EPT[WCS 2018] Global Finals - Day 2 - Page 18
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Paljas
Germany6926 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:17 DarkGamer wrote: Chill. He is kinda right. Argueing a game was bad and telling what a pro should have done - beside it is clearly wrong - is just trying to bring negativity. Its not discussing the game. Beside that ur post is kinda aggressive ("go away with such a terrible attitude"). Chill  No it's not "trying to bring negativity". That's just what you "everything needs to be flowers" people read into it. I would be very disappointed if this attitude prevailed here, as it has done in so many other places of the internet. | ||
|
argonautdice
Canada2719 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:19 Paljas wrote: yo, showtime beat dark? how were the games? Game 1: Dark tried to proxy hatch and got scouted immediately and got rekt. Game 2: DIE MAUER | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16021 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:17 DarkGamer wrote: Chill. He is kinda right. Saying a game was bad and telling what a pro should have done - beside it is clearly wrong - is just trying to bring negativity. Its not discussing the game. Beside that ur post is kinda aggressive ("go away with such a terrible attitude"). Chill agreed. Pros should never be criticized. That's just trying to bring negativity | ||
|
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:19 Paljas wrote: yo, showtime beat dark? how were the games? Game 1 Dark failed proxy hatch and took 10 minute deatch animation, game 2 Showtime won a long macro game defending ling bane aggresion well and teching to enough carriers to close. | ||
|
JoeCool
Germany2520 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:19 Paljas wrote: yo, showtime beat dark? how were the games? In game one Showtime scouted Darks proxy-hatch and basically played it safe from there. Game 2 was pretty good though, went into lategame with lots of harrassing, big fights etc. | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:14 opisska wrote: So having an opinion about the gameplay which is not "everything is so amazing" is negative now? Go away with such terrible attitude, we are here to discuss the games and that requires the ability to say that we don't think some play was good. Are you kidding me, there have been 8 best of 3s so far between the top players, commentated by the best talent, and after the best game of the tourney the troll comes here to complain how not fun it is, and there hasnt been literally A SINGLE GOOD GAME, and I have the terrible attitude? Go to the store and buy a reality check. | ||
Nakajin
Canada8989 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:19 opisska wrote: No it's not "trying to bring negativity". That's just what you "everything needs to be flowers" people read into it. I would be very disappointed if this attitude prevailed here, as it has done in so many other places of the internet. You and I must have a very different use of Internet | ||
|
DBooN
Germany2727 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:19 opisska wrote: No it's not "trying to bring negativity". That's just what you "everything needs to be flowers" people read into it. I would be very disappointed if this attitude prevailed here, as it has done in so many other places of the internet. So calling games bad is fine but criticizing that post is bad? | ||
|
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:16 Charoisaur wrote: throwing low-tech armies in fortified maxed protoss positions does nothing - Dark was just a little bit too sloppy with the engagements and transitioned too late but his gameplan wasn't bad from the 13:00 mark forward dark had a few minutes to try the multitasking route, instead he went for a full blown undecisive engagement that did nothing, go watch it again, that should've been a multipronged attack Serral style. | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16021 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:20 Geo.Rion wrote: Are you kidding me, there have been 8 best of 3s so far between the top players, commentated by the best talent, and after the best game of the tourney the troll comes here to complain how not fun it is, and there hasnt been literally A SINGLE GOOD GAME, and I have the terrible attitude? Go to the store and buy a reality check. before the last game saying there hasn't been a good game isn't a controversial opinion. I liked the last game but I don't think disliking it is trolling/trying to bring negativity. | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16021 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:22 IshinShishi wrote: from the 13:00 mark forward dark had a few minutes to try the multitasking route, instead he went for a full blown undecisive engagement that did nothing, go watch it again, that should've been a multipronged attack Serral style. that's what I mean, his sloppy engagements lost him the game | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:21 DBooN wrote: So calling games bad is fine but criticizing that post is bad? Disagreeing with the poster's opinion on the game (and what the players should have done) is welcome and exactly what should happen, criticizing it for "negativity" is discussing form over substance and trying to silence an opinion without touching its substance, the worst enemies of any discussion. | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:19 opisska wrote: No it's not "trying to bring negativity". That's just what you "everything needs to be flowers" people read into it. I would be very disappointed if this attitude prevailed here, as it has done in so many other places of the internet. Jesus, you re unhinged. The internet is filled with places where everything is all about positivity? From which parallel universe were you warped in? If one couldnt enjoy a single game out of the 20ish that has been played by the best, commentated by the best, then what the hell is he doing here? | ||
|
yht9657
1810 Posts
| ||
|
DBooN
Germany2727 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:23 opisska wrote: Disagreeing with the poster's opinion on the game (and what the players should have done) is welcome and exactly what should happen, criticizing it for "negativity" is discussing form over substance and trying to silence an opinion without touching its substance, the worst enemies of any discussion. You might want to reply to the particular post that you disliked then. Most responses were criticizing the substance of the post. | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16021 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:25 DBooN wrote: You might want to reply to the particular post that you disliked then. Most responses were criticizing the substance of the post. On October 28 2018 03:09 Geo.Rion wrote: The clueless, random, uninformed and ill-willed negativity present at TL lr threads never seizes to amaze me. | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On October 28 2018 03:25 DBooN wrote: You might want to reply to the particular post that you disliked then. Most responses were criticizing the substance of the post. I was referring to: On October 28 2018 03:09 Geo.Rion wrote: The clueless, random, uninformed and ill-willed negativity present at TL lr threads never seizes to amaze me. I did not quote it full, but I thing the reference to "negativity" was pretty clearly related to that particular post and looking at the page, there is no room for any confusion. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45206 Posts
 | ||
| ||
