EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/6I3qgjz.jpg)
when was the last time this happened
NFL 2014 Season - Page 95
| Forum Index > Sports |
GTR
51593 Posts
when was the last time this happened | ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32132 Posts
On September 15 2014 13:13 Wingblade wrote: Whoever decided to give the gimpy brothers giant ass cushions in the second half needs to be punched. seriously. Fuck. Dumb calls, bad plays by Kaep. Mother fuck. I got shit on in most of my fantasty leagues this week. If I didn't lose, I had tons of injuries. And Green's looks like turf toe now. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh. I need Mccoy to score over 31 in my one league to win, but I need Mccoy/Luck to put up under 36 in tl league. Ugh. Sometiems I hate having so many damn leagues. | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On September 15 2014 21:25 GTR wrote: when was the last time this happened Week 3, 2011 season. We beat the Pats 34-31 at home to take sole possession of the division lead. | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
Arizona Carolina Philadelphia Buffalo Cincinnati Houston Denver Not exactly an inspiring list. | ||
|
ZasZ.
United States2911 Posts
On September 16 2014 01:50 andrewlt wrote: The last 7 unbeaten teams this year: Arizona Carolina Philadelphia Buffalo Cincinnati Houston Denver Not exactly an inspiring list. There are a few division title favorites in there (Carolina, Philadelphia, Cincinnati, Denver) and some surprises as well, but I get what you're saying. Philadelphia still hasn't played their game this week, so I don't know if I'd include them on the list as of yet, but it should be a good game tonight. | ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/vikings/2014/09/15/adrian-peterson-reinstated-saints-child-negligence-indictment-minnesota/15663317/ I think that means he's back for the season. The NFL doesn't have auto-suspensions for normal crimes and the Vikings chose not to. I believe in these cases, the NFL waits for the court systems to handle things and he won't be in court until 2015. I still don't want him on my team, now I have to figure out how to flip him. | ||
|
Wingblade
United States1806 Posts
On September 15 2014 22:26 QuanticHawk wrote: seriously. Fuck. Dumb calls, bad plays by Kaep. Mother fuck. I got shit on in most of my fantasty leagues this week. If I didn't lose, I had tons of injuries. And Green's looks like turf toe now. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh. I need Mccoy to score over 31 in my one league to win, but I need Mccoy/Luck to put up under 36 in tl league. Ugh. Sometiems I hate having so many damn leagues. I scored like 54 points in one of my fantasy leagues and lost the other. Jamaal Charles getting injured cost me i had him in both leagues | ||
|
DyEnasTy
United States3714 Posts
| ||
|
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
AP reinstated makes sense I guess. What he did was pretty nuts but I think to a lot of people it's not THAT nuts, and the NFL and Vikings are just going to let the legal system work. For now his reputation is the thing that has taken a major hit. | ||
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32132 Posts
On September 16 2014 02:07 Jibba wrote: So this is happening. http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/vikings/2014/09/15/adrian-peterson-reinstated-saints-child-negligence-indictment-minnesota/15663317/ I think that means he's back for the season. The NFL doesn't have auto-suspensions for normal crimes and the Vikings chose not to. I believe in these cases, the NFL waits for the court systems to handle things and he won't be in court until 2015. I still don't want him on my team, now I have to figure out how to flip him. Waiting until the courts handle things is the right thing imo. But he also admitted to beating the kid with a stick. Whether or not he is found guilty (texas law says that 'parents are entitled to discipline their children as they see fit, except when that discipline exceeds what the community would say is reasonable.') that's totally fucked and the league should step in. They have precent with big ben in suspending for a non-charged crime. I dunno. It's a weird line because due process is important, esp with all these people calling for automatically suspending people accused of dv and that's wrong. | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On September 16 2014 03:50 QuanticHawk wrote: Waiting until the courts handle things is the right thing imo. But he also admitted to beating the kid with a stick. Whether or not he is found guilty (texas law says that 'parents are entitled to discipline their children as they see fit, except when that discipline exceeds what the community would say is reasonable.') that's totally fucked and the league should step in. They have precent with big ben in suspending for a non-charged crime. I dunno. It's a weird line because due process is important, esp with all these people calling for automatically suspending people accused of dv and that's wrong. Yeah. I expected Vikings' owners to do it but I guess not. | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On September 16 2014 04:14 Jibba wrote: Yeah. I expected Vikings' owners to do it but I guess not. I'm in a weird spot with this one like Hawk. I agree with you that I thought they'd keep him under a "totally not suspended but really it's a suspension" deactivation because what changed now from Friday? It feels a bit presumptuous to me for the NFL to judge Peterson without letting the system which exists to do just that work its way through things, no matter how frustratingly slow it might seem. If the NFL does suspend him before that (which we're kind of waiting on with McDonald and Hardy, by the way) it would seem both inconsistent and reactionary. What's the worst case, he plays and then is found guilty and they suspend him then? I don't see what's wrong with letting the legal system do its work and dealing with the repercussions of its decision from a league standpoint later. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On September 16 2014 04:26 AgentW wrote: I'm in a weird spot with this one like Hawk. I agree with you that I thought they'd keep him under a "totally not suspended but really it's a suspension" deactivation because what changed now from Friday? It feels a bit presumptuous to me for the NFL to judge Peterson without letting the system which exists to do just that work its way through things, no matter how frustratingly slow it might seem. If the NFL does suspend him before that (which we're kind of waiting on with McDonald and Hardy, by the way) it would seem both inconsistent and reactionary. What's the worst case, he plays and then is found guilty and they suspend him then? I don't see what's wrong with letting the legal system do its work and dealing with the repercussions of its decision from a league standpoint later. What I really don't like about this situation is how arbitrary the league is acting. I feel like Goodell and the owners are being driven by public lynch mob sentiment rather than any semblance of objectivity. If the league and owners are going to take it upon themselves to discipline players for off-field conduct, then they better being doing what they're doing according to a written set of rules. If those rules don't exist, then they need to be written immediately. | ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
| ||
|
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
Demarco Murray with the Candlestick in the Library | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
On September 16 2014 01:59 ZasZ. wrote: There are a few division title favorites in there (Carolina, Philadelphia, Cincinnati, Denver) and some surprises as well, but I get what you're saying. Philadelphia still hasn't played their game this week, so I don't know if I'd include them on the list as of yet, but it should be a good game tonight. Carolina isn't. They are in salary cap hell because of their previous gm and many expected them to regress this year because of all the players they let go. Marty Hurney was a really bad gm and hamstrung their cap for years. On September 16 2014 04:26 AgentW wrote: I'm in a weird spot with this one like Hawk. I agree with you that I thought they'd keep him under a "totally not suspended but really it's a suspension" deactivation because what changed now from Friday? It feels a bit presumptuous to me for the NFL to judge Peterson without letting the system which exists to do just that work its way through things, no matter how frustratingly slow it might seem. If the NFL does suspend him before that (which we're kind of waiting on with McDonald and Hardy, by the way) it would seem both inconsistent and reactionary. What's the worst case, he plays and then is found guilty and they suspend him then? I don't see what's wrong with letting the legal system do its work and dealing with the repercussions of its decision from a league standpoint later. Technically, each case is different. Rice plea bargained. McDonald hasn't been charged yet. Peterson just got indicted. Hardy has already been found guilty but some weird ass North Carolina law allows him to appeal to a jury, pretty much giving rich people who can afford multiple trials a mulligan. The Vikings just might be planning to give AP 500 carries this year while waiting for his case next year. | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On September 16 2014 04:34 Shellshock wrote: should start trying to guess what the next major crime/scandal will be Demarco Murray with the Candlestick in the Library Wouldn't it be Marshall with the Candlestick after last night? | ||
|
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On September 16 2014 04:56 AgentW wrote: Wouldn't it be Marshall with the Candlestick after last night? Damn I should have thought this through better | ||
| ||
