EPTHotS balance update #8 - Page 82
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS |
|
wongfeihung
United States763 Posts
| ||
|
Nausea
Sweden807 Posts
| ||
|
wongfeihung
United States763 Posts
| ||
|
Breach_hu
Hungary2431 Posts
| ||
|
CakeSauc3
United States1437 Posts
On December 07 2012 04:29 Pr0wler wrote: There is no mid game timing with the medivac upgrade. You need techlab on the starport and its expensive. Unless you expect terrans to build medivacs 1 at a time and waste 150/150 on upgrade for the 2 medivacs that they will be able to get out... Great timing ! The medivac upgrade is late game change it has nothing to do with the mid game. Muta buff is actually there because the medivacs are faster now, so you need faster units to deflect drops. I'm playing zerg and I think that the zerg tears in this treat are ridiculous. Cmon guys you didnt even try it and you are already crying. The most OP thing that Z has is creep spread and the strongest macro mechanics in the game. Just play better, you'll trash those rine/tank compositions ez pz. And when T tries to do those silly 3 base 2/2 pushes, guess what? You'll have Ultras up :D and you'll just roflstomp those rines like it's nobody's birthday. Oh, and the muta speed is going to be great for harassing just a little quicker and for shutting down the faster medivacs. Hydra's will be great for drop defense, as well. Z is gonna be so freaking fun to play! Can't wait :D | ||
|
Ballack
Norway821 Posts
 | ||
|
CikaZombi
Serbia630 Posts
On December 07 2012 04:08 Tsubbi wrote: only you could ask for more terran buffs after reading these patch notes READ what he said. Avilo can be unreasonable, but this time he makes perfect sense. Yes, Terran has been buffed to hell and back. Is it too much? Is it even enough? We don't know yet. What we know is that the medivac timing which is at its strongest at 11/12 minutes isn't affected by this because of the requirement of tech lab addon and 110sec research. Like he said. Is the speed boost a buff? Of course it is and probably a too much of a buff because drops need to have some risk involved in them. But is it better to be cooldown based or energy based? Both have drawbacks and strengths. If it is only cooldown, you can use it almost without thinking, but if its energy you are less fragile if feedback is present. Not to mention, no one has probably even played on the latest patch for more than 2 games yet. | ||
|
Immaterial
Canada510 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On December 07 2012 04:00 avilo wrote: Also, the new raven change is terrible for a multitude of reasons. a) seeker missile is still inaccessible as hell in real games where there's action back and forth b) single target damage means it's going to suck vs mass brood/corruptor/infestor balls I've seen people comparing it to yamato...and it's quite obvious it's almost exactly the same. Raven honestly does not need any changes except making it a more accessible unit in terms of the time it takes to get it's abilities into play. CORVID REACTOR INCREASE RAVEN START ENERGY TO 100. Makes the raven accessible, waits 25 energy for seeker missile instead of 50, and raven has immediate use with a PDD or two auto turrets. Adding a yamato cannon to the raven is a terrible idea -_- Seems pretty good vs Ultras then. Almost like the game is drastically changing and traditional concepts are going to be changed, eh? | ||
|
Crawdad
614 Posts
On December 07 2012 04:58 Pandain wrote: Seems pretty good vs Ultras then. Almost like the game is drastically changing and traditional concepts are going to be changed, eh? Even better against BLs, Colossi, etcetera. However, I think that the main complaint is that it's redundant. BC might need changes. | ||
|
ACrow
Germany6583 Posts
No longer hits cloaked units. They listened!!! Awesome patch, I'm speechless! | ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
Seems like they always forget to patch the server when they patch the game ... ?! | ||
|
ElMeanYo
United States1032 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ahidr.jpg) User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
Sabu113
United States11047 Posts
On December 07 2012 03:33 summerloud wrote: maybe toss wont even make stalkers late game any more except for mobility/harass instead zlot/immortal/sentry backed up by temps, oracles and an air unit of your choice sounds way way sexyer anyways i wish they would make immortals cost 3 supply :o I had similar concerns but after sleeping on it, I have decided that this is a precursor to a big stalker buff. For the record the DT change is still dumb. | ||
|
SarcasmMonster
3136 Posts
Here is what you wanted to say in poll-format Poll: Who got the most EXCITING changes? Terran (173) Protoss (7) Zerg (6) 186 total votes Your vote: Who got the most EXCITING changes? | ||
|
Rampoon
United Kingdom166 Posts
| ||
|
phrenzy
United Kingdom478 Posts
| ||
|
Nausea
Sweden807 Posts
| ||
|
Crawdad
614 Posts
On December 07 2012 05:07 Rampoon wrote: ^^ that should probably have a "who needed the most exciting changes" with it.... It would have had the same results. | ||
|
Agh
United States969 Posts
On December 07 2012 04:57 Immaterial wrote: I wonder what would happen if they made DTs and HTs both unlocked by templar archives like in BW. If they want to encourage more DT usage later on in the game I think that would be a more reasonable change than reducing the cost of dark shrine. The current change is a stepping stone towards that. The current change is good. 150 less gas is absolutely huge. Combined with the widow mine not hitting cloaked you will most likely see them in the majority of PvT's. | ||
| ||
