|
|
On September 07 2016 05:37 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Yeah that was a disgusting call. Pretty sour about that.
Should've scored earlier though, our scoring ability is so bad https://streamable.com/gc1i disallowed goal
|
What, it wasn't even a bad call, it's straight up bullshit.
|
On September 07 2016 06:23 sneirac wrote:Show nested quote +On September 07 2016 05:37 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Yeah that was a disgusting call. Pretty sour about that.
Should've scored earlier though, our scoring ability is so bad https://streamable.com/gc1idisallowed goal swedish defender totally mistimes his jump but yeah its Dost fault he misses the ball surely for the little nudge QQ
|
Norway28637 Posts
I honestly think that's like, not that terrible of a call. It's such a small nudge that it's usually allowed, and I'd be totally fine with the goal being allowed too, but like, referee sees the players jump, sees a kinda extended arm looking like it's kinda pushing him.. I just think it's basically fairly close to being a correct call, slightly harder nudge and it would be. and then it's not like, terrible by the ref to be on the wrong side.
|
On September 07 2016 08:18 Liquid`Drone wrote: I honestly think that's like, not that terrible of a call. It's such a small nudge that it's usually allowed, and I'd be totally fine with the goal being allowed too, but like, referee sees the players jump, sees a kinda extended arm looking like it's kinda pushing him.. I just think it's basically fairly close to being a correct call, slightly harder nudge and it would be. and then it's not like, terrible by the ref to be on the wrong side.
Yeah its hard to say, thing is once a guy is airborne even the smallest nudge will put you off pretty easily. Now sure if your a best of a defender it might not impact you much but there are very few of those.
If there wasnt daylight showing that extended arm and it was more of an out jump shoulder shoulder he wouldve got away with it easy but if your gonna put your arm out like that you give the referee license to call it.
Still think its harsh though. Id lean toward that being allowed.
|
Ronaldinho to (finally) retire
damn, this is sad
|
On September 08 2016 04:28 Faruko wrote:Ronaldo to (finally) retire damn, this is sad  link?
|
LMAO, it was ronaldinho, not ronaldo lol
|
On September 08 2016 05:10 Faruko wrote: LMAO, it was ronaldinho, not ronaldo lol Ronaldo retired ages ago... Ronaldinho was just whoring around, but still played the odd match when he wasn't drunk, high, or too hungover.
|
On September 08 2016 05:25 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2016 05:10 Faruko wrote: LMAO, it was ronaldinho, not ronaldo lol Ronaldo retired ages ago... Ronaldinho was just whoring around, but still played the odd match when he wasn't drunk, high, or too hungover.
There is more than 1 Ronaldo iirc. hence the question I suspect.
|
Only CAS left now I guess.
The FIFA Appeal Committee has decided to reject the appeals lodged by Spanish clubs Atlético de Madrid and Real Madrid and to confirm in their entirety the decisions rendered by the FIFA Disciplinary Committee in the respective cases relating to the protection of minors. www.fifa.com
+ Show Spoiler +
|
|
|
On September 09 2016 03:18 Skynx wrote: Context?
"The walking death" (I don't watch the TV series, but I read the comic book )
|
The recently-announced changes to the Champions League are detrimental to domestic football in Europe and will increase the gap between the wealthiest clubs and the rest, Europe's domestic football leagues (EPFL) said on Thursday.
The EPFL, the umbrella grouping for 24 European domestic leagues, also called upon the next UEFA president to reconsider the changes which made fewer places available in the Champions League group stage to teams from smaller countries.
It was the first major criticism of the reforms of the lucrative competition, which were announced in Monaco in August after secretive negotiations between European football body UEFA and the clubs.
UEFA rearranged the group-stage slots in favour of its four top-ranked leagues - in effect Spain, England, Germany and Italy - by guaranteeing them four places each.
Places for the winners of the 11th and 12th ranked leagues were cut and the number of places reserved for teams from the remaining leagues, who play their way through a qualifying competition, was reduced from five to four.
UEFA also announced changes in the distribution of revenue with more emphasis placed on the historic sporting results of the clubs and less on the value of their television market.
The changes came amid reports that the biggest clubs had been discussing the creation of a so-called Super League.
EPFL said one possible consequence would be an end to the agreement with UEFA under which leagues refrain from scheduling domestic games on the same night as days earmarked for European club competition.
"A major change in European football has been announced without the support and consensus of the organisers of domestic league football in Europe," the EPFL said in a statement.
"This decision will have a detrimental impact on domestic competitions and will lead to an exponential growth in the financial and sporting gap between the biggest clubs in Europe and all the others," it added.
"The European Leagues believe the way this process has been conducted by UEFA to be unacceptable for an organisation that claims to be the governing body of football in Europe.
"The EPFL believes that UEFA has breached the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the two organisations."
It warned that such a breach "would give all European Leagues total freedom to schedule their matches as they see fit – including on the same days and at the same kick-off times as UEFA Club Competitions."
Dutchman Michael van Praag and Aleksander Ceferin from Slovenia are standing in UEFA's presidential election on Wednesday.
"The European Leagues stand ready to meet the new UEFA President to discuss these matters," the statement said. uk.reuters.com
|
completely agree with the epfl. this move was made with financial interests in mind, not fair play
|
yeah the difference between top clubs and the rest is big enough already no need to make it bigger.
|
Roma and Villareal didn't reach the group phase this CL: The #4 position teams of the 4 big leagues are not so good for direct qualification.
|
|
On September 09 2016 18:53 Pandemona wrote:Roma are position 3
^Which is what bothered me most about this change to be honest. Roma couldn't beat the third team of Portugal to qualify and somehow Italy end up with 4 teams in the CL? The other top leagues get marginal benefits and Italy just get everything going for them. It's insane how Spain, Germany and England didn't just tell Italy to go screw themselves. Hell you make a super league with the top teams from these four leagues and, apart from Juventus, the Italians are all going to be at the bottom.
|
|
|
|