EPT[GSL Pre-Season] Semi Finals & Grand Final - Page 21
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
atrox_
United Kingdom1711 Posts
| ||
|
RvB
Netherlands6322 Posts
| ||
|
HellHound
Bulgaria5962 Posts
| ||
|
atrox_
United Kingdom1711 Posts
| ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:39 Tankz123 wrote: Somewhere.. poopfeast420 feels a weird tingeling in his body.. he whispers to himself.. "It is time... I shall return and ask the best questions!" Sadly, he asked REALLY good questions. It was hilarious. | ||
|
HellHound
Bulgaria5962 Posts
| ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
| ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16095 Posts
| ||
|
RaFox17
Finland4581 Posts
| ||
|
Thouhastmail
Korea (North)876 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:43 atrox_ wrote: does anyone know who those two guys are? NGC | ||
|
HellHound
Bulgaria5962 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:48 Yello wrote: so why didn't byul break the first set of force fields at the ramp with corrosive biles? He would never hit the army with how good herO is at microing Lack of a few months practice to instantly know the answer to such questions. Not that it would have helped you don't win fights in zvp while down 20 army supply | ||
|
seopthi
401 Posts
I don't think it's because zerg's would forget, but it is too slow. Perhaps it should be projectile similar to Fungal Growth | ||
|
HellHound
Bulgaria5962 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:50 seopthi wrote: Ravager was created ad hoc against force fields but I have never seen Corrosive Bile casted on one. I don't think it's because zerg's would forget, but it is too slow. Perhaps it should be projectile similar to Fungal Growth That explodes on impact? That would be cool I think | ||
|
Ansibled
United Kingdom9872 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:50 seopthi wrote: Ravager was created ad hoc against force fields but I have never seen Corrosive Bile casted on one. I don't think it's because zerg's would forget, but it is too slow. Perhaps it should be projectile similar to Fungal Growth I've seen it used a couple of times. They just forcefield again straight after though. | ||
GTR
51694 Posts
did not expect this song at a gsl | ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:49 HellHound wrote: Lack of a few months practice to instantly know the answer to such questions. Not that it would have helped you don't win fights in zvp while down 20 army supply would have been a better fight for Byul though if one third of his army wasn't cut off from attacking for the first part of the battle. Ravagers can deal a lot of damage with their auto-attack as well, probably way more than with corrosive biles because they actually hit stuff that way | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
HellHound
Bulgaria5962 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:51 Yello wrote: would have been a better fight for Byul though if one third of his army wasn't cut off from attacking for the first part of the battle. Ravagers can deal a lot of damage with their auto-attack as well, probably way more than with corrosive biles because they actually hit stuff that way Bile drops instant new FF ? Unless protoss meses up badly and loses a bunch of shit to bile it's the same as always. You need more shit or critical tech ( lurkers in numbers) | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16095 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:50 seopthi wrote: Ravager was created ad hoc against force fields but I have never seen Corrosive Bile casted on one. I don't think it's because zerg's would forget, but it is too slow. Perhaps it should be projectile similar to Fungal Growth I think corossive bile is fine. forcefields were fine in straight up engagements, they were only a problem in things like forcefielding the ramp. Ravagers prevent this abuse. | ||
|
HellHound
Bulgaria5962 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:55 Charoisaur wrote: I think corossive bile is fine. forcefields were fine in straight up engagements, they were only a problem in things like forcefielding the ramp. Ravagers prevent this abuse. Agreed. | ||
| ||
