EPTOn January 22 2014 11:48 Frudgey wrote:
I concur. I think Starcraft 2 is better than Brood War.
I concur. I think Starcraft 2 is better than Brood War.
...
Off-Topic General Discussion - Page 984
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21245 Posts
... | ||
|
Zess
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
On January 22 2014 11:48 Frudgey wrote: I concur. I think Starcraft 2 is better than Brood War. Get the fuck out | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
| ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On January 22 2014 12:26 WaveofShadow wrote: HS stream up again. (If yal'l want me to stop spamming my stream in here lemme know. ) STOP + Show Spoiler + we love you, stop thinking we don't like having you | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
Butts. | ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
On January 22 2014 11:31 GhandiEAGLE wrote: Kinda but SC2 is not the Brawl of BW. That's too low even for SC2. Well you'd have to screw up pretty hard to make a worse competitive game than the guy who outright hated competition and tried to suck every ounce of it out. | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
| ||
caelym
United States6429 Posts
On January 22 2014 09:12 jcarlsoniv wrote: 7-3 with a mage deck I thought was super shitty. 150g from it - weeeee just went 10-3 with this shitter (under water ele is argent, ogre, 2 flamestrikes): ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/qmkhrQ2.png) | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
| ||
|
kainzero
United States5211 Posts
On January 22 2014 12:37 Lord Tolkien wrote: Yeah, as I recall he designed Brawl to be as unfriendly to the competitive FGC as possible. Melee's stream pulled in like what, 30k viewers at APEX? I feel like Sakurai and most of Nintendo are really out of touch with what gamers want... | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
Do I think deliberately designing it to piss on the FGC is a good idea? I mean, why would you. But yeah. | ||
|
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21245 Posts
On January 22 2014 12:30 Requizen wrote: I enjoy SC2 and I never played BW all that competitively so I'll side with Frudgey Butts. willful ignorance - the worst kind of ignorance | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
On January 22 2014 13:01 Carnivorous Sheep wrote: willful ignorance - the worst kind of ignorance Willful butts, the smelliest kind | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On January 22 2014 12:47 Lord Tolkien wrote: I mean, yes and no. Yes in that the FGC at a pro level is incredibly annoyed by it. No in that they're selling the title to a mass audience, most of whom won't compete or care about the competitive pro level, and it's a one time buy (and thus they don't really need to focus on long-long term retention, outside of ensuring the regular target demographic gets enough hours out of it). Too much long-term retention for Nintendo means customers not buying other Wii/Nintendo console games, so they won't get royalties off of those purchases. Do I think deliberately designing it to piss on the FGC is a good idea? I mean, why would you. But yeah. Nintendo hates that smash is competitive. | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
On January 22 2014 13:15 jcarlsoniv wrote: Nintendo hates that smash is competitive. Yep. I honestly don't know why they've been pulling the asinine shit like trying to pull Smash out of Evo. I mean really, free publicity? I understand the initial design to not target Brawl towards FGC, but... | ||
|
kainzero
United States5211 Posts
On January 22 2014 12:47 Lord Tolkien wrote: I mean, yes and no. Yes in that the FGC at a pro level is incredibly annoyed by it. No in that they're selling the title to a mass audience, most of whom won't compete or care about the competitive pro level, and it's a one time buy (and thus they don't really need to focus on long-long term retention, outside of ensuring the regular target demographic gets enough hours out of it). Too much long-term retention for Nintendo means customers not buying other Wii/Nintendo console games, so they won't get royalties off of those purchases. Do I think deliberately designing it to piss on the FGC is a good idea? I mean, why would you. But yeah. I think that most gamers in general preferred Melee, even the casuals who have no idea about any of the techniques. Sure, when Brawl came out there is the shiny new game effect and it sold well, but the general opinion seemed pretty tilted towards Melee. I have no evidence though. Speaking of long-term retention, Nintendo's first-party games are infamous for almost never dropping in price unless they get a budget-game re-release. | ||
|
ketchup
14521 Posts
On January 22 2014 12:30 Requizen wrote: I enjoy SC2 and I never played BW all that competitively so I'll side with Frudgey Butts. Please ban. k thanks First troll can at least be called somewhat original, anyone who adds on to it is just not | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
Pokemon Bank when? | ||
|
Shelke14
Canada6655 Posts
| ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
| ||
