|
On November 29 2015 05:17 Doublemint wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2015 05:15 KingofdaHipHop wrote:On November 29 2015 05:14 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On November 29 2015 05:12 KingofdaHipHop wrote: Wait what was different about charge 8 damage to charged target. Well that's fucked up that's like half a swipe and no big deal either way... but why did they change it in the first place? To give them a role vs adepts. Zealots are supposed to be the higher damage dealing option now
|
On November 29 2015 05:15 HellHound wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2015 05:12 Mozdk wrote:On November 29 2015 05:11 HellHound wrote:On November 29 2015 05:10 [PkF] Wire wrote: Should Solar have cut drones a bit earlier ? at 52 Or 54 with queens transfusing. 56 if he countered with lings. How can you possibly think you know the optimal drone count to counter a brand new build in a brand new game? What stupid nitpicking Somewhere around 50 is where he should have cut to have more shit. Point is he used up his inject on drones that should have been roaches also counting with lings is shit you can't get through wall and you would need to cut even sooner to have the lings AND enough shit to defend
It is not nitpicking when your claim is so definite.
|
On November 29 2015 05:18 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2015 05:17 Doublemint wrote:On November 29 2015 05:15 KingofdaHipHop wrote:On November 29 2015 05:14 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On November 29 2015 05:12 KingofdaHipHop wrote: Wait what was different about charge 8 damage to charged target. Well that's fucked up that's like half a swipe and no big deal either way... but why did they change it in the first place? To give them a role vs adepts. Zealots are supposed to be the higher damage dealing option now And then they proceeded to give adepts an attack speed upgrade because them being so tanky didn't make sense.
|
|
On November 29 2015 05:18 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2015 05:17 Doublemint wrote:On November 29 2015 05:15 KingofdaHipHop wrote:On November 29 2015 05:14 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On November 29 2015 05:12 KingofdaHipHop wrote: Wait what was different about charge 8 damage to charged target. Well that's fucked up that's like half a swipe and no big deal either way... but why did they change it in the first place? To give them a role vs adepts. Zealots are supposed to be the higher damage dealing option now
ah ok, ty all!
|
Sadly missed the first two games, how did Parting win?
|
On November 29 2015 05:19 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2015 05:18 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:On November 29 2015 05:17 Doublemint wrote:On November 29 2015 05:15 KingofdaHipHop wrote:On November 29 2015 05:14 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On November 29 2015 05:12 KingofdaHipHop wrote: Wait what was different about charge 8 damage to charged target. Well that's fucked up that's like half a swipe and no big deal either way... but why did they change it in the first place? To give them a role vs adepts. Zealots are supposed to be the higher damage dealing option now And then they proceeded to give adepts an attack speed upgrade because them being so tanky didn't make sense.
Protoss finally got their wish of Gateway = MMM haha.
Also, those mutas did too much damage, I think this is over now?
|
|
This is the solar we expected :D
|
|
High level zerg play right there.
|
On November 29 2015 05:19 KeksX wrote: Sadly missed the first two games, how did Parting win? Game 1 Solar did a stupid on Dusk Towers. Game 2 he did a 2-base chargelot/immortal all-in.
|
Lol Parting got completely destroyed that game
|
On November 29 2015 05:19 Mozdk wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2015 05:15 HellHound wrote:On November 29 2015 05:12 Mozdk wrote:On November 29 2015 05:11 HellHound wrote:On November 29 2015 05:10 [PkF] Wire wrote: Should Solar have cut drones a bit earlier ? at 52 Or 54 with queens transfusing. 56 if he countered with lings. How can you possibly think you know the optimal drone count to counter a brand new build in a brand new game? What stupid nitpicking Somewhere around 50 is where he should have cut to have more shit. Point is he used up his inject on drones that should have been roaches also counting with lings is shit you can't get through wall and you would need to cut even sooner to have the lings AND enough shit to defend It is not nitpicking when your claim is so definite. I meant around 52 drones sorry for the confusion Wasn't sure if ravegers would help you hold it off a higher drone count but it certainly didn't help in that game
|
|
yeah that was smartly played by solar.
|
oh dear how terribly unfortunate
|
Northern Ireland23759 Posts
Solar looking to re-establish the 'Z OP' narrative after it took a bit of a setback the last few days.
|
What could have Parting done different here? Honestly curious for data.
|
On November 29 2015 05:19 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2015 05:18 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:On November 29 2015 05:17 Doublemint wrote:On November 29 2015 05:15 KingofdaHipHop wrote:On November 29 2015 05:14 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On November 29 2015 05:12 KingofdaHipHop wrote: Wait what was different about charge 8 damage to charged target. Well that's fucked up that's like half a swipe and no big deal either way... but why did they change it in the first place? To give them a role vs adepts. Zealots are supposed to be the higher damage dealing option now And then they proceeded to give adepts an attack speed upgrade because them being so tanky didn't make sense. Yeah theres a slight discrepancy there xD
|
|
|
|