EPTNBA Playoffs + Finals 2018 - Page 52
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
cLutZ
United States19573 Posts
| ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16670 Posts
| ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
On June 02 2018 03:33 JimmiC wrote: Javale McGee is probably the most excited about it, it helped him team win AND it likely made this the new play for having low basketball IQ instead of his. It made people forget that the Warriors were making their third quarter run with him and then he missed a WIDE open dunk and got subbed out soon after. This series isn't just about regular star power. What's wonderful about this series is that it also features 4 Shaqtin a Fool all-stars in Javale McGee, Swaggy P, JR Smith and Kendrick Perkins, with 1 MVP on each side. No matter who wins, two of them are getting a ring. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
| ||
|
Elroi
Sweden5594 Posts
A comparable situation is in end of game situations when they go to replay to see who touched the ball last when it goes out of bounds and then they have to give the ball to one player because he slapped the arm of the opponent and not the ball (a foul, but he didnt touch the ball last and they cant call a foul). Getting the right call is always better. On June 02 2018 12:26 zev318 wrote: not suspending thompson for game 2 is a joke Its arguably double standards, but its good that we didnt get more cheap suspensions. | ||
|
Twinkle Toes
United States3605 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On June 02 2018 19:34 Elroi wrote: But dont you think the other team would get even more fucked if the refs made a clearly wrong call than the Cavs were now when they used the replay to get the call right? Except the lead official in good position called it a charge. And Steve Javie agreed. Ronnie Nunn also agreed on bball breakdown today. It wasn't a "clearly" wrong call when 3 experienced professionals saw it as a charge, your opinion doesn't really come into it. Most fans are clueless and think any movement or not having your feet set means it can't be a charge. If the initial call on the floor stood this would have been a non-issue compared to the blatant fouls that they actually missed. As for Tristan I agree he should've been suspended (the initial ejection was shit officiating though), as long as Draymond also got suspended for raking Lebron's face. | ||
|
Elroi
Sweden5594 Posts
I don't think Draymond did that on purpose but that his intention was to block Lebrons vision of the rim. But anyway it should easily be a flagrant one in my opinion since it is pretty bad contact to the face and could potentially be dangerous. Ejection would be too much imo and suspension is just fan-talk. | ||
|
Twinkle Toes
United States3605 Posts
On June 02 2018 21:07 Scarecrow wrote: Except the lead official in good position called it a charge. And Steve Javie agreed. Ronnie Nunn also agreed on bball breakdown today. It wasn't a "clearly" wrong call when 3 experienced professionals saw it as a charge, your opinion doesn't really come into it. Most fans are clueless and think any movement or not having your feet set means it can't be a charge. If the initial call on the floor stood this would have been a non-issue compared to the blatant fouls that they actually missed. As for Tristan I agree he should've been suspended (the initial ejection was shit officiating though), as long as Draymond also got suspended for raking Lebron's face. There is a difference between the two. Draymond deserves an F1 or even F2 because of the damage. It was still clearly a play to obstruct Lebron's view of the ring, and there was no intent to harm Lebron (which Nunn also pointed out). The harm was inadvertent but not malicious, and F1 or F2 is deserved, but not suspension. Tristan Thompson on the other hand deserves suspension because it was a clear frustration non-basketball play. This is aggravated by two things, he did it on Shaun, hands-down one of the most inoffensive nice guys in the league who will never be involved in bullshit, and Shaun had a valid reason to shoot it as the shot clock was running out, even considering the unspoken gentlemen's rule during garbage time. Refs ruled it already F1 (down from F2) with $25,000 fine. | ||
|
BlackJack
United States10421 Posts
| ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
yup u can see the baseline official wanted to call a charge (at 0:38-0:39)but the sideline referee wanted to signaled a block (at about 0:49-0:50) | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
On June 02 2018 19:34 Elroi wrote: I think that was a clear block - even when I saw it in real time - but I somehow can understand that fans are upset because the review was about the restricted area. But dont you think the other team would get even more fucked if the refs made a clearly wrong call than the Cavs were now when they used the replay to get the call right? A comparable situation is in end of game situations when they go to replay to see who touched the ball last when it goes out of bounds and then they have to give the ball to one player because he slapped the arm of the opponent and not the ball (a foul, but he didnt touch the ball last and they cant call a foul). Getting the right call is always better. Its arguably double standards, but its good that we didnt get more cheap suspensions. cheap suspension would have been suspending kevin love for stepping on the court. thompson flat out basically punched (even if it was a very weak one) a guy and threw the ball at his face. now the warriors can do the same and the league has set the precedent that it's only a 25k fine. send zaza out there, throw some elbows, get thrown out, punch lebron in the face, pay a 25k fine, whoopie doo. | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
And definitely no suspension on Love. That would just be stupidly cheap. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19573 Posts
On June 03 2018 01:23 zev318 wrote: didnt they say one official called a charge and one called a block so they settled on reviewing it? at least that's what i've heard, and u can clearly see in the replays that the top official was looking to call a charge but he never finished the action cause he kept looking at another referee https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GpmPj5MMyY yup u can see the baseline official wanted to call a charge (at 0:38-0:39)but the sideline referee wanted to signaled a block (at about 0:49-0:50) It was a block and charge call that they could not resolve. By rule that would have been a jump. BUT by selecting charge, and saying it needs to be reviewed because of the restricted area rule they could resolve it. The charge call was a combination super-duper star call for LBJ and the baseline ref trying to look cool. | ||
|
Twinkle Toes
United States3605 Posts
| ||
|
Twinkle Toes
United States3605 Posts
| ||
| ||
