EPT[GSL Pre-Season] Semi Finals & Grand Final - Page 17
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Penev
28485 Posts
| ||
|
Brutaxilos
United States2629 Posts
| ||
|
Arvendilin
Germany1878 Posts
| ||
|
Topdoller
United Kingdom3860 Posts
On December 18 2015 19:59 deacon.frost wrote: He needs to be more aggresive. You cannot be a passive against Zerg on current map pool and balance. Templars are a joke, psi storm has a range of 9. Lurkers have the same range... guess what happens. Also disruptor doesn;t kill a lurker on 1 hit, psi storm does less dmg, doesn't it? Maybe he could have shaded a few adepts into the lurker field to bait their attack, then storm the the field, BW play was similar wasnt it? | ||
|
CruelZeratul
Germany4588 Posts
On December 18 2015 19:57 Topdoller wrote: You are joking right? Storm is still brilliant and the fact you can recyle into Archons straight after using it is even better. Perhaps Zest should have tried Templar tech or simply put his Robo in a better position. You need 3 Storms to kill a single Lurker, that's hardly effective at all against that. | ||
|
CheddarToss
534 Posts
| ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
This is not just sending adepts in and hope to kill something, this is perfectly executed harass to the point that it looks really scary | ||
|
Brutaxilos
United States2629 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:03 Topdoller wrote: He needs to be more aggresive. You cannot be a passive against Zerg on current map pool and balance. Templars are a joke, psi storm has a range of 9. Lurkers have the same Do shades trigger attacks? | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16838 Posts
On December 18 2015 19:55 deacon.frost wrote: WEll he saw he hasn't any AtG damage. Don't make a fool from Life. Life would have reacted properly  Yeah of course, but then the lurker mass wouldn't absolutely fuck you like that. | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:02 Pandemona wrote: | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24583 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:03 Topdoller wrote: Maybe he could have shaded a few adepts into the lurker field to bait their attack, then storm the the field, BW play was similar wasnt it? well, there were no adepts or anything so you just have to storm the Lurkers. But it depends a bit on the situation and what stage the game is in. | ||
|
Penev
28485 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:01 royalroadweed wrote: Seems to be working pretty good so far. Yes, prepare to see it every game | ||
|
Phredxor
New Zealand15076 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:03 Topdoller wrote: Maybe he could have shaded a few adepts into the lurker field to bait their attack, then storm the the field, BW play was similar wasnt it? Don't think that'd work too well. Sacrificing adepts to get off a storm or two that won't even kill the Lurkers doesn't seem like a good idea. | ||
|
Arvendilin
Germany1878 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:03 Topdoller wrote: Maybe he could have shaded a few adepts into the lurker field to bait their attack, then storm the the field, BW play was similar wasnt it? BW play vs Lurkers was getting a lot of Dragoons (and maybe reavers) and otherwise do stuff normal since Dragoons are actually decent against Lurkers compared to Speedlots :0 But ofcourse bating shots is part of like cute things you can do to make it hurt less bad EDIT: Ohh and storm sucks in this game compared to BW  | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
| ||
|
CruelZeratul
Germany4588 Posts
| ||
|
Penev
28485 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:09 deacon.frost wrote: This map >< it's golden + Show Spoiler + not really | ||
|
CheddarToss
534 Posts
On December 18 2015 20:09 deacon.frost wrote: This map >< Yeah. This terrible map has no business being in the GSL map pool. | ||
|
Topdoller
United Kingdom3860 Posts
| ||
|
MiniFotToss
China2430 Posts
| ||
| ||
