plague). This would promote infestors as a support unit to the zerg army, not the whole zerg army
3. Hydra / Swarm host buffs. Reverting WoL beta nerfs to the hydra would be nice
4. Tank buff. Way too many counters to the tank. 2 supply / 100 gas or 50 damage default.
5. Bunker build time decreased.


Pretty sure widow mines can't be stronger vs ground. They are already ridiculously good against ground.

I think the design of the infestor needs to be fixed. If you recall back to BW, the defiler was fucking ridiculously OP, but it fit within the game design. It was really strong defensively, so if someone had a defiler near a choke, you had the option of simply not going up that choke. I wouldn't mind the infestor being a super strong OP spell caster if it was only defensive, and its offensive capability wasn't so good. It gives options to the opponent. Right now, the infestor is either terrible at everything, or amazing at everything. I say buff it even more, but give it some form of exploitable vulnerability like slow speed or lower HP or inability to move while burrowed.

Right now it is a swiss army knife that can shoot bullets. No matter how you change it, it will either be super good or super terrible. The second zergs see it as a weaker alternative to other units, they will just build the other units. But if you give it a specific role in the game, it will be much easier to balance. Put your foot down blizzard, and say this unit is defensive. Make fungal stronger however way you want, and make it slower. That way, you can make 20 infestors and survive for ever, but you will lose offensive capability and it will end up being dead weight in the end game. So you will want many 4-5 a game to control some strategic points of the game. This way, it won't be ridiculous where building more is always better. Also, if people wanted to get offensive with them, maybe start doing some form of overload carry and stuff, kind of like how we see HerO use warpprism and HTs. At least there will be some strategy involved.
We talkin about PRACTICE
DemigodcelpH
Profile Joined August 2011
1138 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 04:10:47
December 19 2012 04:09 GMT
#683
On December 19 2012 13:08 mprs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2012 12:46 nomyx wrote:
83 days left until HOTS is released.

My wishlist (please read santa)

1. Widow mine no longer hits air, but is much stronger vs ground
2. Infestor nerfs, they should be a support unit like a spellcaster should be. My favorite change would be to make fungal a 50%~ slow and a slight damage buff, but it only brings targets to 1 hp (like plague). This would promote infestors as a support unit to the zerg army, not the whole zerg army
3. Hydra / Swarm host buffs. Reverting WoL beta nerfs to the hydra would be nice
4. Tank buff. Way too many counters to the tank. 2 supply / 100 gas or 50 damage default.
5. Bunker build time decreased.


Pretty sure widow mines can't be stronger vs ground. They are already ridiculously good against ground.

I think the design of the infestor needs to be fixed. If you recall back to BW, the defiler was fucking ridiculously OP, but it fit within the game design. It was really strong defensively, so if someone had a defiler near a choke, you had the option of simply not going up that choke. I wouldn't mind the infestor being a super strong OP spell caster if it was only defensive, and its offensive capability wasn't so good. It gives options to the opponent. Right now, the infestor is either terrible at everything, or amazing at everything. I say buff it even more, but give it some form of exploitable vulnerability like slow speed or lower HP or inability to move while burrowed.

Right now it is a swiss army knife that can shoot bullets. No matter how you change it, it will either be super good or super terrible. The second zergs see it as a weaker alternative to other units, they will just build the other units. But if you give it a specific role in the game, it will be much easier to balance. Put your foot down blizzard, and say this unit is defensive. Make fungal stronger however way you want, and make it slower. That way, you can make 20 infestors and survive for ever, but you will lose offensive capability and it will end up being dead weight in the end game. So you will want many 4-5 a game to control some strategic points of the game. This way, it won't be ridiculous where building more is always better. Also, if people wanted to get offensive with them, maybe start doing some form of overload carry and stuff, kind of like how we see HerO use warpprism and HTs. At least there will be some strategy involved.


Widow Mines are great if you like losing past 10 minutes.
bittman
Profile Joined February 2011
Australia8759 Posts
December 19 2012 04:10 GMT
#684
Wow. Such doomsayers here like this will be the last patch Blizzard ever do or that they're not totally doing an A-B test here. You know, like a good test should do.

Then again I guess people feel that Blizzard has personally screwed them over before.

I'm not concerned at all.
Mvp - Leenock - Dongraegu - MC - Gumiho - Keen - Polt - Squirtle - Jjakji - Genius - Seed - Life - sC - Dream || LG-IM - MVP - FXO
ZjiublingZ
Profile Joined September 2011
United Arab Emirates439 Posts
December 19 2012 04:13 GMT
#685
On December 19 2012 12:44 Velinath wrote:
Can we maybe look at fundamentally changing the way Fungal works? Obviously from the insane amount of balancing that Blizzard is trying to do, the basic concept of the spell simply isn't working.

On a more constructive note, I think that the Widow Mine change is a step in the right direction. I still feel like splash of 40 is pretty insane, but that may be because I'm used to watching people skimp on detection in WoL. I'm not sure if it's still one-shotting Overseers, but I would say that that's my major concern - bring an overseer to scout, mismicro once and your push is over - that would suck. That said, I think the BEST possible solution is to just remove Widow Mine targeting air units.

Also, and this probably echoes others' sentiments, but I miss the tank. Can we have some buffs to that?


Widow Mines never 1 shotted Overseers, in any HotS version, ever.

I see a lot of people, most seem to be Zergs, saying Mines shouldn't hit air units. Maybe they are right, the biggest argument seems to be Mutalisks. Using an overseer to spot for mines slows down your muta harass, and you are still vulnerable to mines in unexpected locations.

I just want people to think about what a Widow Mine is if all it does is hit ground units, after being burrowed. No cloaked units even anymore. Just single target damage and then ~33% damage to units surrounding. What we have is a unit that is almost identical to the Siege Tank in function at that point, but with less range and cloaked when "sieged". So yeah, there are still a few uses with Widow Mines if they don't hit air. Putting them in chokes, putting them in 4th/5th/6th bases, using them before detection is out for defense (only really possible vs Zerg...). But once the races have detection, if Widow Mines don't hit air, what is the point of having Widow Mines out on the map? All it takes is the races flying Detection to just be sweeping the map and clearing these units out. It's not like the races don't already have map control against Mech to do this.

If getting rid of Widow Mine's anti-air is really the solution, just scrap the unit. What a 1 dimensional unit it would be if it only hit ground.
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 04:14:37
December 19 2012 04:13 GMT
#686
ugh blizzards patch history is really one step forwards two steps backwards..

Infestor being buffed a little again is good as it was overnerfed before.. 10 range puzzles me though but is probably fine.

Blink change is crap though, it's not a good solution for the underlying problem: the msc. Blink play was dominating pvp and pvt too much but first of all this change doesn't do that much and blink is needlessly nerfed elsewhere now.

Widow mine change is awful too, the unit is moved way too much towards a AoE unit with low main damage but it should be the other way around!! Widow mine is now completely useless against protoss if it wasn't already since it doesn't even kill units in one go anymore... Really curious what the reasoning for this change was, widow mine too strong again zerg or too much of a deterrant for air play??
Widow mine with these stats is still stupid against zerg that it invalidates early pressure and muta play but is now pretty much total crap in TvP and soso in TvT. They need to completely rethink this unit and make it good against single units with low or no aoe and not let it hit air units.. Terran doesn't need the widow mine as it stands as they already have great board control against lings... They need board control agianst blink stalkers and fast units to make their mech work... These new stats make it one of the worst designs ever, it only ruins the fun of earlygame TvZ and does NOTHING positive for the gameplay of the game anymore..

Also medivac buff to fusion core is really random... I know bio needs a lategame buff that isn't available to early but this is some seriously ugly design to do that..
SheaR619
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2399 Posts
December 19 2012 04:17 GMT
#687
On December 19 2012 13:13 ZjiublingZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2012 12:44 Velinath wrote:
Can we maybe look at fundamentally changing the way Fungal works? Obviously from the insane amount of balancing that Blizzard is trying to do, the basic concept of the spell simply isn't working.

On a more constructive note, I think that the Widow Mine change is a step in the right direction. I still feel like splash of 40 is pretty insane, but that may be because I'm used to watching people skimp on detection in WoL. I'm not sure if it's still one-shotting Overseers, but I would say that that's my major concern - bring an overseer to scout, mismicro once and your push is over - that would suck. That said, I think the BEST possible solution is to just remove Widow Mine targeting air units.

Also, and this probably echoes others' sentiments, but I miss the tank. Can we have some buffs to that?


Widow Mines never 1 shotted Overseers, in any HotS version, ever.

I see a lot of people, most seem to be Zergs, saying Mines shouldn't hit air units. Maybe they are right, the biggest argument seems to be Mutalisks. Using an overseer to spot for mines slows down your muta harass, and you are still vulnerable to mines in unexpected locations.

I just want people to think about what a Widow Mine is if all it does is hit ground units, after being burrowed. No cloaked units even anymore. Just single target damage and then ~33% damage to units surrounding. What we have is a unit that is almost identical to the Siege Tank in function at that point, but with less range and cloaked when "sieged". So yeah, there are still a few uses with Widow Mines if they don't hit air. Putting them in chokes, putting them in 4th/5th/6th bases, using them before detection is out for defense (only really possible vs Zerg...). But once the races have detection, if Widow Mines don't hit air, what is the point of having Widow Mines out on the map? All it takes is the races flying Detection to just be sweeping the map and clearing these units out. It's not like the races don't already have map control against Mech to do this.

If getting rid of Widow Mine's anti-air is really the solution, just scrap the unit. What a 1 dimensional unit it would be if it only hit ground.


Honestly i thought it was fine. I saw Catz play against dragon and with good micro you can pull it off muta lisk vs mines. It increase the skill cap of the game and make zerg micro more. Honestly, zerg doesnt really have a lot of micro and I though this would create a new and richer element in the game but I guess blizzard see elsewise.
I may not be the best, but i will be some day...
mprs
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada2933 Posts
December 19 2012 04:18 GMT
#688
On December 19 2012 13:09 DemigodcelpH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2012 13:08 mprs wrote:
On December 19 2012 12:46 nomyx wrote:
83 days left until HOTS is released.

My wishlist (please read santa)

1. Widow mine no longer hits air, but is much stronger vs ground
2. Infestor nerfs, they should be a support unit like a spellcaster should be. My favorite change would be to make fungal a 50%~ slow and a slight damage buff, but it only brings targets to 1 hp (like plague). This would promote infestors as a support unit to the zerg army, not the whole zerg army
3. Hydra / Swarm host buffs. Reverting WoL beta nerfs to the hydra would be nice
4. Tank buff. Way too many counters to the tank. 2 supply / 100 gas or 50 damage default.
5. Bunker build time decreased.


Pretty sure widow mines can't be stronger vs ground. They are already ridiculously good against ground.

I think the design of the infestor needs to be fixed. If you recall back to BW, the defiler was fucking ridiculously OP, but it fit within the game design. It was really strong defensively, so if someone had a defiler near a choke, you had the option of simply not going up that choke. I wouldn't mind the infestor being a super strong OP spell caster if it was only defensive, and its offensive capability wasn't so good. It gives options to the opponent. Right now, the infestor is either terrible at everything, or amazing at everything. I say buff it even more, but give it some form of exploitable vulnerability like slow speed or lower HP or inability to move while burrowed.

Right now it is a swiss army knife that can shoot bullets. No matter how you change it, it will either be super good or super terrible. The second zergs see it as a weaker alternative to other units, they will just build the other units. But if you give it a specific role in the game, it will be much easier to balance. Put your foot down blizzard, and say this unit is defensive. Make fungal stronger however way you want, and make it slower. That way, you can make 20 infestors and survive for ever, but you will lose offensive capability and it will end up being dead weight in the end game. So you will want many 4-5 a game to control some strategic points of the game. This way, it won't be ridiculous where building more is always better. Also, if people wanted to get offensive with them, maybe start doing some form of overload carry and stuff, kind of like how we see HerO use warpprism and HTs. At least there will be some strategy involved.


Widow Mines are great if you like losing past 10 minutes.


Never said they were good to make. They are good against ground, as in they do a shit ton of damage vs. ground. As in, if you were to give them more damage, they could potentially break the game. They are bad in different ways, but not in their damage. Also, they aren't supposed to replace the marine or something. But 2-3, defensively can be extremely cost effective...
We talkin about PRACTICE
Havik_
Profile Joined November 2011
United States5585 Posts
December 19 2012 04:37 GMT
#689
I understand the Blink nerf now, but WHY THE INFESTOR BUFF?!???
"An opinion is only as good as the evidence that backs it up."- William O'Malley, S.J.
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 04:40:42
December 19 2012 04:40 GMT
#690
Looks like Blizzard saw that MMM was the main strategy for Terran vs Zerg. I really wish they would buff the ultralisk instead of the combination of nerfing terran and buffing infestor. Right now ultralisks are useless and it feels like it would had been better if they made ultras a primary counter to late game bio Terrans...
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
Wen_Jie
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia38 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 04:47:26
December 19 2012 04:47 GMT
#691
On December 19 2012 13:01 Harbinger631 wrote:
Infestor changes are good. Fast projectile, still dodgeable, weaker infested Terran.


You can't dodge the projectile considering how fast it is. If your units are already on the move, it's possible for the fungal to miss, but that's because the zerg is bad at aiming and not because you saw the projectile and deliberately moved out of the radius in the half a second it takes to hit.
Hattori_Hanzo
Profile Joined October 2010
Singapore1229 Posts
December 19 2012 04:51 GMT
#692
On December 19 2012 06:43 SheaR619 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2012 06:41 Prog455 wrote:
On December 19 2012 06:35 kcdc wrote:
So widow mines don't kill Protoss units anymore? Seems dumb.

Can't we just take away the widow mine's AA attack and just make them really strong vs ground? That gives widow mines a solid role but still lets players use drops, mutas, oracles etc without rolling the dice on having their precious harassment unit get 1-shotted by an invisible turret.


If you remove air attack from Widow Mines it is basicly just a Siege Tank.


Not necessarily, it is invisble. I would think that it would still have a role since it cheap and decent map control.

And finally, Good BYE mech TvP. Clearly they dont wana fix it lol.


Yes, it still has a role but it has been heavily nerfed, previously four well placed WM could crush a small roach/ling force, 640 dmg + 160 splash dmg. Now, it's 500 + 160 dmg, a huge 28% drop in damage.

Technically both sieged tank fire and tempests attacks are invisible as most units do not have sight of 15 range.


On December 19 2012 06:46 SheaR619 wrote:
Wait so mine dont even 1 shot protoss units and roaches now? Wow their pretty useless now lol except in a few situation but largely useless.


No, they "fixed" it so you'll need at LEAST two widow mines to "one-shot" them, 125 + 40 splash, previously 160+40.
I like the name change from unstable payload to sentinel missile?
Cauterize the area
pure.Wasted
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada4701 Posts
December 19 2012 04:58 GMT
#693
On December 19 2012 13:47 Wen_Jie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2012 13:01 Harbinger631 wrote:
Infestor changes are good. Fast projectile, still dodgeable, weaker infested Terran.


You can't dodge the projectile considering how fast it is. If your units are already on the move, it's possible for the fungal to miss, but that's because the zerg is bad at aiming and not because you saw the projectile and deliberately moved out of the radius in the half a second it takes to hit.


Bingo. A lot of the complaints over FG were about how it only took one player's skill into account (Z), and although the nerfs seem to have mollified most people, that actually hasn't changed. The spell still only takes the Z's skill into account. There's just a higher margin of error, and a lot more luck in the equation.
INna Maru-da-FanTa, Bbaby, TY Dream that I'm Flashing you
Aserrin
Profile Joined October 2011
Uruguay231 Posts
December 19 2012 05:03 GMT
#694
I think Blizzard doesn't understand that everyone's problem with Fungal isn't that it's op as hell or whatever, but that it denies micro, it actually LOWERS the skillcap while also netting the max results out of anything sans a-move.

I'm a firm believer that the best balance is achieved by raising the skillcap and rewarding the most skillful and original players. Not the ones who just f and click or a and move, disregarding anything their opponent could possibly do against it.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
December 19 2012 05:04 GMT
#695
On December 19 2012 13:58 pure.Wasted wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2012 13:47 Wen_Jie wrote:
On December 19 2012 13:01 Harbinger631 wrote:
Infestor changes are good. Fast projectile, still dodgeable, weaker infested Terran.


You can't dodge the projectile considering how fast it is. If your units are already on the move, it's possible for the fungal to miss, but that's because the zerg is bad at aiming and not because you saw the projectile and deliberately moved out of the radius in the half a second it takes to hit.


Bingo. A lot of the complaints over FG were about how it only took one player's skill into account (Z), and although the nerfs seem to have mollified most people, that actually hasn't changed. The spell still only takes the Z's skill into account. There's just a higher margin of error, and a lot more luck in the equation.


We all know they are going to nerf the speed of the missile. They are just testing different ranges. The last one was to short and slow. This one is likely to long and quick. I bet the third time they get it about right and it goes a reasonable speed and likely has around 8-9 range.

You don't known until you unleash the changes to the masses of the community.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
IronsideSC2
Profile Joined December 2012
1 Post
December 19 2012 05:08 GMT
#696
On December 19 2012 06:18 Archas wrote:
Were Infestors really so neutered by the previous Fungal Growth change that Blizzard needed to boost the range and missile speed this much?

Serious question, by the way.


Not really.

Zergs stopped making infestors just like they did last time infestors got nerfed.

What happened last time they got nerfed? Zergs stopped making them for 3-6 month or so and then remebered they still got an i win button.

Zergs just whinged cuz they cudnt hit nething with a projectile.
DoubleReed
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States4130 Posts
December 19 2012 05:13 GMT
#697
On December 19 2012 14:04 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2012 13:58 pure.Wasted wrote:
On December 19 2012 13:47 Wen_Jie wrote:
On December 19 2012 13:01 Harbinger631 wrote:
Infestor changes are good. Fast projectile, still dodgeable, weaker infested Terran.


You can't dodge the projectile considering how fast it is. If your units are already on the move, it's possible for the fungal to miss, but that's because the zerg is bad at aiming and not because you saw the projectile and deliberately moved out of the radius in the half a second it takes to hit.


Bingo. A lot of the complaints over FG were about how it only took one player's skill into account (Z), and although the nerfs seem to have mollified most people, that actually hasn't changed. The spell still only takes the Z's skill into account. There's just a higher margin of error, and a lot more luck in the equation.


We all know they are going to nerf the speed of the missile. They are just testing different ranges. The last one was to short and slow. This one is likely to long and quick. I bet the third time they get it about right and it goes a reasonable speed and likely has around 8-9 range.

You don't known until you unleash the changes to the masses of the community.


Eh, the speed is probably fine. Spellcasting is supposed to take only spellcasting's side skill into account. I think it would be kind of weird that someone could literally dodge 100% of the damage from a good fungal. Otherwise the unit is just totally unreliable.

Range 10 seems pretty silly though, and honestly kind of random to me. I'm not really sure why they did that. With the faster projectile speed, range 8 isn't all that bad...
Killcycle
Profile Joined January 2011
United States170 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 05:21:37
December 19 2012 05:20 GMT
#698
Why not reduce the radius of fungal? Seriously, that's the best place to do it without screwing with its usability - EMP/Storm are each 1.5 units, which translates to ~7 units squared of affected area; with a 2.0 radius, fungal affects ~12.5 units squared as an area. So damage aside, fungal is ~178% as effective in its primary use than the other main spells. I don't get why blizzard hasn't just gone here - I'm sure zerg would prefer instant cast back with a reduced radius over the projectile implementation currently being explored.

I mention the other spells because this is where blizzard went first when going for nerfs - rather than toy with the actual usability of the spell. And it adds more micro to its usage - not as much as a projectile, sure, but it's still harder to get the money spells off when you can't hit as much.
I fear not the shadows of glory nor the echoes of eternity; place before me a true rendition of greatness... and then we shall see.
SheaR619
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2399 Posts
December 19 2012 05:20 GMT
#699
On December 19 2012 13:40 Integra wrote:
Looks like Blizzard saw that MMM was the main strategy for Terran vs Zerg. I really wish they would buff the ultralisk instead of the combination of nerfing terran and buffing infestor. Right now ultralisks are useless and it feels like it would had been better if they made ultras a primary counter to late game bio Terrans...


your trolling right? lol cause ultralisk are really good against terran bio atm atleast from what I been seeing on stream and experience
I may not be the best, but i will be some day...
Too_MuchZerg
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
Finland2818 Posts
December 19 2012 05:21 GMT
#700
Couple ideas how to change/fix infestor:

1. Reduce speed off-creep to queen speed
2. Implement passive skill "Creep Synergy" that makes infestor lose energy when off-creep but when in creep remains as it is.
3. Make fungal work that if you cast is next to opponent you lose 5-10 hitpoints but max range you lose 40-50 hp. So forces getting them closer to your opponents forces.
Prev 1 33 34 35 36 37 92 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
17:00
#42
TKL 271
SteadfastSC243
IndyStarCraft 132
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
TKL 271
SteadfastSC 243
BRAT_OK 160
IndyStarCraft 132
JuggernautJason87
UpATreeSC 5
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 45055
Britney 28637
Bisu 958
Shuttle 680
Mini 217
Dewaltoss 145
Nal_rA 84
Rock 28
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Sacsri 7
[ Show more ]
soO 7
HiyA 7
Dota 2
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m3157
pashabiceps2545
Heroes of the Storm
MindelVK12
Other Games
gofns27203
tarik_tv7167
Grubby2863
Gorgc2652
Beastyqt752
B2W.Neo743
ceh9504
ArmadaUGS136
Hui .78
Trikslyr72
C9.Mang071
KnowMe67
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV198
WardiTV190
Counter-Strike
PGL101
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 51
• StrangeGG 46
• Reevou 1
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix7
• Michael_bg 6
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis6713
• TFBlade1197
• Shiphtur420
Other Games
• imaqtpie496
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 56m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 6h
Replay Cast
1d 14h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Ultimate Battle
3 days
Light vs ZerO
Replay Cast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS5
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
WardiTV Winter 2026
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 21: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.