[IEM XII] Katowice - Qualifiers - Page 11
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
phyren
United States1067 Posts
| ||
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
On January 18 2018 23:12 phyren wrote: I know I'm being the wrong type of nerdhere, but....Kaelaris, dribble and drivel are 2 different words Yeah I think he was going for gibberish and not baby drool :D. Edit: Btw he is wrong. The Harry Potter writing is great. Fight me Kaelaris! | ||
phyren
United States1067 Posts
| ||
Ciaus_Dronu
South Africa1848 Posts
![]() | ||
Noonius
Estonia17413 Posts
On January 18 2018 23:13 Musicus wrote: Yeah I think he was going for gibberish and not baby drool :D. Edit: Btw he is wrong. The Harry Potter writing is great. Fight me Kaelaris! Harry Potter writing is Fifty Shades of Grey level great | ||
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
On January 18 2018 23:19 Noonius wrote: Harry Potter writing is Fifty Shades of Grey level great I haven't read that. But maybe I should! | ||
AzAlexZ
Australia3303 Posts
On January 18 2018 23:19 Ciaus_Dronu wrote: God roaches are terrible units ![]() Wait I thought roaches counter everything that is protoss Insert Roach meme | ||
DieuCure
France3713 Posts
| ||
Penev
28487 Posts
| ||
KappaKingPrime
United States468 Posts
![]() | ||
Myrddrael
United Kingdom291 Posts
| ||
Alarak89
United States882 Posts
| ||
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
| ||
![]()
Poopi
France12904 Posts
TvZ : 3 - 6 33% ZvP : 13 - 14 48% PvT : 10 - 7 59% KR final + open qualifier : TvZ : 7 - 9 44% ZvP : 19 - 23 45% PvT : 25 - 17 60% | ||
Anterwaare
22 Posts
On January 18 2018 23:13 Musicus wrote: Yeah I think he was going for gibberish and not baby drool :D. Edit: Btw he is wrong. The Harry Potter writing is great. Fight me Kaelaris! Does anyone else think Harry Potter has been one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises? Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert. Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to. >a-at least the books were good though r-right "No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs." I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King. | ||
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On January 19 2018 00:29 Anterwaare wrote: Does anyone else think Harry Potter has been one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises? Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert. Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to. >a-at least the books were good though r-right "No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs." I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King. Thanks for sharing! | ||
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
What's the context of this, did he slam Harry Potter on screen, or do you have a feud with him? | ||
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
On January 19 2018 00:55 intotheheart wrote: What's the context of this, did he slam Harry Potter on screen, or do you have a feud with him? Kaelaris slammed HP on the stream. | ||
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
| ||
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
On January 19 2018 00:58 intotheheart wrote: Did you fight him irl over it yet? Not yet, he scared. | ||
| ||