[IEM XIII] Katowice 2019 - Playoffs - Day 1 - Page 53
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
JJH777
United States4408 Posts
| ||
Alchemik
Poland7124 Posts
| ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:52 opisska wrote: If I had a team, my players would lose a week's salary for each instance of leaving a game when their buildings are not being destroyed. Zergs don't have buildings. | ||
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
| ||
Kazi25
Philippines236 Posts
| ||
Penev
28481 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:50 lolfail9001 wrote: Stream switched to soO's PoV and then Serral move commanded his entire army into soO and gg'd out. So, what is up, Serral? hehe I saw I just meant it's no 3-0 | ||
DBooN
Germany2727 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:52 Xain0n wrote: He would have lost against any top EU zerg with that command. Is this really the hill you're gonna die on? | ||
Rodya
546 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:52 JJH777 wrote: Serral was already way behind before the move command. That didn't matter. Yeah, commentators kept hyping up Serral nonstop so it seemed like the game was even or even in his favor. | ||
![]()
Nakajin
Canada8989 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:52 opisska wrote: If I had a team, my players would lose a week's salary for each instance of leaving a game when their buildings are not being destroyed. Considering teams don't pay their player these day it wouldn't be to bad | ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:52 JJH777 wrote: Serral was already way behind before the move command. That didn't matter. He was behind but he came back from way harsher situations. Definitely not way behind, that move was integral to his defeat. | ||
nojok
France15845 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:52 opisska wrote: If I had a team, my players would lose a week's salary for each instance of leaving a game when their buildings are not being destroyed. So a fantasy pro team? | ||
Fanatic-Templar
Canada5819 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:54 Rodya wrote: Yeah, commentators kept hyping up Serral nonstop so it seemed like the game was even or even in his favor. I guess he was behind in economy, so when he also lost too much with the move command he couldn't see an advantage to exploit for a comeback? | ||
fishjie
United States1519 Posts
| ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
Did you really watch the game? | ||
stilt
France2749 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:49 ZigguratOfUr wrote: I like how you act like David Kim was making all his decisions unilaterally without input from the rest of the balance team... He was leading the balance team tho so he should be taken as responsible, I really don't get why people are like "it's not his fault" for all the absurdity he threw at us, it's as if he has a immunity totem. It's not the only reason but his decision hurt the scene and the situation has improved drastically since he is gone, I am glad about it. I don't criticizise the person but his job. | ||
starkiller123
United States4030 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:55 Fanatic-Templar wrote: I guess he was behind in economy, so when he also lost too much with the move command he couldn't see an advantage to exploit for a comeback? and down an upgrade as well? I wasn't watching very closely so idk for sure | ||
DBooN
Germany2727 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:55 Fanatic-Templar wrote: I guess he was behind in economy, so when he also lost too much with the move command he couldn't see an advantage to exploit for a comeback? He hadn't even started his +2 while soO had it. The nydus worm would've been a hail mary. | ||
Fanatic-Templar
Canada5819 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:55 starkiller123 wrote: and down an upgrade as well? I wasn't watching very closely so idk for sure Yeah, he was definitely down in ranged attack. | ||
Alchemik
Poland7124 Posts
On March 03 2019 01:54 Xain0n wrote: He was behind but he came back from way harsher situations. Definitely not way behind, that move was integral to his defeat. he was extremely behind, +1 vs +2, fewer workers, soO started his 4th before Serral got even above 50 workers, a useless nydus being created | ||
sudete
Singapore3054 Posts
| ||
| ||