|
On August 25 2014 22:24 GTR wrote: If the Rams don't get Winston/Mariota/Hundley next year, I'd be shocked. They really should have drafted someone this year year. But yeah, the jig is up for Bradford. His replacement will be drafted next year. Watching the Rams on offense this year is going to be painful. Even the Jags may get more Red Zone highlights.
|
It might be too early to be asking this question, but does this help or hurt Zac Stacy's fantasy value?
|
On August 25 2014 22:49 AgentW wrote: It might be too early to be asking this question, but does this help or hurt Zac Stacy's fantasy value? Hard to say right now but the general feel is that it shouldn't impact Stacy too much. There is a chance that defenses will focus more on Stacy with Bradford down but then again, his backup, Shaun Hill has better career stats than Bradford anyway.
|
On August 25 2014 23:09 c0ldfusion wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2014 22:49 AgentW wrote: It might be too early to be asking this question, but does this help or hurt Zac Stacy's fantasy value? Hard to say right now but the general feel is that it shouldn't impact Stacy too much. There is a chance that defenses will focus more on Stacy with Bradford down but then again, his backup, Shaun Hill has better career stats than Bradford anyway. As sad as it is, Shaun Hill probably isn't that much of a downgrade from Bradford.
|
Shaun Hill is a capable backup
|
United States32132 Posts
1. (1) LeSean McCoy (Phi - RB) 2. (24) Alshon Jeffery (Chi - WR) 3. (25) Antonio Brown (Pit - WR) 4. (48) Vernon Davis (SF - TE) 5. (49) Michael Floyd (Ari - WR) 6. (72) Philip Rivers (SD - QB) 7. (73) Pierre Thomas (NO - RB) 8. (96) Carlos Hyde (SF - RB) 9. (97) Josh Gordon (Cle - WR) 10. (120) DeAngelo Williams (Car - RB) 11. (121) Brian Hartline (Mia - WR) 12. (144) Danny Amendola (NE - WR) 13. (145) Arizona (Ari - DEF) 14. (168) Jarrett Boykin (GB - WR) 15. (169) Andrew Hawkins (Cle - WR)
12 man with .25 ppr, boosts for big plays, topping 100/300 yds, etc. 2 WRs, 1 wrt flex.
I feel my first half was good, the second half less so probably because I was half in the bag due to the fucking draft took forever because half our league was using the yahoo app on phone or tablet and the draft button literally didn't work, and they couldn't switch to auto. So they had to wait the full time limit.
I probably could have gotten Hyde a bit lower, but I feel like he's gonna see some decent time this year whether or not Frank gets injured. Gordon I maybe could have gotten a bit lower, but if he even plays for just playoffs that is huge.
I'm not sure how I feel about WR-WR for my 2nd and 3rd picks. Those two were the best WRs on, and as much as it sucks having basically a RB3 in my 2 spot, I feel both those guys were much better than Morris, Martin, and Gore, who were the best RBs available. The following picks, I just missed out on Stafford, who was the only QB I was gonna go for that high, and Julius Thomas just went off too. VD was the last of the elite TEs, and Floyd was one of the better WR options still on and seemed a lot better value than Rashad Jennings or RBs in line with him. I missed out on Kendall Wright in the 8th, who I really wanted, and Moreno went right after me. So I probably botched both of those.
|
51589 Posts
i personally think charles is the better pick for #1, especially in PPR and considering mccoy's injury scare in the pre-season game. i definitely would value lacy over mccoy in non-PPR formats, at least in my opinion. (charles/AP/lacy/mccoy)
|
who was on the board when you drafted rivers? If you wanted him I feel like you could have gotten him a lot cheaper.
|
Tim wright traded from the bucs to the patriots. Bucs received Logan mankins(g) Tim wright maybe used in the Hernandez role????
|
On August 27 2014 03:15 SolaR- wrote: Tim wright traded from the bucs to the patriots. Bucs received Logan mankins(g) Tim wright maybe used in the Hernandez role???? Son of a ...
Quick on the draw man - good pick up.
|
This is weird, it makes Wright and Steffarian-Jenkins (or whatever his name is) more valuable. We'll have to see what the pick is, but with Mankins being 32, it makes a bit of sense for the Pats.
|
On August 27 2014 03:31 AgentW wrote: This is weird, it makes Wright and Steffarian-Jenkins (or whatever his name is) more valuable. We'll have to see what the pick is, but with Mankins being 32, it makes a bit of sense for the Pats. I find the ASJ hype kind of hilarious actually. As of now he's not even starting. There is already a ton of breakout candidates at TE this year to start looking at ASJ.
|
On August 27 2014 05:44 c0ldfusion wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2014 03:31 AgentW wrote: This is weird, it makes Wright and Steffarian-Jenkins (or whatever his name is) more valuable. We'll have to see what the pick is, but with Mankins being 32, it makes a bit of sense for the Pats. I find the ASJ hype kind of hilarious actually. As of now he's not even starting. There is already a ton of breakout candidates at TE this year to start looking at ASJ. Ah maybe I'm mixing him up with Ebron. I thought ASJ was taken in the first. That was Ebron. Is there a history of 2nd round TEs being anything special; Gronk doesn't count.
EDIT: Fourth rounder in Mankins deal, per Schefter.
|
51589 Posts
ASJ was a potential first-rounder but shit happened at Washington.
|
Ah, that's good to know. What happened? Coach conflict or bad QB or character stuff?
|
51589 Posts
Sources told WalterFootball.com that Seferian-Jenkins didn't interview well with teams and believe that he could slide in Round 2. That could send Seferian-Jenkins to the third round and make him a nice value pick. Some teams are turned off by Seferian-Jenkins off the field and are downgrading him for character concerns.
Seferian-Jenkins had 36 receptions for 450 yards and eight scores in 2013. He played well against Stanford and UCLA, but did have a fumble against the Bruins. The Washington offense seemed to have put him on the back burner as it was led by Bishop Sankey, while Keith Price favored throwing to other receivers. Seferian-Jenkins showed some improvement as a blocker and was a contributor to Sankey's big season on the ground.
Seferian-Jenkins was in the running as the best tight end in college football as a freshman in 2011. He was an absolute force as a receiver and a blocker. Seferian-Jenkins already has an NFL body with the speed to be a top tight end at the next level. As a prospect, he looks like he could develop into a tight end on a par with Rob Gronkowski or Jimmy Graham.
|
On August 27 2014 00:46 GTR wrote: i personally think charles is the better pick for #1, especially in PPR and considering mccoy's injury scare in the pre-season game. i definitely would value lacy over mccoy in non-PPR formats, at least in my opinion. (charles/AP/lacy/mccoy) In ppr I'd still take mccoy over any of them. AP and Charles have had far worse injuries then anything mccoy has even been close to
|
On August 27 2014 12:19 tonight wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2014 00:46 GTR wrote: i personally think charles is the better pick for #1, especially in PPR and considering mccoy's injury scare in the pre-season game. i definitely would value lacy over mccoy in non-PPR formats, at least in my opinion. (charles/AP/lacy/mccoy) In ppr I'd still take mccoy over any of them. AP and Charles have had far worse injuries then anything mccoy has even been close to
I 100% agree. Hell I might even stress AP over Charles. I am still spooked out by him. I drafted him the year he tore his ACL first game.
|
All 5 top consensus backs have had their share of injuries.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think Shady has the healthiest history among them.
|
On August 27 2014 21:29 c0ldfusion wrote: All 5 top consensus backs have had their share of injuries.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think Shady has the healthiest history among them. Forte has been healthiest, and besides the year he missed with the ACL, Charles has been healthier too. Peterson has been nearly equally as healthy over a longer period of time, and we only have one data point for Lacy. These are mostly all close, but if we want to be pedantic, it's probably:
1. Forte 2. Charles 3. Peterson 4. McCoy
Excluding Lacy for the lack of information.
|
|
|
|
|
|