|
On August 21 2017 22:34 yht9657 wrote:
nice one click harass patchterran
permission to use facepalm meme
|
On August 21 2017 22:35 Ansibled wrote:What? lmao.
man I thought ppl are getting used to those patchterran jokes
|
Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable"
|
United States1916 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote:
Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable"
Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance.
|
Inno so bad can't even 2-0 while I see one patient
|
On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote:
Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance.
Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators.
Dunno i think Solar threw that game
|
On August 21 2017 22:38 yht9657 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2017 22:35 Ansibled wrote:On August 21 2017 22:34 yht9657 wrote:
nice one click harass patchterran What? lmao. man I thought ppl are getting used to those patchterran jokes
Idd, GumBa gave it his all
|
United States1916 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote:
Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game
You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out.
|
On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote:
Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out.
I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead.
|
On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote:
Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead.
Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air
|
United States1916 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote:
Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air
No income, inno would have just made vikings...
He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over.
|
Inno will lose this, no title defense :/
|
On August 21 2017 22:52 mizenhauer wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote:On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote:
Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air No income, inno would have just made vikings... He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over.
At some point Solar had won a few fights and had a lead with income.
|
I am not the only one who loses lots of drones to some hellions :D
And in this case there weren't even libs, solar what a noob 
|
United States1916 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:56 10bulgares wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2017 22:52 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote:On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote:
Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air No income, inno would have just made vikings... He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over. At some point Solar had won a few fights and had a lead with income.
He was down on workers for a good ten minutes.
|
On August 21 2017 22:58 mizenhauer wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2017 22:56 10bulgares wrote:On August 21 2017 22:52 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote:On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote:
Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air No income, inno would have just made vikings... He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over. At some point Solar had won a few fights and had a lead with income. He was down on workers for a good ten minutes.
What about potentially going for the main? With the big army lead that seems possible, maybe? Ofc solar doesn't have perfect information
|
United States1916 Posts
On August 21 2017 22:59 The_Red_Viper wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2017 22:58 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:56 10bulgares wrote:On August 21 2017 22:52 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote:On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:40 pvsnp wrote:
Your SAT vocab word of the day is "indefatiguable" Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air No income, inno would have just made vikings... He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over. At some point Solar had won a few fights and had a lead with income. He was down on workers for a good ten minutes. What about potentially going for the main? With the big army lead that seems possible, maybe? Ofc solar doesn't have perfect information
Going into those chokes against liberators? Seems like another way to die. The answer is that Solar needed a superior economy to fight/remax multiple times with various comps and wear Inno down. He went into that stage at an economic disadvantage though and was never able to win because of it.
|
On August 21 2017 23:02 mizenhauer wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2017 22:59 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:58 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:56 10bulgares wrote:On August 21 2017 22:52 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:52 10bulgares wrote:On August 21 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:47 mizenhauer wrote:On August 21 2017 22:44 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 21 2017 22:41 mizenhauer wrote:
[quote]
Or "Planetary Fortress" and "Liberator", because Solar was never able to attack and kill Inno because of them. This game had nothing to do with Inno's endurance. Solar didn't even try to find an opening really. He was so far ahead in army supply. Hydras can kill liberators. Dunno i think Solar threw that game You can't attack a planetary with ranged liberators sitting behind it. They lead you speak of would have evaporated in a second. He never attacked because he didn't have the economy to replace his army if he threw it all into an entrenched position. Add in the fact that it's Abyssal Reef and there are almost no good places to attack and you see how Solar was never able to close things out. I mean i get the idea, ofc planetaries plus libs are good in a defensive position. I would need to watch it once more a bit more closely, but right now i think there could have been an option to do SOMETHING with the lead. Agreed. Build spire and corruptors to deal more effectively with air No income, inno would have just made vikings... He needed to break him then and there after killing the first army. When he couldn't, the game was over. At some point Solar had won a few fights and had a lead with income. He was down on workers for a good ten minutes. What about potentially going for the main? With the big army lead that seems possible, maybe? Ofc solar doesn't have perfect information Going into those chokes against liberators? Seems like another way to die.
I mean they have to be in position for that, you cannot simply say "libs" no matter where solar could attack 
The point is that Solar could try something, he doesn't have to fully commit if it doesn't work. Not doing anything loses the game
|
France12911 Posts
Hahaha Maru managed to beat Stats!
But Dark lost to Dear and aLive lost to ByuL so I only have 3/5 LB :/.
How many of you guys managed to have 4 or 5 right bets that session?
|
Ok Innovation still in it for the possible playoffs
Title defense still doable
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
