• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:28
CEST 07:28
KST 14:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation12$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 529 users

Why the Warhound should NOT be balanced - Page 27

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
Prev 1 25 26 27 28 29 34 Next All
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 13 2012 16:38 GMT
#521
On September 13 2012 14:42 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2012 09:44 [NSL]BansheeHero wrote:
On September 13 2012 09:41 NicolBolas wrote:
On September 13 2012 09:29 [NSL]BansheeHero wrote:
On September 13 2012 09:19 NicolBolas wrote:
On September 13 2012 08:59 [NSL]BansheeHero wrote:
On September 13 2012 08:25 jinorazi wrote:
On September 13 2012 07:50 [NSL]BansheeHero wrote:
Oh no. Should african terrans be removed from HOTS too? Because they do not belong? Maybe we should build a minefield so they cannot cross over the borders of space.

Maybe we should save the sanctity of marriage and remove Archon made from Dark Templars. Starcraft had so many A move units and nobody gave a shit (Some of them even had developed into heavy micro depended units.). This is just another over blown opinion of somebody. If we seriously want these sensational statements to matter we should vote for Slasher to be the eSports president.

EDIT: He could have written this ever since the preview was out. The concept of Warhound never changed. All aboard the warhound bandwagon chuchuchu.


the point isnt warhound but design philosophy and warhound is the prime example of whats wrong with their design philosophy.
and yes, people have spoken about this topic, good game design taking ques from bw, countless fucking times, even about warhound. but the problem is they are the minority, many with bw background(who understands whats good or bad better), that just gets ignored by sc2 people saying "go play bw then"


Seriously a big post about how Warhound should not be in the game at all is not about the concept of warhound? WOW.
I like BW, never said anything about them playing Broodwar. Nor that it should matter., whether you do or dont.

All i said that this is just a chuchuchu train. Nobody should take beta seriously, unless they work with Blizzard. Making posts like these is not relevant at all to the Beta. It is just a statement of an opinion.(And in this case yet another sensational statement.....)


How is a post about units in the beta not relevant to the beta? And yes, it's "just a statement of an opinion;" that's the point! He's stating his opinion about why the Warhound is a bad unit. And while I agree that it's semi-sensationalist to disguise a "remove the Warhound" thread with the title "don't balance the Warhound", it's hardly senationalist to want it removed.

As for the "chuchuchu train" (which I presume is some kind of net-speak for "bandwagoning." Wagons aren't trains), yes, he's not alone in wanting the Warhound gone. Lots of people want it gone. But "bandwagoning" is basically accusing someone of not thinking. That they're agreeing with everyone else only because those other people are saying it. That they would not have come to this belief on their own.

Just because everyone is against something doesn't make it a bandwagon. Everyone hates drowning; that doesn't mean avoiding drowning is a bandwagon. It just means that we all see the downsides and would rather not do it.


I posted why this is a sensational band-wagoning.
Warhound did not change from the first sneak peak. Nobody gave a crap about it, except the model being a ripoff of Warhammer.


People were talking about the Warhound being bad pretty much since it came to this form. Maybe not as many people; some people decided to adopt a wait-and-see approach. They waited, saw that it still wasn't good, and started complaining.

That's not band-wagoning. That's being mistrustful of Theorycrafting.

Futhermore, even if it is, how do you know that it's band-wagoning in this case? Did Orb ever once say that he liked the Warhound before? Did he ever once say that it was a good unit before? If not, then you don't know that it's a case of band-wagoning.


No thats why it is band wagoning. Nothing changed, except the popularity of the topic. Thats the whole point. If you do not agree with it, its fine.

No, actually watching people play it makes a huge difference. Playing it makes a bigger difference and that's what has changed. For instance, I wrote a very long blog on why I felt the the warhound was going in the opposite direction of good mech play. However, because I had only seen battle reports (which are notoriously bad for macro for one thing), I had to leave a back door/caveat at the beginning saying that we were not yet in beta. That's because one needs to see how the unit handles. Particularly on the off chance they included move-shot. The design of it hasn't changed, but more people will become convinced as they see pro's trying to make it work and how it interacts with the rest of the units.,

But how do you tell the difference between a critical mass of people becoming convinced that the early arguments were correct vs band wagoning? Or would you dismiss any general consensus on a topic as bandwagoning?


It can be both. The general consensus is that the Warhound is broken and not good. However, the band wagon is the further argument that is should be removed and replaced with a world shattering siege tank buff or some omega end game unit. People don't like the warhound, but the band wagon effect is causing people to just assume that Blizzard does not care about the game and just wants it to fail.

The second part of the issue, that Blizzard does not care or wants to make the game for casual players, is valid. However, on this weeks Inside the Game, you can see Idra and Incontrol address both of these topics. I will give you the highlights:

- Is Blizzard making the game easier to casuals: Yes and no, they are trying to put in features that will make the game more accessable for the newest players. However, they are keenly aware that they do not want to go to far are remove that allow high level players to succeed. They are openly discussing the topic with Pro players in a private beta forum. Both Idra and Incontrol both felt Blizzard was focusing on players just getting into the game, but not making it easier for mid or high level players.

- Blizzard is arrogant and unwilling to accept feedback on bad units: No. Blizzard is open to all feed back and is taking it in stride. Idra stated they seem very open to making changes and are aware of many of the issues.

- Does Blizzard know that the Warhound is crap: Yep. They are focusing on getting it a place in the match up and giving it abilities that make sense.

- Does Blizzard know that Protoss got a whole bunch of useless crap: Yep. They are working on that as well and are taking advice on how to change things.

People should go watch the episode. It will make you feel a whole lot better about the beta, the maps and that things are going to get better.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Crawdad
Profile Joined September 2012
614 Posts
September 13 2012 17:07 GMT
#522
Everyone is acting as if the Warhound won't function completely differently by the end of beta. Doesn't anyone remember WoL beta?
Sapphire.lux
Profile Joined July 2010
Romania2620 Posts
September 13 2012 17:13 GMT
#523
On September 14 2012 01:38 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2012 14:42 Falling wrote:
On September 13 2012 09:44 [NSL]BansheeHero wrote:
On September 13 2012 09:41 NicolBolas wrote:
On September 13 2012 09:29 [NSL]BansheeHero wrote:
On September 13 2012 09:19 NicolBolas wrote:
On September 13 2012 08:59 [NSL]BansheeHero wrote:
On September 13 2012 08:25 jinorazi wrote:
On September 13 2012 07:50 [NSL]BansheeHero wrote:
Oh no. Should african terrans be removed from HOTS too? Because they do not belong? Maybe we should build a minefield so they cannot cross over the borders of space.

Maybe we should save the sanctity of marriage and remove Archon made from Dark Templars. Starcraft had so many A move units and nobody gave a shit (Some of them even had developed into heavy micro depended units.). This is just another over blown opinion of somebody. If we seriously want these sensational statements to matter we should vote for Slasher to be the eSports president.

EDIT: He could have written this ever since the preview was out. The concept of Warhound never changed. All aboard the warhound bandwagon chuchuchu.


the point isnt warhound but design philosophy and warhound is the prime example of whats wrong with their design philosophy.
and yes, people have spoken about this topic, good game design taking ques from bw, countless fucking times, even about warhound. but the problem is they are the minority, many with bw background(who understands whats good or bad better), that just gets ignored by sc2 people saying "go play bw then"


Seriously a big post about how Warhound should not be in the game at all is not about the concept of warhound? WOW.
I like BW, never said anything about them playing Broodwar. Nor that it should matter., whether you do or dont.

All i said that this is just a chuchuchu train. Nobody should take beta seriously, unless they work with Blizzard. Making posts like these is not relevant at all to the Beta. It is just a statement of an opinion.(And in this case yet another sensational statement.....)


How is a post about units in the beta not relevant to the beta? And yes, it's "just a statement of an opinion;" that's the point! He's stating his opinion about why the Warhound is a bad unit. And while I agree that it's semi-sensationalist to disguise a "remove the Warhound" thread with the title "don't balance the Warhound", it's hardly senationalist to want it removed.

As for the "chuchuchu train" (which I presume is some kind of net-speak for "bandwagoning." Wagons aren't trains), yes, he's not alone in wanting the Warhound gone. Lots of people want it gone. But "bandwagoning" is basically accusing someone of not thinking. That they're agreeing with everyone else only because those other people are saying it. That they would not have come to this belief on their own.

Just because everyone is against something doesn't make it a bandwagon. Everyone hates drowning; that doesn't mean avoiding drowning is a bandwagon. It just means that we all see the downsides and would rather not do it.


I posted why this is a sensational band-wagoning.
Warhound did not change from the first sneak peak. Nobody gave a crap about it, except the model being a ripoff of Warhammer.


People were talking about the Warhound being bad pretty much since it came to this form. Maybe not as many people; some people decided to adopt a wait-and-see approach. They waited, saw that it still wasn't good, and started complaining.

That's not band-wagoning. That's being mistrustful of Theorycrafting.

Futhermore, even if it is, how do you know that it's band-wagoning in this case? Did Orb ever once say that he liked the Warhound before? Did he ever once say that it was a good unit before? If not, then you don't know that it's a case of band-wagoning.


No thats why it is band wagoning. Nothing changed, except the popularity of the topic. Thats the whole point. If you do not agree with it, its fine.

No, actually watching people play it makes a huge difference. Playing it makes a bigger difference and that's what has changed. For instance, I wrote a very long blog on why I felt the the warhound was going in the opposite direction of good mech play. However, because I had only seen battle reports (which are notoriously bad for macro for one thing), I had to leave a back door/caveat at the beginning saying that we were not yet in beta. That's because one needs to see how the unit handles. Particularly on the off chance they included move-shot. The design of it hasn't changed, but more people will become convinced as they see pro's trying to make it work and how it interacts with the rest of the units.,

But how do you tell the difference between a critical mass of people becoming convinced that the early arguments were correct vs band wagoning? Or would you dismiss any general consensus on a topic as bandwagoning?


It can be both. The general consensus is that the Warhound is broken and not good. However, the band wagon is the further argument that is should be removed and replaced with a world shattering siege tank buff or some omega end game unit. People don't like the warhound, but the band wagon effect is causing people to just assume that Blizzard does not care about the game and just wants it to fail.

The second part of the issue, that Blizzard does not care or wants to make the game for casual players, is valid. However, on this weeks Inside the Game, you can see Idra and Incontrol address both of these topics. I will give you the highlights:

- Is Blizzard making the game easier to casuals: Yes and no, they are trying to put in features that will make the game more accessable for the newest players. However, they are keenly aware that they do not want to go to far are remove that allow high level players to succeed. They are openly discussing the topic with Pro players in a private beta forum. Both Idra and Incontrol both felt Blizzard was focusing on players just getting into the game, but not making it easier for mid or high level players.

- Blizzard is arrogant and unwilling to accept feedback on bad units: No. Blizzard is open to all feed back and is taking it in stride. Idra stated they seem very open to making changes and are aware of many of the issues.

- Does Blizzard know that the Warhound is crap: Yep. They are focusing on getting it a place in the match up and giving it abilities that make sense.

- Does Blizzard know that Protoss got a whole bunch of useless crap: Yep. They are working on that as well and are taking advice on how to change things.

People should go watch the episode. It will make you feel a whole lot better about the beta, the maps and that things are going to get better.

This gives me hope. There are a few encouraging posts from Dustin B on the NA forums to.

Now there is a massive difference between saying "i understand, we are looking in to it" and actually doing taking drastic measures.. We will see.
Head Coach Park: "They should buff tanks!"
DodgySmalls
Profile Joined June 2012
Canada158 Posts
September 13 2012 17:16 GMT
#524
AWWWW YEAH ORB.

I agree 100%, too bad it's never going to work itself out, SC2 has had many design flaws (imo) since day1, and a lot of them have stood the test of time to annoy us today.

Really well written piece.
Please remove nyx assassin
danson
Profile Joined April 2010
United States689 Posts
September 13 2012 17:23 GMT
#525
they have 1 more expansion after this to make everything right, and i actually think they are holding out on some units and stuff to make people wnat to buy LotV and get hyped about it
coZy
Profile Joined March 2012
United States65 Posts
September 13 2012 20:50 GMT
#526
I agree completely. Thank you, Orb, for finally expressing your opinions publicly about this new unit and in a professional manner Please listen to him, Blizzard.
Aulisemia
Profile Joined August 2011
United States123 Posts
September 13 2012 20:58 GMT
#527
Orb, you are 100% correct and I wish Blizzard would listen. Unfortunately you can replace "Warhound 2012 beta" with "Colossus 2010 beta" and this article will not miss a beat. Blizzard doesn't care about their game being balanced, challenging or rewarding. They want eye-candy that anyone can pick up and do strategies they see on WCS or MLG to feel good about winning on ladder...and it is really a shame because of the amount of talent and passion people have for what boils down to an inferior product.
The ponciest ponce that ever ponced past a poncing palour.
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
September 13 2012 21:05 GMT
#528
On September 14 2012 00:04 shindigs wrote:
I'd be OK if they decided to remove the collosus now


Even better than removing the Warhound IMO.
MMA: The true King of Wings
ArchDC
Profile Joined May 2011
Malaysia1996 Posts
September 13 2012 21:28 GMT
#529
Hear hear about design philosophy! Totally agree!!
shindigs
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States4795 Posts
September 13 2012 21:56 GMT
#530
On September 14 2012 06:05 SarcasmMonster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2012 00:04 shindigs wrote:
I'd be OK if they decided to remove the collosus now


Even better than removing the Warhound IMO.


Hahaha I could imagine the insanity if they remove the collosus, replaced it with reaver, and kept warhounds as is.
Photographer@shindags || twitch.tv/shindigs
Bails
Profile Joined June 2011
United States317 Posts
September 13 2012 22:06 GMT
#531
Thanks for pointing out all the facts ^_^, i think you're right about a lot of it, especially the reaver part; and I wish there was something like that in Starcraft2 now!
lowercase
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada1047 Posts
September 13 2012 22:17 GMT
#532
Blizz, leave carrier, remove colossus.
That is not dead which can eternal lie...
imBLIND
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
United States2626 Posts
September 13 2012 22:24 GMT
#533
I would go as far as to say it's too late to remove the warhound or to redesign anything about the game because for one, It's activision-blizzard + bowder's design team who are in charge of th game, and two, that the game is already immersed more in the noob-friendly side of society.

This forum is unfortunately more biased towards the "high-difficulty, more enjoyment" side of gaming because most of us are old-school games who come from BW and other games with similar enjoyability. I have many friends on facebook who are just dazzled at the explosions in SC2 and they think it's already too hard because they can't stop a zergling rush and they have to micro individual groups of units already.

So while I agree wholeheartedly with your opinion on the warhound and the game in general, it's unfortunate that we are only about 20-40% of the sc2 community and Blizzard has to cater towards the majority of gamers.
im deaf
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
September 13 2012 22:28 GMT
#534
@Plansix
That's fair enough. I like they have a private forum for the pro's. Hopefully someone's taking up the cause for proper moving shot and a couple other things.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
September 13 2012 22:30 GMT
#535
On September 14 2012 07:28 Falling wrote:
@Plansix
That's fair enough. I like they have a private forum for the pro's. Hopefully someone's taking up the cause for proper moving shot and a couple other things.


I wish I had read-only access to this forum T_T

It would be so interesting to read
MMA: The true King of Wings
Cosmos
Profile Joined March 2010
Belgium1077 Posts
September 13 2012 22:50 GMT
#536
Terran finally gets a-click units, I find it great, I was extremely bored by the amount of skill required to do the same thing with terran while you can easily do it with the other races (and I play random). I don't like the warhound, but only because I find it ugly. Your post is just QQ in advance because you think it will be overpowered (I know you play protoss). You rage in advance to see that terran's micro is now as easy as the other races, meaning that players from your level will beat you.
But I don't want to talk about imbalance, just think about what makes the warhound different than the colossus...
http://www.twitch.tv/becosmos
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
September 13 2012 23:07 GMT
#537
On September 14 2012 07:50 Cosmos wrote:
Terran finally gets a-click units, I find it great, I was extremely bored by the amount of skill required to do the same thing with terran while you can easily do it with the other races (and I play random). I don't like the warhound, but only because I find it ugly. Your post is just QQ in advance because you think it will be overpowered (I know you play protoss). You rage in advance to see that terran's micro is now as easy as the other races, meaning that players from your level will beat you.
But I don't want to talk about imbalance, just think about what makes the warhound different than the colossus...


Yep, you sure nailed the point of this thread. Go back to call of duty noob.


User was temp banned for this post.
sorry for dem one liners
Vei
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2845 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-13 23:56:01
September 13 2012 23:55 GMT
#538
such a good thread

i really would love to see it removed; Terran is already a very complete race, i don't think they need something *major* to make mech viable. what it is that they actually need, i do not know as i am just a shitty zerg player, but i'd love to see pro/semi-pro Terran offer their input on what sort of "interesting" unit mech needs to help it become viable.
www.justin.tv/veisc2 ~ 720p + commentary
Kastlo
Profile Joined August 2012
Italy13 Posts
September 14 2012 00:38 GMT
#539
Lol by reading this thread SC2 professional gaming might die tomorrow. It will be fun to see how many of you will buy Hots day one, or even in the future.

Btw, Sc2 is probably the most carefully developed RTS that is being released, so I wouldn't be so worried about it
Oh boy!
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 14 2012 00:49 GMT
#540
On September 14 2012 07:30 SarcasmMonster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2012 07:28 Falling wrote:
@Plansix
That's fair enough. I like they have a private forum for the pro's. Hopefully someone's taking up the cause for proper moving shot and a couple other things.


I wish I had read-only access to this forum T_T

It would be so interesting to read


Although I would love to see the discussion as well, I am glad it is private. Blizzard should really focus on getting feedback from the best and most critical of the professional community, rather than sifting through the masses of non-sense that fill a lot of the forums.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Prev 1 25 26 27 28 29 34 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 32m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 217
StarCraft: Brood War
Noble 175
PianO 160
Bale 20
Dota 2
monkeys_forever639
ODPixel101
NeuroSwarm92
League of Legends
JimRising 837
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1012
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor110
Other Games
summit1g9051
shahzam670
hungrybox323
ViBE176
SortOf1
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick42077
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH353
• Hupsaiya 89
• Light_VIP 64
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity7
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1007
• Stunt463
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
4h 32m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
7h 32m
Replay Cast
18h 32m
RSL Revival
1d 4h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 10h
OSC
1d 14h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.