|
On October 03 2015 06:44 Parnage wrote:Doing some elite streaming as I know some of the folks here expressed interest and or wanted to ask questions etc. Feel free to stop in. Or not. I'll be space mining. http://www.twitch.tv/parnage
I always loved space games but never had the patience to learn them. Tried EVE once lasted like a week and a half before I got so confused I stopped.
|
|
|
On October 03 2015 06:29 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 04:23 wei2coolman wrote:
setting up a vanguard account was a lot more painless than I thought it would be.
shoutout to csheep for the s&p500 index suggestion. whats vanguard?
Investment management company, needed to rollover my 401k.
it's pretty disgusting how this entire thing was handled.
I don't know how the fuck you code your game engine so that it's capped at 30 fps, and unable to simply switch a simple setting so that the game isn't capped at 30 fps for pc games. Like, how is this not a 2 second solution to this shit?
And you partner with nvidia for "gamewerks" or whatever bullshit nvidia is shilling to these idiots, and you still can't fucking run the game at a capped 30 fps on a fucking 340 USD GPU ??? (gtx 970) It also blows my mind that a game that is slated for Console release, would team up with nvidia, when ps4 and the xbox one are both powered by AMD GCN architecture. Jesus, these guys are incompetent fucks.
|
http://www.twitch.tv/crusnik77
Streaming my attempts at getting Gordian gear from the Heavensward raid, normal version if people are interested in how FF14 plays at all.
|
Tactics Ogre is truly a game of patience. Zzzz.... awfully slow character progression...
I think I should drop the game and play something else.
|
On October 03 2015 07:48 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 06:29 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On October 03 2015 04:23 wei2coolman wrote:
setting up a vanguard account was a lot more painless than I thought it would be.
shoutout to csheep for the s&p500 index suggestion. whats vanguard? Investment management company, needed to rollover my 401k. it's pretty disgusting how this entire thing was handled. I don't know how the fuck you code your game engine so that it's capped at 30 fps, and unable to simply switch a simple setting so that the game isn't capped at 30 fps for pc games. Like, how is this not a 2 second solution to this shit? And you partner with nvidia for "gamewerks" or whatever bullshit nvidia is shilling to these idiots, and you still can't fucking run the game at a capped 30 fps on a fucking 340 USD GPU ??? (gtx 970) It also blows my mind that a game that is slated for Console release, would team up with nvidia, when ps4 and the xbox one are both powered by AMD GCN architecture. Jesus, these guys are incompetent fucks.
it was unacceptable. but it wasnt an easy fix. the engine/general setup couldnt handle more than 30fps which is why they set the cap. when people "hacked" it and took off the hard limit there were huge performance issues. they re optimized it and re released it and honestly now its pretty fun for a while. but they shouldn't have released it like that obviously
|
On October 03 2015 11:14 ComaDose wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 07:48 wei2coolman wrote:On October 03 2015 06:29 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On October 03 2015 04:23 wei2coolman wrote:
setting up a vanguard account was a lot more painless than I thought it would be.
shoutout to csheep for the s&p500 index suggestion. whats vanguard? Investment management company, needed to rollover my 401k. it's pretty disgusting how this entire thing was handled. I don't know how the fuck you code your game engine so that it's capped at 30 fps, and unable to simply switch a simple setting so that the game isn't capped at 30 fps for pc games. Like, how is this not a 2 second solution to this shit? And you partner with nvidia for "gamewerks" or whatever bullshit nvidia is shilling to these idiots, and you still can't fucking run the game at a capped 30 fps on a fucking 340 USD GPU ??? (gtx 970) It also blows my mind that a game that is slated for Console release, would team up with nvidia, when ps4 and the xbox one are both powered by AMD GCN architecture. Jesus, these guys are incompetent fucks. it was unacceptable. but it wasnt an easy fix. the engine/general setup couldnt handle more than 30fps which is why they set the cap. when people "hacked" it and took off the hard limit there were huge performance issues. they re optimized it and re released it and honestly now its pretty fun for a while. but they shouldn't have released it like that obviously
You forgot the part where nvidia sped up the game footage to try and fake 60fps on youtube of the game. It was truely a collusion to try and push out a product that had no right to be set out to the market and the only reason it was even pulled off is because steam refund exists. Which is pretty damn sad that it takes mass returns for a product that poorly done to be pulled off and I'd put money down and say that if it wasn't possible to return the game wouldn't of been pulled at all.
|
Saw The Martian, was a lot better than I expected it to be. But on the other hand, I expected it to be absolute shit because I'm not a Matt Damon fan.
|
On October 03 2015 10:24 Crusnik wrote:http://www.twitch.tv/crusnik77Streaming my attempts at getting Gordian gear from the Heavensward raid, normal version if people are interested in how FF14 plays at all.
wow. I need to get that game at some point. looks really great
|
On October 03 2015 12:00 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:wow. I need to get that game at some point. looks really great
Im on Jenova if you do get it, you can try a free trial of the game for 2 weeks that caps your character at 20, but that's isnt really an issue since you can get every class to 20 on a single character.
|
On October 03 2015 12:05 Crusnik wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 12:00 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On October 03 2015 10:24 Crusnik wrote:http://www.twitch.tv/crusnik77Streaming my attempts at getting Gordian gear from the Heavensward raid, normal version if people are interested in how FF14 plays at all. wow. I need to get that game at some point. looks really great Im on Jenova if you do get it, you can try a free trial of the game for 2 weeks that caps your character at 20, but that's isnt really an issue since you can get every class to 20 on a single character.
I'll prob try it at some point.
|
On October 03 2015 11:14 ComaDose wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 07:48 wei2coolman wrote:On October 03 2015 06:29 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On October 03 2015 04:23 wei2coolman wrote:
setting up a vanguard account was a lot more painless than I thought it would be.
shoutout to csheep for the s&p500 index suggestion. whats vanguard? Investment management company, needed to rollover my 401k. it's pretty disgusting how this entire thing was handled. I don't know how the fuck you code your game engine so that it's capped at 30 fps, and unable to simply switch a simple setting so that the game isn't capped at 30 fps for pc games. Like, how is this not a 2 second solution to this shit? And you partner with nvidia for "gamewerks" or whatever bullshit nvidia is shilling to these idiots, and you still can't fucking run the game at a capped 30 fps on a fucking 340 USD GPU ??? (gtx 970) It also blows my mind that a game that is slated for Console release, would team up with nvidia, when ps4 and the xbox one are both powered by AMD GCN architecture. Jesus, these guys are incompetent fucks. it was unacceptable. but it wasnt an easy fix. the engine/general setup couldnt handle more than 30fps which is why they set the cap. when people "hacked" it and took off the hard limit there were huge performance issues. they re optimized it and re released it and honestly now its pretty fun for a while. but they shouldn't have released it like that obviously
Which falls into spaghetti code. Like how did they manage to fuck it up so badly so that it was hardcoded, and that poorly optimized?
|
On October 03 2015 11:50 Parnage wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 11:14 ComaDose wrote:On October 03 2015 07:48 wei2coolman wrote:On October 03 2015 06:29 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On October 03 2015 04:23 wei2coolman wrote:
setting up a vanguard account was a lot more painless than I thought it would be.
shoutout to csheep for the s&p500 index suggestion. whats vanguard? Investment management company, needed to rollover my 401k. it's pretty disgusting how this entire thing was handled. I don't know how the fuck you code your game engine so that it's capped at 30 fps, and unable to simply switch a simple setting so that the game isn't capped at 30 fps for pc games. Like, how is this not a 2 second solution to this shit? And you partner with nvidia for "gamewerks" or whatever bullshit nvidia is shilling to these idiots, and you still can't fucking run the game at a capped 30 fps on a fucking 340 USD GPU ??? (gtx 970) It also blows my mind that a game that is slated for Console release, would team up with nvidia, when ps4 and the xbox one are both powered by AMD GCN architecture. Jesus, these guys are incompetent fucks. it was unacceptable. but it wasnt an easy fix. the engine/general setup couldnt handle more than 30fps which is why they set the cap. when people "hacked" it and took off the hard limit there were huge performance issues. they re optimized it and re released it and honestly now its pretty fun for a while. but they shouldn't have released it like that obviously You forgot the part where nvidia sped up the game footage to try and fake 60fps on youtube of the game. It was truely a collusion to try and push out a product that had no right to be set out to the market and the only reason it was even pulled off is because steam refund exists. Which is pretty damn sad that it takes mass returns for a product that poorly done to be pulled off and I'd put money down and say that if it wasn't possible to return the game wouldn't of been pulled at all.
yeah i said. "unacceptable" "shouldn't have been released" didn't know about lying about frame rate tho. my only point was that it wasnt an easy fix that would take 2 seconds.
On October 03 2015 12:07 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 11:14 ComaDose wrote:On October 03 2015 07:48 wei2coolman wrote:On October 03 2015 06:29 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On October 03 2015 04:23 wei2coolman wrote:
setting up a vanguard account was a lot more painless than I thought it would be.
shoutout to csheep for the s&p500 index suggestion. whats vanguard? Investment management company, needed to rollover my 401k. it's pretty disgusting how this entire thing was handled. I don't know how the fuck you code your game engine so that it's capped at 30 fps, and unable to simply switch a simple setting so that the game isn't capped at 30 fps for pc games. Like, how is this not a 2 second solution to this shit? And you partner with nvidia for "gamewerks" or whatever bullshit nvidia is shilling to these idiots, and you still can't fucking run the game at a capped 30 fps on a fucking 340 USD GPU ??? (gtx 970) It also blows my mind that a game that is slated for Console release, would team up with nvidia, when ps4 and the xbox one are both powered by AMD GCN architecture. Jesus, these guys are incompetent fucks. it was unacceptable. but it wasnt an easy fix. the engine/general setup couldnt handle more than 30fps which is why they set the cap. when people "hacked" it and took off the hard limit there were huge performance issues. they re optimized it and re released it and honestly now its pretty fun for a while. but they shouldn't have released it like that obviously Which falls into spaghetti code. Like how did they manage to fuck it up so badly so that it was hardcoded, and that poorly optimized?
It was horribly developed!
|
On October 03 2015 12:07 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 11:14 ComaDose wrote:On October 03 2015 07:48 wei2coolman wrote:On October 03 2015 06:29 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On October 03 2015 04:23 wei2coolman wrote:
setting up a vanguard account was a lot more painless than I thought it would be.
shoutout to csheep for the s&p500 index suggestion. whats vanguard? Investment management company, needed to rollover my 401k. it's pretty disgusting how this entire thing was handled. I don't know how the fuck you code your game engine so that it's capped at 30 fps, and unable to simply switch a simple setting so that the game isn't capped at 30 fps for pc games. Like, how is this not a 2 second solution to this shit? And you partner with nvidia for "gamewerks" or whatever bullshit nvidia is shilling to these idiots, and you still can't fucking run the game at a capped 30 fps on a fucking 340 USD GPU ??? (gtx 970) It also blows my mind that a game that is slated for Console release, would team up with nvidia, when ps4 and the xbox one are both powered by AMD GCN architecture. Jesus, these guys are incompetent fucks. it was unacceptable. but it wasnt an easy fix. the engine/general setup couldnt handle more than 30fps which is why they set the cap. when people "hacked" it and took off the hard limit there were huge performance issues. they re optimized it and re released it and honestly now its pretty fun for a while. but they shouldn't have released it like that obviously Which falls into spaghetti code. Like how did they manage to fuck it up so badly so that it was hardcoded, and that poorly optimized?
Question: Do you actually know what spaghetti code is?
|
On October 03 2015 12:07 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 11:14 ComaDose wrote:On October 03 2015 07:48 wei2coolman wrote:On October 03 2015 06:29 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On October 03 2015 04:23 wei2coolman wrote:
setting up a vanguard account was a lot more painless than I thought it would be.
shoutout to csheep for the s&p500 index suggestion. whats vanguard? Investment management company, needed to rollover my 401k. it's pretty disgusting how this entire thing was handled. I don't know how the fuck you code your game engine so that it's capped at 30 fps, and unable to simply switch a simple setting so that the game isn't capped at 30 fps for pc games. Like, how is this not a 2 second solution to this shit? And you partner with nvidia for "gamewerks" or whatever bullshit nvidia is shilling to these idiots, and you still can't fucking run the game at a capped 30 fps on a fucking 340 USD GPU ??? (gtx 970) It also blows my mind that a game that is slated for Console release, would team up with nvidia, when ps4 and the xbox one are both powered by AMD GCN architecture. Jesus, these guys are incompetent fucks. it was unacceptable. but it wasnt an easy fix. the engine/general setup couldnt handle more than 30fps which is why they set the cap. when people "hacked" it and took off the hard limit there were huge performance issues. they re optimized it and re released it and honestly now its pretty fun for a while. but they shouldn't have released it like that obviously Which falls into spaghetti code. Like how did they manage to fuck it up so badly so that it was hardcoded, and that poorly optimized?
There might be a few reasons.
My top bet is simply poor QA. It's possible that it was simply never tested for PC in the first place, or it was undertested; after all, there are TONS of different PC specs out there and it's hard to capture everything.
The more likely scenario is a combination of poor planning and poor management. It's possible that the project was approaching its deadline, so there wasn't enough time to make sure everything meshes together. Management decided to take a gamble knowing that the game runs poorly on the PC (it DOES run, but only on very high end PCs IIRC). It's also possible that the game was never intended to be initally released on the PC - but a PC release was pushed out nevertheless. Alternatively, the game was initially developed for console, and it was assumed that porting to PC was an easy task. It wasn't, and everything fell apart.
|
On October 03 2015 12:26 Sufficiency wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 12:07 wei2coolman wrote:On October 03 2015 11:14 ComaDose wrote:On October 03 2015 07:48 wei2coolman wrote:On October 03 2015 06:29 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On October 03 2015 04:23 wei2coolman wrote:
setting up a vanguard account was a lot more painless than I thought it would be.
shoutout to csheep for the s&p500 index suggestion. whats vanguard? Investment management company, needed to rollover my 401k. it's pretty disgusting how this entire thing was handled. I don't know how the fuck you code your game engine so that it's capped at 30 fps, and unable to simply switch a simple setting so that the game isn't capped at 30 fps for pc games. Like, how is this not a 2 second solution to this shit? And you partner with nvidia for "gamewerks" or whatever bullshit nvidia is shilling to these idiots, and you still can't fucking run the game at a capped 30 fps on a fucking 340 USD GPU ??? (gtx 970) It also blows my mind that a game that is slated for Console release, would team up with nvidia, when ps4 and the xbox one are both powered by AMD GCN architecture. Jesus, these guys are incompetent fucks. it was unacceptable. but it wasnt an easy fix. the engine/general setup couldnt handle more than 30fps which is why they set the cap. when people "hacked" it and took off the hard limit there were huge performance issues. they re optimized it and re released it and honestly now its pretty fun for a while. but they shouldn't have released it like that obviously Which falls into spaghetti code. Like how did they manage to fuck it up so badly so that it was hardcoded, and that poorly optimized? There might be a few reasons. My top bet is simply poor QA. It's possible that it was simply never tested for PC in the first place, or it was undertested; after all, there are TONS of different PC specs out there and it's hard to capture everything. The more likely scenario is a combination of poor planning and poor management. It's possible that the project was approaching its deadline, so there wasn't enough time to make sure everything meshes together. Management decided to take a gamble knowing that the game runs poorly on the PC (it DOES run, but only on very high end PCs IIRC). It's also possible that the game was never intended to be initally released on the PC - but a PC release was pushed out nevertheless. Alternatively, the game was initially developed for console, and it was assumed that porting to PC was an easy task. It wasn't, and everything fell apart.
That's what I assumed, but still boggles my mind how they thought it was ok to release it in that status.
|
On October 03 2015 12:29 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 12:26 Sufficiency wrote:On October 03 2015 12:07 wei2coolman wrote:On October 03 2015 11:14 ComaDose wrote:On October 03 2015 07:48 wei2coolman wrote:On October 03 2015 06:29 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On October 03 2015 04:23 wei2coolman wrote:
setting up a vanguard account was a lot more painless than I thought it would be.
shoutout to csheep for the s&p500 index suggestion. whats vanguard? Investment management company, needed to rollover my 401k. it's pretty disgusting how this entire thing was handled. I don't know how the fuck you code your game engine so that it's capped at 30 fps, and unable to simply switch a simple setting so that the game isn't capped at 30 fps for pc games. Like, how is this not a 2 second solution to this shit? And you partner with nvidia for "gamewerks" or whatever bullshit nvidia is shilling to these idiots, and you still can't fucking run the game at a capped 30 fps on a fucking 340 USD GPU ??? (gtx 970) It also blows my mind that a game that is slated for Console release, would team up with nvidia, when ps4 and the xbox one are both powered by AMD GCN architecture. Jesus, these guys are incompetent fucks. it was unacceptable. but it wasnt an easy fix. the engine/general setup couldnt handle more than 30fps which is why they set the cap. when people "hacked" it and took off the hard limit there were huge performance issues. they re optimized it and re released it and honestly now its pretty fun for a while. but they shouldn't have released it like that obviously Which falls into spaghetti code. Like how did they manage to fuck it up so badly so that it was hardcoded, and that poorly optimized? There might be a few reasons. My top bet is simply poor QA. It's possible that it was simply never tested for PC in the first place, or it was undertested; after all, there are TONS of different PC specs out there and it's hard to capture everything. The more likely scenario is a combination of poor planning and poor management. It's possible that the project was approaching its deadline, so there wasn't enough time to make sure everything meshes together. Management decided to take a gamble knowing that the game runs poorly on the PC (it DOES run, but only on very high end PCs IIRC). It's also possible that the game was never intended to be initally released on the PC - but a PC release was pushed out nevertheless. Alternatively, the game was initially developed for console, and it was assumed that porting to PC was an easy task. It wasn't, and everything fell apart. That's what I assumed, but still boggles my mind how they thought it was ok to release it in that status.
I can see why, to be honest. I've seen disastrous projects - while probably not on that kind of budget - being released with heavy consequences.
|
I'll stream some more tomorrow/Sunday, so if people have questions or what not, let me know.
|
are OC memes okay? i just made this after watching the legacy of the void trailer and i think im funny + Show Spoiler +
|
Finally hit MG1 on CSGO not a huge achievement but ill take it after being stuck in nova for so long
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/LiN0Dg9.jpg)
