EPTedit: holy shit that kc field goal omg
2016 NFL and CFB Season Discussion - Page 118
| Forum Index > Sports |
GTR
51589 Posts
edit: holy shit that kc field goal omg | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
KingofdaHipHop
United States25602 Posts
probably my favorite game of the year | ||
|
giftdgecko
United States2126 Posts
| ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
|
darthfoley
United States8004 Posts
| ||
|
GoShox
United States1843 Posts
| ||
|
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
| ||
|
GTR
51589 Posts
On November 28 2016 15:07 DannyJ wrote: That must have been a super annoying decision for the Broncos to kick that 62 yarder. Basically no chance of hitting it but how could they refuse. yeah, i feel badly for kubiak, it was a lose-lose situation either way. the division is pretty tight too so maybe a half-game would've been worth it. if i were him i'd would've just settled for the tie and punted them deep in their own territory so they wouldn't be able to go down to make the game winning fg. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
9049 Posts
| ||
|
BlackJack
United States10574 Posts
On November 28 2016 15:09 GTR wrote: yeah, i feel badly for kubiak, it was a lose-lose situation either way. the division is pretty tight too so maybe a half-game would've been worth it. if i were him i'd would've just settled for the tie and punted them deep in their own territory so they wouldn't be able to go down to make the game winning fg. I agree punt is the right call (unless your kicker is Matt Prater). I wonder if Kubiak felt pressured into going for the FG, maybe fearing people will question his will to win if he concedes any possibility of winning the game. | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
I thought McManus is one of the strong legged kickers we have in the NFL lately. Maybe that factored into it as well. | ||
|
TerransHill
Germany572 Posts
On November 28 2016 16:55 BlackJack wrote: I agree punt is the right call (unless your kicker is Matt Prater). I wonder if Kubiak felt pressured into going for the FG, maybe fearing people will question his will to win if he concedes any possibility of winning the game. Why didn't they just go for 4&10? Probably a better chance than scoring a 62y field goal? | ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
9049 Posts
| ||
|
giftdgecko
United States2126 Posts
On November 29 2016 05:41 TerransHill wrote: Why didn't they just go for 4&10? Probably a better chance than scoring a 62y field goal? Why not run a play to get 5 yards on third down? I don't remember the exact play they ran but it was beyond a 10 yard throw right? If you are thinking about taking the fg get 4-5 yards and make it that much more managable, or in range for the hard count before you take the timeout. It's bad coaching decisions for sure. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
GTR
51589 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35172 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On November 29 2016 09:57 giftdgecko wrote: Why not run a play to get 5 yards on third down? I don't remember the exact play they ran but it was beyond a 10 yard throw right? If you are thinking about taking the fg get 4-5 yards and make it that much more managable, or in range for the hard count before you take the timeout. It's bad coaching decisions for sure. This is the right thought, any yards make the FG much easier. That said, IMO the FG, given that you are in 4th and 10 and 62 yards is the least-bad call. | ||
| ||
