|
United States97276 Posts
On June 01 2016 05:55 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? Nope. Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 05:51 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? or is there a way to have 3 options for Player A, Player B, Tie for each matchup? I don't understand.
each match can be 2-0, 1-1, or 0-2 if I understand the format right because it's "best of 2". So you could make an individual liquibet for every matchup in each grouping and have it be Player A, Player B, or 1-1 Tie as the options if somehow possible.
|
On June 01 2016 05:57 Shellshock wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 05:55 Seeker wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? Nope. On June 01 2016 05:51 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? or is there a way to have 3 options for Player A, Player B, Tie for each matchup? I don't understand. each match can be 2-0, 1-1, or 0-2 if I understand the format right because it's "best of 2". So you could make an individual liquibet for every matchup in each grouping and have it be Player A, Player B, or 1-1 Tie as the options if somehow possible.
Or just vote to predict a 2-0, and no one gets points if it goes 1-1.
So like I bet on Bomber > Hush, Bomber wins 2-0 so I get 1 point. I also bet on TY > Cure, but that goes 1-1, so no one gets points for that. It'd be the same as any other Liquibet for a match except you have to invalidate the ties.
|
United States97276 Posts
On June 01 2016 06:09 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 05:57 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 05:55 Seeker wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? Nope. On June 01 2016 05:51 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? or is there a way to have 3 options for Player A, Player B, Tie for each matchup? I don't understand. each match can be 2-0, 1-1, or 0-2 if I understand the format right because it's "best of 2". So you could make an individual liquibet for every matchup in each grouping and have it be Player A, Player B, or 1-1 Tie as the options if somehow possible. Or just vote to predict a 2-0, and no one gets points if it goes 1-1. So like I bet on Bomber > Hush, Bomber wins 2-0 so I get 1 point. I also bet on TY > Cure, but that goes 1-1, so no one gets points for that. It'd be the same as any other Liquibet for a match except you have to invalidate the ties.
yeah I would be ok with this idea too
|
On June 01 2016 06:09 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 05:57 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 05:55 Seeker wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? Nope. On June 01 2016 05:51 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? or is there a way to have 3 options for Player A, Player B, Tie for each matchup? I don't understand. each match can be 2-0, 1-1, or 0-2 if I understand the format right because it's "best of 2". So you could make an individual liquibet for every matchup in each grouping and have it be Player A, Player B, or 1-1 Tie as the options if somehow possible. Or just vote to predict a 2-0, and no one gets points if it goes 1-1. So like I bet on Bomber > Hush, Bomber wins 2-0 so I get 1 point. I also bet on TY > Cure, but that goes 1-1, so no one gets points for that. It'd be the same as any other Liquibet for a match except you have to invalidate the ties.
I think, that would be tooooo many bets for such small matches. Then I would prefer doing for each group 6 bets, with the names of the players and 2 options:
A. Advances
B. Doesn't advance.
|
On June 01 2016 06:26 Diabolique wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 06:09 Die4Ever wrote:On June 01 2016 05:57 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 05:55 Seeker wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? Nope. On June 01 2016 05:51 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? or is there a way to have 3 options for Player A, Player B, Tie for each matchup? I don't understand. each match can be 2-0, 1-1, or 0-2 if I understand the format right because it's "best of 2". So you could make an individual liquibet for every matchup in each grouping and have it be Player A, Player B, or 1-1 Tie as the options if somehow possible. Or just vote to predict a 2-0, and no one gets points if it goes 1-1. So like I bet on Bomber > Hush, Bomber wins 2-0 so I get 1 point. I also bet on TY > Cure, but that goes 1-1, so no one gets points for that. It'd be the same as any other Liquibet for a match except you have to invalidate the ties. I think, that would be tooooo many bets for such small matches. Then I would prefer doing for each group 6 bets, with the names of the players and 2 options: A. Advances B. Doesn't advance.
yea this is my favorite solution
|
On June 01 2016 06:39 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 06:26 Diabolique wrote:On June 01 2016 06:09 Die4Ever wrote:On June 01 2016 05:57 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 05:55 Seeker wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? Nope. On June 01 2016 05:51 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? or is there a way to have 3 options for Player A, Player B, Tie for each matchup? I don't understand. each match can be 2-0, 1-1, or 0-2 if I understand the format right because it's "best of 2". So you could make an individual liquibet for every matchup in each grouping and have it be Player A, Player B, or 1-1 Tie as the options if somehow possible. Or just vote to predict a 2-0, and no one gets points if it goes 1-1. So like I bet on Bomber > Hush, Bomber wins 2-0 so I get 1 point. I also bet on TY > Cure, but that goes 1-1, so no one gets points for that. It'd be the same as any other Liquibet for a match except you have to invalidate the ties. I think, that would be tooooo many bets for such small matches. Then I would prefer doing for each group 6 bets, with the names of the players and 2 options: A. Advances B. Doesn't advance. yea this is my favorite solution
It is not a good solution, because it is not the solution "either or", people could click all 6 players and get 3 points for sure, or if there is a group with 4 favorites (like now TY, Trap, soO, Cure), they could click these 4 and probably get from it 5 points guaranteed. But that would be the easiest way to code the liquibets.
|
On June 01 2016 06:59 Diabolique wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 06:39 Die4Ever wrote:On June 01 2016 06:26 Diabolique wrote:On June 01 2016 06:09 Die4Ever wrote:On June 01 2016 05:57 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 05:55 Seeker wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? Nope. On June 01 2016 05:51 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? or is there a way to have 3 options for Player A, Player B, Tie for each matchup? I don't understand. each match can be 2-0, 1-1, or 0-2 if I understand the format right because it's "best of 2". So you could make an individual liquibet for every matchup in each grouping and have it be Player A, Player B, or 1-1 Tie as the options if somehow possible. Or just vote to predict a 2-0, and no one gets points if it goes 1-1. So like I bet on Bomber > Hush, Bomber wins 2-0 so I get 1 point. I also bet on TY > Cure, but that goes 1-1, so no one gets points for that. It'd be the same as any other Liquibet for a match except you have to invalidate the ties. I think, that would be tooooo many bets for such small matches. Then I would prefer doing for each group 6 bets, with the names of the players and 2 options: A. Advances B. Doesn't advance. yea this is my favorite solution It is not a good solution, because it is not the solution "either or", people could click all 6 players and get 3 points for sure, or if there is a group with 4 favorites (like now TY, Trap, soO, Cure), they could click these 4 and probably get from it 5 points guaranteed. But that would be the easiest way to code the liquibets.
oh right lol, can't do negative points on Liquibets
|
TY please you need the points for Blizzcon! !!
|
On June 01 2016 07:03 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 06:59 Diabolique wrote:On June 01 2016 06:39 Die4Ever wrote:On June 01 2016 06:26 Diabolique wrote:On June 01 2016 06:09 Die4Ever wrote:On June 01 2016 05:57 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 05:55 Seeker wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? Nope. On June 01 2016 05:51 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? or is there a way to have 3 options for Player A, Player B, Tie for each matchup? I don't understand. each match can be 2-0, 1-1, or 0-2 if I understand the format right because it's "best of 2". So you could make an individual liquibet for every matchup in each grouping and have it be Player A, Player B, or 1-1 Tie as the options if somehow possible. Or just vote to predict a 2-0, and no one gets points if it goes 1-1. So like I bet on Bomber > Hush, Bomber wins 2-0 so I get 1 point. I also bet on TY > Cure, but that goes 1-1, so no one gets points for that. It'd be the same as any other Liquibet for a match except you have to invalidate the ties. I think, that would be tooooo many bets for such small matches. Then I would prefer doing for each group 6 bets, with the names of the players and 2 options: A. Advances B. Doesn't advance. yea this is my favorite solution It is not a good solution, because it is not the solution "either or", people could click all 6 players and get 3 points for sure, or if there is a group with 4 favorites (like now TY, Trap, soO, Cure), they could click these 4 and probably get from it 5 points guaranteed. But that would be the easiest way to code the liquibets. oh right lol, can't do negative points on Liquibets
How about just voting on top 2?
Or letting me have a look at the code, maybe it can be done right...
|
On June 01 2016 06:59 Diabolique wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 06:39 Die4Ever wrote:On June 01 2016 06:26 Diabolique wrote:On June 01 2016 06:09 Die4Ever wrote:On June 01 2016 05:57 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 05:55 Seeker wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? Nope. On June 01 2016 05:51 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? or is there a way to have 3 options for Player A, Player B, Tie for each matchup? I don't understand. each match can be 2-0, 1-1, or 0-2 if I understand the format right because it's "best of 2". So you could make an individual liquibet for every matchup in each grouping and have it be Player A, Player B, or 1-1 Tie as the options if somehow possible. Or just vote to predict a 2-0, and no one gets points if it goes 1-1. So like I bet on Bomber > Hush, Bomber wins 2-0 so I get 1 point. I also bet on TY > Cure, but that goes 1-1, so no one gets points for that. It'd be the same as any other Liquibet for a match except you have to invalidate the ties. I think, that would be tooooo many bets for such small matches. Then I would prefer doing for each group 6 bets, with the names of the players and 2 options: A. Advances B. Doesn't advance. yea this is my favorite solution It is not a good solution, because it is not the solution "either or", people could click all 6 players and get 3 points for sure, or if there is a group with 4 favorites (like now TY, Trap, soO, Cure), they could click these 4 and probably get from it 5 points guaranteed. But that would be the easiest way to code the liquibets.
Ok how about this ?
Have 6 options
Ask people to select 3 out of six and then vote
+ 1 point for each player who advance
|
On June 01 2016 15:45 Gawd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 06:59 Diabolique wrote:On June 01 2016 06:39 Die4Ever wrote:On June 01 2016 06:26 Diabolique wrote:On June 01 2016 06:09 Die4Ever wrote:On June 01 2016 05:57 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 05:55 Seeker wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? Nope. On June 01 2016 05:51 Shellshock wrote:On June 01 2016 04:47 Elentos wrote:On June 01 2016 04:45 Seeker wrote:
I have no f*ing way to make liquibets for this. Let's just enjoy the matches. Does the system not account for groups of 6 with 3 players advancing? or is there a way to have 3 options for Player A, Player B, Tie for each matchup? I don't understand. each match can be 2-0, 1-1, or 0-2 if I understand the format right because it's "best of 2". So you could make an individual liquibet for every matchup in each grouping and have it be Player A, Player B, or 1-1 Tie as the options if somehow possible. Or just vote to predict a 2-0, and no one gets points if it goes 1-1. So like I bet on Bomber > Hush, Bomber wins 2-0 so I get 1 point. I also bet on TY > Cure, but that goes 1-1, so no one gets points for that. It'd be the same as any other Liquibet for a match except you have to invalidate the ties. I think, that would be tooooo many bets for such small matches. Then I would prefer doing for each group 6 bets, with the names of the players and 2 options: A. Advances B. Doesn't advance. yea this is my favorite solution It is not a good solution, because it is not the solution "either or", people could click all 6 players and get 3 points for sure, or if there is a group with 4 favorites (like now TY, Trap, soO, Cure), they could click these 4 and probably get from it 5 points guaranteed. But that would be the easiest way to code the liquibets. Ok how about this ? Have 6 options Ask people to select 3 out of six and then vote + 1 point for each player who advance
This question was here already ... the system doesn't support it.
|
Season 2 Cluster@%&$ indeed.
Why are there two times listed?
|
On June 01 2016 16:52 Roadog wrote:
Season 2 Cluster@%&$ indeed.
Why are there two times listed?
The group is a round robin with 2 rounds. They'll do the first round starting at the first time, then a break, and then the 2nd round at the 2nd time.
|
TY Cure and Trap i reckon.
Can't wait to see how these groups play out.
|
Hush advancing would be the biggest upset if the year
A man can dream! Can t be worse than bunny in code A anyway
|
On June 01 2016 18:51 WGT-Baal wrote:
Hush advancing would be the biggest upset if the year
A man can dream! Can t be worse than bunny in code A anyway
Don't underestimate Hush, he's capable of amazing feats of terribleness.
|
Kinda sucks for soO he has to prepare for a Zerg today and a day later has to play in this group with no Zergs.
|
On June 01 2016 18:51 WGT-Baal wrote:
Hush advancing would be the biggest upset if the year
A man can dream! Can t be worse than bunny in code A anyway
actually given the format it probably wouldn't be that hard. Since it's round robin and you're only playing an opponent on two maps, you could probably eek out some nice wins and have a bunch of 6-4 5-5 4-6 records and manage to win based on ties
|
On June 01 2016 21:16 KingofdaHipHop wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 18:51 WGT-Baal wrote:
Hush advancing would be the biggest upset if the year
A man can dream! Can t be worse than bunny in code A anyway actually given the format it probably wouldn't be that hard. Since it's round robin and you're only playing an opponent on two maps, you could probably eek out some nice wins and have a bunch of 6-4 5-5 4-6 records and manage to win based on ties
Yeah but in a group like this, Hush shouldn't get together an average end record. And even if he did, one would expect some of TY, Cure, Trap, soO, Bomber to finish above average.
|
Go Jin Air!!!
Go Harry Potter!!!
Go Catch!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
