On August 21 2017 22:34 yht9657 wrote:
nice one click harass patchterran
nice one click harass patchterran
permission to use facepalm meme
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Noonius
Estonia17413 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:34 yht9657 wrote: nice one click harass patchterran permission to use facepalm meme | ||
yht9657
1810 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:35 Ansibled wrote: What? lmao. man I thought ppl are getting used to those patchterran jokes | ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
| ||
Mizenhauer
United States1552 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote: Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. | ||
Philozovic
France1676 Posts
| ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote: Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game | ||
Penev
28348 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:38 yht9657 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2017 22:35 Ansibled wrote: On August 21 2017 22:34 yht9657 wrote: nice one click harass patchterran What? lmao. man I thought ppl are getting used to those patchterran jokes Idd, GumBa gave it his all | ||
Mizenhauer
United States1552 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote: Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote: Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. | ||
10bulgares
352 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote: Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air | ||
Mizenhauer
United States1552 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote: Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air No income, inno would have just made vikings... He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over. | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
| ||
10bulgares
352 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:52 mizenhauer wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote: On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote: Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air No income, inno would have just made vikings... He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over. At some point Solar had won a few fights and had a lead with income. | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
And in this case there weren't even libs, solar what a noob | ||
Mizenhauer
United States1552 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:56 10bulgares wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2017 22:52 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote: On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote: Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air No income, inno would have just made vikings... He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over. At some point Solar had won a few fights and had a lead with income. He was down on workers for a good ten minutes. | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:58 mizenhauer wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2017 22:56 10bulgares wrote: On August 21 2017 22:52 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote: On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote: Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air No income, inno would have just made vikings... He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over. At some point Solar had won a few fights and had a lead with income. He was down on workers for a good ten minutes. What about potentially going for the main? With the big army lead that seems possible, maybe? Ofc solar doesn't have perfect information | ||
Mizenhauer
United States1552 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:59 The_Red_Viper wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2017 22:58 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:56 10bulgares wrote: On August 21 2017 22:52 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote: On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote: Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air No income, inno would have just made vikings... He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over. At some point Solar had won a few fights and had a lead with income. He was down on workers for a good ten minutes. What about potentially going for the main? With the big army lead that seems possible, maybe? Ofc solar doesn't have perfect information Going into those chokes against liberators? Seems like another way to die. The answer is that Solar needed a superior economy to fight/remax multiple times with various comps and wear Inno down. He went into that stage at an economic disadvantage though and was never able to win because of it. | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 21 2017 23:02 mizenhauer wrote: Show nested quote + On August 21 2017 22:59 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:58 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:56 10bulgares wrote: On August 21 2017 22:52 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote: On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote: On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote: [quote] Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air No income, inno would have just made vikings... He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over. At some point Solar had won a few fights and had a lead with income. He was down on workers for a good ten minutes. What about potentially going for the main? With the big army lead that seems possible, maybe? Ofc solar doesn't have perfect information Going into those chokes against liberators? Seems like another way to die. I mean they have to be in position for that, you cannot simply say "libs" no matter where solar could attack The point is that Solar could try something, he doesn't have to fully commit if it doesn't work. Not doing anything loses the game | ||
Poopi
France12466 Posts
But Dark lost to Dear and aLive lost to ByuL so I only have 3/5 LB :/. How many of you guys managed to have 4 or 5 right bets that session? | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
Title defense still doable | ||
| ||
Replay Cast
2024 GSL S2: Qualifiers
TY vs Bunny
ByuN vs SHIN
TBD vs Classic
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Rain 8670 Dota 2firebathero 485 Hyuk 469 actioN 277 Leta 247 Pusan 226 EffOrt 169 Dewaltoss 152 scan(afreeca) 104 Snow 75 [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games ceh9981 DeMusliM344 Livibee305 Liquid`LucifroN263 XaKoH 249 NuckleDu114 nookyyy 112 crisheroes32 QueenE2 Organizations StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • aXEnki StarCraft: Brood War• intothetv • Gussbus • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamez Trovo • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • Poblha League of Legends |
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
Reynor vs MaNa
GunGFuBanDa vs Spirit
Elazer vs Krystianer
SKillous vs MaxPax
Big Brain Bouts
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
hero vs Soulkey
AfreecaTV Pro Series
Reynor vs Cure
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Zhanhun vs DragOn
Dewalt vs Sziky
[ Show More ] CSO Cup
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Gypsy vs Bonyth
Mihu vs XiaoShuai
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
|
|