★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
33%
★★★- Good game (3)
33%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
22%
9 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 2?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (2)
25%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
38%
★★★- Good game (1)
13%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
25%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
13%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (3)
38%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
13%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (3)
38%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
13%
★★★- Good game (4)
50%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (3)
38%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend TLO vs Happy Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend TLO vs Happy Game 2?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
38%
★★★- Good game (4)
50%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
13%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend TLO vs Happy Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend TLO vs Happy Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (5)
42%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (7)
58%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
12 total votes
Your vote: Recommend TLO vs Happy Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (1)
5%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (15)
79%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (3)
16%
19 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
7%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (6)
40%
★★★- Good game (6)
40%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
7%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
7%
15 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (2)
15%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
8%
★★★- Good game (8)
62%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
15%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
13 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (4)
80%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
5 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 2?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
17%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (5)
83%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
6 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
25%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (3)
75%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
4 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4)
57%
★★★- Good game (2)
29%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
7 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 2?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (3)
23%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
8%
★★★- Good game (2)
15%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (7)
54%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
13 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (3)
38%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
38%
★★★- Good game (1)
13%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
13%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
WCS EU S2 Premier - MC is at ~ 99.99 % chances for top 16 points of 2014 ~ 68.66 % of the time MC wins and their chances go up to ~ 100 %. ~ 31.34 % of the time MC loses and their chances go down to ~ 99.99 %. ------------------------------------------------- - Golden is at ~ 2.57 % chances for top 16 points of 2014 ~ 41.55 % of the time Golden wins and their chances go up to ~ 5.3 %. ~ 58.45 % of the time Golden loses and their chances go down to ~ 0.63 %. ------------------------------------------------- - Happy is at ~ 5.37 % chances for top 16 points of 2014 ~ 44.64 % of the time Happy wins and their chances go up to ~ 9.65 %. ~ 55.36 % of the time Happy loses and their chances go down to ~ 1.92 %. ------------------------------------------------- - TLO is at ~ 3.47 % chances for top 16 points of 2014 ~ 45.15 % of the time TLO wins and their chances go up to ~ 6.24 %. ~ 54.85 % of the time TLO loses and their chances go down to ~ 1.18 %.
On May 27 2014 23:02 Undead1993 wrote: guys tlo lost to our lovely panda, nothing against desbro but come on. if he makes it out of this group i would be very impressed
On May 27 2014 23:02 Undead1993 wrote: guys tlo lost to our lovely panda, nothing against desbro but come on. if he makes it out of this group i would be very impressed
desbro is a pvz god obviously
TLO just loses to Protoss randomly it seems. I think he will lose against MC but he should get out of this group because his ZvT and ZvZ are good.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
33%
★★★- Good game (3)
33%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
22%
9 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Golden was floating so many minerals holding off that push with just queens and slow lings. If he had just tried to get ling speed I think he could have shoved MC back a lot sooner and maybe had enough time to macro up before the inevitable 2 base immortal sentry hit. Still really hard to hold
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
38%
★★★- Good game (1)
13%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
25%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
13%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (3)
38%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
13%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (3)
38%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On May 27 2014 08:53 looken wrote: FF, disgusting me since 2010
User was warned for this post
It's still disgusting...
Don't understand why he got warned... is there a place for us to say and fight against the warnings? I got warned for referring Terran as Broodlord-Infestor when everyone else was doing it in the same thread. It's like moderators can say anything we can't say that would warrant a warn.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
38%
★★★- Good game (1)
13%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
25%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
13%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (3)
38%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
13%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (3)
38%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Golden Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On May 28 2014 01:34 Lokken_8 wrote: Well, I hope that TLO and Happy can bring us some more interesting games.
I never liked to watch MCs shenigenz and today is just proving it again... Boring Toss instead of Boss Toss.
I find MC"s play the exact opposite of boring. He seems to understand at least the early and mid-game so well that he knows exactly what to do with his units to edge out an advantage. He constantly uses what units he has to the best of their ability to make his opponent take game-ending damage. On the other hand a lot of lower-tier toss and especially European toss prefer sitting back and macroing up to their dream composition while turtling on three base while shooting out hallucinated phoenix, which is the definition of boring to me.
FF just make games and fights so boring as TimeWarp. We dont need spells that prevents opponent's micro. I am very happy that terran and zerg dont have such spells.
On May 27 2014 08:53 looken wrote: FF, disgusting me since 2010
User was warned for this post
It's still disgusting...
Don't understand why he got warned... is there a place for us to say and fight against the warnings? I got warned for referring Terran as Broodlord-Infestor when everyone else was doing it in the same thread. It's like moderators can say anything we can't say that would warrant a warn.
On May 27 2014 08:53 looken wrote: FF, disgusting me since 2010
User was warned for this post
It's still disgusting...
Don't understand why he got warned... is there a place for us to say and fight against the warnings? I got warned for referring Terran as Broodlord-Infestor when everyone else was doing it in the same thread. It's like moderators can say anything we can't say that would warrant a warn.
i dont think you can. guess we just have to live with the reign of terror in these forums
On May 28 2014 01:37 Dingodile wrote: FF just make games and fights so boring as TimeWarp. We dont need spells that prevents opponent's micro. I am very happy that terran and zerg dont have such spells.
On May 28 2014 01:37 Dingodile wrote: FF just make games and fights so boring as TimeWarp. We dont need spells that prevents opponent's micro. I am very happy that terran and zerg dont have such spells.
Yeah, imagine if those races had things like fungal growth or concussive shells, would be weird.
On May 27 2014 08:53 looken wrote: FF, disgusting me since 2010
User was warned for this post
It's still disgusting...
Don't understand why he got warned... is there a place for us to say and fight against the warnings? I got warned for referring Terran as Broodlord-Infestor when everyone else was doing it in the same thread. It's like moderators can say anything we can't say that would warrant a warn.
On May 28 2014 01:37 Dingodile wrote: FF just make games and fights so boring as TimeWarp. We dont need spells that prevents opponent's micro. I am very happy that terran and zerg dont have such spells.
Yeah, imagine if those races had things like fungal growth or concussive shells, would be weird.
to be fair you can sort of micro out of fungal now that it's not instacast but yes i agree his comment was silly
On May 28 2014 01:37 Dingodile wrote: FF just make games and fights so boring as TimeWarp. We dont need spells that prevents opponent's micro. I am very happy that terran and zerg dont have such spells.
Fungal?
Oh your are right. No root but dmg to 45 and blink not possible during fungal.
I don't know, to me that series didn't even seem like "protoss bull" or whatever. Golden just wasn't at an adequate level. =/ And I really like the guy, so it's not like I'm lashing out as a hater or something.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
13%
★★★- Good game (4)
50%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (3)
38%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend TLO vs Happy Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On May 28 2014 01:51 MrMotionPicture wrote: TLO is playing like he is nervous. I know he is much better than this.
Did anyone notice he extractor trick'd at the beginning on the game ? He doesn't do that usually, it's like he had forgotten his first overlord. Also the misplaced hatches.
On May 28 2014 01:51 MrMotionPicture wrote: TLO is playing like he is nervous. I know he is much better than this.
Did anyone notice he extractor trick'd at the beginning on the game ? He doesn't do that usually, it's like he had forgotten his first overlord. Also the misplaced hatches.
that's just one of those things that happens sometimes as zerg. granted it might be a sign of nerves, but it's also inevitable, x out of 1000 games it's just going to happen
edit: i meant the overlord thing but i guess the hatches too now that i think of it
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
38%
★★★- Good game (4)
50%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
13%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend TLO vs Happy Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (5)
42%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (7)
58%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
12 total votes
Your vote: Recommend TLO vs Happy Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
TLO transfused an overlord before engaging. Abducted a viking into literally nothing. No blinding clouds when he pushed second time. Seriously, he seems to be so nervous.
WCS EU S2 Premier - MC is at ~ 99.99 % chances for top 16 points of 2014 ~ 68.66 % of the time MC wins and their chances go up to ~ 100 %. ~ 31.34 % of the time MC loses and their chances go down to ~ 99.99 %. ------------------------------------------------- - Golden is at ~ 2.57 % chances for top 16 points of 2014 ~ 41.55 % of the time Golden wins and their chances go up to ~ 5.3 %. ~ 58.45 % of the time Golden loses and their chances go down to ~ 0.63 %. ------------------------------------------------- - Happy is at ~ 5.37 % chances for top 16 points of 2014 ~ 44.64 % of the time Happy wins and their chances go up to ~ 9.65 %. ~ 55.36 % of the time Happy loses and their chances go down to ~ 1.92 %. ------------------------------------------------- - TLO is at ~ 3.47 % chances for top 16 points of 2014 ~ 45.15 % of the time TLO wins and their chances go up to ~ 6.24 %. ~ 54.85 % of the time TLO loses and their chances go down to ~ 1.18 %.
On May 28 2014 02:40 SNSeigifried wrote: Happy's ghost control is quite sick
Happy has the best micro of all foreigners. And I stand by that statement. What he's lacking is sometimes his macro is slipping and he loses games due to that.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (1)
5%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (15)
79%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (3)
16%
19 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
This is how terran is supposed to be played! People are so used to rally units and hope for the best because of the culture introduced by widow mine in hots.
Big fan of happy since Warcraft 3. It's a little bit weird that he plays such a different style (defensive, passive, and methodological) compared to his warcraft 3 style ( one of the absolutely best micro of all time, very aggressive strategies and on the fly decisions).
People who are becoming his fan now should learn about his warcraft 3 career. He was like a bad mannered version of Life. Hahaha he really couldn't keep his tongue down
On May 28 2014 02:59 Popkiller wrote: Another group where a foreigner comes within one game of advancing in first but fails, and then no foreigners advance?
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (6)
40%
★★★- Good game (6)
40%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
7%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
7%
15 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On May 28 2014 02:59 Popkiller wrote: Another group where a foreigner comes within one game of advancing in first but fails, and then no foreigners advance?
well if he loses to MC theres a high chance that he will not advance. He would have a hard time against the winner of Golden/TLO
one thing ive always hated in tvp is how terran can't mass retreat with medivacs once blink is out. it would be sick to see terrans microing medivac escapes from engagements so running into the deathball isn't just gg
I hope Happy wins this third game. I think there is a high risk that Happy would lose against Golden/a second series against TLO, while MC probably would not lose against either of these players if he loses this winner's match.
On May 28 2014 02:59 Popkiller wrote: Another group where a foreigner comes within one game of advancing in first but fails, and then no foreigners advance?
well if he loses to MC theres a high chance that he will not advance. He would have a hard time against the winner of Golden/TLO
Idk, he defeated TLO earlier and the last time, he played against Golden, he knocked him out of Copenhagen Games in the playoffs. TvZ can be a tough MU for Happy, but I would have faith in him in the final match.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
8%
★★★- Good game (8)
62%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
15%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
13 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
8%
★★★- Good game (8)
62%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
15%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
13 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On May 28 2014 03:22 azzih wrote: Hmm how could he loose that fight at MC's base? Perfect EMPs and the right army plus same upgrades?
Perfect EMP and same upgrades actually makes you even with protoss. Of course, on the other way, a few storms and you're completely dead. That's what makes you love this match up as a terran
On May 28 2014 03:22 azzih wrote: Hmm how could he loose that fight at MC's base? Perfect EMPs and the right army plus same upgrades?
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
On May 28 2014 03:22 azzih wrote: Hmm how could he loose that fight at MC's base? Perfect EMPs and the right army plus same upgrades?
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Funny how this defender's advantage disappears when Happy defends.
On May 28 2014 03:22 azzih wrote: Hmm how could he loose that fight at MC's base? Perfect EMPs and the right army plus same upgrades?
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Funny how this defender's advantage disappears when Happy defends.
um, what? Because it was a straight up engagement the entire time opposed to Happy targeting the nexus first and then fighting afterwards. There was 0 reason for MC's units to lock onto the CC or workers when higher priority targets were firing on them, and it was 3-3 versus 2-1 at that point.
On May 28 2014 03:22 azzih wrote: Hmm how could he loose that fight at MC's base? Perfect EMPs and the right army plus same upgrades?
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Funny how this defender's advantage disappears when Happy defends.
um, what? Because it was a straight up engagement the entire time opposed to Happy targeting the nexus first and then fighting afterwards. There was 0 reason for MC's units to lock onto the CC or workers when higher priority targets were firing on them, and it was 3-3 versus 2-1 at that point.
Maybe you should look up what defender's advantage means again.
On May 28 2014 03:22 azzih wrote: Hmm how could he loose that fight at MC's base? Perfect EMPs and the right army plus same upgrades?
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Funny how this defender's advantage disappears when Happy defends.
um, what? Because it was a straight up engagement the entire time opposed to Happy targeting the nexus first and then fighting afterwards. There was 0 reason for MC's units to lock onto the CC or workers when higher priority targets were firing on them, and it was 3-3 versus 2-1 at that point.
Maybe you should look up what defender's advantage means again.
Maybe you should read what you were quoting again.
On May 28 2014 03:22 azzih wrote: Hmm how could he loose that fight at MC's base? Perfect EMPs and the right army plus same upgrades?
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Funny how this defender's advantage disappears when Happy defends.
um, what? Because it was a straight up engagement the entire time opposed to Happy targeting the nexus first and then fighting afterwards. There was 0 reason for MC's units to lock onto the CC or workers when higher priority targets were firing on them, and it was 3-3 versus 2-1 at that point.
Maybe you should look up what defender's advantage means again.
Maybe you should read what you were quoting again.
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Definition of defender's advantage (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Defender's_Advantage): Defender's Advantage refers to the well-known idea that a player is defending an attack at his/her base is at an inherent advantage stemming from the fact that the attack is occurring at a minimal distance from the defender's production facilities and that the defender has additional time to produce units (due to map attack distances).
On May 28 2014 03:22 azzih wrote: Hmm how could he loose that fight at MC's base? Perfect EMPs and the right army plus same upgrades?
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Funny how this defender's advantage disappears when Happy defends.
um, what? Because it was a straight up engagement the entire time opposed to Happy targeting the nexus first and then fighting afterwards. There was 0 reason for MC's units to lock onto the CC or workers when higher priority targets were firing on them, and it was 3-3 versus 2-1 at that point.
Maybe you should look up what defender's advantage means again.
Defender's advantage pretty much means any factor causing a defending player to have an advantage over an attacking opponent.
Ramps, chokes, pre-set concaves, faster rallies, static defense, and yes, buildings which draw your opponents fire are all possible factors.
EDIT: Referring to your definition.. fair enough, I'd argue that definition needs to be expanded though.
On May 28 2014 03:22 azzih wrote: Hmm how could he loose that fight at MC's base? Perfect EMPs and the right army plus same upgrades?
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Funny how this defender's advantage disappears when Happy defends.
um, what? Because it was a straight up engagement the entire time opposed to Happy targeting the nexus first and then fighting afterwards. There was 0 reason for MC's units to lock onto the CC or workers when higher priority targets were firing on them, and it was 3-3 versus 2-1 at that point.
Maybe you should look up what defender's advantage means again.
Maybe you should read what you were quoting again.
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Definition of defender's advantage (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Defender's_Advantage): Defender's Advantage refers to the well-known idea that a player is defending an attack at his/her base is at an inherent advantage stemming from the fact that the attack is occurring at a minimal distance from the defender's production facilities and that the defender has additional time to produce units (due to map attack distances).
Um, yes, and Happy did have that defender's advantage of having his reinforcements at his base, forcing MC to attack up a ramp, and forming a concave beforehand with the CC blocking MC's zealots from spreading out evenly. It wasn't enough because MC was too far ahead. That fight would have been even more of a complete slaughter if it occurred on an open field. What are you even attempting to argue, seriously?
On May 28 2014 03:22 azzih wrote: Hmm how could he loose that fight at MC's base? Perfect EMPs and the right army plus same upgrades?
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Funny how this defender's advantage disappears when Happy defends.
um, what? Because it was a straight up engagement the entire time opposed to Happy targeting the nexus first and then fighting afterwards. There was 0 reason for MC's units to lock onto the CC or workers when higher priority targets were firing on them, and it was 3-3 versus 2-1 at that point.
Maybe you should look up what defender's advantage means again.
Maybe you should read what you were quoting again.
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Definition of defender's advantage (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Defender's_Advantage): Defender's Advantage refers to the well-known idea that a player is defending an attack at his/her base is at an inherent advantage stemming from the fact that the attack is occurring at a minimal distance from the defender's production facilities and that the defender has additional time to produce units (due to map attack distances).
Um, yes, and Happy did have that defender's advantage of having his reinforcements at his base, forcing MC to attack up a ramp, and forming a concave beforehand with the CC blocking MC's zealots from spreading out evenly. It wasn't enough because MC was too far ahead. That fight would have been even more of a complete slaughter if it occurred on an open field. What are you even attempting to argue, seriously?
On May 28 2014 03:22 azzih wrote: Hmm how could he loose that fight at MC's base? Perfect EMPs and the right army plus same upgrades?
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Funny how this defender's advantage disappears when Happy defends.
um, what? Because it was a straight up engagement the entire time opposed to Happy targeting the nexus first and then fighting afterwards. There was 0 reason for MC's units to lock onto the CC or workers when higher priority targets were firing on them, and it was 3-3 versus 2-1 at that point.
Maybe you should look up what defender's advantage means again.
Maybe you should read what you were quoting again.
Its called "defender advantage". Never take a fight if you can attack opponents base and army in the same moment, because some of your units is attacking the base ->free-loss.
Definition of defender's advantage (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Defender's_Advantage): Defender's Advantage refers to the well-known idea that a player is defending an attack at his/her base is at an inherent advantage stemming from the fact that the attack is occurring at a minimal distance from the defender's production facilities and that the defender has additional time to produce units (due to map attack distances).
Um, yes, and Happy did have that defender's advantage of having his reinforcements at his base, forcing MC to attack up a ramp, and forming a concave beforehand with the CC blocking MC's zealots from spreading out evenly. It wasn't enough because MC was too far ahead. That fight would have been even more of a complete slaughter if it occurred on an open field. What are you even attempting to argue, seriously?
You don't have defenders advantage vs protoss...
Yes you do. You don't have the garbage definition that liquipedia gives that could've been put there by any random contributor but he still has advantages as the defender. Even if warpin negates the reinforcement distance that still gives terran the advantage of their reinforcements being closer when fighting at his base compared to fighting midfield. Also like I said, ramp, concave, blocking CC.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (4)
80%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
5 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (5)
83%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
6 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
25%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (3)
75%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
4 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (5)
83%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
6 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
25%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (3)
75%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
4 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On May 28 2014 04:04 BaneRiders wrote: Is twitchtv lagging a lot for you? As soon as it gets exiting, it becomes difficult to watch... technically speaking that is.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4)
57%
★★★- Good game (2)
29%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
7 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On May 28 2014 04:22 Zealously wrote: Guys you should watch Hunter x Hunter
On May 28 2014 04:20 Undead1993 wrote:
On May 28 2014 04:19 THELEHGOTERRAN wrote: This is why you don't play mech
except when you are bbyonjwa, then you are able to do anything you want
I approve of this statement
Is that a general comment, or does this have to do with anything going on in the game?
It has nothing at all to do with this game, but I'm a nice person and I thought I'd bring attention to the fact that it's a great thing to do. Like stuchiu says, we talk about a little of everything in these threads.
On May 28 2014 04:37 AlternativeEgo wrote: I looked up that "hunter x hunter" and it is a cartoon. Cartoons are for kids. Now let's talk about this video game competition.
i too get angry when the young people are interested in something i don't like
On May 28 2014 04:37 AlternativeEgo wrote: I looked up that "hunter x hunter" and it is a cartoon. Cartoons are for kids. Now let's talk about this video game competition.
Legend of Aang/Korra is amazing. Pokémon is ok. Rest is lol
On May 28 2014 04:37 AlternativeEgo wrote: I looked up that "hunter x hunter" and it is a cartoon. Cartoons are for kids. Now let's talk about this video game competition.
On May 28 2014 04:37 AlternativeEgo wrote: I looked up that "hunter x hunter" and it is a cartoon. Cartoons are for kids. Now let's talk about this video game competition.
Legend of Aang/Korra is amazing. Pokémon is ok. Rest is lol
I can ban you without needing someone to approve it first now you know
On May 28 2014 04:42 scypio wrote: watching SH becomes more painful than watching infestor/BL. The latter at least had to move around a bit.
I don't mind this game personally. Its not mass swarmhosts, there are combinations of units being used together, and the mutas are attacking different positions.
On May 28 2014 04:37 AlternativeEgo wrote: I looked up that "hunter x hunter" and it is a cartoon. Cartoons are for kids. Now let's talk about this video game competition.
Legend of Aang/Korra is amazing. Pokémon is ok. Rest is lol
I can ban you without needing someone to approve it first now you know
I took a break from watching SC2 two weeks ago. Now I remember why I did it. I came to see how the new hellbat change impacted TvZ, but this is not motivating me to watch again. Well hey, at least they fixed ZvZ.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
8%
★★★- Good game (2)
15%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (7)
54%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
13 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
So in other words, some of the games are going to be extreme this year
My favorite phrase, pursuant to a European politician is about Berlusconi, while not about the EU Parliament in particular, it was about the fact that he is so crooked he sleeps on a spiral staircase.
On May 28 2014 04:49 Frex wrote: I took a break from watching SC2 two weeks ago. Now I remember why I did it. I came to see how the new hellbat change impacted TvZ, but this is not motivating me to watch again. Well hey, at least they fixed ZvZ.
Patch came out like 5 days ago. You'd need to take 2 more weeks of break if you really want to see how the hellbat change affected TvZ. Particulary in a foreigner tournament.
On May 28 2014 04:53 YourMom wrote: Snute can stop that army.
tbh Snute was supposed to lose the game fourth and Happy threw miserably that. It was also Alterzim Stronghold.. infinite space. I really hate how Blizzard is still fine with this type of design in some match ups (build invincible army or lose before that)
On May 28 2014 04:53 PepsiMaxxxx wrote: Don't blame the tediousness on Swarm hosts, it's all on Happy.
It's all on Golden. It was his job to break Happy.
so if his timing fails/is defended and he doesn't win it's his responsibility to immediately ragequit instead of transitioning into the only thing left he can do
same way protoss tells us the game is balanced without swarm hosts, ok
On May 28 2014 04:53 PepsiMaxxxx wrote: Don't blame the tediousness on Swarm hosts, it's all on Happy.
It's all on Golden. It was his job to break Happy.
so if his timing fails/is defended and he doesn't win it's his responsibility to immediately ragequit instead of transitioning into the only thing left he can do
same way protoss tells us the game is balanced without swarm hosts, ok
I know, right? How can reaching late-game not be an auto-win?
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
38%
★★★- Good game (1)
13%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
13%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On May 28 2014 05:05 stuchiu wrote: I hope you all learned your lesson about including the words foriegn Terran train hype or hope in one sentence now.
On May 28 2014 05:07 ptbl wrote: Bunny, Hero, and now TLO falls in WCS. Seems like after Hero won WCS NA Season 1, WCS has been the bane of Liquid. They can't get anything going.
So disappointed now. Expectations were high (much higher compared to group F). TLO played way below par I feel. Happy was one map away from winning the group, but ends up 3rd. Good night Europe, wherever you are...
On May 28 2014 04:51 Heartland wrote: I just saw that Prime were eliminated from any chance of grand finals playoffs in PL. Has Lorning committed suicide yet?
On May 28 2014 04:51 Heartland wrote: I just saw that Prime were eliminated from any chance of grand finals playoffs in PL. Has Lorning committed suicide yet?
They aren't
They just need Coach Park to go Coach Hirai and Prime to go full out SwagHo R2 to make it.
On May 28 2014 04:51 Heartland wrote: I just saw that Prime were eliminated from any chance of grand finals playoffs in PL. Has Lorning committed suicide yet?
They aren't
They just need Coach Park to go Coach Hirai and Prime to go full out SwagHo R2 to make it.
No, Prime have to perform better than MVP did in R2.
On May 28 2014 04:51 Heartland wrote: I just saw that Prime were eliminated from any chance of grand finals playoffs in PL. Has Lorning committed suicide yet?
They aren't
They just need Coach Park to go Coach Hirai and Prime to go full out SwagHo R2 to make it.
No, Prime have to perform better than MVP did in R2.
Yeah, CJ has to get last and Prime first in both play offs and regular round play
On May 28 2014 04:51 Heartland wrote: I just saw that Prime were eliminated from any chance of grand finals playoffs in PL. Has Lorning committed suicide yet?
They aren't
They just need Coach Park to go Coach Hirai and Prime to go full out SwagHo R2 to make it.
No, Prime have to perform better than MVP did in R2.
Well I can't name another coach that has pulled a team of mostly crappy players into such a high standing.
On May 28 2014 04:51 Heartland wrote: I just saw that Prime were eliminated from any chance of grand finals playoffs in PL. Has Lorning committed suicide yet?
They aren't
They just need Coach Park to go Coach Hirai and Prime to go full out SwagHo R2 to make it.
No, Prime have to perform better than MVP did in R2.
Well I can't name another coach that has pulled a team of mostly crappy players into such a high standing.
On May 28 2014 04:51 Heartland wrote: I just saw that Prime were eliminated from any chance of grand finals playoffs in PL. Has Lorning committed suicide yet?
They aren't
They just need Coach Park to go Coach Hirai and Prime to go full out SwagHo R2 to make it.
No, Prime have to perform better than MVP did in R2.
Well I can't name another coach that has pulled a team of mostly crappy players into such a high standing.
Coach Park with CJ in R3
Meh, I'm still convinced that it is rather like this: Coach Park didn't manage to pull a team of mostly great players down to a low standing in R3
On May 28 2014 04:51 Heartland wrote: I just saw that Prime were eliminated from any chance of grand finals playoffs in PL. Has Lorning committed suicide yet?
They aren't
They just need Coach Park to go Coach Hirai and Prime to go full out SwagHo R2 to make it.
No, Prime have to perform better than MVP did in R2.
Well I can't name another coach that has pulled a team of mostly crappy players into such a high standing.
Coach Park with CJ in R3
Meh, I'm still convinced that it is rather like this: Coach Park didn't manage to pull a team of mostly great players down to a low standing in R3
CJ has 1 great player 1 above average player and then a team of just middle of the road koreans