EPTAlso I'm not dead.
Off-Topic General Discussion - Page 729
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
Cixah
United States11285 Posts
Also I'm not dead. | ||
|
NotYango
United States719 Posts
On December 06 2013 12:12 ketchup wrote: For hearthstone, and for people just starting out. Is the warrior-beast deck one of the better/easier decks to work when starting out? It seems pretty easy to make. I also tried it a bit, and it was decent in practice mode. When you're starting out every deck basically uses the same pool of mediocre-to-good card quality neutrals--SSC, Novice Engineer, Yeti, etc. plus whichever of basic class cards are actually decent. | ||
|
BlackPaladin
United States9316 Posts
On December 06 2013 12:22 Cixah wrote: If you build murlocks I will disown you. You will be banished from wence you came. Also I'm not dead. RIP we knew you well. I'm totally carving a murloc onto your gravestone. | ||
|
ketchup
14521 Posts
On December 06 2013 12:26 NotYango wrote: When you're starting out every deck basically uses the same pool of mediocre-to-good card quality neutrals--SSC, Novice Engineer, Yeti, etc. plus whichever of basic class cards are actually decent. I suck and used warrior instead of hunter. Sorry! I meant the hunter's basic class cards. The hunter's basic cards are centered around beast cards, and there are plenty of beasts(with taunt, charge, etc) in the basic pool of cards. My point was that considering all of this, it seemed more easy for me to build an okay hunter deck compared to anything else due to how less of a chore it is to use his class cards in the deck. Did anyone else observe this or have I overlooked another basic class card pool which is easier to make a deck from? | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
Today is a good day. Also 15% off lol. | ||
|
kainzero
United States5211 Posts
On December 06 2013 12:05 GhandiEAGLE wrote: Thx bby WRONG ANSWER you're supposed to say "no i'm not that good yet" what kind of japanese were you raised on | ||
|
caelym
United States6421 Posts
| ||
|
NotYango
United States719 Posts
On December 06 2013 14:39 caelym wrote: only get midrange creatures. fml. Welcome to arena. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35172 Posts
On December 06 2013 13:21 ketchup wrote: I suck and used warrior instead of hunter. Sorry! I meant the hunter's basic class cards. The hunter's basic cards are centered around beast cards, and there are plenty of beasts(with taunt, charge, etc) in the basic pool of cards. My point was that considering all of this, it seemed more easy for me to build an okay hunter deck compared to anything else due to how less of a chore it is to use his class cards in the deck. Did anyone else observe this or have I overlooked another basic class card pool which is easier to make a deck from? Going to have to agree heavily. Even with half a Unleash the Hounds deck it's still a blast to play. | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
On December 06 2013 14:25 kainzero wrote: WRONG ANSWER you're supposed to say "no i'm not that good yet" what kind of japanese were you raised on The Weeaboo kind | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35172 Posts
I swear arena is giving me the biggest piles of jank ever. | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
On December 06 2013 15:48 Gahlo wrote: Heresy. I swear arena is giving me the biggest piles of jank ever. Heresy, or HERESY! ? + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/kA17Z.png) | ||
|
caelym
United States6421 Posts
On December 06 2013 15:48 Gahlo wrote: Heresy. I swear arena is giving me the biggest piles of jank ever. picked mage twice, haven't seen a single flamestrike or fireball yet -_-. completely scrubbed out the one free arena run you get, doing much better in the second run. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35172 Posts
On December 06 2013 16:31 caelym wrote: picked mage twice, haven't seen a single flamestrike or fireball yet -_-. completely scrubbed out the one free arena run you get, doing much better in the second run. I get mage once every other week it seems. | ||
|
ketchup
14521 Posts
On December 06 2013 15:46 Lord Tolkien wrote: Would it be too soon to call Hearthstone TLLOLs new Pokemon? I think it just has more to do with more people getting hearthstone beta keys. I believe it will be in open beta soon, and it seems like they are handing out a lot of keys. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
Is that it? And Hearthstone isn't nearly close to our new Pokemon, it's just some people have it, there's hype, others get jealous because they'd like to know what it's about, they get a key, they play it and have to talk about it because they spent so much time waiting for it they have to make it look like it was worth it for them, and then the cycle keeps going ('cept the part where people don't have a key, because it's becoming harder now). Whereas Pokemon? We didn't make people pick that up. We're all believers here. Our faith is true. We'd be kind of hipsters if Pokemon wasn't so popular already. I haven't touched the games since Gold/Silver. Speaking of which, how successful are X/Y? I don't seem to hear/read nearly as much about it as I did Black/White and B2/W2. On the other hand had it fluked I assume we'd hear even more about how the Pokemon franchise is dead or something. ... ah, fuck. Now I've got Pokemon music stuck in my head. And there'll prob be some more during WVGCW tonight if Jessie's up. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
* last line added just so it looks more PC i have no idea actually since i didn't play pokemans since like, gold edition or something Also I built a murloc deck. Now that cixah is dead, nobody can stop me anymore! | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
Mid or Feed
Korea (South)250 Posts
I play cheesy all-in aggro decks only and now that OTK is dead, I gotta find greener pastures. + Show Spoiler + I don't like wurloc all that much tbh, but aggro is aggro | ||
| ||
