want to see what the Browns actually do with the picks before calling it a win though. they didnt do shit with all the picks they got from the Falcons when they traded up for Julio

Jaaaaasper

United States10225 Posts

April 20 2016 19:50 GMT

#303

The thing is, they won on value, thats indisputable. Even if they blow the picks, this was a great trade for them.

y0su

Finland7871 Posts

April 20 2016 20:04 GMT

#304

On April 21 2016 04:50 Jaaaaasper wrote:
The thing is, they won on value, thats indisputable. Even if they blow the picks, this was a great trade for them.

and how do you define this value?

Shellshock

United States97276 Posts

April 20 2016 20:08 GMT

#305

On April 21 2016 04:50 Jaaaaasper wrote:
The thing is, they won on value, thats indisputable. Even if they blow the picks, this was a great trade for them.

yeah I agree. They would have been crazy to turn down those picks

vult

United States9400 Posts

April 20 2016 20:23 GMT

#306

That was a ridiculous benefit for the Browns. Even if the picks are mediocre they are still getting so much value for what they gave. Is this rookie class really that good to throw away 2 future first-rounders for #2???

farvacola

United States18856 Posts

April 20 2016 20:25 GMT

#307

Mediocrity fleecing mediocrity, sounds about right

Let's hope the Browns do something with the windfall.

Jaaaaasper

United States10225 Posts

April 20 2016 20:28 GMT

#308

On April 21 2016 05:04 y0su wrote:

Show nested quote +

and how do you define this value?

The picks they got are worth way more than the second pick

Shellshock

United States97276 Posts

April 20 2016 20:41 GMT

#309

now we watch the first 2 picks be Jalen Ramsey and Ezekiel Elliott

JimmiC

Canada22817 Posts

April 20 2016 21:00 GMT

#310

--- Nuked ---

Titusmaster6

United States5937 Posts

April 20 2016 21:06 GMT

#311

Yes please GoT level

KingofdaHipHop

United States25602 Posts

April 20 2016 21:39 GMT

#312

well this draft is certainly more interesting now

also the panthers have just taken back their Franchise tag on Josh Norman and now he's a Free agent again

Jaaaaasper

United States10225 Posts

April 20 2016 21:49 GMT

#313

Man Patriots fans are freaking out about signing Norman, not realizing its never going to happen. I'm of the opinion they should only sign him if they can announce it during the first round of the draft. I bet the Giants over pay him based on one really good year as well.

xDaunt

United States17988 Posts

April 20 2016 22:20 GMT

#314

I wouldn't mind seeing the Niners throw a large offer Norman's way.

JimmiC

Canada22817 Posts

April 20 2016 22:29 GMT

#315

--- Nuked ---

Jaaaaasper

United States10225 Posts

April 20 2016 22:36 GMT

#316

I assume this is a we won't negotiate with terrorists moment. Norman wants more money than the Panthers think he is worth, and they don't want any part of it.

Shellshock

United States97276 Posts

April 20 2016 22:37 GMT

#317

Redskins haven't overpaid anyone in like 2 years. We are due since we didn't throw the bank at cousins yet

JimmiC

Canada22817 Posts

April 20 2016 22:39 GMT

#318

--- Nuked ---

FatChicksUnited

Canada214 Posts

April 20 2016 22:43 GMT

#319

Norman has only had a year or two of high level play, and is already 29. Anyone paying him is going to be betting that a) his last two years weren't a fluke and b) that he ages gracefully (which is relatively rare for cornerbacks).