| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On November 14 2013 05:58 onlywonderboy wrote: The hardcore players still prefer Melee, but as far as providing a much closer experience to Melee while also including an expanded character roster, P:M does a damn good job. Mew2King has gone on record saying he prefers P:M I believe. He's absolutely nasty at it too. | ||
|
Nos-
Canada12016 Posts
| ||
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On November 14 2013 06:02 Nos- wrote: Worked from home, and now it's 4. I have nothing to show for it. Good day all in all. In my experience this is how 9/10 "working from home" days go. | ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
-draft what I thought was a pretty good rogue deck and go 1-3, it all went downhill starting with the pally with a million hammers, truesilvers, and swords of justices. -draft what I think is an awful priest deck and go 7-3. Priest just OP? The funniest thing was when it was priest vs priest and I'm going first with cleric 2 owls and a spellbreaker in my hand. I start with cleric, he coins crusader. I owl suicide cleric. He plays lightwell. Owl. He plays lightspawn. Spellbreaker. I felt really bad for him. | ||
|
Zdrastochye
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
On November 14 2013 06:10 phyvo wrote: I don't understand hearthstone arena. -draft what I thought was a pretty good rogue deck and go 1-3, it all went downhill starting with the pally with a million hammers, truesilvers, and swords of justices. -draft what I think is an awful priest deck and go 7-3. Priest just OP? The funniest thing was when it was priest vs priest and I'm going first with cleric 2 owls and a spellbreaker in my hand. I start with cleric, he coins crusader. I owl suicide cleric. He plays lightwell. Owl. He plays lightspawn. Spellbreaker. I felt really bad for him. You actually understand it perfectly, Priest is batshit in arena, pally is batshit in arena, rogue is crap (yes rogue is totally fine but it's clearly worse than Priest/Pally/Mage in arena, plus I had a point to make). | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
| ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/about-the-game | ||
|
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On November 14 2013 06:28 jcarlsoniv wrote: This...has the potential to be awesome. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/about-the-game When you're given as much Kickstarter money as that project was, it sure as hell better be. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On November 14 2013 06:32 AsmodeusXI wrote: When you're given as much Kickstarter money as that project was, it sure as hell better be. I'm prolly gonna opt in for early access in the near future. Dogfighting module release next month... I just hope it doesn't Spore out on us. | ||
|
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
| ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
| ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
So close, and yet so very very far | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On November 14 2013 06:28 jcarlsoniv wrote: This...has the potential to be awesome. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/about-the-game So...someone give me the rundown? I tend not to pay attention to this kind of stuff anymore and I';m assuming it's not something I'll ever buy/play. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On November 14 2013 06:49 WaveofShadow wrote: So...someone give me the rundown? I tend not to pay attention to this kind of stuff anymore and I';m assuming it's not something I'll ever buy/play. Seems like all the MMO stuff from EVE that I want, without the whole "full time job" aspect. At least, that's the impression I got from my bro-in-law describing it to me. | ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
Then Spore happened. LE SIGH | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On November 14 2013 06:50 jcarlsoniv wrote: Seems like all the MMO stuff from EVE that I want, without the whole "full time job" aspect. At least, that's the impression I got from my bro-in-law describing it to me. Yeah MMOs all look fucking amazing but it's almost kind of nice that the whole genre just eliminates itself from my radar indefinitely. I always hate when games come out that I want to but won't get to play---MMOs I know I SHOULDN'T ever play even if I was interested so it's a little better for me. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
PlanetSide2 is great cuz it's big enough to feel like a whole world, and there's lots of personal development you can do with the certs, but I don't feel bad not playing for months at a time. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On November 14 2013 06:10 phyvo wrote: I don't understand hearthstone arena. -draft what I thought was a pretty good rogue deck and go 1-3, it all went downhill starting with the pally with a million hammers, truesilvers, and swords of justices. -draft what I think is an awful priest deck and go 7-3. Priest just OP? The funniest thing was when it was priest vs priest and I'm going first with cleric 2 owls and a spellbreaker in my hand. I start with cleric, he coins crusader. I owl suicide cleric. He plays lightwell. Owl. He plays lightspawn. Spellbreaker. I felt really bad for him. Honestly, I feel like the Arena format needs a little tweaking. If nothing else, the fact that you have to play every card you draft creates some issues. One being that it's hard to make risky picks early and then ditch the cards if you didn't get the later picks to back it up, so there are certain safe reliable picks you just make over and over again. Combined with the fact that the card pool is very neutral-heavy to begin with, you end up seeing a lot of the same cards every draft. You don't need the shared card pool of drafting in MtG, but even making it draft 40 use 30 would make me feel more comfortable overall with the format. Edit: Admittedly this issue partially solves itself as the card pool evolves. Part of why Arena falls back on the same picks is because we're playing with a base set that's got primarily got a card pool built around basic functions and not around specific archetypes and synergy. It's essentially the equivalent of a core set draft in MtG, and core set drafts blow because card synergy is fairly weak and archetypes are nonexistent, resulting in you just valuing card quality highest every time. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On November 14 2013 07:01 TheYango wrote: Honestly, I feel like the Arena format needs a little tweaking. If nothing else, the fact that you have to play every card you draft creates some issues. One being that it's hard to make risky picks early and then ditch the cards if you didn't get the later picks to back it up, so there are certain safe reliable picks you just make over and over again. Combined with the fact that the card pool is very neutral-heavy to begin with, you end up seeing a lot of the same cards every draft. You don't need the shared card pool of drafting in MtG, but even making it draft 40 use 30 would make me feel more comfortable overall with the format. I also hate getting a deck with maybe one epic, and then facing someone with 3 legendaries ~_~ | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
Won't be watching that again. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Afreeca Starleague
Leta vs ggaemo
Jaedong vs Queen
GSL
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
Escore
IntoTheTV X SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
